Carcinoma, HepatocellularNCT00857805
Transarterial Chemoembolization Versus Proton Beam Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
A study testing Transarterial Chemoembolization and Proton Beam Radiotherapy in people with Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, run by Loma Linda University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Patients with liver tumor burden that exceeds Milan criteria are considered to receive one of the following locoregional treatments: transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), percutaneous ethanol injection and proton beam radiation (PBR). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
- What is being tested?
- Transarterial Chemoembolization and Proton Beam Radiotherapy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 76 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 7 Jan 2009to 7 Jul 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients are candidates to receive both proton beam and TACE
- Patients with no evidence of metastasis or macrovascular invasion
- Patients with tumor burden that meets San Francisco criteria
Who cannot join
- Patients who are candidates for surgical resection
- Patients with lesion < 2 cm
- Patients who have contraindication to receive either TACE or proton
- Patients with serum alpha fetoprotein > 500
- Patients with metastasis or macrovascular invasion
- Patients treated previously for HCC by any locoregional treatment
Show all 15Show fewer
- Patients with prior liver transplant
- Patients with Child class C
- Patients with MELD score of > 25
- Patients with other comorbid diseases that may impact survival
- Patients with ongoing alcohol intake
- Patients with active sepsis
- Patients with gastrointestinal bleeding within a week
- Patients unwilling to sign informed consent form
- Patients with history of noncompliance
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Loma Linda University Medical Center
Loma Linda, California, 92354
About this study
Official title: Randomized Controlled Trial of Transarterial Chemoembolization Versus Proton Beam Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Patients with liver tumor burden that exceeds Milan criteria are considered to receive one of the following locoregional treatments: transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), percutaneous ethanol injection and proton beam radiation (PBR). The goals of these treatments are to control tumor growth, to downstage tumor size to meet Milan criteria, and to improve survival. Patients who exceed the Milan criteria benefit from tumor downstaging as a result of treatment. Patients who meet Milan criteria benefit from tumor control to bridge them to liver transplantation. TACE is considered the most common locoregional treatment that is used to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Proton beam radiotherapy has been used in treating HCC in a few centers across the globe. Phase I and II trials showed a satisfactory safety and efficacy results. Loma Linda University Medical Center is one of these pioneering centers that use proton beam as a treatment for HCC. This is the first randomized trial in the medical field that will compare head-to-head the efficacy of TACE versus proton beam in treating HCC patients.
- Conditions
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
- Being tested
- Transarterial Chemoembolization, Proton Beam Radiotherapy
- Keywords
- Transarterial chemoembolization, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Proton Beam Radiotherapy
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Transarterial ChemoembolizationProcedure or surgery
Also called (TACE)
Application of carboplatin, doxorubicin in ethiodol into the artery for one or more sessions.
Proton Beam RadiotherapyRadiation
Fifteen consecutive sessions
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Transarterial Chemoembolization | Active comparator | Transarterial Chemoembolization Receives: Procedure: Transarterial Chemoembolization |
| Proton Beam Radiotherapy | Active comparator | Proton Beam Radiotherapy Receives: Radiation: Proton Beam Radiotherapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Two Year Overall Survival
Comparison between arms of the percentage of patient alive 2 years following study treatment.
Measured: 24 Months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Mar 2009 (estimated)
- Study start7 Jan 2009
- Primary completion7 Jul 2021
- Study completion7 Jul 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Carcinoma, HepatocellularStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Loma Linda UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 76 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Loma Linda University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, David Bush, Loma Linda University
- Investigators
- Michael deVera, MD, Principal investigator, Loma Linda University Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00857805
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 58348
- Status last verified
- May 2024
- First submitted
- 5 Mar 2009
- Last updated
- 31 May 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 May 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Controlled Trial of Transarterial Chemoembolization Versus Proton Beam Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00857805
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 58348
- Conditions
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
- Keywords
- Transarterial chemoembolization, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Proton Beam Radiotherapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 76 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Loma Linda UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 7 Jan 2009 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 7 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 Jul 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Mar 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 31 May 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients with liver tumor burden that exceeds Milan criteria are considered to receive one of the following locoregional treatments: transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), percutaneous ethanol injection and proton beam radiation (PBR). The goals of these treatments are to control tumor growth, to downstage tumor size to meet Milan criteria, and to improve survival. Patients who exceed the Milan criteria benefit from tumor downstaging as a result of treatment. Patients who meet Milan criteria benefit from tumor control to bridge them to liver transplantation. TACE is considered the most common locoregional treatment that is used to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Proton beam radiotherapy has been used in treating HCC in a few centers across the globe. Phase I and II trials showed a satisfactory safety and efficacy results. Loma Linda University Medical Center is one of these pioneering centers that use proton beam as a treatment for HCC. This is the first randomized trial in the medical field that will compare head-to-head the efficacy of TACE versus proton beam in treating HCC patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Transarterial Chemoembolization | Active comparator | Procedure: Transarterial ChemoembolizationTransarterial Chemoembolization |
| Proton Beam Radiotherapy | Active comparator | Radiation: Proton Beam RadiotherapyProton Beam Radiotherapy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients are candidates to receive both proton beam and TACE
- Patients with no evidence of metastasis or macrovascular invasion
- Patients with tumor burden that meets San Francisco criteria
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Patients who are candidates for surgical resection
- Patients with lesion < 2 cm
- Patients who have contraindication to receive either TACE or proton
- Patients with serum alpha fetoprotein > 500
- Patients with metastasis or macrovascular invasion
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Transarterial ChemoembolizationAlso: (TACE)Application of carboplatin, doxorubicin in ethiodol into the artery for one or more sessions. | Procedure or surgery | Transarterial Chemoembolization |
| Proton Beam RadiotherapyFifteen consecutive sessions | Radiation | Proton Beam Radiotherapy |
Primary outcome
Two Year Overall Survival
Time frame: 24 Months
Comparison between arms of the percentage of patient alive 2 years following study treatment.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 May 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
RecruitingObservational study
Real-world Evaluation of the HistoSonics Edison System for Treatment of Liver Tumors Across Multidisciplinary Users (BOOMBOX: Master Study)
Liver Neoplasms, Primary Liver Cancer
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Prospective Exploratory Study of FAPi PET/CT With Histopathology Validation in Patients With Various Cancers
Bladder Carcinoma, Cervical Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
A Study to Evaluate Patient-Reported Satisfaction, Effectiveness, and Safety of Atezolizumab in Participants Treated in Routine Clinical Practice
Lung Cancer, Hepatocellular Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michael deVera, MD principal investigator
Loma Linda University Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Transarterial Chemoembolization and Proton Beam Radiotherapy in people with Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, run by Loma Linda University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 31 May 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Two Year Overall Survival (time frame: 24 Months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 May 2024.