Esophageal CancerPhase 2EXCELNCT00815308
Erbitux Combined With Chemo-radiotherapy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
A Phase 2 study testing cetuximab (Erbitux), Paclitaxel and Cisplatin in people with Esophageal Cancer, run by Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the treatment of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)with cetuximab in combination with paclitaxel, cisplatin and radiation improve clinical outcomes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Esophageal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- cetuximab (Erbitux), Paclitaxel and Cisplatin
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 55 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- Jan 2009to Jul 2010
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Inpatients or outpatients, ≥ 18 years of age
- Histologically confirmed primary (non-recurrent) ESCC fulfilling one of the following criteria (AJCC Staging System)
- cervical esophageal carcinoma, stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ
- upper thoracic esophageal carcinoma, stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ, or mid-thoracic esophageal carcinoma, stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ,which is medically unfit for surgery, surgery been refused and patient medically able to tolerate chemo-radiation.
- Evidence of unidimensional measurable disease as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST).
- ECOG Performance status of 0-1
Show all 12Show fewer
- Effective contraception for both male and female patients if the risk of conception exists
- Adequate bone marrow reserves: neutrophil (ANC) count ≥ 1500 /mm^3, platelet count ≥ 100,000 /mm^3, hemoglobin ≥ 9 g/dl
- Adequate renal function: serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 mg/dl and/or calculated creatinine clearance ≥ 60 ml/min
- Adequate hepatic function: bilirubin level ≤ 1.5 x ULN, ASAT \& ALST ≤ 1.5 x ULN
- Tumor tissue available for KRAS biomarker test
- Signed written informed consent prior to study entry
Who cannot join
- Previous chest radiotherapy, systemic chemotherapy, and major esophageal surgery
- Concurrent chronic systemic immune therapy, targeted therapy not indicated in this study protocol
- Multiple primary carcinomas of the esophagus
- Pregnancy (confirmed by serum or urine β-HCG) or lactation period;
- Uncontrolled diabetes, hypertension, and severe cardiac or pulmonary disease
- Unable to comprehend the study requirements or who are not likely to comply with the study parameters;
Show all 9Show fewer
- Distant metastasis
- Second malignancy, except for curable non-melanoma skin cancer, cervical cancer in situ, or malignant disease, free for ≥ 5 years
- Known grade 3 or 4 allergic reaction to any of the study treatment
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute
Jinan, Shandong, 250117
About this study
Official title: An Open-labeled Study to Evaluate Efficacy of Combining Erbitux Plus Concurrent Chemo-radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC)
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the treatment of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)with cetuximab in combination with paclitaxel, cisplatin and radiation improve clinical outcomes.
Read the detailed description
Esophageal cancer is the sixth leading cause of cancer death worldwide.
Over the past 2 decades, well-designed clinical trials have documented the clinical benefits of combination of chemotherapy and radiation for localized esophageal cancer, either as primary therapy or in neoadjuvant setting.
Paclitaxel, a radiation sensitizer, has important single-agent activity in esophageal cancer. Paclitaxel-based chemoradiation has been the framework for the recent Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trials of nonoperative management of esophageal cancer.
Accumulating clinical evidence suggests that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) represents a viable target in the treatment of esophageal cancer. EGFR expression is associated with poor prognosis. Cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody, binds specifically to EGFR on both normal and tumor cells and competitively inhibits the binding of EGF and other ligands, such as transforming growth factor (TGF)-α.
Preclinical models have suggested synergy between cetuximab, paclitaxel, cisplatin and radiation. For patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer, the combination of cetuximab and radiation has demonstrated both response and survival benefit.
With all these, the investigators hypothesize that treatment of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)with cetuximab in combination with paclitaxel, cisplatin and radiation may further improve clinical outcomes. This trial results will be important as it may support further studies for setting the new treatment standard for ESCC.
