Pancreatic CancerPhase 2NCT00841035
7 Day's of Erlotinib Neo-adjuvant, Followed by Adjuvant Erlotinib-gemcitabine in Pancreatic Cancer Patients
A Phase 2 study testing erlotinib in people with Pancreatic Cancer, run by University of Alabama at Birmingham at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
1.1 Primary Objective To evaluate the effects of short course preoperative erlotinib treatment in a panel of predictive biomarkers from a group of patients who undergo resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with curative intent. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pancreatic Cancer
- What is being tested?
- erlotinib
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 6 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Feb 2009to Jul 2011
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- .Histologic or cytologic confirmation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
- Pancreatic cancer must be surgically resectable: a) no evidence of distant metastasis; b) clear fat plane around the celiac and superior mesenteric arteries; c) patent portal and superior mesenteric veins
- No evidence of post-resection distant metastasis
- Pathologic confirmation of R0/R1 status following surgical resection
- Age ≥ 19 years
- Male or female gender (not pregnant or lactating). If the subject is fertile, use of medically acceptable contraception will be required.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Patient should be able to understand and offer signed written informed consent prior to study entry.
- No prior receipt of chemotherapy or radiotherapy
- Patients must demonstrate a Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG) P.S. of 0 or 1
- End Organ function must be adequate meeting the below criteria at baseline:
- White Blood Cell Count (WBC)> 3000/mm3, absolute neutrophil count(ANC)> 1500/mm3, Platelets>100,000mm3 Calculated creatinine clearance >50 ml/min, normal serum creatinine (mg/dL) (if calculated Crcl <50 ml/min, Crcl should measured and be > 50 ml/min) Bilirubin <3.0 mg/dL (patients with obstructive jaundice require preoperative endoscopic biliary stenting if total bilirubin >3.0 mg/dl) prothrombin time(PT) /partial thromboplastin time(PTT) below the upper limit of normal
Who cannot join
- Diagnosis of active (treated in past 5 years) concomitant malignancy with exception of non-melanotic skin cancer
- Transplant patients or patients receiving immunosuppression
- Presence of an underlying disease state associated with active bleeding or a past medical history of coagulopathy
- New York Heart Association Class IV congestive heart failure
- Limited mental capacity or language skills to the extent simple instructions cannot be followed or information regarding adverse events cannot be provided
- History of non-compliance with prescribed medical care
Show all 16Show fewer
- Post-Operative Phase Inclusion
- No Evidence of Post-Resection Distant Metastasis
- Pathological confirmation of R0/R1 status following Surgical resection
- Patient must demonstrate a post-operative performance status of 0 or 1.
- End Organ function must be adequate, meeting the below criteria at baseline:
- WBC > 3000/mm³,ANC > 1500/mm³, Platelets > 100,000 mm³
- Calculated Creatinine Clearance > 50 ml/min,Serum Creatinine < 1.5 mg/dl
- Bilirubin < 3.0 mg/dl; aspartate aminotransferase(AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) < 3 x normal value
- PT/PTT/international normalized ratio(INR) within normal Limits.
- -
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Alabama at Birmingham,Comprehensive Cancer Center
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294-0016
About this study
Official title: University of Alabama at Birmingham(UAB 0808), A Phase II Study of Short-course Preoperative Erlotinib Followed by Post-operative Erlotinib-gemcitabine in Patients With Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
1.1 Primary Objective
To evaluate the effects of short course preoperative erlotinib treatment in a panel of predictive biomarkers from a group of patients who undergo resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with curative intent.
Read more
1.2 Secondary Objectives
1.2.1 To analyze the effects of short course preoperative erlotinib treatment followed by postoperative erlotinib-gemcitabine therapy in the disease-free survival of patients who undergo curative intent resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
1.2.2 To evaluate secondary endpoints of disease response such as duration of overall survival and patterns of recurrence for patients with resectable pancreatic cancer who undergo this treatment regimen.
1.2.3 To evaluate the plasma pharmacokinetics of erlotinib in pancreatic cancer patients both in the preoperative and postoperative setting, and to explore correlations between plasma and tumor erlotinib concentrations.
