Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, ChronicPhase 3NCT00824265
Ofatumumab Added to Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide vs Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide Combination in Relapsed Subjects With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
A Phase 3 study testing OFC Infusion and FC infusion in people with Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 135 sites in 18 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ofatumumab added to fludarabine-cyclophosphamide in patients with relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic
- What is being tested?
- OFC Infusion and FC infusion
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 365 participants
- Where
- 135 sitesin 18 countries
- Study dates
- 12 Mar 2009to 25 Oct 2017
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- confirmed and active CLL requiring treatment
- at least one previous treatment for CLL and having achieved a complete or partial remission/response but after a period of 6 or more months, shows evidence of disease progression
- fully active at a minimum or fully capable of selfcare and up and about more than 50% of waking hours
- age 18yrs or older
- signed written informed consent
Who cannot join
- diagnosis of refractory CLL (failure to achieve a complete or partial remission/response or disease progression within 6 months of last anti-CLL treatment
- abnormal/inadequate blood values, liver and kidney function
- certain heart problems, serious significant diseases, AIHA, other current cancers or within the last 5 years
- active or chronic infections
- use of drugs to suppress allergic or inflammatory responses (glucocorticoids)
- CLL transformation
Show all 10Show fewer
- CLL central nervous system involvement
- current participation in other clinical study
- inability to comply with the protocol activities
- lactating or pregnant women or female patients of child-bearing potential (or male patients with such partners) not willing to use adequate contraception
Trial locations and contacts
135 sites in 18 countries.
135 sites in 18 countries
Germany16 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Dresden, Saxony, 01307
Novartis Investigative Site
Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 45122
Novartis Investigative Site
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 65929
Novartis Investigational Site
Hamburg, 22767
Novartis Investigative Site
Hanover, Lower Saxony, 30625
Novartis Investigative Site
Karlsruhe, Baden-Wurttemberg, 76137
Novartis Investigative Site
Kassel, Hesse, 34119
Novartis Investigative Site
Lehrte, Lower Saxony, 31275
Novartis Investigational Site
Lübeck, 23562
Novartis Investigative Site
Moenchengladbach-Rheydt, North Rhine-Westphalia, 41239
Novartis Investigative Site
Munich, Bavaria, 81241
Novartis Investigative Site
Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, 48149
Novartis Investigative Site
Saarbrücken, Saarland, 66113
Novartis Investigative Site
Stuttgart, Baden-Wurttemberg, 70190
Novartis Investigative Site
Stuttgart, Baden-Wurttemberg, 70376
Novartis Investigative Site
Villingen-Schwenningen, Baden-Wurttemberg, 78052
United Kingdom13 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Birmingham, B9 5SS
Novartis Investigative Site
Bradford, BD96RJ
Novartis Investigative Site
Burton-on-Trent, DE13 0RB
Novartis Investigative Site
Cottingham, HU16 5JQ
Novartis Investigative Site
Dudley, DY1 2HQ
Novartis Investigative Site
Glasgow, G12 OYN
Novartis Investigative Site
Leicester, LE1 5WW
Novartis Investigative Site
London, SE5 9RS
Novartis Investigative Site
Manchester, M13 9WL
Novartis Investigative Site
Sutton, SM5 1AA
Novartis Investigative Site
Swindon, SN3 6BB
Novartis Investigative Site
Truro, TR1 3LJ
Novartis Investigative Site
Uxbridge, UB8 3NN
Poland11 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bialystok, 15-276
Novartis Investigative Site
Chorzów, 41-500
Novartis Investigative Site
Krakow, 31-501
Novartis Investigative Site
Lodz, 93-510
Novartis Investigative Site
Opole, 45-372
Novartis Investigative Site
Słupsk, 76-200
Novartis Investigative Site
Szczecin, 71-242
Novartis Investigative Site
Warsaw, 02-507
Novartis Investigative Site
Warsaw, 02-776
Novartis Investigative Site
Warsaw, 02-781
Novartis Investigative Site
Wroclaw, 50-367
Ukraine11 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Cherkasy, 18009
Novartis Investigative Site
Dnipropetrovsk, 49102
Novartis Investigative Site
Kharkiv, 61070
Novartis Investigative Site
Khmelnytskyi, 29000
Novartis Investigative Site
Kyiv, 03022
Novartis Investigative Site
Kyiv, 04112
Novartis Investigative Site
Lviv, 79044
Novartis Investigative Site
Makiivka, 86132
Novartis Investigational Site
Simferopil, 95023
Novartis Investigative Site
Vinnitsa, 21018
Novartis Investigational Site
Zhytomyr, 10002
Italy10 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Alessandria, Piedmont, 15100
Novartis Investigative Site
Ascoli Piceno, The Marches, 63100
Novartis Investigative Site
