AzTrials
AzTrials

Cancer PainPhase 4NCT00766831

An Efficacy and Safety Study of Hydromorphone Oral Osmotic System (OROS) in Korean Participants With Cancer Pain

A Phase 4 study testing Hydromorphone in people with Cancer Pain, run by Janssen Korea, Ltd., Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this is study to evaluate improvement of sleep disorder caused by cancer pain after the administration of Hydromorphone Oral Osmotic System (OROS) in Korean participants with cancer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Cancer Pain
What is being tested?
Hydromorphone
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
190 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Oct 2008to Jun 2010
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants who are currently receiving strong opioid analgesic (drug used to control pain) for their cancer pain management
  • Participants whose arithmetical mean of sleep disturbance caused by pain measured with Numeric Rating Scale for 3 days before Visit 2 (Day 1) is equal to or greater than 4 points
  • Participants who are able, in the opinion of Investigator, to comply fully with the trial requirements including completion of the Korean-Brief Pain Inventory
  • Participants who have signed an informed consent form

Who cannot join

  • Participants with pain who are not likely to response to opioid analgesics
  • Participants who are intolerant or hypersensitive to hydromorphone
  • Participants with the following digestive tract diseases which is serious enough to interfere action of an oral analgesic; diseases which can affect absorption and transit of oral drugs such as dysphagia (trouble swallowing), vomiting, no bowel movement, intestinal obstruction, serious intestinal stenosis (narrowing of a duct, tube, or 1 of the valves in the heart), etc
  • Female participants of childbearing potential who are pregnant or lactating, seeking pregnancy, or failing to take adequate contraceptive precautions
  • Participants in whom the risks of treatment with morphine/hydromorphone outweigh the potential benefits, including such risk categories as raised intracranial pressure, hypotension, hypothyroidism, asthma, compromised respiratory function compromised liver function, convulsive (an involuntary contraction or series of contractions of the voluntary muscles) disorder and Addison disease (disorder that occurs when the adrenal glands do not produce enough of their hormones)

About this study

Official title: Hydromorphone OROS in Korean Cancer Patients: Evaluation of Its Clinical Usefulness in Improvement of Sleep Disturbance

The purpose of this is study to evaluate improvement of sleep disorder caused by cancer pain after the administration of Hydromorphone Oral Osmotic System (OROS) in Korean participants with cancer.

Read the detailed description

This is an open-label (all people know the identity of the intervention), multi-center (conducted in more than 1 center), prospective (study following participants forward in time) dose-ascending study to evaluate the clinical usefulness of hydromorphone OROS in improvement of sleep disturbance caused by cancer pain.Total duration of study will be 3 weeks. The study consists of 3 phases: Screening phase (up to 1 week), Treatment phase (2 weeks), and Extension phase (12 weeks). The study will include 6 visits: Day -7, Day 1, Day 15, Day 43, Day 71, and Day 99. During screening phase, potential participants will receive strong oral (long acting) opioid analgesic (for 7 days) until Day 1 and the participants will be evaluated for participation in clinical study on Day 1. During treatment phase, participants will receive hydromorphone OROS (8 milligram [mg] to greater than or equal to 32 mg), once daily for 2 weeks, and the dose will be adjusted every 2 days from Day 3 at the Investigator's discretion and according to the strong oral (long acting) opioid analgesic administered from screening phase to Day 1 (the initial dose of the study drug will be determined by converting the dose of the previously administered analgesic to that of the daily dose of oral morphine with the equivalent analgesic effect to the study drug [dose with equivalent analgesic effect; Hydromorphone OROS dose: oral morphine dose =1:5]). Participants who completed treatment phase and suffer from continuing cancer pain will be enrolled to extension phase and study drug will be administered as per Investigator discretion for 99 days. Participants primarily will be evaluated for improvement in sleep disturbance measured by Korean Brief Pain Inventory (KBPI). Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the study.

Conditions
Cancer Pain
Being tested
Hydromorphone
Keywords
Cancer pain, Hydromorphone OROS, Jurnista
Medical subject headings
Cancer Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • HydromorphoneDrug

    Also called Jurnista

    Participants will receive hydromorphone OROS (8 milligram [mg] to greater than or equal to 32 mg) once daily for 2 weeks, in a dose adjusted according to previously administered strong oral opioid analgesic (dose with equivalent analgesic effect; hydromorphone OROS dose: oral morphine dose=1:5) hydromorphone OROS will be continued as per Investigator's discretion for additional 84 days of extension phase.

Study groups in NCT00766831
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Hydromorphone OROSExperimentalParticipants will receive hydromorphone OROS (8 milligram [mg] up to greater than or equal to 32 mg) once daily for 2 weeks, in a dose adjusted according to previously administered strong oral opioid analgesic (dose with equivalent analgesic effect; hydromorphone OROS dose: oral morphine dose=1:5) hydromorphone OROS will be continued as per Investigator's discretion for additional 84 days of extension phase.
Receives: Drug: Hydromorphone

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Treatment Response in Sleep Disturbance Caused by Cancer Pain

    Percentage of treatment response in sleep disturbance caused by cancer pain was reported. Treatment response in sleep disturbance was measured by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 0=no disturbance to 10=extreme disturbance.

