AzTrials
AzTrials

Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, ChronicPhase 3NCT00824265

Ofatumumab Added to Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide vs Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide Combination in Relapsed Subjects With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

A Phase 3 study testing OFC Infusion and FC infusion in people with Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 135 sites in 18 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ofatumumab added to fludarabine-cyclophosphamide in patients with relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic
What is being tested?
OFC Infusion and FC infusion
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
365 participants
Where
135 sitesin 18 countries
Study dates
12 Mar 2009to 25 Oct 2017
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • confirmed and active CLL requiring treatment
  • at least one previous treatment for CLL and having achieved a complete or partial remission/response but after a period of 6 or more months, shows evidence of disease progression
  • fully active at a minimum or fully capable of selfcare and up and about more than 50% of waking hours
  • age 18yrs or older
  • signed written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • diagnosis of refractory CLL (failure to achieve a complete or partial remission/response or disease progression within 6 months of last anti-CLL treatment
  • abnormal/inadequate blood values, liver and kidney function
  • certain heart problems, serious significant diseases, AIHA, other current cancers or within the last 5 years
  • active or chronic infections
  • use of drugs to suppress allergic or inflammatory responses (glucocorticoids)
  • CLL transformation
Show all 10Show fewer
  • CLL central nervous system involvement
  • current participation in other clinical study
  • inability to comply with the protocol activities
  • lactating or pregnant women or female patients of child-bearing potential (or male patients with such partners) not willing to use adequate contraception

Trial locations and contacts

135 sites in 18 countries.

135 sites in 18 countries

Germany16 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Dresden, Saxony, 01307

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 45122

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 65929

  • Novartis Investigational Site

    Hamburg, 22767

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Hanover, Lower Saxony, 30625

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Karlsruhe, Baden-Wurttemberg, 76137

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Kassel, Hesse, 34119

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Lehrte, Lower Saxony, 31275

  • Novartis Investigational Site

    Lübeck, 23562

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Moenchengladbach-Rheydt, North Rhine-Westphalia, 41239

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Munich, Bavaria, 81241

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, 48149

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Saarbrücken, Saarland, 66113

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Stuttgart, Baden-Wurttemberg, 70190

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Stuttgart, Baden-Wurttemberg, 70376

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Villingen-Schwenningen, Baden-Wurttemberg, 78052

Other trials in Germany

United Kingdom13 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Birmingham, B9 5SS

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bradford, BD96RJ

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Burton-on-Trent, DE13 0RB

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Cottingham, HU16 5JQ

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Dudley, DY1 2HQ

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Glasgow, G12 OYN

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Leicester, LE1 5WW

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    London, SE5 9RS

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Manchester, M13 9WL

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Sutton, SM5 1AA

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Swindon, SN3 6BB

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Truro, TR1 3LJ

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Uxbridge, UB8 3NN

Other trials in United Kingdom

Poland11 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bialystok, 15-276

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Chorzów, 41-500

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Krakow, 31-501

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Lodz, 93-510

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Opole, 45-372

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Słupsk, 76-200

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Szczecin, 71-242

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Warsaw, 02-507

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Warsaw, 02-776

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Warsaw, 02-781

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Wroclaw, 50-367

Other trials in Poland

Ukraine11 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Cherkasy, 18009

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Dnipropetrovsk, 49102

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Kharkiv, 61070

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Khmelnytskyi, 29000

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Kyiv, 03022

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Kyiv, 04112

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Lviv, 79044

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Makiivka, 86132

  • Novartis Investigational Site

    Simferopil, 95023

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Vinnitsa, 21018

  • Novartis Investigational Site

    Zhytomyr, 10002

Other trials in Ukraine

Italy10 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Alessandria, Piedmont, 15100

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Ascoli Piceno, The Marches, 63100

