Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1Phase 2NCT00827112
A Pilot Study Of A Novel Treatment Regimen, Maraviroc + Ritonavir Boosted Atazanavir, In Treatment Naive HIV-Infected Patients
A Phase 2 study testing maraviroc in people with Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1, run by ViiV Healthcare at 39 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
This is a pilot study to examine if the novel treatment regimen maraviroc plus boosted atazanavir can be expected to be safe and efficacious in treatment naive HIV infected patients. Based on the results from this study, a confirmatory phase 3 study may be conducted. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1
- What is being tested?
- maraviroc
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 129 participants
- Where
- 39 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- Mar 2009to Jul 2011
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- HIV-1 RNA viral load of ≥1,000 copies/mL measured at the Screening Visit.
- CD4 count ≥100 cells/mm3 at Screening.
- Have only R5 HIV-1 at Screening as verified by the Monogram Bioscience Trofile® assay with enhanced sensitivity.
Who cannot join
- Prior treatment with any other HIV antiretroviral therapy for more than 14 days at any time.
- Any evidence of resistance to atazanavir, tenofovir, and emtricitabine.
- X4-or dual/mixed-tropic virus by enhanced Trofile assay or repeated assay failure or not reportable results.
Trial locations and contacts
39 sites in 3 countries.
39 sites in 3 countries
United States27 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Addison, Texas, 75001
Pfizer Investigational Site
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Pfizer Investigational Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30312
Pfizer Investigational Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60657
Pfizer Investigational Site
Dallas, Texas, 75204
Pfizer Investigational Site
Dallas, Texas, 75390
Pfizer Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77098
Pfizer Investigational Site
Huntersville, North Carolina, 28078
Pfizer Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, 90027
Pfizer Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, 90028
Pfizer Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, 90048
Pfizer Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, 90069
Pfizer Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33133
Pfizer Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33136
Pfizer Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33137
Pfizer Investigational Site
New York, New York, 10003
Pfizer Investigational Site
Norwalk, Connecticut, 06851
Pfizer Investigational Site
Omaha, Nebraska, 68106
Pfizer Investigational Site
Orlando, Florida, 32803
Pfizer Investigational Site
Pensacola, Florida, 32504
Pfizer Investigational Site
Spokane, Washington, 99204
Pfizer Investigational Site
Springfield, Massachusetts, 01107
Pfizer Investigational Site
Springfield, Massachusetts, 01199
Pfizer Investigational Site
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33713
Pfizer Investigational Site
Tampa, Florida, 33602
Pfizer Investigational Site
Tampa, Florida, 33614
Pfizer Investigational Site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20009
Germany6 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Berlin, 10243
Pfizer Investigational Site
Berlin, 12157
Pfizer Investigational Site
Cologne, 50937
Pfizer Investigational Site
Frankfurt am Main, 60590
Pfizer Investigational Site
Hamburg, 20146
Pfizer Investigational Site
München, 80335
Spain6 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Alicante, Alicante, 03010
Pfizer Investigational Site
Barcelona, Barcelona, 08036
Pfizer Investigational Site
Córdoba, Cordoba, 14004
Pfizer Investigational Site
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08907
Pfizer Investigational Site
Madrid, Madrid, 28046
Pfizer Investigational Site
Seville, Sevilla, 41013
About this study
Official title: Pilot Study Of Novel Combination Of Maraviroc + Atazanavir/Ritonavir vs. Atazanavir/Ritonavir + Emtricitabine/Tenofovir For The Treatment Of Naïve HIV-Infected Patients With R5 HIV-1
This is a pilot study to examine if the novel treatment regimen maraviroc plus boosted atazanavir can be expected to be safe and efficacious in treatment naive HIV infected patients. Based on the results from this study, a confirmatory phase 3 study may be conducted.