Catania, Sicily, 95124
Novartis Investigative Site
Genoa, Liguria, 16132
Novartis Investigative Site
Novara, Piedmont, 28100
Novartis Investigative Site
Palermo, Sicily, 90146
Novartis Investigative Site
Pavia, Lombardy, 27100
Novartis Investigative Site
Potenza, Basilicate, 85100
Novartis Investigative Site
Rome, Lazio, 00041
Novartis Investigative Site
Rome, Lazio, 00161
Brazil8 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Brasilia, Goiás, 70390-150
Novartis Investigative Site
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90610000
Novartis Investigational Site
Porto Alegre, 91350
Novartis Investigative Site
Rio de Janeiro, 20211-030
Novartis Investigation Site
Rio de Janeiro, 20230-130
Novartis Investigative Site
Rio de Janeiro, 21941-913
Novartis Investigative Site
São Paulo, São Paulo, 05403-000
Novartis Investigational Site
São Paulo, 03102-002
Canada8 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Greenfield Park, Quebec, J4V 2H1
Novartis Investigative Site
Kitchener, Ontario, N2G 1G3
Novartis Investigative Site
Montreal, Quebec, H1T 2M4
Novartis Investigative Site
New Westminster, British Columbia, V3L 3W4
Novartis Investigative Site
Newmarket, Ontario, L3Y 2P9
Novartis Investigative Site
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6
Novartis Investigative Site
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 4H4
Novartis Investigative Site
Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H 5N4
Spain8 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, 08003
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, 08025
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, 08916
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28006
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28040
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28046
Novartis Investigative Site
Salamanca, 37007
Novartis Investigative Site
Seville, 41014
Bulgaria7 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Pleven, 5800
Novartis Investigative Site
Plovdiv, 4000
Novartis Investigative Site
Sofia, 1233
Novartis Investigational Site
Sofia, 1407
Novartis Investigational Site
Sofia, 1606
Novartis Investigative Site
Sofia
Novartis Investigative Site
Varna, 9010
Russia7 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Kazan', 420029
Novartis Investigative Site
Moscow, 115478
Novartis Investigative Site
Moscow, 125101
Novartis Investigative Site
Moscow, 125167
Novartis Investigative Site
Novosibirsk, 630087
Novartis Investigative Site
Saint Petersburg, 197 089
Novartis Investigative Site
St'Petersburg, 191024
United States6 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Boca Raton, Florida, 33486
Novartis Investigative Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60612-3833
Novartis Investigative Site
Clinton, Maryland, 20735
Novartis Investigative Site
Kansas City, Missouri, 64128
Novartis Investigative Site
Memphis, Tennessee, 38120
Novartis Investigative Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
India6 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bangalore, 560029
Novartis Investigative Site
Mumbai, 400012
Novartis Investigative Site
Mumbai, 400014
Novartis Investigative Site
New Delhi, 110029
Novartis Investigative Site
Pune, 411001
Novartis Investigative Site
Vadodara, 390007
Netherlands5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Amersfoort, 3818 ES
Novartis Investigative Site
Nijmegen, 6525 GA
Novartis Investigative Site
Rotterdam, 3015 CE
Novartis Investigative Site
Rotterdam, 3075 EA
Novartis Investigative Site
The Hague, 2545 CH
Greece4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Athens, 11 527
Novartis Investigative Site
Athens, 11527
Novartis Investigative Site
Thessaloniki, 564 29
Novartis Investigative Site
Thessaloniki, 57010
Mexico4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44280
Novartis Investigative Site
Mexico City, CP 14080
Novartis Investigative Site
Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64460
Novartis Investigative Site
Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64710
Romania4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bucharest, 022328
Novartis Investigative Site
Bucharest, 050098
Study site
Iași, 300328
Novartis Investigative Site
Iași, 700483
Taiwan4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Taichung, 404
Novartis Investigative Site
Taipei, 100
Novartis Investigative Site
Taipei, 112
Novartis Investigational Site
Taipei, 404
Thailand3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bangkok, 10330
Novartis Investigative Site
Bangkok, 10400
Novartis Investigative Site
Bangkok, 10700
About this study
Official title: A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Trial of Ofatumumab Added to Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide vs. Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide Combination in Subjects With Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ofatumumab added to fludarabine-cyclophosphamide in patients with relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL).