- Conditions
- Esophageal Cancer
- Being tested
- cetuximab (Erbitux), Paclitaxel, Cisplatin, Radiation
- Keywords
- Therapeutic, Drug Therapy, combination, Radiotherapy
- Medical subject headings
- Esophageal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
cetuximab (Erbitux)Drug
Also called erbitux
Cetuximab,injection,loading dose400 mg/m^2,(Day1 in Week1) followed by 250 mg/m^2(Day1, every week for Weeks 2-8)
PaclitaxelDrug
Paclitaxel,injection,loading dose 45 mg/m^2,(Day1 in every week for Weeks 2-8)
CisplatinDrug
Cisplatin,injection,loading dose 20 mg/m^2,(Day1 in every week for Weeks 2-8)
RadiationRadiation
Also called Conformal Radiotherapy, Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy
Radiation, External beam therapy, total 59.4 Gy , 33 fractions, 1.8 Gy per fraction.(Day 1-Day 5 in every week 2-week 8).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| cetuximab, concurrent chemo-radiotherapy | Experimental | Cetuximab, injection, loading dose400 mg/m^2,(Day1 in Week1) followed by 250 mg/m^2(Day1, every week for Weeks 2-8) Paclitaxel, injection,45 mg/m^2 (Day 1, every week for Weeks 2-8) Cisplatin, injection,20 mg/m^2 (Day 1, every week for Weeks 2-8) radiation therapy, 59.4 Gy, 1.8 Gy/33 fractions,1 fraction daily, Days 1-5 every week for Weeks 2-7, and Days 1-3 for Week 8 Receives: Drug: cetuximab (Erbitux); Drug: Paclitaxel; Drug: Cisplatin; Radiation: Radiation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Overall Response Rate (RR)
The overall response rate was defined as the numbers of patients with a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). CR was defined as no target lesion at follow-up computed tomography scan and barium swallow examination 3-6 weeks after completion of chemo-radiation. PR was defined at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Measured: 1 to 3 month after therapy
Secondary outcomes (5)
Number of Participants With Toxicity
All patients were regularly monitored for possible adverse events, which were graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 3.0.
Measured: Every week during treatment and 1 month after therapy
Participants With Overall Survival (OS) at 1 Year
Measured: 1 year from the date of diagnosis
Participants With Overall Survival (OS) at 3 Year
Measured: 3 year from the date of diagnosis
Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Measured: Recurrence or metastasis from the date of diagnosis
Number of Participants With K-ras Gene Mutation
DNA was extracted from tumor specimens.Screened for the presence of KRAS codon 12 and 13 mutations using a PCR clamping and melting curve technique. PCR amplification of the wild-type KRAS sequence was suppressed in this process by the incorporation in the reaction mix of a locked nucleic-acid oligomer16 spanning codons 12 and 13 of the KRAS gene. Post-PCR hybridization and melting curve analysis using fluorescently tagged oligonucleotides incorporated in the original PCR reaction permitted the identification and discrimination of distinct KRAS codon 12 and 13 missense mutations.
Measured: 07/29/2010-09/30/2010
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Dec 2008 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2009
- Primary completionJul 2010
- Study completionJul 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Esophageal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 55 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Hebei Fourth Hospital, Jiangsu Cancer Institute & Hospital, RenJi Hospital, Zhengzhou University, West China Hospital
- Investigators
- Jin Ming Yu, PH.D, M.D, Study chair, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00815308
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SDRTC-0901
- Acronym
- EXCEL
- Status last verified
- Jul 2009
- First submitted
- 29 Dec 2008
- Last updated
- 8 Feb 2011
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Urba SG, Orringer MB, Turrisi A, Iannettoni M, Forastiere A, Strawderman M. Randomized trial of preoperative chemoradiation versus surgery alone in patients with locoregional esophageal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Jan 15;19(2):305-13. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.2.305.
PubMed 11208820Kelsen DP, Ginsberg R, Pajak TF, Sheahan DG, Gunderson L, Mortimer J, Estes N, Haller DG, Ajani J, Kocha W, Minsky BD, Roth JA. Chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone for localized esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1998 Dec 31;339(27):1979-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199812313392704.
PubMed 9869669Bosset JF, Gignoux M, Triboulet JP, Tiret E, Mantion G, Elias D, Lozach P, Ollier JC, Pavy JJ, Mercier M, Sahmoud T. Chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone in squamous-cell cancer of the esophagus. N Engl J Med. 1997 Jul 17;337(3):161-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199707173370304.
PubMed 9219702Walsh TN, Noonan N, Hollywood D, Kelly A, Keeling N, Hennessy TP. A comparison of multimodal therapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1996 Aug 15;335(7):462-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199608153350702.