- Conditions
- Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1
- Being tested
- maraviroc
- Keywords
- CCR5-tropic HIV-1 virus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
maravirocDrug
Also called maraviroc =Celsentri, Selzentry; atazanavir =Reyataz; ritonavir =Norvir; lopinavir/ritonavir=Kaletra, Aluvia; darunavir=Prezista
maraviroc (Selzentry, Celsentri) 150mg QD + atazanavir (Reyataz) /ritonavir (Norvir) (300/100mg) QD OR maraviroc (Selzentry, Celsentri) 150mg QD+ darunavir (Prezista)/ritonavir (Norvir) (800/100 mg) QD (if atazanavir (Reyataz) /ritonavir (Norvir) is replaced by darunavir (Prezista)/ritonavir (Norvir)) OR maraviroc (Selzentry, Celsentri) 150mg QD+ lopinavir/ritonavir (Kaletra, Aluvia) (400/100 mg) BID (if atazanavir (Reyataz) /ritonavir (Norvir) is replaced by lopinavir/ritonavir (Kaletra, Aluvia))
maravirocDrug
Also called maraviroc=Celsentri, Selzentry; emtricitabine/tenofovir=Truvada; atazanavir =Reyataz; ritonavir =Norvir; lopinavir/ritonavir=Kaletra, Aluvia
emtricitabine/tenofovir (Truvada) 200/300mg QD + atazanavir (Reyataz) /ritonavir (Norvir) 300/100 mg QD OR emtricitabine/tenofovir (Truvada) 200/300 mg QD + darunavir (Prezista)/ritonavir (Norvir) (800/100 mg) QD (if atazanavir (Reyataz) /ritonavir (Norvir) is replaced by darunavir (Prezista)/ritonavir (Norvir)) OR emtricitabine/tenofovir (Truvada) 200/300 mg QD + lopinavir/ritonavir(Kaletra, Aluvia) (400/100 mg) BID (if atazanavir (Reyataz) /ritonavir (Norvir) is replaced by lopinavir/ritonavir (Kaletra, Aluvia))
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A | Experimental | maraviroc (Selzentry, Celsentri) 150 mg QD + atazanavir (Reyataz) /ritonavir (Norvir) 300/100mg QD Subjects experiencing unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia attributable to atazanavir (Reyataz) /ritonavir (Norvir) without any other etiology of hyperbilirubinemia, responding to the therapy without virologic failure, but expressing cosmetic concerns because of the jaundice or scleral icterus (associated with bilirubin elevations) and wish to discontinue atazanavir (Reyataz) in spite of reassurances by the investigator, will be permitted on a single occasion only to switch to another protease inhibitor either darunavir (Prezista)/ritonavir (Norvir)((800/100 mg) QD or lopinavir/ritonavir (Kaletra, Aluvia)(400/100mg) BID and remain in the study. If the investigator decides to switch to a protease inhibitor other than darunavir (Prezista)/ritonavir (Norvir) or lopinavir/ritonavir (Kaletra, Aluvia)(, then the subject must be discontinued from the study. Receives: Drug: maraviroc |
| Arm B | Experimental | emtricitabine/tenofovir (Truvada) 200/300mg QD + atazanavir (Reyataz) /ritonavir (Norvir) 300/100 mg QD
Subjects experiencing unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia attributable to atazanavir (Reyataz) /ritonavir (Norvir) without any other etiology of hyperbilirubinemia, responding to the therapy without virologic failure, but expressing cosmetic concerns because of the jaundice or scleral icterus (associated with bilirubin elevations) and wish to discontinue atazanavir in spite of reassurances by the investigator, will be permitted on a single occasion only to switch to another protease inhibitor either darunavir/ritonavir (800/100 mg) QD or lopinavir/ritonavir (400/100mg) BID and remain in the study. If the investigator decides to switch to a protease inhibitor other than darunavir/ritonavir or lopinavir/ritonavir, then the subject must be discontinued from the study. Receives: Drug: maraviroc |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With Plasma Human Immuno Deficiency Virus-1 Ribonucleic Acid (HIV-1 RNA) Levels Less Than 50 Copies/Milliliter (mL)
Measured: Week 48
Secondary outcomes (15)
HIV-1 RNA Levels at Baseline
Measured: Baseline
Change From Baseline in HIV-1 RNA Levels of First 15 Participants at Days 4, 7, 10 and 14
Plasma HIV-1 RNA levels were evaluated for first 15 participants enrolled at United States (U.S) sites only.