Read the detailed description
Fludarabine is currently approved for treatment of relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Studies have shown that drugs in combination with fludarabine have shown more effectiveness than fludarabine alone. The addition of ofatumumab to fludarabine-cyclophosphamide combination offers potentially a more effective therapy, without additional toxicity.
The objective of this study was to determine the effect of ofatumumab added to fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia who have responded previously to therapy but later develop progressive disease and require additional therapy.
- Conditions
- Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic
- Being tested
- OFC Infusion, FC infusion
- Keywords
- Relapsed, Oncology, Safety, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Ofatumumab, Efficacy
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, B-Cell, Recurrence, Neoplasms, Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
OFC InfusionDrug
Ofatumumab Cycle 1-Day 1 300mg, Cycle 1-Day 8 1000mg, then Cycles 2-6 Day 1 1000mg every 28 days, Fludarabine 25mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles, Cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles
FC infusionDrug
Fludarabine 25mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles, Cyclophosphamide 250mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ofatumumab, Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide | Experimental | Ofatumumab Cycle 1-Day 1 300mg, Cycle 1-Day 8 1000mg, then Cycles 2-6 Day 1 1000mg every 28 days, Fludarabine 25mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles, Cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles Receives: Drug: OFC Infusion |
| Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide | Active comparator | Fludarabine 25mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles, Cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles Receives: Drug: FC infusion |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression-free Survival (PFS), as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)
PFS is defined as the interval of time between the date of randomization and the earlier of the date of disease progression (progressive disease,PD) and the date of death due to any cause. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlargerd lymph nodes (>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL).
Measured: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug
Secondary outcomes (28)
Overall Survival (OS)
Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Each participant was followed at the time when the last IRC-assessed PFS events occurred. Participants who had not died were censored at the date of last contact.
Measured: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug
Time to Response, as Assessed by the IRC
Time to response is defined as the time from randomization to the first response. Complete Response/remission(CR) all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment: no lymphadenopathy(Ly) > 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/spleenomegaly/constitutional symptoms; neutrophils >1500 per microliter(µL), platelets(PL) >100,000/µL, hemoglobin(Hb) >11 grams/deciliter(g/dL), lymphocytes(LC) <4000/µL, bone marrow(BM) sample must be normocellular for age, <30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. Incomplete bone marrow recovery(CRi): CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. Partial Remission/response(PR): >=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL >100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline(BL), Hb >11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. Nodular PR(nPR): persistent nodules BM.
Measured: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug
Duration of Response (DOR), as Assessed by the IRC
DOR is defined as the time from the initial response (CR, CRi, nPR, or PR) to the first documented sign of PD or death due to any cause. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlargerd lymph nodes (>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.
Measured: From time of initial response to disease progression or death, whichever came first (up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug)
Time to Progression, as Assessed by the IRC
Time to progression is defined as the time from the date of randomization to PD. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlargerd lymph nodes (>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.