1.2.4 To develop a clinically relevant predictive assay of response to erlotinib based on selected biomarkers in endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) specimens when it can be obtained at the time of pancreatic cancer diagnosis in chemotherapy-naive patients.
Read the detailed description
Our current clinical trial proposal includes a short course of pre-operative, single agent erlotinib followed by post-operative erlotinib-gemcitabine in a neo-adjuvant/adjuvant approach to the treatment of patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The short course pre-operative erlotinib treatment serves two objectives: 1) erlotinib, through its cytostatic effects, may hinder the ability of tumor cells to metastasize at the time of surgical resection with minimal toxic effects and no delay in surgical treatment; 2) the true effects of erlotinib on potential determinants of response can be best assayed on the pancreatic cancer itself since no other model can better resemble the patients authentic tumor microenvironment. The post-operative treatment component of the protocol attempts to improve the demonstrated effects of gemcitabine by adding erlotinib in the adjuvant setting, a drug combination that, as mentioned, has already been proven to be advantageous for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.
Traditionally, chemotherapy for cancer has been conducted in an empiric fashion by first selecting a regimen based on clinical trial evidence and clinical parameters, and then by assessing the objective response to that regimen employing clinical and radiographic imaging means. This approach suffers from many disadvantages, most conspicuously the inability to select the better patient candidates prior to the initiation of therapy, thus sparing the risk and expense of ineffective treatment for patients who are unlikely to respond. Since pancreatic cancer expression of EGFR protein by itself is not predictive of therapeutic response, alternative methods of patient selection seem to be essential for the success of EGFR-targeted treatment. The understanding of EGFR molecular signaling has allowed the drug development process to shift from an empiric random screening approach to a more rational and mechanistic, target-directed approach. Among multiple attempts to identify molecular determinants of tumor cell sensitivity to EGFR inhibitors, there are two main paradigms that stand out: 1) activation of downstream pharmacodynamic effectors associated with response to the drug (i.e. phosphorylation of Akt or extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK); expression of c-fos), and 2) prediction of sensitivity based on a "static" analyte (detection of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) sensitizing mutations; epithelial-mesenchymal transition profile). However, given the complexity of factors governing pancreatic cancer response to erlotinib, the biologic heterogeneity of malignant phenotype, and overall relatively low response rates, we believe that it is unlikely that analysis of a single biomarker will be useful for patient selection. A comprehensive analysis of a dynamic panel of biomarkers relevant to EGFR signaling and erlotinib mechanism of action seems more useful in that sense. Furthermore, the limited ability of pancreatic cancer tissue sampling often precludes biomarker correlation to assays worked out in xenograft models or in-vitro conditions.
The translational rationale of this proposal is therefore to develop predictive chemotherapy sensitivity-resistance assays (CSRA) for pancreas carcinoma patients treated with erlotinib and gemcitabine. This will represent a major advance, because the CSRA would enable prediction of clinical response prior to initiation of therapy.
- Conditions
- Pancreatic Cancer
- Being tested
- erlotinib
- Keywords
- Pancreatic, Cancer, Assay, Biomarkers
- Medical subject headings
- Pancreatic Neoplasms, Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
erlotinibDrug
Also called Tarceva
Preoperative dosing of 150 mg oral erlotinib for 7 days before surgery. followed by erlotinib 100 mg daily 6 month/6 chemotherapy cycles. Gemcitabine 1000 m2 weekly after surgery for 6 cycles.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Eroltinib added to standard of care | Experimental | 150 mg of erlotinib for 7 days prior to surgery,then in the adjuvant stage the subject will receive 100mg of erlotinib and gemcitabine 1000mg/2 for 6 cycles Receives: Drug: erlotinib |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signaling(EGFR) in the Presence of Pancreatic Tumor Related to the Mechanism to Erlotinib.
It was our belief that we would need a comprehensive analysis of a dynamic panel of biomarkers relevant to EGFR signaling as well as the erlotinib mechanism of action it seems more useful in that sense. Furthermore,the ability limited of pancreatic cancer tissue sampling precluded biomarker correlation assays.These could not be worked out in either a xenograft model or in in-vitro conditions.
