Angioplasty, Transluminal, Percutaneous CoronaryPhase 4EREMUSNCT00870038
To Achieve an Early Reendothelialization at the Expense of Low Restenosis: The EREMUS Study
A Phase 4 study testing Percutaneous coronary intervention: Paclitaxel eluting balloon (Elutax) + Genous stent, Percutaneous coronary intervention: Uncoated balloon + Genous stent and Percutaneous coronary intervention: Drug eluting stent (Taxus stent) in people with Angioplasty, Transluminal, Percutaneous Coronary and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, run by Ospedale della Misericordia at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
The investigators sought to discover which one of the following strategies is the safest for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: paclitaxel-coated balloon+Genous stent; Genous stent; drug eluting stent (paclitaxel). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Angioplasty, Transluminal, Percutaneous Coronary, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- What is being tested?
- Percutaneous coronary intervention: Paclitaxel eluting balloon (Elutax) + Genous stent, Percutaneous coronary intervention: Uncoated balloon + Genous stent and Percutaneous coronary intervention: Drug eluting stent (Taxus stent)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 75 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- Dec 2010to Jan 2012
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Stable or unstable angina pectoris suitable to PCI of at least one coronary vessel
- Age >18 years
Who cannot join
- Recent (<72 hours) acute myocardial infarction
- Creatinine clearance <40 ml/min
- Allergy or hypersensitivity to at least two between: aspirin, clopidogrel, heparin, bivalirudin, paclitaxel, contrast media
- Life expectancy <1 year
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Ugo Limbruno, MD, PhD contact
Italy1 site
U.O. Emodinamica, Ospedale della Misericordia
Grosseto, 58100
Bernardo Cortese, MD
About this study
Official title: Early Re-Endothelialization Might Not be the Unique Solution to Prevent Restenosis. The EREMUS Study
The investigators sought to discover which one of the following strategies is the safest for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: paclitaxel-coated balloon+Genous stent; Genous stent; drug eluting stent (paclitaxel).
- Being tested
- Percutaneous coronary intervention: Paclitaxel eluting balloon (Elutax) + Genous stent, Percutaneous coronary intervention: Uncoated balloon + Genous stent, Percutaneous coronary intervention: Drug eluting stent (Taxus stent)
- Keywords
- PCI, stent, drug eluting stent, reendothelialization, restenosis, Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Percutaneous coronary intervention: Paclitaxel eluting balloon (Elutax) + Genous stentDevice
Also called Elutax balloon, Aachen Resonance GmbH, Bavaria, Germany;, Genous stent, Orbus Neich, Fort Lauderdale, FL.
Predilatation with paclitaxel-eluting balloon, then stenting of the lesion with Genous stent
Percutaneous coronary intervention: Uncoated balloon + Genous stentDevice
Also called Genous stent, Orbus Neich, Fort Lauderdale, FL.
Predilatation with uncoated balloon, the stenting with Genous stent.
Percutaneous coronary intervention: Drug eluting stent (Taxus stent)Device
Also called Taxus stent, Boston Scientific, Natick, MA.
Predilatation with uncoated balloon, the placement of a Taxus stent.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Paclitaxel eluting balloon (Elutax) + Genous stent Receives: Device: Percutaneous coronary intervention: Paclitaxel eluting balloon (Elutax) + Genous stent |
| 2 | Experimental | Uncoated balloon + Genous stent Receives: Device: Percutaneous coronary intervention: Uncoated balloon + Genous stent |
| 3 | Active comparator | Drug eluting stent (Taxus stent) Receives: Device: Percutaneous coronary intervention: Drug eluting stent (Taxus stent) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Late luminal loss between the three groups at 6 months angiographic follow up.
Measured: 6 months
Percent of stent struts covered by endothelium at optical coherence tomography, during 6 months angiographic follow up.
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Angiographic restenosis (6 months angiographic follow up).
Measured: 6 months
Net adverse clinical events at 6 months (death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, bleedings as from Acuity scale).
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Mar 2009 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2010
- Primary completionAug 2011 (estimated)
- Study completionJan 2012 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Angioplasty, Transluminal, Percutaneous CoronaryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ospedale della Misericordia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Bernardo Cortese, MD, FESC, Principal investigator, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00870038
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Bernard1
- Acronym
- EREMUS
- Status last verified
- Mar 2009
- First submitted
- 25 Mar 2009
- Last updated
- 22 Jul 2010
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Alfonso F, Zueco J, Cequier A, Mantilla R, Bethencourt A, Lopez-Minguez JR, Angel J, Auge JM, Gomez-Recio M, Moris C, Seabra-Gomes R, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Macaya C; Restenosis Intra-stent: Balloon Angioplasty Versus Elective Stenting (RIBS) Investigators. A randomized comparison of repeat stenting with balloon angioplasty in patients with in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Sep 3;42(5):796-805. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00852-0.