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Catania, Sicily, 95124

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Genoa, Liguria, 16132

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Novara, Piedmont, 28100

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Palermo, Sicily, 90146

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Pavia, Lombardy, 27100

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Potenza, Basilicate, 85100

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Rome, Lazio, 00041

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Rome, Lazio, 00161

Other trials in Italy

Brazil8 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Brasilia, Goiás, 70390-150

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90610000

  • Novartis Investigational Site

    Porto Alegre, 91350

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Rio de Janeiro, 20211-030

  • Novartis Investigation Site

    Rio de Janeiro, 20230-130

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Rio de Janeiro, 21941-913

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    São Paulo, São Paulo, 05403-000

  • Novartis Investigational Site

    São Paulo, 03102-002

Other trials in Brazil

Canada8 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Greenfield Park, Quebec, J4V 2H1

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Kitchener, Ontario, N2G 1G3

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Montreal, Quebec, H1T 2M4

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    New Westminster, British Columbia, V3L 3W4

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Newmarket, Ontario, L3Y 2P9

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 4H4

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H 5N4

Other trials in Canada

Spain8 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Barcelona, 08003

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Barcelona, 08025

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Barcelona, 08916

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Madrid, 28006

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Madrid, 28040

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Madrid, 28046

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Salamanca, 37007

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Seville, 41014

Other trials in Spain

Bulgaria7 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Pleven, 5800

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Plovdiv, 4000

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Sofia, 1233

  • Novartis Investigational Site

    Sofia, 1407

  • Novartis Investigational Site

    Sofia, 1606

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Sofia

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Varna, 9010

Other trials in Bulgaria

Russia7 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Kazan', 420029

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Moscow, 115478

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Moscow, 125101

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Moscow, 125167

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Novosibirsk, 630087

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Saint Petersburg, 197 089

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    St'Petersburg, 191024

Other trials in Russia

United States6 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Boca Raton, Florida, 33486

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Chicago, Illinois, 60612-3833

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Clinton, Maryland, 20735

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Kansas City, Missouri, 64128

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Memphis, Tennessee, 38120

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

Other trials in United States

India6 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bangalore, 560029

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Mumbai, 400012

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Mumbai, 400014

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    New Delhi, 110029

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Pune, 411001

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Vadodara, 390007

Other trials in India

Netherlands5 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Amersfoort, 3818 ES

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Nijmegen, 6525 GA

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Rotterdam, 3015 CE

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Rotterdam, 3075 EA

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    The Hague, 2545 CH

Other trials in Netherlands

Greece4 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Athens, 11 527

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Athens, 11527

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Thessaloniki, 564 29

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Thessaloniki, 57010

Other trials in Greece

Mexico4 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44280

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Mexico City, CP 14080

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64460

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64710

Other trials in Mexico

Romania4 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bucharest, 022328

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bucharest, 050098

  • Study site

    Iași, 300328

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Iași, 700483

Other trials in Romania

Taiwan4 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Taichung, 404

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Taipei, 100

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Taipei, 112

  • Novartis Investigational Site

    Taipei, 404

Other trials in Taiwan

Thailand3 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bangkok, 10330

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bangkok, 10400

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bangkok, 10700

Other trials in Thailand

About this study

Official title: A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Trial of Ofatumumab Added to Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide vs. Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide Combination in Subjects With Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ofatumumab added to fludarabine-cyclophosphamide in patients with relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL).

Read the detailed description

Fludarabine is currently approved for treatment of relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Studies have shown that drugs in combination with fludarabine have shown more effectiveness than fludarabine alone. The addition of ofatumumab to fludarabine-cyclophosphamide combination offers potentially a more effective therapy, without additional toxicity.

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of ofatumumab added to fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia who have responded previously to therapy but later develop progressive disease and require additional therapy.