Measured: During the trial only
Secondary outcomes (1)
The Secondary Objectives Include Analysis of Recurrence-free and Overall Survival and the Development of a Predictive Assay for Response to Erlotinib Based on Selected Bio-markers in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Fine-needle Aspiration Specimens.
The measurement was to be the average length of time before recurrence of disease and the overall survival time. As well as time from recurrence to death in subjects.This time will be measure in months till recurrence and them months to death.
Measured: End of the study
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Feb 2009 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2009
- Primary completionJul 2011
- Study completionJul 2011
Why it stopped: Sponsor stopped due to slow enrollment
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Pancreatic CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Alabama at BirminghamThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 6 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Alabama at Birmingham
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- OSI Pharmaceuticals
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Marty Heslin, University of Alabama at Birmingham
- Investigators
- Juan P Arnoletti, M.D., Principal investigator, University of Alabama at Birmingham
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00841035
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- F080718006
- Status last verified
- Apr 2017
- First submitted
- 9 Feb 2009
- Last updated
- 19 May 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 May 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- University of Alabama at Birmingham(UAB 0808), A Phase II Study of Short-course Preoperative Erlotinib Followed by Post-operative Erlotinib-gemcitabine in Patients With Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00841035
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- F080718006
- Conditions
- Pancreatic Cancer
- Keywords
- Pancreatic, Cancer, Assay, Biomarkers
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Sponsor stopped due to slow enrollment
- Enrolment
- 6 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Alabama at BirminghamUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- OSI Pharmaceuticals
- Study start
- Feb 2009
- Primary completion
- Jul 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Feb 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 6 Oct 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
1.1 Primary Objective
To evaluate the effects of short course preoperative erlotinib treatment in a panel of predictive biomarkers from a group of patients who undergo resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with curative intent.
1.2 Secondary Objectives
1.2.1 To analyze the effects of short course preoperative erlotinib treatment followed by postoperative erlotinib-gemcitabine therapy in the disease-free survival of patients who undergo curative intent resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
1.2.2 To evaluate secondary endpoints of disease response such as duration of overall survival and patterns of recurrence for patients with resectable pancreatic cancer who undergo this treatment regimen.
1.2.3 To evaluate the plasma pharmacokinetics of erlotinib in pancreatic cancer patients both in the preoperative and postoperative setting, and to explore correlations between plasma and tumor erlotinib concentrations.
1.2.4 To develop a clinically relevant predictive assay of response to erlotinib based on selected biomarkers in endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) specimens when it can be obtained at the time of pancreatic cancer diagnosis in chemotherapy-naive patients.
Detailed description
Our current clinical trial proposal includes a short course of pre-operative, single agent erlotinib followed by post-operative erlotinib-gemcitabine in a neo-adjuvant/adjuvant approach to the treatment of patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The short course pre-operative erlotinib treatment serves two objectives: 1) erlotinib, through its cytostatic effects, may hinder the ability of tumor cells to metastasize at the time of surgical resection with minimal toxic effects and no delay in surgical treatment; 2) the true effects of erlotinib on potential determinants of response can be best assayed on the pancreatic cancer itself since no other model can better resemble the patients authentic tumor microenvironment. The post-operative treatment component of the protocol attempts to improve the demonstrated effects of gemcitabine by adding erlotinib in the adjuvant setting, a drug combination that, as mentioned, has already been proven to be advantageous for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.
