AzTrials
AzTrials

Recurrent Malignant Pleural Effusion.Phase 4NCT00789087

Talc Pleurodesis in Patients With Recurrent Malignant Pleural Effusion

A Phase 4 study testing Videothoracoscopic talc poudrage (VT). and Talc slurry through a chest tube (DT). in people with Recurrent Malignant Pleural Effusion., run by University of Sao Paulo at 1 site in Brazil.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to analyze and compare radiological lung expansion after talc pleurodesis performed either by videothoracoscopy or chest tube and correlate it with clinical outcome. Secondary endpoints evaluated were: clinical efficacy, safety, quality of life and survival. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
Conditions the study is for
Recurrent Malignant Pleural Effusion.
What is being tested?
Videothoracoscopic talc poudrage (VT). and Talc slurry through a chest tube (DT).
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
Jan 2005to Jan 2008
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Malignant pleural effusion confirmed by cytological analysis of pleural fluid and/or pleural biopsy;
  • Recurrent pleural effusion with symptoms;
  • Chest radiography with lung expansion after thoracocentesis;
  • Karnofsky Performance Status > 70;
  • Written informed patient consent were obtained.

Who cannot join

  • Hemorrhagic diathesis;
  • Active infection;
  • Cutaneous infiltration;
  • Patients unable to understand the questionnaires;
  • Age: > 90 yo or < 18 yo.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Brazil1 site
  • University of São Paulo Medical School

    São Paulo, São Paulo, 01246903

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: Analysis of Clinical and Radiological Results of Two Methods of Talc Pleurodesis in Patients With Recurrent Malignant Pleural Effusion

The purpose of this study is to analyze and compare radiological lung expansion after talc pleurodesis performed either by videothoracoscopy or chest tube and correlate it with clinical outcome. Secondary endpoints evaluated were: clinical efficacy, safety, quality of life and survival.

Read the detailed description

Talc pleurodesis is the most popular method to control symptoms of recurrent malignant pleural effusion. The intrapleural talc delivery may be by videothoracoscopy and talc poudrage or talc slurry thought a chest tube and the best method is still controversial. Although the lung expansion is a key criteria for success of the procedure, its characteristics are poorly studied.

Patients were enrolled into two groups: videothoracoscopic talc poudrage (VT) and talc slurry through a chest tube (DT). Lung expansion was evaluated through chest CT scans obtained obtained in the first 7 days and 1, 3 and 6 months after pleurodesis. All examinations were revised by two independent observers. Clinical efficacy (considered as lack of new procedures during follow up), complications, drainage duration, hospital stay and quality of life (general and specific questionnaires) were also analyzed.

Being tested
Videothoracoscopic talc poudrage (VT)., Talc slurry through a chest tube (DT).
Keywords
Pleural Effusion., Talc., Pleurodesis., Quality of Life., Thoracoscopy.
Medical subject headings
Pleural Effusion, Malignant, Pleural Effusion

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Videothoracoscopic talc poudrage (VT).Procedure or surgery

    Also called Videothoracoscopic talc poudrage

    Videothoracoscopic talc poudrage

  • Talc slurry through a chest tube (DT).Procedure or surgery

    Also called Talc slurry through a chest tube

    Talc slurry through a chest tube

Study groups in NCT00789087
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1. Videothoracoscopic talc poudrage (VT)Active comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: Videothoracoscopic talc poudrage (VT).
2. Talc slurry through a chest tube (DT)Active comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: Talc slurry through a chest tube (DT).

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Radiological lung expansion after talc pleurodesis and clinical outcome

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Clinical efficacy, safety, quality of life and survival.

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Nov 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2005
  3. Primary completionJan 2008
  4. Study completionJan 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00789087
Sponsor's protocol ID
1105/04
Status last verified
Nov 2008
First submitted
10 Nov 2008
Last updated
11 Nov 2008
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Terra RM, Junqueira JJM, Teixeira LR, Vargas FS, Pego-Fernandes PM, Jatene FB. Is full postpleurodesis lung expansion a determinant of a successful outcome after talc pleurodesis? Chest. 2009 Aug;136(2):361-368. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-2448. Epub 2009 Apr 6.

    PubMed 19349389

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Videothoracoscopic talc poudrage (VT). and Talc slurry through a chest tube (DT). in people with Recurrent Malignant Pleural Effusion., run by University of Sao Paulo at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Nov 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Radiological lung expansion after talc pleurodesis and clinical outcome (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00789087, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Nov 2008.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in