Being tested
OFC Infusion, FC infusion
Keywords
Relapsed, Oncology, Safety, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Ofatumumab, Efficacy
Medical subject headings
Leukemia, B-Cell, Recurrence, Neoplasms, Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • OFC InfusionDrug

    Ofatumumab Cycle 1-Day 1 300mg, Cycle 1-Day 8 1000mg, then Cycles 2-6 Day 1 1000mg every 28 days, Fludarabine 25mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles, Cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles

  • FC infusionDrug

    Fludarabine 25mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles, Cyclophosphamide 250mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles

Study groups in NCT00824265
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ofatumumab, Fludarabine, CyclophosphamideExperimentalOfatumumab Cycle 1-Day 1 300mg, Cycle 1-Day 8 1000mg, then Cycles 2-6 Day 1 1000mg every 28 days, Fludarabine 25mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles, Cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles
Receives: Drug: OFC Infusion
Fludarabine, CyclophosphamideActive comparatorFludarabine 25mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles, Cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles
Receives: Drug: FC infusion

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Progression-free Survival (PFS), as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)

    PFS is defined as the interval of time between the date of randomization and the earlier of the date of disease progression (progressive disease,PD) and the date of death due to any cause. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlargerd lymph nodes (>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL).

    Measured: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug

Secondary outcomes (28)
  1. Overall Survival (OS)

    Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Each participant was followed at the time when the last IRC-assessed PFS events occurred. Participants who had not died were censored at the date of last contact.

    Measured: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug

  2. Time to Response, as Assessed by the IRC

    Time to response is defined as the time from randomization to the first response. Complete Response/remission(CR) all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment: no lymphadenopathy(Ly) > 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/spleenomegaly/constitutional symptoms; neutrophils >1500 per microliter(µL), platelets(PL) >100,000/µL, hemoglobin(Hb) >11 grams/deciliter(g/dL), lymphocytes(LC) <4000/µL, bone marrow(BM) sample must be normocellular for age, <30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. Incomplete bone marrow recovery(CRi): CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. Partial Remission/response(PR): >=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL >100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline(BL), Hb >11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. Nodular PR(nPR): persistent nodules BM.

    Measured: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug

  3. Duration of Response (DOR), as Assessed by the IRC

    DOR is defined as the time from the initial response (CR, CRi, nPR, or PR) to the first documented sign of PD or death due to any cause. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlargerd lymph nodes (>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.

    Measured: From time of initial response to disease progression or death, whichever came first (up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug)

  4. Time to Progression, as Assessed by the IRC

    Time to progression is defined as the time from the date of randomization to PD. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlargerd lymph nodes (>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.

    Measured: From randomization up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug

  5. Time to Next Therapy

    Time to next therapy is defined as the time from randomization until the start of the next-line of treatment. Data are presented for participants who took anti-cancer therapies and participants in the ITT population.

    Measured: From the start of study drug until the start of the next anti-CLL therapy (up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug)

  6. Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status

    The ECOG performance status scales and criteria are used by doctors and researchers to assess how a participant's disease is progressing, how the disease affects the daily living, and determines appropriate treatment and prognosis. ECOG performance status are measured at Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1 and Cycle 6 Day1. During follow period, 1 M after study drug therapy, then every 3 month up to 5 year (up to 60 months). Improvement is defined as a decrease from baseline by at least one step on the ECOG performance status scale (yes/no).

    Measured: Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1, Cycle 6 Day1, follow up (FU) at 1Month (M) after study drug therapy, 3M, then every 3 month up to 5 year (up to 60 months)

  7. Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time

    Participants with no B-symptoms (B-Sy) (no night sweat, no weight loss, no fever and no extreme fatigue) and at least one indicated B-sy(night sweats, weight loss, fever or extreme fatigue) were presented at Screening, Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and during follow up period at 1 M after study drug therapy, then every 3 M up to 5 year (up to 60 months).

    Measured: Screening, Cycle1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and During at 1M after study drug therapy, 3M, then every 3 M up to 5 year (up to 60 months)

  8. Percentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRC

    OR is defined as the number of participants achieving an objective response (complete response [CR], CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery [CRi], partial response [PR], and nodular PR [nPR]). CR (all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment): no lymphadenopathy (Ly) > 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/ splenomegaly/ constitutional symptoms; neutrophils >1500 per microliter (µL), platelets (PL) >100,000/µL, hemoglobin (Hb) >11 grams/deciliter (g/dL), lymphocytes (LC) <4000/µL, bone marrow (BM) sample must be normocellular for age, <30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. CRi: CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. PR: >=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL >100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline (BL), Hb >11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. nPR: persistent nodules BM.