Measured: Baseline , Days 4, 7, 10 and 14
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Maraviroc
Measured: Day 14 (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours post dose)
Minimum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmin) of Maraviroc
Measured: Day 14 (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours post dose)
Average Observed Plasma Concentration (Cavg) of Maraviroc
Cavg was described as area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero to time 24 hours (AUC24) divided by the dosing interval (AUC24/ 24).
Measured: Day 14 (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours post dose)
Change From Baseline in Plasma log10 Viral Load at Weeks 16, 24, 48 and 96
Measured: Baseline, Week 16, Week 24, Week 48, Week 96
Percentage of Participants With Less Than 50 Copies/mL of HIV-1 RNA
Measured: Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, Week 32, Week 40, Week 48, Week 60, Week 72, Week 84, Week 96
Percentage of Participants With Less Than 400 Copies/mL of HIV-1 RNA
Measured: Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, Week 32, Week 40, Week 48, Week 60, Week 72, Week 84, Week 96
Time to Loss of Virological Response (TLOVR)
TLOVR (virological failure) was defined as the time from first dose of study treatment (Day 1) until the time of virologic failure using the time to loss of virologic response algorithm.
Measured: Baseline through Week 96
Time-Averaged Difference (TAD) in log10 Viral Load
TAD was calculated as area under the curve of HIV divided by time period minus baseline HIV where HIV was denoted as HIV-1 RNA (log10 copies/mL).
Measured: Week 16, Week 24, Week 48, Week 96
Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation 4+T Lymphocyte (CD4) Cell Counts at Weeks 16, 24, 48 and 96
Measured: Baseline, Week 16, Week 24, Week 48, Week 96
Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation 8+T Lymphocyte (CD8) Cell Count at Weeks 16, 24, 48 and 96
Measured: Baseline, Week 16, Week 24, Week 48, Week 96
Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance
Genotypic resistance was assessed for all participants at screening and was evaluated for protease inhibitors (PIs), Nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), and non-NRTIs (NNRTIs) using Monogram GenoSeq and/or PhenoSenseGT assays. This was then repeated for all participants with HIV-1 viral load more than 500 copies/mL either at treatment failure or at early termination, up to Week 96.
Measured: Week 96 or Time of treatment failure
Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance
Phenotypic resistance was assessed for all participants at screening and was evaluated for PIs, NRTIs, and NNRTIs using Monogram GenoSeq and/or PhenoSenseGT assays. This was then repeated for all participants with HIV-1 viral load more than 500 copies/mL either at treatment failure or at early termination, up to Week 96.
Measured: Week 96 or Time of treatment failure
Number of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Tropism Status Using Trofile Assay
Viral tropism was determined using the trofile assay with enhanced sensitivity for participants with HIV-1 RNA greater than equal to 1000 copies/mL. The enhanced trofile assay had the sensitivity to detect 100 percent of spiked samples when C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 {CXCR4} [X4]-using HIV-1 RNA represented 0.3 percent of the total viral population.