    Measured: Day 15 or Early withdrawal

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Sleep Disturbance Questionnaire: Analgesic Administration

    The Investigator evaluated sleep disturbance through the participant's answers to below question in "yes" or "no" response: 'Did you need to take an analgesic for pain relief in order to go to sleep last night?'

    Measured: Baseline and Day 15

  2. Sleep Disturbance Questionnaire: Frequency of Waking Up

    The Investigator evaluated sleep disturbance through the participant's answers to below question: How many times did you wake up while sleeping late night (frequency [once, 2 times, 3 times, 4 times, 5 times, couldn't fall asleep at all] of waking up due to pain last night).

    Measured: Baseline and Day 15

  3. Sleep Disturbance Questionnaire: Wake up Due to Unbearable Pain

    The Investigator evaluated sleep disturbance through the participant's answers to below question in "yes" or "no" response: 'Did you wake up because of unbearable pain this morning?'

    Measured: Baseline and Day 15

  4. Korean Brief Pain Inventory (K-BPI) Questionnaire Score

    K-BPI is a questionnaire designed to measure the degree of pain severity and the impact of pain in performing daily routines. K-BPI comprises of 9 items out of which 6 items were assessed. Score of each item ranges from 0 to 10, where 0=no pain/impact and 10=severe pain/impact. The 6 items that were assessed are: a) level of pain worst in last 24 hours; b) level of pain weakest in last 24 hours; c) level of pain average in last 24 hours; d) level of pain right now; e) how much pain reduced with the therapy taken; sixth item was further classified into 7 categories: i) general activities ii) mood iii) ambulatory ability iv) routine works v) interpersonal relation vi) sleep vii) life enjoyment.

    Measured: Baseline and Day 15

  5. Participant's Pain Intensity

    Participant's pain intensity was measured using NRS ranging from 0=no pain to 10=unimaginable extreme pain. Participants maintained pain diary for 3 days before Baseline until Day 15 and pain intensity was measured twice daily (morning and afternoon). Here average pain intensity is reported. Average pain intensity was calculated as mean of morning pain intensity and evening pain intensity for each baseline and Day 15.

    Measured: Baseline and Day 15

  6. Number of Times the Short-Acting Opioid Analgesic Administered for Breakthrough Pain

    The participants recorded the frequency of short acting opioid analgesic taken for treating breakthrough pain among the pains suffered by the participants. Here frequency means number of times the short-acting opioid analgesic administered for breakthrough pain from baseline to Day 15

    Measured: Baseline and Day 15

  7. Number of Participants With Each Grade of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Score

    The ECOG performance status was used to evaluate participant's disease progression and the effect of the disease on the participant's activities of daily living. ECOG performance status score ranges from Grade 0 to 4, where Grade 0=Fully active, Grade 1=restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, Grade 2=ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities, Grade 3=capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair, and Grade 4=completely disabled.

    Measured: Baseline and Day 15

  8. Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-Improvement) Score

    The CGI-Improvement score evaluates how much the participant's condition is improved compared to Baseline. The score ranges from 1 to 7, where 1=improved very much, 2=Improved much, 3=Improved a little, 4=No change, 5=Aggravated a little,6=Aggravated much and 7=aggravated very much.

    Measured: Day 15

  9. Number of Participants in Each Category of Global Assessment of Overall Efficacy of Study Drug Assessed by Participants

    Participants evaluated overall efficacy of study drug according to the rating of 1=not effective, 2=average, 3=effective, 4=very effective and 5=extremely effective.

    Measured: Day 15

  10. Number of Participants in Each Category of Global Assessment of Overall Efficacy of Study Drug Assessed by Investigators

    Investigator evaluated overall efficacy of study drug according to the rating of 1=not effective, 2=average, 3=effective, 4=very effective and 5=extremely effective.

    Measured: Day 15

  11. Percentage of Participants Who Preferred the Oral Long-Action Opioids Analgesic or Study Drug

    Participant's preferences between the oral long-action opioids analgesic and the study drug was reported.

    Measured: Day 15

  12. Percentage of Participants With Different Reasons for Their Preference for Oral Long-Action Opioids Analgesic or Study Drug

    Participants reasons for preference between the long acting oral opioid analgesic and the study drug administered were reported. Reasonos for preferences were "I experienced a certain pain relief effect during the administration of the drug", "I didn't wake up due to pain while sleeping", "It was more convenient because the number of administrations was reduced", "I could reduce the administration of short acting narcotic analgesic to treat breakthrough pain" and "other".

    Measured: Day 15

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Oct 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2008
  3. Primary completionJun 2010
  4. Study completionJun 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
190 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00766831
Sponsor's protocol ID
CR014806
Other IDs
HYD-KOR-4002
Status last verified
Sep 2013
First submitted
3 Oct 2008
Last updated
23 Oct 2013
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Hydromorphone in people with Cancer Pain, run by Janssen Korea, Ltd., Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Oct 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Aug 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Treatment Response in Sleep Disturbance Caused by Cancer Pain (time frame: Day 15 or Early withdrawal). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Oct 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in