PubMed 12957423Stettler C, Wandel S, Allemann S, Kastrati A, Morice MC, Schomig A, Pfisterer ME, Stone GW, Leon MB, de Lezo JS, Goy JJ, Park SJ, Sabate M, Suttorp MJ, Kelbaek H, Spaulding C, Menichelli M, Vermeersch P, Dirksen MT, Cervinka P, Petronio AS, Nordmann AJ, Diem P, Meier B, Zwahlen M, Reichenbach S, Trelle S, Windecker S, Juni P. Outcomes associated with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: a collaborative network meta-analysis. Lancet. 2007 Sep 15;370(9591):937-48. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61444-5.
PubMed 17869634Aoki J, Serruys PW, van Beusekom H, Ong AT, McFadden EP, Sianos G, van der Giessen WJ, Regar E, de Feyter PJ, Davis HR, Rowland S, Kutryk MJ. Endothelial progenitor cell capture by stents coated with antibody against CD34: the HEALING-FIM (Healthy Endothelial Accelerated Lining Inhibits Neointimal Growth-First In Man) Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 May 17;45(10):1574-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.048.
PubMed 15893169Co M, Tay E, Lee CH, Poh KK, Low A, Lim J, Lim IH, Lim YT, Tan HC. Use of endothelial progenitor cell capture stent (Genous Bio-Engineered R Stent) during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction: intermediate- to long-term clinical follow-up. Am Heart J. 2008 Jan;155(1):128-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.08.031. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
PubMed 18082503Stone GW, White HD, Ohman EM, Bertrand ME, Lincoff AM, McLaurin BT, Cox DA, Pocock SJ, Ware JH, Feit F, Colombo A, Manoukian SV, Lansky AJ, Mehran R, Moses JW; Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategy (ACUITY) trial investigators. Bivalirudin in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a subgroup analysis from the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategy (ACUITY) trial. Lancet. 2007 Mar 17;369(9565):907-19. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60450-4.
PubMed 17368152Cortese B, Danzi GB, Piti A, Severi S, Limbruno U. Rationale and design of the randomized, multicenter EREMUS trial, a study that investigates how to achieve low restenosis and early reendothelialization after percutaneous coronary interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jul 1;78(1):32-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22856. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
PubMed 21413116
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Jul 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Early Re-Endothelialization Might Not be the Unique Solution to Prevent Restenosis. The EREMUS Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00870038
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EREMUS / Bernard1
- Keywords
- PCI, stent, drug eluting stent, reendothelialization, restenosis, Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Ospedale della MisericordiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2010
- Primary completion
- Aug 2011 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jan 2012 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 Mar 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators sought to discover which one of the following strategies is the safest for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: paclitaxel-coated balloon+Genous stent; Genous stent; drug eluting stent (paclitaxel).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Device: Percutaneous coronary intervention: Paclitaxel eluting balloon (Elutax) + Genous stentPaclitaxel eluting balloon (Elutax) + Genous stent |
| 2 | Experimental | Device: Percutaneous coronary intervention: Uncoated balloon + Genous stentUncoated balloon + Genous stent |
| 3 | Active comparator | Device: Percutaneous coronary intervention: Drug eluting stent (Taxus stent)Drug eluting stent (Taxus stent) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Stable or unstable angina pectoris suitable to PCI of at least one coronary vessel
- Age >18 years
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Recent (<72 hours) acute myocardial infarction
- Creatinine clearance <40 ml/min
- Allergy or hypersensitivity to at least two between: aspirin, clopidogrel, heparin, bivalirudin, paclitaxel, contrast media
- Life expectancy <1 year
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Percutaneous coronary intervention: Paclitaxel eluting balloon (Elutax) + Genous stentAlso: Elutax balloon, Aachen Resonance GmbH, Bavaria, Germany;, Genous stent, Orbus Neich, Fort Lauderdale, FL.Predilatation with paclitaxel-eluting balloon, then stenting of the lesion with Genous stent | Device | 1 |
| Percutaneous coronary intervention: Uncoated balloon + Genous stentAlso: Genous stent, Orbus Neich, Fort Lauderdale, FL.Predilatation with uncoated balloon, the stenting with Genous stent. | Device | 2 |
| Percutaneous coronary intervention: Drug eluting stent (Taxus stent)Also: Taxus stent, Boston Scientific, Natick, MA.Predilatation with uncoated balloon, the placement of a Taxus stent. | Device | 3 |
Primary outcome
Late luminal loss between the three groups at 6 months angiographic follow up.
Time frame: 6 months
Percent of stent struts covered by endothelium at optical coherence tomography, during 6 months angiographic follow up.