    Measured: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug

  9. Percentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the Investigator

    OR is defined as the number of participants achieving an objective response (complete response [CR], CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery [CRi], partial response [PR], and nodular PR [nPR]). CR (all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment): no lymphadenopathy (Ly) > 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/ splenomegaly/ constitutional symptoms; neutrophils >1500 per microliter (µL), platelets (PL) >100,000/µL, hemoglobin (Hb) >11 grams/deciliter (g/dL), lymphocytes (LC) <4000/µL, bone marrow (BM) sample must be normocellular for age, <30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. CRi: CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. PR: >=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL >100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline (BL), Hb >11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. nPR: persistent nodules BM.

    Responder = CR + CRi + NPR + PR

    Measured: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug

  10. Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC

    MRD refers to small number of leukemic cells that remain in the participant during treatment or after treatment at the time the participant achieved a confirmed CR. MRD analysis was performed for the participants who were suspected of achieving a primary endpoint CR. MDR was performed by flow cytometry on a bone marrow or peripheral blood sample taken at least 2 months after final treatment. MRD negative was defined as less than one CLL cell per 10000 leukocytes.

    Measured: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug

  11. Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator

    MRD refers to small number of leukemic cells that remain in the participant during treatment or after treatment at the time the participant achieved a confirmed CR. MRD analysis was performed for the participants who were suspected of achieving a primary endpoint CR. MDR was performed by flow cytometry on a bone marrow or peripheral blood sample taken at least 2 months after final treatment. MRD negative was defined as less than one CLL cell per 10000 leukocytes.

    Measured: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug

  12. Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE)

    An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury.

    Measured: From first dose of study medication to 60 Days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE)

  13. Number of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive Result at Indicated Time Points

    Serum samples for analysis of HAHA were collected at Baseline (Screening), after 3 cycles were compelted, after 1 M and 6 M post last dose. All samples were first tested in a screening step; positive samples from the screening were further evaluated in a confirmation test. The confirmed positive samples were reported as HAHA-positive.

    Measured: From start of study drug until 60 days after the last dose of study medication

  14. Number of Participants With Autoimmune Hemolytic Anaemia (AIHA)

    AIHA is a condition where the body's immune system fails to recognize red blood cells as "self" and begins destroying these red blood cells. The number of participants experienced AIHA are presented.

    Measured: From first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE)

  15. Number of Participants With Drug Related Infections Reported as AEs and SAEs of Maximum Severity of Grade 3 or Higher

    An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury. Maximum severity grades were evaluated according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 (1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; 4, life-threatening/disabling; 5, death).

    Measured: From first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE)

  16. Number of Participants With at Least One Grade 3/Grade 4 Myelosuppression Adverse Events

    Participants with at least one Grade 3 or Grade 4 myelosuppression (anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia) are presented. Myelosuppression is defined as the decrease in the ability of the bone marrow to produce blood cells. AEs were graded according to NCI common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade, version 3.0 (1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; 4, life-threatening/disabling; 5, death).

    Measured: From first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE)

  17. Number of Participants Who Received no Transfusion or at Least One Transfusion During the Study

    Participants who received no transfusion and at least one transfusion during the study are presented. Participants who took any blood products or blood supportive care product are included.

    Measured: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug

  18. Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM

    Immunoglobulins, or antibodies, are large proteins used by the immune system to identify and neutralize foreign particles such as bacteria and viruses. Their normal blood levels indicate proper immune status. Low levels indicate immuno-suppression. Blood samples were collected from each participant and IgA, IgG, and IgM were measured at Baseline, and 1M and 6M after last dose during follow up period.