Measured: From randomization up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug
Time to Next Therapy
Time to next therapy is defined as the time from randomization until the start of the next-line of treatment. Data are presented for participants who took anti-cancer therapies and participants in the ITT population.
Measured: From the start of study drug until the start of the next anti-CLL therapy (up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug)
Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
The ECOG performance status scales and criteria are used by doctors and researchers to assess how a participant's disease is progressing, how the disease affects the daily living, and determines appropriate treatment and prognosis. ECOG performance status are measured at Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1 and Cycle 6 Day1. During follow period, 1 M after study drug therapy, then every 3 month up to 5 year (up to 60 months). Improvement is defined as a decrease from baseline by at least one step on the ECOG performance status scale (yes/no).
Measured: Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1, Cycle 6 Day1, follow up (FU) at 1Month (M) after study drug therapy, 3M, then every 3 month up to 5 year (up to 60 months)
Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time
Participants with no B-symptoms (B-Sy) (no night sweat, no weight loss, no fever and no extreme fatigue) and at least one indicated B-sy(night sweats, weight loss, fever or extreme fatigue) were presented at Screening, Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and during follow up period at 1 M after study drug therapy, then every 3 M up to 5 year (up to 60 months).
Measured: Screening, Cycle1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and During at 1M after study drug therapy, 3M, then every 3 M up to 5 year (up to 60 months)
Percentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRC
OR is defined as the number of participants achieving an objective response (complete response [CR], CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery [CRi], partial response [PR], and nodular PR [nPR]). CR (all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment): no lymphadenopathy (Ly) > 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/ splenomegaly/ constitutional symptoms; neutrophils >1500 per microliter (µL), platelets (PL) >100,000/µL, hemoglobin (Hb) >11 grams/deciliter (g/dL), lymphocytes (LC) <4000/µL, bone marrow (BM) sample must be normocellular for age, <30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. CRi: CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. PR: >=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL >100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline (BL), Hb >11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. nPR: persistent nodules BM.
Measured: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug
Percentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the Investigator
OR is defined as the number of participants achieving an objective response (complete response [CR], CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery [CRi], partial response [PR], and nodular PR [nPR]). CR (all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment): no lymphadenopathy (Ly) > 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/ splenomegaly/ constitutional symptoms; neutrophils >1500 per microliter (µL), platelets (PL) >100,000/µL, hemoglobin (Hb) >11 grams/deciliter (g/dL), lymphocytes (LC) <4000/µL, bone marrow (BM) sample must be normocellular for age, <30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. CRi: CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. PR: >=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL >100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline (BL), Hb >11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. nPR: persistent nodules BM.
Responder = CR + CRi + NPR + PR
Measured: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug
Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC
MRD refers to small number of leukemic cells that remain in the participant during treatment or after treatment at the time the participant achieved a confirmed CR. MRD analysis was performed for the participants who were suspected of achieving a primary endpoint CR. MDR was performed by flow cytometry on a bone marrow or peripheral blood sample taken at least 2 months after final treatment. MRD negative was defined as less than one CLL cell per 10000 leukocytes.
Measured: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug
Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator
MRD refers to small number of leukemic cells that remain in the participant during treatment or after treatment at the time the participant achieved a confirmed CR. MRD analysis was performed for the participants who were suspected of achieving a primary endpoint CR. MDR was performed by flow cytometry on a bone marrow or peripheral blood sample taken at least 2 months after final treatment. MRD negative was defined as less than one CLL cell per 10000 leukocytes.
Measured: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury.
Measured: From first dose of study medication to 60 Days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE)
Number of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive Result at Indicated Time Points
Serum samples for analysis of HAHA were collected at Baseline (Screening), after 3 cycles were compelted, after 1 M and 6 M post last dose. All samples were first tested in a screening step; positive samples from the screening were further evaluated in a confirmation test. The confirmed positive samples were reported as HAHA-positive.
Measured: From start of study drug until 60 days after the last dose of study medication
Number of Participants With Autoimmune Hemolytic Anaemia (AIHA)
AIHA is a condition where the body's immune system fails to recognize red blood cells as "self" and begins destroying these red blood cells. The number of participants experienced AIHA are presented.