PubMed 8672151Herskovic A, Martz K, al-Sarraf M, Leichman L, Brindle J, Vaitkevicius V, Cooper J, Byhardt R, Davis L, Emami B. Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in patients with cancer of the esophagus. N Engl J Med. 1992 Jun 11;326(24):1593-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199206113262403.
PubMed 1584260Raben D, Helfrich B, Bunn PA Jr. Targeted therapies for non-small-cell lung cancer: biology, rationale, and preclinical results from a radiation oncology perspective. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;59(2 Suppl):27-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.01.054.
PubMed 15142632Langer CJ. Emerging role of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition in therapy for advanced malignancy: focus on NSCLC. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Mar 1;58(3):991-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.09.099.
PubMed 14967461Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J, Azarnia N, Shin DM, Cohen RB, Jones CU, Sur R, Raben D, Jassem J, Ove R, Kies MS, Baselga J, Youssoufian H, Amellal N, Rowinsky EK, Ang KK. Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med. 2006 Feb 9;354(6):567-78. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa053422.
PubMed 16467544
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Feb 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Open-labeled Study to Evaluate Efficacy of Combining Erbitux Plus Concurrent Chemo-radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00815308
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EXCEL / SDRTC-0901
- Conditions
- Esophageal Cancer
- Keywords
- Therapeutic, Drug Therapy, combination, Radiotherapy
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 55 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Shandong Cancer Hospital and InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Hebei Fourth Hospital, Jiangsu Cancer Institute & Hospital, RenJi Hospital, Zhengzhou University, West China Hospital
- Study start
- Jan 2009
- Primary completion
- Jul 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Dec 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 3 Feb 2011
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the treatment of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)with cetuximab in combination with paclitaxel, cisplatin and radiation improve clinical outcomes.
Detailed description
Esophageal cancer is the sixth leading cause of cancer death worldwide.
Over the past 2 decades, well-designed clinical trials have documented the clinical benefits of combination of chemotherapy and radiation for localized esophageal cancer, either as primary therapy or in neoadjuvant setting.
Paclitaxel, a radiation sensitizer, has important single-agent activity in esophageal cancer. Paclitaxel-based chemoradiation has been the framework for the recent Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trials of nonoperative management of esophageal cancer.
Accumulating clinical evidence suggests that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) represents a viable target in the treatment of esophageal cancer. EGFR expression is associated with poor prognosis. Cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody, binds specifically to EGFR on both normal and tumor cells and competitively inhibits the binding of EGF and other ligands, such as transforming growth factor (TGF)-α.
Preclinical models have suggested synergy between cetuximab, paclitaxel, cisplatin and radiation. For patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer, the combination of cetuximab and radiation has demonstrated both response and survival benefit.
With all these, the investigators hypothesize that treatment of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)with cetuximab in combination with paclitaxel, cisplatin and radiation may further improve clinical outcomes. This trial results will be important as it may support further studies for setting the new treatment standard for ESCC.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| cetuximab, concurrent chemo-radiotherapy | Experimental | Drug: cetuximab (Erbitux), Drug: Paclitaxel, Drug: Cisplatin, Radiation: RadiationCetuximab, injection, loading dose400 mg/m^2,(Day1 in Week1) followed by 250 mg/m^2(Day1, every week for Weeks 2-8) Paclitaxel, injection,45 mg/m^2 (Day 1, every week for Weeks 2-8) Cisplatin, injection,20 mg/m^2 (Day 1, every week for Weeks 2-8) radiation therapy, 59.4 Gy, 1.8 Gy/33 fractions,1 fraction daily, Days 1-5 every week for Weeks 2-7, and Days 1-3 for Week 8 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Inpatients or outpatients, ≥ 18 years of age
- Histologically confirmed primary (non-recurrent) ESCC fulfilling one of the following criteria (AJCC Staging System)
- Evidence of unidimensional measurable disease as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST).