    Measured: Baseline, 1M and 6M follow up

  19. Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+

    CD5+ and CD19+ cells were counted by flow cytometry at Screening (Baseline) on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 during the treatment period and after last dose of study drug at 1 M and then every three month follow up up to 45 M. Flow cytometry is a technique for counting and examining microscopic particles with an electronic detection apparatus. Baseline is defined as the assessment closest to but prior to first dose (e.g. day 1 if available, otherwise, screening). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

    Measured: Screening, Cycle 1 Day1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and after last dose at 1 M and then every three months up to 45 M during Follow-up Period

  20. Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+

    CD5- CD19+ cells were counted by flow cytometry at Screening (baseline) at Cycle 1 Day1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 during treatment period and after last dose of study drug at 1 M and then every three month up to 45 M during follow up period. Flow cytometry is a technique for counting and examining microscopic particles with an electronic detection apparatus. Baseline is defined as the assessment closest to but prior to first dose (e.g. Day 1 if available otherwise screening). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

    Measured: Screening, Cycle 1 Day1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and after last dose at 1 M and then every three month up to 45 M during Follow-up Period

  21. Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response

    Blood samples were collected for the assessment of the following prognostic markers at BL: immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region(IgVH) homology; Zeta-Chain-Associated Protein Kinase 70(ZAP70), VH3-21 usage; Cytogenetics (by fluorescent in situ hybridization [FISH]); beta 2 microglobulin. Cox-regression model was used to explore the relationship between progression-free survival and the following explanatory variables: treatment group, cytogenetics (analyzed by FISH included 6q-,11q-, +12q, 17p-, 13q-) , ZAP-70 (positive, negative or intermediate), VH3-21 usage (Yes and No), IgVH homology (>98%, 97%-98% and <97%), beta 2 microglobulin (>3500 microgram per liter [µg/L] and <=3500 µg/L). For each covariate, a hazard ratio <1 indicates a lower risk on the first effect tested compared with the other effects tested. Cytogenetics Group (based on >=20%)=cytogenetics (CY G).

    Measured: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug

  22. Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)

    The EORTC QLQ-CLL16 is comprised of 16 questions that address 5 domains of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) important in CLL. There are 4 multi-item scales - fatigue (2 items), treatment side effects ([TSE], 4 items), disease symptoms (disease effects scale [DES], 4 items), and infection scale [IS] (4 items) - and single item scales (social activities [Social Problems (SP) Scale] and future health worries[Future Health (FH) Scale].). These are measured on a four point scale where 1 = not at all and 4 = very much. These scores are transformed to give a rating from 0 - 100, where 0 =no symptoms or problems and 100 = a severe symptoms or problems. EORTC QLQ-CLL16 was assessed at Screening; Cycle 4 Day 1 and during follow-up 1 M and every 3 M up to 24 months. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The Baseline value was obtained at randomization.

    Measured: Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month.

  23. Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit

    EQ-5D is comprised of a 5-item health status measure and a visual analogue scale (VAS) and is used to generate two scores: the utility score and the thermometer score. The utility score measures mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain, discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Responses to each of the 5 health states are measured on a 3-point scale (level 1 = no problem; level 2 = some or moderate problem(s) and level 3 = unable, or extreme problems). Responses are typically converted into health utilities or valuations on a scale ranging from 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health). The thermometer score ranges from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. A Negative health status describes health state worse than death.Baseline is the most recent, non-missing value prior to or on the first study drug dose date.

    Measured: Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month.

  24. Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score

    EORTC QLQ-C30, a self-reported, cancer-specific instrument assessing 15 domains: physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning, pain,fatigue, nausea and vomiting, insomnia, loss of appetite, constipation, diarrhea, and dyspnea, financial difficulties and a global health status/quality of life (QOF). Functional and symptoms scales were measured on four point Likert scale where 1 = not at all and 4 = very much. Pat. assessed at Screening; Cycle 4 Day 1 and during follow-up 1 M and every 3 M up to 24 months. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline is the most recent, non-missing value prior to or on the first study treatment dose date. Clinically meaningful changes or minimally important differences (MIDs)have been previously established for the EORTC QLQ C30, and categorized as 'small' if the mean change in scores is 5-10 points, 'moderate' if 10-20 points, and 'large' if >20points.