Measured: From first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE)
Number of Participants With Drug Related Infections Reported as AEs and SAEs of Maximum Severity of Grade 3 or Higher
An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury. Maximum severity grades were evaluated according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 (1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; 4, life-threatening/disabling; 5, death).
Measured: From first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE)
Number of Participants With at Least One Grade 3/Grade 4 Myelosuppression Adverse Events
Participants with at least one Grade 3 or Grade 4 myelosuppression (anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia) are presented. Myelosuppression is defined as the decrease in the ability of the bone marrow to produce blood cells. AEs were graded according to NCI common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade, version 3.0 (1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; 4, life-threatening/disabling; 5, death).
Measured: From first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE)
Number of Participants Who Received no Transfusion or at Least One Transfusion During the Study
Participants who received no transfusion and at least one transfusion during the study are presented. Participants who took any blood products or blood supportive care product are included.
Measured: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug
Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM
Immunoglobulins, or antibodies, are large proteins used by the immune system to identify and neutralize foreign particles such as bacteria and viruses. Their normal blood levels indicate proper immune status. Low levels indicate immuno-suppression. Blood samples were collected from each participant and IgA, IgG, and IgM were measured at Baseline, and 1M and 6M after last dose during follow up period.
Measured: Baseline, 1M and 6M follow up
Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+
CD5+ and CD19+ cells were counted by flow cytometry at Screening (Baseline) on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 during the treatment period and after last dose of study drug at 1 M and then every three month follow up up to 45 M. Flow cytometry is a technique for counting and examining microscopic particles with an electronic detection apparatus. Baseline is defined as the assessment closest to but prior to first dose (e.g. day 1 if available, otherwise, screening). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Screening, Cycle 1 Day1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and after last dose at 1 M and then every three months up to 45 M during Follow-up Period
Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+
CD5- CD19+ cells were counted by flow cytometry at Screening (baseline) at Cycle 1 Day1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 during treatment period and after last dose of study drug at 1 M and then every three month up to 45 M during follow up period. Flow cytometry is a technique for counting and examining microscopic particles with an electronic detection apparatus. Baseline is defined as the assessment closest to but prior to first dose (e.g. Day 1 if available otherwise screening). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Screening, Cycle 1 Day1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and after last dose at 1 M and then every three month up to 45 M during Follow-up Period
Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of the following prognostic markers at BL: immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region(IgVH) homology; Zeta-Chain-Associated Protein Kinase 70(ZAP70), VH3-21 usage; Cytogenetics (by fluorescent in situ hybridization [FISH]); beta 2 microglobulin. Cox-regression model was used to explore the relationship between progression-free survival and the following explanatory variables: treatment group, cytogenetics (analyzed by FISH included 6q-,11q-, +12q, 17p-, 13q-) , ZAP-70 (positive, negative or intermediate), VH3-21 usage (Yes and No), IgVH homology (>98%, 97%-98% and <97%), beta 2 microglobulin (>3500 microgram per liter [µg/L] and <=3500 µg/L). For each covariate, a hazard ratio <1 indicates a lower risk on the first effect tested compared with the other effects tested. Cytogenetics Group (based on >=20%)=cytogenetics (CY G).
Measured: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug
Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)
The EORTC QLQ-CLL16 is comprised of 16 questions that address 5 domains of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) important in CLL. There are 4 multi-item scales - fatigue (2 items), treatment side effects ([TSE], 4 items), disease symptoms (disease effects scale [DES], 4 items), and infection scale [IS] (4 items) - and single item scales (social activities [Social Problems (SP) Scale] and future health worries[Future Health (FH) Scale].). These are measured on a four point scale where 1 = not at all and 4 = very much. These scores are transformed to give a rating from 0 - 100, where 0 =no symptoms or problems and 100 = a severe symptoms or problems. EORTC QLQ-CLL16 was assessed at Screening; Cycle 4 Day 1 and during follow-up 1 M and every 3 M up to 24 months. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The Baseline value was obtained at randomization.
