Major Depressive DisorderPhase 4NCT00824044
Quantitative Electroencephalogram (QEEG) Predictors of Response to Psychotherapy Versus Antidepressant Treatment in Depression
A Phase 4 study testing Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Escitalopram in people with Major Depressive Disorder, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this research study is to find out if a test can predict whether someone with depression will get better with treatment. We also want to find out whether there are changes in the brains of depressed patients having different types of treatment (drug therapy vs. talk therapy). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Major Depressive Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Escitalopram
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 39 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jul 2008to Mar 2011
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects will be adults, ages 18 to 75 years.
- Written informed consent
- MDD, current according to the fourth version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (DSM-IV)
- 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-17) score of > 14 at baseline.
- Subjects who are not currently taking any antidepressant or other psychotropic medications and who have been free of these medications for 4 weeks prior to screening visit.
Who cannot join
- Women who are pregnant, lactating, or planning a pregnancy during the study.
- Women of child bearing potential who are not using a medically accepted means of contraception (to include oral contraceptive or implant, condom, diaphragm, spermicide, intrauterine device, tubal ligation, or a partner with vasectomy).
- Any uncontrolled psychiatric disorder.
- Current use of psychotropic medications.
- Psychotic features in the current episode or a history of psychotic features.
- Alcohol or substance abuse or dependence within the past three months.
Show all 15Show fewer
- History of head trauma or seizure disorder.
- History of intolerance of the study medication.
- Failure to respond to escitalopram up to 20 mg for at least 6 weeks.
- Failure to respond to 2 or more adequate antidepressant trials (6 weeks or longer on a therapeutic dose, equivalent to fluoxetine 40mg) in the current episode.
- Currently enrolled in other depression-focused psychotherapy and unwilling to cease treatment.
- Subjects who, per clinical judgment, are not appropriate candidates for CBT or SSRIs.
- History or current diagnosis of the following DSM-IV psychiatric illness: organic mental disorder, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, delusional disorder, psychotic disorders not otherwise specified, bipolar disorder, patients with mood congruent or mood incongruent psychotic features, patients with substance dependence disorders, including alcohol, active within the last 3 months.
- Serious suicide or homicide risk, as assessed by the evaluating clinician or a score of 4 on the third item of the HAM-D.
- Serious or unstable medical illness, including cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, respiratory, endocrine, neurologic or hematologic disease
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
About this study
Official title: QEEG Predictors of Response for Psychotherapy Compared to Pharmacotherapy in Depression
The purpose of this research study is to find out if a test can predict whether someone with depression will get better with treatment. We also want to find out whether there are changes in the brains of depressed patients having different types of treatment (drug therapy vs. talk therapy). We hope that a test called QEEG (Quantitative Electroencephalogram) can tell us if a treatment is going to work, even before the person starts to feel better.
Hypothesis 1: Response to treatment will correlate with changes in QEEG metrics.
Hypothesis 2: QEEG parameters, different from those that predict response to pharmacotherapy, will be associated with response to CBT.
Read the detailed description
To our knowledge, QEEG has not been studied in the prediction of response to CBT, an important and widely used non-pharmacologic approach to treating depression. Establishing QEEG technology as a predictor of response to CBT could help to guide treatment selection for individual patients. It is probable that certain patient populations are more likely to respond to either psychotherapeutic or psychopharmacological interventions, while others may benefit from a combination of treatment modalities. This study will provide preliminary information about the utility of QEEG as a predictor of response in psychotherapy and will furnish the knowledge base of QEEG changes related to clinical variables, providing pilot data for a study in a larger sample. We have hypothesized that clinical response will correlate with changes in QEEG metrics from beginning to two weeks after treatment, and that QEEG parameters, different from those that predict response to pharmacotherapy, will be associated with response to CBT.
- Conditions
- Major Depressive Disorder
- Being tested
- Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), Escitalopram
- Keywords
- Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), Escitalopram, Quantitative EEG (QEEG)
- Medical subject headings
- Depressive Disorder, Major
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)Behavioural
The CBT group will receive weekly 50-minute individual sessions over the course of 12 weeks conducted by experienced therapists who are trained in manual based CBT.
EscitalopramDrug
Also called Lexapro
The medication group will receive open label treatment of escitalopram, 10-20 mg/day, flexible dose, for 12 weeks, and will be seen every two weeks by a study physician.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) | Active comparator | CBT is a manualized therapeutic treatment for depression based on principles of cognitive restructuring and behavioral changes. Receives: Behavioral: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) |
| Escitalopram | Active comparator | Escitalopram or Lexapro is a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) used to treat depression Receives: Drug: Escitalopram |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-17) Scores
The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale is a clinician-rated scale used to rate depression severity. The maximum score is a 50 and the minimum score is a 0, where higher scores indicate greater severity. Scores from 14 to 18 indicate moderately severe depression.