- ECOG Performance status of 0-1
- Effective contraception for both male and female patients if the risk of conception exists
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Previous chest radiotherapy, systemic chemotherapy, and major esophageal surgery
- Concurrent chronic systemic immune therapy, targeted therapy not indicated in this study protocol
- Multiple primary carcinomas of the esophagus
- Pregnancy (confirmed by serum or urine β-HCG) or lactation period;
- Uncontrolled diabetes, hypertension, and severe cardiac or pulmonary disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| cetuximab (Erbitux)Also: erbituxCetuximab,injection,loading dose400 mg/m^2,(Day1 in Week1) followed by 250 mg/m^2(Day1, every week for Weeks 2-8) | Drug | cetuximab, concurrent chemo-radiotherapy |
| PaclitaxelPaclitaxel,injection,loading dose 45 mg/m^2,(Day1 in every week for Weeks 2-8) | Drug | cetuximab, concurrent chemo-radiotherapy |
| CisplatinCisplatin,injection,loading dose 20 mg/m^2,(Day1 in every week for Weeks 2-8) | Drug | cetuximab, concurrent chemo-radiotherapy |
| RadiationAlso: Conformal Radiotherapy, Intensity Modulated RadiotherapyRadiation, External beam therapy, total 59.4 Gy , 33 fractions, 1.8 Gy per fraction.(Day 1-Day 5 in every week 2-week 8). | Radiation | cetuximab, concurrent chemo-radiotherapy |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Overall Response Rate (RR)
Time frame: 1 to 3 month after therapy
The overall response rate was defined as the numbers of patients with a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). CR was defined as no target lesion at follow-up computed tomography scan and barium swallow examination 3-6 weeks after completion of chemo-radiation. PR was defined at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
5 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With Toxicity
Time frame: Every week during treatment and 1 month after therapy
Participants With Overall Survival (OS) at 1 Year
Time frame: 1 year from the date of diagnosis
Participants With Overall Survival (OS) at 3 Year
Time frame: 3 year from the date of diagnosis
Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: Recurrence or metastasis from the date of diagnosis
Number of Participants With K-ras Gene Mutation
Time frame: 07/29/2010-09/30/2010
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Feb 2011.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 11208820Urba SG, Orringer MB, Turrisi A, Iannettoni M, Forastiere A, Strawderman M. Randomized trial of preoperative chemoradiation versus surgery alone in patients with locoregional esophageal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Jan 15;19(2):305-13. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.2.305.
- Results publication: PubMed 9869669Kelsen DP, Ginsberg R, Pajak TF, Sheahan DG, Gunderson L, Mortimer J, Estes N, Haller DG, Ajani J, Kocha W, Minsky BD, Roth JA. Chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone for localized esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1998 Dec 31;339(27):1979-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199812313392704.
- Results publication: PubMed 9219702Bosset JF, Gignoux M, Triboulet JP, Tiret E, Mantion G, Elias D, Lozach P, Ollier JC, Pavy JJ, Mercier M, Sahmoud T. Chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone in squamous-cell cancer of the esophagus. N Engl J Med. 1997 Jul 17;337(3):161-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199707173370304.
- Results publication: PubMed 8672151Walsh TN, Noonan N, Hollywood D, Kelly A, Keeling N, Hennessy TP. A comparison of multimodal therapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1996 Aug 15;335(7):462-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199608153350702.
- Results publication: PubMed 1584260Herskovic A, Martz K, al-Sarraf M, Leichman L, Brindle J, Vaitkevicius V, Cooper J, Byhardt R, Davis L, Emami B. Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in patients with cancer of the esophagus. N Engl J Med. 1992 Jun 11;326(24):1593-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199206113262403.
- Results publication: PubMed 15142632Raben D, Helfrich B, Bunn PA Jr. Targeted therapies for non-small-cell lung cancer: biology, rationale, and preclinical results from a radiation oncology perspective. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;59(2 Suppl):27-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.01.054.
- Results publication: PubMed 14967461Langer CJ. Emerging role of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition in therapy for advanced malignancy: focus on NSCLC. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Mar 1;58(3):991-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.09.099.
- Results publication: PubMed 16467544Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J, Azarnia N, Shin DM, Cohen RB, Jones CU, Sur R, Raben D, Jassem J, Ove R, Kies MS, Baselga J, Youssoufian H, Amellal N, Rowinsky EK, Ang KK. Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med. 2006 Feb 9;354(6):567-78. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa053422.
Related trials for Esophageal Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Multicenter Prospective Cohort on Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Superficial Esophageal Cancer, Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-08046876 in People With Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors, Bladder Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jin Ming Yu, PH.D, M.D study chair
Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing cetuximab (Erbitux), Paclitaxel and Cisplatin in people with Esophageal Cancer, run by Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Feb 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 Feb 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Overall Response Rate (RR) (time frame: 1 to 3 month after therapy). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00815308, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Feb 2011.