Measured: Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month.
Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit
EQ-5D is comprised of a 5-item health status measure and a visual analogue scale (VAS) and is used to generate two scores: the utility score and the thermometer score. The utility score measures mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain, discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Responses to each of the 5 health states are measured on a 3-point scale (level 1 = no problem; level 2 = some or moderate problem(s) and level 3 = unable, or extreme problems). Responses are typically converted into health utilities or valuations on a scale ranging from 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health). The thermometer score ranges from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. A Negative health status describes health state worse than death.Baseline is the most recent, non-missing value prior to or on the first study drug dose date.
Measured: Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month.
Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score
EORTC QLQ-C30, a self-reported, cancer-specific instrument assessing 15 domains: physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning, pain,fatigue, nausea and vomiting, insomnia, loss of appetite, constipation, diarrhea, and dyspnea, financial difficulties and a global health status/quality of life (QOF). Functional and symptoms scales were measured on four point Likert scale where 1 = not at all and 4 = very much. Pat. assessed at Screening; Cycle 4 Day 1 and during follow-up 1 M and every 3 M up to 24 months. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline is the most recent, non-missing value prior to or on the first study treatment dose date. Clinically meaningful changes or minimally important differences (MIDs)have been previously established for the EORTC QLQ C30, and categorized as 'small' if the mean change in scores is 5-10 points, 'moderate' if 10-20 points, and 'large' if >20points.
Measured: Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month.
Mean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ)
The HCQ consists of a single question in which the participant is asked if he/she has experienced any change in his/her health overall since beginning the study. For HCQ, values from 1 to 9 were assigned to the 9 responses in the HCQ questionnaire, ranging from 1 for 'my health is a great deal better' to 9 for 'my health is a great deal worse' since the beginning of the study. Lower scores represent better conditions.
Measured: Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month.
Mean Area Under the Time-concentration Curve (AUC) Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC[0-tau]) of Ofatumumab
Area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) over the dosing interval (AUC[0-tau]) was evaluated. Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide predose and 0.5 h after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, predose samples were collected prior to ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, and 6 (Days 29, 57, 113, and 141).
Measured: Cycle 1 Week 1, Cycle 1 Week 2, Cycles 2,3,4,5,6
Maximum Concentration (Cmax) and Observed Drug Concentration Prior to the Next Dose (Ctrough) of Ofatumumab
Blood samples were collected to assess the plasma concentration of ofatumumab.Cmax and Ctrough were determined. Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide predose and 0.5 h after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, predose samples were collected prior to ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, and 6 (Days 29, 57, 113, and 141).
Measured: Cycle 1 Week 1, Cycle 1 Week 2, Cycles 2,3,4,5
Time of Occurrence of Cmax (Tmax) of Ofatumumab
Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide predose and 0.5 h after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4.
Measured: Cycle 1 Week 1, Cycle 1 Week 2, Cycle 4
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Jan 2009 (estimated)
- Study start12 Mar 2009
- Primary completion17 Dec 2014
- Study completion25 Oct 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, ChronicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Novartis PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 365 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Study director, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00824265
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 110913
- Status last verified
- Jun 2020
- First submitted
- 15 Jan 2009
- Last updated
- 18 Jun 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Publications
Robak T, Warzocha K, Govind Babu K, Kulyaba Y, Kuliczkowski K, Abdulkadyrov K, Loscertales J, Kryachok I, Kloczko J, Rekhtman G, Homenda W, Blonski JZ, McKeown A, Chang CN, Bal V, Lisby S, Gupta IV, Grosicki S. Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes of ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide versus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in the COMPLEMENT 2 trial of patients with relapsed CLL. Leuk Lymphoma. 2017 Jul;58(7):1598-1606. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2016.1253837. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
PubMed 27830957Robak T, Warzocha K, Govind Babu K, Kulyaba Y, Kuliczkowski K, Abdulkadyrov K, Loscertales J, Kryachok I, Kloczko J, Rekhtman G, Homenda W, Blonski JZ, McKeown A, Gorczyca MM, Carey JL, Chang CN, Lisby S, Gupta IV, Grosicki S. Ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results from the COMPLEMENT 2 trial. Leuk Lymphoma. 2017 May;58(5):1084-1093. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2016.1233536. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
PubMed 27731748Jewell RC, Laubscher K, Lewis E, Fang L, Gafoor Z, Carey J, McKeown A, West S, Wright O, Sedoti D, Dixon I, Hottenstein CS, Chan G. Assessment of the effect of ofatumumab on cardiac repolarization. J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Jan;55(1):114-21. doi: 10.1002/jcph.376. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
PubMed 25103870
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Jun 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Trial of Ofatumumab Added to Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide vs. Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide Combination in Subjects With Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00824265
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 110913
- Conditions
- Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic
- Keywords
- Relapsed, Oncology, Safety, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Ofatumumab, Efficacy
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 365 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 12 Mar 2009 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 17 Dec 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 Oct 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Jan 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 25 Jul 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ofatumumab added to fludarabine-cyclophosphamide in patients with relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL).