Time frame: 6 months
2 secondary outcomes
Angiographic restenosis (6 months angiographic follow up).
Time frame: 6 months
Net adverse clinical events at 6 months (death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, bleedings as from Acuity scale).
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Jul 2010.
- Results publication: PubMed 12957423Alfonso F, Zueco J, Cequier A, Mantilla R, Bethencourt A, Lopez-Minguez JR, Angel J, Auge JM, Gomez-Recio M, Moris C, Seabra-Gomes R, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Macaya C; Restenosis Intra-stent: Balloon Angioplasty Versus Elective Stenting (RIBS) Investigators. A randomized comparison of repeat stenting with balloon angioplasty in patients with in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Sep 3;42(5):796-805. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00852-0.
- Results publication: PubMed 17869634Stettler C, Wandel S, Allemann S, Kastrati A, Morice MC, Schomig A, Pfisterer ME, Stone GW, Leon MB, de Lezo JS, Goy JJ, Park SJ, Sabate M, Suttorp MJ, Kelbaek H, Spaulding C, Menichelli M, Vermeersch P, Dirksen MT, Cervinka P, Petronio AS, Nordmann AJ, Diem P, Meier B, Zwahlen M, Reichenbach S, Trelle S, Windecker S, Juni P. Outcomes associated with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: a collaborative network meta-analysis. Lancet. 2007 Sep 15;370(9591):937-48. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61444-5.
- Results publication: PubMed 15893169Aoki J, Serruys PW, van Beusekom H, Ong AT, McFadden EP, Sianos G, van der Giessen WJ, Regar E, de Feyter PJ, Davis HR, Rowland S, Kutryk MJ. Endothelial progenitor cell capture by stents coated with antibody against CD34: the HEALING-FIM (Healthy Endothelial Accelerated Lining Inhibits Neointimal Growth-First In Man) Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 May 17;45(10):1574-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.048.
- Results publication: PubMed 18082503Co M, Tay E, Lee CH, Poh KK, Low A, Lim J, Lim IH, Lim YT, Tan HC. Use of endothelial progenitor cell capture stent (Genous Bio-Engineered R Stent) during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction: intermediate- to long-term clinical follow-up. Am Heart J. 2008 Jan;155(1):128-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.08.031. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
- Results publication: PubMed 17368152Stone GW, White HD, Ohman EM, Bertrand ME, Lincoff AM, McLaurin BT, Cox DA, Pocock SJ, Ware JH, Feit F, Colombo A, Manoukian SV, Lansky AJ, Mehran R, Moses JW; Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategy (ACUITY) trial investigators. Bivalirudin in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a subgroup analysis from the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategy (ACUITY) trial. Lancet. 2007 Mar 17;369(9565):907-19. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60450-4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 21413116Cortese B, Danzi GB, Piti A, Severi S, Limbruno U. Rationale and design of the randomized, multicenter EREMUS trial, a study that investigates how to achieve low restenosis and early reendothelialization after percutaneous coronary interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jul 1;78(1):32-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22856. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
Related trials for Angioplasty, Transluminal, Percutaneous Coronary
Recruiting
Effects of Percutaneous Transluminal Renal Angioplasty of Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis in High-Risk Patients.
Renovascular Hypertension, Renovascular Hypertension With Renal Failure
RecruitingObservational study
Real-World Outcomes of Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in Coronary Artery Disease
Coronary Artery Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Vascular Complications After Kidney Transplantation
Kidney Transplant Recipient, Kidney Transplant; Complications
Recruiting
First-in-Human Study Using the SiroMax™ Sirolimus-Coated Balloon Catheter as a Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA) Balloon Catheter to Treat Subjects Who Have Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Involving In-Stent Restenosis (ISR) or an Unstented Lesion in a Small Coronary Vessel (DNSV).
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) (E.G., Angina, Myocardial Infarction, and Atherosclerotic Heart Disease (ASHD))
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
One-Year Results of GENOSS PCB Real-World Study in Femoropopliteal Artery Disease
PTA (Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty), Femoropopliteal Artery Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ugo Limbruno, MD, PhD contact
Bernardo Cortese, MD, FESC principal investigator
Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Percutaneous coronary intervention: Paclitaxel eluting balloon (Elutax) + Genous stent, Percutaneous coronary intervention: Uncoated balloon + Genous stent and Percutaneous coronary intervention: Drug eluting stent (Taxus stent) in people with Angioplasty, Transluminal, Percutaneous Coronary and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, run by Ospedale della Misericordia at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jul 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Bernardo Cortese, MD (+39 02 55033507, bcortese@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Late luminal loss between the three groups at 6 months angiographic follow up. (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00870038, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jul 2010.