    Measured: Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month.

  25. Mean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ)

    The HCQ consists of a single question in which the participant is asked if he/she has experienced any change in his/her health overall since beginning the study. For HCQ, values from 1 to 9 were assigned to the 9 responses in the HCQ questionnaire, ranging from 1 for 'my health is a great deal better' to 9 for 'my health is a great deal worse' since the beginning of the study. Lower scores represent better conditions.

    Measured: Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month.

  26. Mean Area Under the Time-concentration Curve (AUC) Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC[0-tau]) of Ofatumumab

    Area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) over the dosing interval (AUC[0-tau]) was evaluated. Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide predose and 0.5 h after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, predose samples were collected prior to ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, and 6 (Days 29, 57, 113, and 141).

    Measured: Cycle 1 Week 1, Cycle 1 Week 2, Cycles 2,3,4,5,6

  27. Maximum Concentration (Cmax) and Observed Drug Concentration Prior to the Next Dose (Ctrough) of Ofatumumab

    Blood samples were collected to assess the plasma concentration of ofatumumab.Cmax and Ctrough were determined. Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide predose and 0.5 h after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, predose samples were collected prior to ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, and 6 (Days 29, 57, 113, and 141).

    Measured: Cycle 1 Week 1, Cycle 1 Week 2, Cycles 2,3,4,5

  28. Time of Occurrence of Cmax (Tmax) of Ofatumumab

    Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide predose and 0.5 h after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Week 1, Cycle 1 Week 2, Cycle 4

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Jan 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study start12 Mar 2009
  3. Primary completion17 Dec 2014
  4. Study completion25 Oct 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
365 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00824265
Sponsor's protocol ID
110913
Status last verified
Jun 2020
First submitted
15 Jan 2009
Last updated
18 Jun 2020
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

Publications

  • Robak T, Warzocha K, Govind Babu K, Kulyaba Y, Kuliczkowski K, Abdulkadyrov K, Loscertales J, Kryachok I, Kloczko J, Rekhtman G, Homenda W, Blonski JZ, McKeown A, Chang CN, Bal V, Lisby S, Gupta IV, Grosicki S. Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes of ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide versus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in the COMPLEMENT 2 trial of patients with relapsed CLL. Leuk Lymphoma. 2017 Jul;58(7):1598-1606. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2016.1253837. Epub 2016 Nov 10.

    PubMed 27830957
  • Robak T, Warzocha K, Govind Babu K, Kulyaba Y, Kuliczkowski K, Abdulkadyrov K, Loscertales J, Kryachok I, Kloczko J, Rekhtman G, Homenda W, Blonski JZ, McKeown A, Gorczyca MM, Carey JL, Chang CN, Lisby S, Gupta IV, Grosicki S. Ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results from the COMPLEMENT 2 trial. Leuk Lymphoma. 2017 May;58(5):1084-1093. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2016.1233536. Epub 2016 Oct 12.

    PubMed 27731748
  • Jewell RC, Laubscher K, Lewis E, Fang L, Gafoor Z, Carey J, McKeown A, West S, Wright O, Sedoti D, Dixon I, Hottenstein CS, Chan G. Assessment of the effect of ofatumumab on cardiac repolarization. J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Jan;55(1):114-21. doi: 10.1002/jcph.376. Epub 2014 Aug 21.

    PubMed 25103870

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing OFC Infusion and FC infusion in people with Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 135 sites in 18 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jun 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 135 sites in Germany, United Kingdom, Poland, Ukraine, Italy and 13 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Jul 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Progression-free Survival (PFS), as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC) (time frame: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00824265, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jun 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in