Detailed description
Fludarabine is currently approved for treatment of relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Studies have shown that drugs in combination with fludarabine have shown more effectiveness than fludarabine alone. The addition of ofatumumab to fludarabine-cyclophosphamide combination offers potentially a more effective therapy, without additional toxicity.
The objective of this study was to determine the effect of ofatumumab added to fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia who have responded previously to therapy but later develop progressive disease and require additional therapy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ofatumumab, Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide | Experimental | Drug: OFC InfusionOfatumumab Cycle 1-Day 1 300mg, Cycle 1-Day 8 1000mg, then Cycles 2-6 Day 1 1000mg every 28 days, Fludarabine 25mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles, Cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles |
| Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide | Active comparator | Drug: FC infusionFludarabine 25mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles, Cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- confirmed and active CLL requiring treatment
- at least one previous treatment for CLL and having achieved a complete or partial remission/response but after a period of 6 or more months, shows evidence of disease progression
- fully active at a minimum or fully capable of selfcare and up and about more than 50% of waking hours
- age 18yrs or older
- signed written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- diagnosis of refractory CLL (failure to achieve a complete or partial remission/response or disease progression within 6 months of last anti-CLL treatment
- abnormal/inadequate blood values, liver and kidney function
- certain heart problems, serious significant diseases, AIHA, other current cancers or within the last 5 years
- active or chronic infections
- use of drugs to suppress allergic or inflammatory responses (glucocorticoids)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| OFC InfusionOfatumumab Cycle 1-Day 1 300mg, Cycle 1-Day 8 1000mg, then Cycles 2-6 Day 1 1000mg every 28 days, Fludarabine 25mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles, Cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles | Drug | Ofatumumab, Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide |
| FC infusionFludarabine 25mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles, Cyclophosphamide 250mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles | Drug | Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide |
Primary outcome
Progression-free Survival (PFS), as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)
Time frame: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug
PFS is defined as the interval of time between the date of randomization and the earlier of the date of disease progression (progressive disease,PD) and the date of death due to any cause. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlargerd lymph nodes (>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL).