Measured: Baseline to Week 96 or Time of treatment Failure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jan 2009 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2009
- Primary completionJul 2010
- Study completionJul 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by ViiV HealthcareThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 129 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- ViiV Healthcare
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Pfizer
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00827112
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A4001078
- Status last verified
- Jun 2012
- First submitted
- 21 Jan 2009
- Last updated
- 15 Jun 2012
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Jun 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pilot Study Of Novel Combination Of Maraviroc + Atazanavir/Ritonavir vs. Atazanavir/Ritonavir + Emtricitabine/Tenofovir For The Treatment Of Naïve HIV-Infected Patients With R5 HIV-1
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00827112
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- A4001078
- Conditions
- Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1
- Keywords
- CCR5-tropic HIV-1 virus
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 129 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- ViiV HealthcareIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Pfizer
- Study start
- Mar 2009
- Primary completion
- Jul 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Jan 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 24 Nov 2011
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a pilot study to examine if the novel treatment regimen maraviroc plus boosted atazanavir can be expected to be safe and efficacious in treatment naive HIV infected patients. Based on the results from this study, a confirmatory phase 3 study may be conducted.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A | Experimental | Drug: maravirocmaraviroc (Selzentry, Celsentri) 150 mg QD + atazanavir (Reyataz) /ritonavir (Norvir) 300/100mg QD Subjects experiencing unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia attributable to atazanavir (Reyataz) /ritonavir (Norvir) without any other etiology of hyperbilirubinemia, responding to the therapy without virologic failure, but expressing cosmetic concerns because of the jaundice or scleral icterus (associated with bilirubin elevations) and wish to discontinue atazanavir (Reyataz) in spite of reassurances by the investigator, will be permitted on a single occasion only to switch to another protease inhibitor either darunavir (Prezista)/ritonavir (Norvir)((800/100 mg) QD or lopinavir/ritonavir (Kaletra, Aluvia)(400/100mg) BID and remain in the study. If the investigator decides to switch to a protease inhibitor other than darunavir (Prezista)/ritonavir (Norvir) or lopinavir/ritonavir (Kaletra, Aluvia)(, then the subject must be discontinued from the study. |
| Arm B | Experimental | Drug: maravirocemtricitabine/tenofovir (Truvada) 200/300mg QD + atazanavir (Reyataz) /ritonavir (Norvir) 300/100 mg QD Subjects experiencing unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia attributable to atazanavir (Reyataz) /ritonavir (Norvir) without any other etiology of hyperbilirubinemia, responding to the therapy without virologic failure, but expressing cosmetic concerns because of the jaundice or scleral icterus (associated with bilirubin elevations) and wish to discontinue atazanavir in spite of reassurances by the investigator, will be permitted on a single occasion only to switch to another protease inhibitor either darunavir/ritonavir (800/100 mg) QD or lopinavir/ritonavir (400/100mg) BID and remain in the study. If the investigator decides to switch to a protease inhibitor other than darunavir/ritonavir or lopinavir/ritonavir, then the subject must be discontinued from the study. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- HIV-1 RNA viral load of ≥1,000 copies/mL measured at the Screening Visit.
- CD4 count ≥100 cells/mm3 at Screening.
- Have only R5 HIV-1 at Screening as verified by the Monogram Bioscience Trofile® assay with enhanced sensitivity.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Prior treatment with any other HIV antiretroviral therapy for more than 14 days at any time.
- Any evidence of resistance to atazanavir, tenofovir, and emtricitabine.
- X4-or dual/mixed-tropic virus by enhanced Trofile assay or repeated assay failure or not reportable results.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| maravirocAlso: maraviroc =Celsentri, Selzentry; atazanavir =Reyataz; ritonavir =Norvir; lopinavir/ritonavir=Kaletra, Aluvia; darunavir=Prezistamaraviroc (Selzentry, Celsentri) 150mg QD + atazanavir (Reyataz) /ritonavir (Norvir) (300/100mg) QD OR maraviroc (Selzentry, Celsentri) 150mg QD+ darunavir (Prezista)/ritonavir (Norvir) (800/100 mg) QD (if atazanavir (Reyataz) /ritonavir (Norvir) is replaced by darunavir (Prezista)/ritonavir (Norvir)) OR maraviroc (Selzentry, Celsentri) 150mg QD+ lopinavir/ritonavir (Kaletra, Aluvia) (400/100 mg) BID (if atazanavir (Reyataz) /ritonavir (Norvir) is replaced by lopinavir/ritonavir (Kaletra, Aluvia)) | Drug | Arm A |