Traditionally, chemotherapy for cancer has been conducted in an empiric fashion by first selecting a regimen based on clinical trial evidence and clinical parameters, and then by assessing the objective response to that regimen employing clinical and radiographic imaging means. This approach suffers from many disadvantages, most conspicuously the inability to select the better patient candidates prior to the initiation of therapy, thus sparing the risk and expense of ineffective treatment for patients who are unlikely to respond. Since pancreatic cancer expression of EGFR protein by itself is not predictive of therapeutic response, alternative methods of patient selection seem to be essential for the success of EGFR-targeted treatment. The understanding of EGFR molecular signaling has allowed the drug development process to shift from an empiric random screening approach to a more rational and mechanistic, target-directed approach. Among multiple attempts to identify molecular determinants of tumor cell sensitivity to EGFR inhibitors, there are two main paradigms that stand out: 1) activation of downstream pharmacodynamic effectors associated with response to the drug (i.e. phosphorylation of Akt or extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK); expression of c-fos), and 2) prediction of sensitivity based on a "static" analyte (detection of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) sensitizing mutations; epithelial-mesenchymal transition profile). However, given the complexity of factors governing pancreatic cancer response to erlotinib, the biologic heterogeneity of malignant phenotype, and overall relatively low response rates, we believe that it is unlikely that analysis of a single biomarker will be useful for patient selection. A comprehensive analysis of a dynamic panel of biomarkers relevant to EGFR signaling and erlotinib mechanism of action seems more useful in that sense. Furthermore, the limited ability of pancreatic cancer tissue sampling often precludes biomarker correlation to assays worked out in xenograft models or in-vitro conditions.
The translational rationale of this proposal is therefore to develop predictive chemotherapy sensitivity-resistance assays (CSRA) for pancreas carcinoma patients treated with erlotinib and gemcitabine. This will represent a major advance, because the CSRA would enable prediction of clinical response prior to initiation of therapy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Eroltinib added to standard of care | Experimental | Drug: erlotinib150 mg of erlotinib for 7 days prior to surgery,then in the adjuvant stage the subject will receive 100mg of erlotinib and gemcitabine 1000mg/2 for 6 cycles |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- .Histologic or cytologic confirmation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
- Pancreatic cancer must be surgically resectable: a) no evidence of distant metastasis; b) clear fat plane around the celiac and superior mesenteric arteries; c) patent portal and superior mesenteric veins
- No evidence of post-resection distant metastasis
- Pathologic confirmation of R0/R1 status following surgical resection
- Age ≥ 19 years
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Diagnosis of active (treated in past 5 years) concomitant malignancy with exception of non-melanotic skin cancer
- Transplant patients or patients receiving immunosuppression
- Presence of an underlying disease state associated with active bleeding or a past medical history of coagulopathy
- New York Heart Association Class IV congestive heart failure
- Limited mental capacity or language skills to the extent simple instructions cannot be followed or information regarding adverse events cannot be provided
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| erlotinibAlso: TarcevaPreoperative dosing of 150 mg oral erlotinib for 7 days before surgery. followed by erlotinib 100 mg daily 6 month/6 chemotherapy cycles. Gemcitabine 1000 m2 weekly after surgery for 6 cycles. | Drug | Eroltinib added to standard of care |
Primary outcome
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signaling(EGFR) in the Presence of Pancreatic Tumor Related to the Mechanism to Erlotinib.
Time frame: During the trial only
It was our belief that we would need a comprehensive analysis of a dynamic panel of biomarkers relevant to EGFR signaling as well as the erlotinib mechanism of action it seems more useful in that sense. Furthermore,the ability limited of pancreatic cancer tissue sampling precluded biomarker correlation assays.These could not be worked out in either a xenograft model or in in-vitro conditions.
1 secondary outcome
The Secondary Objectives Include Analysis of Recurrence-free and Overall Survival and the Development of a Predictive Assay for Response to Erlotinib Based on Selected Bio-markers in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Fine-needle Aspiration Specimens.
Time frame: End of the study
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 May 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Pancreatic Cancer
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
Modified FOLFIRINOX and Pentamidine in Advanced and Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
RecruitingPhase 3
Atebimetinib + GnP as a First Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Pancreatic Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 3
Lanreotide Versus Placebo Before Surgery to Prevent a Surgical Complication Called a Pancreatic Fistula
Pancreatic Carcinoma, Pancreatic Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Juan P Arnoletti, M.D. principal investigator
University of Alabama at Birmingham
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing erlotinib in people with Pancreatic Cancer, run by University of Alabama at Birmingham at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Oct 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signaling(EGFR) in the Presence of Pancreatic Tumor Related to the Mechanism to Erlotinib. (time frame: During the trial only). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 May 2017.