28 secondary outcomes
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug
Time to Response, as Assessed by the IRC
Time frame: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug
Duration of Response (DOR), as Assessed by the IRC
Time frame: From time of initial response to disease progression or death, whichever came first (up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug)
Time to Progression, as Assessed by the IRC
Time frame: From randomization up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug
Time to Next Therapy
Time frame: From the start of study drug until the start of the next anti-CLL therapy (up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug)
Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Time frame: Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1, Cycle 6 Day1, follow up (FU) at 1Month (M) after study drug therapy, 3M, then every 3 month up to 5 year (up to 60 months)
Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time
Time frame: Screening, Cycle1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and During at 1M after study drug therapy, 3M, then every 3 M up to 5 year (up to 60 months)
Percentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRC
Time frame: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug
Percentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the Investigator
Time frame: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug
Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC
Time frame: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug
Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator
Time frame: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
Time frame: From first dose of study medication to 60 Days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE)
Number of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive Result at Indicated Time Points
Time frame: From start of study drug until 60 days after the last dose of study medication
Number of Participants With Autoimmune Hemolytic Anaemia (AIHA)
Time frame: From first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE)
Number of Participants With Drug Related Infections Reported as AEs and SAEs of Maximum Severity of Grade 3 or Higher
Time frame: From first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE)
Number of Participants With at Least One Grade 3/Grade 4 Myelosuppression Adverse Events
Time frame: From first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE)
Number of Participants Who Received no Transfusion or at Least One Transfusion During the Study
Time frame: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug
Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM
Time frame: Baseline, 1M and 6M follow up
Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+
Time frame: Screening, Cycle 1 Day1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and after last dose at 1 M and then every three months up to 45 M during Follow-up Period
Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+
Time frame: Screening, Cycle 1 Day1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and after last dose at 1 M and then every three month up to 45 M during Follow-up Period
Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response
Time frame: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug
Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)
Time frame: Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month.
Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit
Time frame: Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month.
Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score
Time frame: Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month.
Mean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ)
Time frame: Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month.
Mean Area Under the Time-concentration Curve (AUC) Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC[0-tau]) of Ofatumumab
Time frame: Cycle 1 Week 1, Cycle 1 Week 2, Cycles 2,3,4,5,6
Maximum Concentration (Cmax) and Observed Drug Concentration Prior to the Next Dose (Ctrough) of Ofatumumab
Time frame: Cycle 1 Week 1, Cycle 1 Week 2, Cycles 2,3,4,5
Time of Occurrence of Cmax (Tmax) of Ofatumumab
Time frame: Cycle 1 Week 1, Cycle 1 Week 2, Cycle 4
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Jun 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27830957Robak T, Warzocha K, Govind Babu K, Kulyaba Y, Kuliczkowski K, Abdulkadyrov K, Loscertales J, Kryachok I, Kloczko J, Rekhtman G, Homenda W, Blonski JZ, McKeown A, Chang CN, Bal V, Lisby S, Gupta IV, Grosicki S. Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes of ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide versus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in the COMPLEMENT 2 trial of patients with relapsed CLL. Leuk Lymphoma. 2017 Jul;58(7):1598-1606. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2016.1253837. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27731748Robak T, Warzocha K, Govind Babu K, Kulyaba Y, Kuliczkowski K, Abdulkadyrov K, Loscertales J, Kryachok I, Kloczko J, Rekhtman G, Homenda W, Blonski JZ, McKeown A, Gorczyca MM, Carey JL, Chang CN, Lisby S, Gupta IV, Grosicki S. Ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results from the COMPLEMENT 2 trial. Leuk Lymphoma. 2017 May;58(5):1084-1093. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2016.1233536. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25103870Jewell RC, Laubscher K, Lewis E, Fang L, Gafoor Z, Carey J, McKeown A, West S, Wright O, Sedoti D, Dixon I, Hottenstein CS, Chan G. Assessment of the effect of ofatumumab on cardiac repolarization. J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Jan;55(1):114-21. doi: 10.1002/jcph.376. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Related trials for Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Nemtabrutinib for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)/Small Lymphocytic Leukemia (SLL) Refractory to Covalent Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor or Pirtobrutinib and Previously Treated With a BCL2 Inhibitor
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Small Lymphocytic Leukemia
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History Study of Monoclonal B Cell Lymphocytosis (MBL), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (CLL/SLL), Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma (LPL)/Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM), and Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma (SMZL)
Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia, Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Nemtabrutinib Plus Venetoclax vs Venetoclax + Rituximab (VR) in Second-line (2L) + Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (CLL/SLL) (MK-1026-010/BELLWAVE-010).
Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell, Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals study director
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
135 sites in 18 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing OFC Infusion and FC infusion in people with Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 135 sites in 18 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jun 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 135 sites in Germany, United Kingdom, Poland, Ukraine, Italy and 13 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Jul 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression-free Survival (PFS), as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC) (time frame: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00824265, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jun 2020.