| maravirocAlso: maraviroc=Celsentri, Selzentry; emtricitabine/tenofovir=Truvada; atazanavir =Reyataz; ritonavir =Norvir; lopinavir/ritonavir=Kaletra, Aluviaemtricitabine/tenofovir (Truvada) 200/300mg QD + atazanavir (Reyataz) /ritonavir (Norvir) 300/100 mg QD OR emtricitabine/tenofovir (Truvada) 200/300 mg QD + darunavir (Prezista)/ritonavir (Norvir) (800/100 mg) QD (if atazanavir (Reyataz) /ritonavir (Norvir) is replaced by darunavir (Prezista)/ritonavir (Norvir)) OR emtricitabine/tenofovir (Truvada) 200/300 mg QD + lopinavir/ritonavir(Kaletra, Aluvia) (400/100 mg) BID (if atazanavir (Reyataz) /ritonavir (Norvir) is replaced by lopinavir/ritonavir (Kaletra, Aluvia)) | Drug | Arm B |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With Plasma Human Immuno Deficiency Virus-1 Ribonucleic Acid (HIV-1 RNA) Levels Less Than 50 Copies/Milliliter (mL)
Time frame: Week 48
15 secondary outcomes
HIV-1 RNA Levels at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline
Change From Baseline in HIV-1 RNA Levels of First 15 Participants at Days 4, 7, 10 and 14
Time frame: Baseline , Days 4, 7, 10 and 14
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Maraviroc
Time frame: Day 14 (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours post dose)
Minimum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmin) of Maraviroc
Time frame: Day 14 (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours post dose)
Average Observed Plasma Concentration (Cavg) of Maraviroc
Time frame: Day 14 (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours post dose)
Change From Baseline in Plasma log10 Viral Load at Weeks 16, 24, 48 and 96
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16, Week 24, Week 48, Week 96
Percentage of Participants With Less Than 50 Copies/mL of HIV-1 RNA
Time frame: Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, Week 32, Week 40, Week 48, Week 60, Week 72, Week 84, Week 96
Percentage of Participants With Less Than 400 Copies/mL of HIV-1 RNA
Time frame: Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, Week 32, Week 40, Week 48, Week 60, Week 72, Week 84, Week 96
Time to Loss of Virological Response (TLOVR)
Time frame: Baseline through Week 96
Time-Averaged Difference (TAD) in log10 Viral Load
Time frame: Week 16, Week 24, Week 48, Week 96
Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation 4+T Lymphocyte (CD4) Cell Counts at Weeks 16, 24, 48 and 96
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16, Week 24, Week 48, Week 96
Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation 8+T Lymphocyte (CD8) Cell Count at Weeks 16, 24, 48 and 96
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16, Week 24, Week 48, Week 96
Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance
Time frame: Week 96 or Time of treatment failure
Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance
Time frame: Week 96 or Time of treatment failure
Number of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Tropism Status Using Trofile Assay
Time frame: Baseline to Week 96 or Time of treatment Failure
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Jun 2012.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability Study of Long-acting Cabotegravir Plus Long-acting Rilpivirine (CAB LA + RPV LA) in Human-immunodeficiency Virus-1 (HIV-1) Infected Adults
HIV Infections
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Using an Oral Once-daily 2 Drug Regimen Compared to an Oral Once-daily 3 Drug Regimen for the Treatment of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-1 in Adults Who Have Not Previously Taken Antiretroviral Therapy
HIV, HIV Infections
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Study of Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide Fixed Dose Combination in Adolescents and Children With Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1
HIV-1 Infection
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Clinico-biological Characterization and Survival of Patients With Adult T-cell Leukemia / Lymphoma (ATL) and Patients Chronically Infected With the HTLV-1 Virus (HTLV-OBS)
Lymphoproliferation Induced by HTLV-1, HTLV-1 Adult T-cell Lymphoma / Leukemia
Recruiting
Impact of Pain From Injectables Antiretroviral Treatments in HIV-1 Patients Based on the Injection Site (Ventrogluteal or Dorsogluteal) and the Use or Non-use of Virtual Reality Headset
HIV I Infection, Injection Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
39 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing maraviroc in people with Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1, run by ViiV Healthcare at 39 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jun 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 39 sites in United States, Germany, Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Nov 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With Plasma Human Immuno Deficiency Virus-1 Ribonucleic Acid (HIV-1 RNA) Levels Less Than 50 Copies/Milliliter (mL) (time frame: Week 48). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jun 2012.