Measured: 12 weeks
Change in Absolute Beta Power in Channel 4
Change between baseline and LOCF in absolute power of the beta wave recorded from channel 4 of the EEG
Measured: 12 weeks
Change in Absolute Theta Power From Channel 1
Change between baseline and LOCF in relative power of the theta wave recorded from channel 1 of the EEG. Relative power refers to the percentage of power in the theta wave compared with the total power in the patient's EEG.
Measured: 12 weeks
Change in Relative Theta Power Channel 3
Change between baseline and LOCF in relative power of the theta wave recorded from channel 3 of the EEG. Relative power refers to the percentage of power in the theta wave compared with the total power in the patient's EEG.
Measured: 12 weeks
Change in Relative Theta Power From Channel 4
Change between baseline and LOCF in relative power of the theta wave recorded from channel 4 of the EEG. Relative power refers to the percentage of power in the theta wave compared with the total power in the patient's EEG.
Measured: 12 weeks
Change in Relative Beta Power From Channel 4
Change between baseline and LOCF in relative power of the beetawave recorded from channel 4 of the EEG. Relative power refers to the percentage of power in the beta wave compared with the total power in the patient's EEG.
Measured: 12 weeks
Change in Absolute Beta Power From the Ear Channel
Change between baseline and LOCF in absolute power of the beta wave recorded from the ear channel of the EEG. The ear channel refers to the average of channels 3 and 4.
Measured: 12 weeks
Change in Relative Theta Power From Temporal Channel
Change between baseline and LOCF in relative power of the theta wave recorded from the temporal channel of the EEG. Relative power refers to the percentage of power in the theta wave compared with the total power in the patient's EEG. The temporal channel refers to the average of channels 1 and 2
Measured: 12 weeks
Change in Relative Theta Power From Ear Channel
Change between baseline and LOCF in relative power of the theta wave recorded from the ear channel of the EEG. Relative power refers to the percentage of power in the theta wave compared with the total power in the patient's EEG. The ear channel refers to the average of channels 3 and 4
Measured: 12 weeks
Percent Change in Relative Theta Power From Week 1 of the Ear Channel
Percent change between baseline and week 1 in relative power of the theta wave recorded from the ear channel of the EEG. Relative power refers to the percentage of power in the theta wave compared with the total power in the patient's EEG. The ear channel refers to the average of channels 3 and 4
Measured: 1 week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Jan 2009 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2008
- Primary completionMar 2011
- Study completionMar 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Major Depressive DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Massachusetts General HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 39 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Amy Farabaugh, PhD, Massachusetts General Hospital
- Investigators
- Amy Farabaugh, Ph.D., Principal investigator, Massachusetts General Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00824044
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2008-P-000838
- Status last verified
- Dec 2017
- First submitted
- 14 Jan 2009
- Last updated
- 5 Jan 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Jan 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- QEEG Predictors of Response for Psychotherapy Compared to Pharmacotherapy in Depression
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00824044
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2008-P-000838
- Conditions
- Major Depressive Disorder
- Keywords
- Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), Escitalopram, Quantitative EEG (QEEG)
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 39 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
- Study start
- Jul 2008
- Primary completion
- Mar 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Jan 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 8 Jan 2013
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this research study is to find out if a test can predict whether someone with depression will get better with treatment. We also want to find out whether there are changes in the brains of depressed patients having different types of treatment (drug therapy vs. talk therapy). We hope that a test called QEEG (Quantitative Electroencephalogram) can tell us if a treatment is going to work, even before the person starts to feel better.
Hypothesis 1: Response to treatment will correlate with changes in QEEG metrics.
Hypothesis 2: QEEG parameters, different from those that predict response to pharmacotherapy, will be associated with response to CBT.
Detailed description
To our knowledge, QEEG has not been studied in the prediction of response to CBT, an important and widely used non-pharmacologic approach to treating depression. Establishing QEEG technology as a predictor of response to CBT could help to guide treatment selection for individual patients. It is probable that certain patient populations are more likely to respond to either psychotherapeutic or psychopharmacological interventions, while others may benefit from a combination of treatment modalities. This study will provide preliminary information about the utility of QEEG as a predictor of response in psychotherapy and will furnish the knowledge base of QEEG changes related to clinical variables, providing pilot data for a study in a larger sample. We have hypothesized that clinical response will correlate with changes in QEEG metrics from beginning to two weeks after treatment, and that QEEG parameters, different from those that predict response to pharmacotherapy, will be associated with response to CBT.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) | Active comparator | Behavioral: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)CBT is a manualized therapeutic treatment for depression based on principles of cognitive restructuring and behavioral changes. |
| Escitalopram | Active comparator | Drug: EscitalopramEscitalopram or Lexapro is a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) used to treat depression |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Subjects will be adults, ages 18 to 75 years.
- Written informed consent
- MDD, current according to the fourth version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (DSM-IV)
- 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-17) score of > 14 at baseline.
- Subjects who are not currently taking any antidepressant or other psychotropic medications and who have been free of these medications for 4 weeks prior to screening visit.
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Women who are pregnant, lactating, or planning a pregnancy during the study.
- Women of child bearing potential who are not using a medically accepted means of contraception (to include oral contraceptive or implant, condom, diaphragm, spermicide, intrauterine device, tubal ligation, or a partner with vasectomy).
- Any uncontrolled psychiatric disorder.
- Current use of psychotropic medications.
- Psychotic features in the current episode or a history of psychotic features.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)The CBT group will receive weekly 50-minute individual sessions over the course of 12 weeks conducted by experienced therapists who are trained in manual based CBT. | Behavioural | Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) |
| EscitalopramAlso: LexaproThe medication group will receive open label treatment of escitalopram, 10-20 mg/day, flexible dose, for 12 weeks, and will be seen every two weeks by a study physician. | Drug | Escitalopram |
Primary outcome
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-17) Scores
Time frame: 12 weeks
The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale is a clinician-rated scale used to rate depression severity. The maximum score is a 50 and the minimum score is a 0, where higher scores indicate greater severity. Scores from 14 to 18 indicate moderately severe depression.
Change in Absolute Beta Power in Channel 4
Time frame: 12 weeks
Change between baseline and LOCF in absolute power of the beta wave recorded from channel 4 of the EEG
Change in Absolute Theta Power From Channel 1
Time frame: 12 weeks
Change between baseline and LOCF in relative power of the theta wave recorded from channel 1 of the EEG. Relative power refers to the percentage of power in the theta wave compared with the total power in the patient's EEG.
Change in Relative Theta Power Channel 3
Time frame: 12 weeks
Change between baseline and LOCF in relative power of the theta wave recorded from channel 3 of the EEG. Relative power refers to the percentage of power in the theta wave compared with the total power in the patient's EEG.
Change in Relative Theta Power From Channel 4
Time frame: 12 weeks
Change between baseline and LOCF in relative power of the theta wave recorded from channel 4 of the EEG. Relative power refers to the percentage of power in the theta wave compared with the total power in the patient's EEG.
Change in Relative Beta Power From Channel 4
Time frame: 12 weeks
Change between baseline and LOCF in relative power of the beetawave recorded from channel 4 of the EEG. Relative power refers to the percentage of power in the beta wave compared with the total power in the patient's EEG.
Change in Absolute Beta Power From the Ear Channel
Time frame: 12 weeks
Change between baseline and LOCF in absolute power of the beta wave recorded from the ear channel of the EEG. The ear channel refers to the average of channels 3 and 4.
Change in Relative Theta Power From Temporal Channel
Time frame: 12 weeks
Change between baseline and LOCF in relative power of the theta wave recorded from the temporal channel of the EEG. Relative power refers to the percentage of power in the theta wave compared with the total power in the patient's EEG. The temporal channel refers to the average of channels 1 and 2
Change in Relative Theta Power From Ear Channel
Time frame: 12 weeks
Change between baseline and LOCF in relative power of the theta wave recorded from the ear channel of the EEG. Relative power refers to the percentage of power in the theta wave compared with the total power in the patient's EEG. The ear channel refers to the average of channels 3 and 4
Percent Change in Relative Theta Power From Week 1 of the Ear Channel
Time frame: 1 week
Percent change between baseline and week 1 in relative power of the theta wave recorded from the ear channel of the EEG. Relative power refers to the percentage of power in the theta wave compared with the total power in the patient's EEG. The ear channel refers to the average of channels 3 and 4
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Jan 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Major Depressive Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Preventive and Personalized Digital Emotion Regulation Skills Intervention to Reduce Depression and Anxiety in Youths With Adverse Childhood Experiences
Adverse Childhood Experience, Depression / Major Depressive Disorder
RecruitingPhase 4
Biomarker-Guided Antidepressant Selection
Depression - Major Depressive Disorder, Treatment-resistant Depression (TRD)
Recruiting
Targeting Network Dysfunction in Apathy of Late-life Depression Using Digital Therapeutics
Major Depressive Disorder, Apathy
RecruitingObservational study
Student Precarity and Psychiatry
Depressive Disorder, Major, Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Acute Intermittent Hypoxia Therapy for Depression
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Amy Farabaugh, Ph.D. principal investigator
Massachusetts General Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Escitalopram in people with Major Depressive Disorder, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Jan 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-17) Scores (time frame: 12 weeks). The study lists 10 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jan 2018.