AzTrials
AzTrials

VentriculomegalyNCT00870675

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of Ventriculomegaly: Morphology and Outcome

An observational study of Ventriculomegaly, run by National Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study compares the accuracy of fast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using the half Fourier single shot rapid acceleration with relaxation enhancement technique to ultrasound in the diagnosis of fetal abnormalities. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Ventriculomegaly
How many people
434 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jan 1996to Jun 2011
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Pregnant women carrying a fetus diagnosed by ultrasound as having ventriculomegaly.

Who may be able to join

  • Sonographic finding of ventriculomegaly
  • Ability and willingness of the patient to provide informed consent and cooperate for the examination
  • Absence of contraindications for MRI (claustrophobia, pacemaker, intracranial clips, intra-articular ocular debris)
  • All patients must be greater than 18 years old and must be in the second or third trimester of pregnancy

Who cannot join

  • Contraindications to MRI
  • Age less than 18
  • First trimester of pregnancy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Childrens Hospital Boston

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: MRI of Ventriculomegaly: Morphology and Outcome

This study compares the accuracy of fast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using the half Fourier single shot rapid acceleration with relaxation enhancement technique to ultrasound in the diagnosis of fetal abnormalities. The investigators' specific aim is to perform MRI examinations with ultrafast MRI on fetuses with sonographic morphologic abnormalities. The investigators' hypotheses are that 1) MRI will demonstrate fetal morphologic abnormalities; and 2) MRI will add additional information to the sonographic diagnosis which may directly affect maternal and/or neonatal care.

Read the detailed description
  1. Study Design: This is a descriptive study looking at the potential for MRI to aid in the diagnosis of fetal ventriculomegaly. It will also compare the specificity of MRI and ultrasound in diagnosing additional morphologic abnormalities.

450 pregnant women in the second and third trimester with ventriculomegaly will be asked to participate. Sonograms will be performed according the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine/American College of Radiology guidelines. In addition, views will be obtained of the fetal face, lips, outflow tracts, hands, and feet.

The gestational age of the fetus, interpretation of the sonogram, with sonographic abnormality and specific diagnosis will be prospectively recorded. Other data collected will be age and ethnicity of the patient, results of chromosomal analysis during the current pregnancy, and gestational age at the time of original diagnosis of abnormality during this pregnancy.

After screening for contraindications to MRI examination patients will undergo a 20 minute MRI examination. MRI examinations will be performed with a 1.5 T superconductive system (SIEMENS VISION, Erlangen, Germany or General Electric Twin, Milwaukee) using a 4-8 element body phased-array coil and/or body coil. The minimum rise time will be 600 microseconds (for a 25 milliTesla preset gradient amplitude). The whole body specific absorption rate will be kept under 1.5 watt/kilogram. Patients will be positioned supine with their feet entering the magnet bore first to minimize feelings of claustrophobia. A scout view will be obtained, and fetal images will be obtained with half Fourier single shot fast spin echo imaging imaging in the fetal sagittal, coronal, and axial planes (echo spacing of 4.2 msec, echo time=60 msec, echo train length=72, 1 acquisition, 3-5 mm section thickness, 26 x 35 cm field of view, 128 x 256 acquisition matrix). The refocusing flip angle will be minimized to decrease the amount of radiofrequency power deposition. Fetal anomalies seen with MRI will be recorded prospectively with knowledge of the sonographic findings.

Interpretation of the sonograms will be performed independently of the MR results. Interpretation of MRI examinations will be performed by reviewers with knowledge of the results of the ultrasound. The principal investigator will then combine the results from the two modalities. When the diagnosis differs between the modalities, the images will be reviewed by three radiologists and a consensus will be reached. The results of the sonogram and MRI will be communicated to the referring physician. Affect of any change in patient care will be assessed.

Comparison of MR diagnoses will be made to sonographic diagnoses. Clinical and pathologic follow-up will be obtained postnatally on all fetuses enrolled in the study.

After the baby is born, at 3 months of age, the patients will be contacted by phone by one of the investigators at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center to see if they want to enroll their baby in the neonatal follow-up portion of the study. This involves cognitive and motor testing of the child at Boston's Children's Hospital at age 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years of age. If a head MR or head ultrasound has not been obtained for clinical indications, it will be offered to the patient at that time.

Timeline of postnatal follow-up Number of patient for postnatal follow-up at specified age* Patients Enrolled Peripartum follow-up 6 months 18 months 24 months 36 month Any age Year 1 90 68 18 18 Year 2 90 90 54 51 105 Year 3 90 90 54 51 49 154 Year 4 90 90 54 51 49 46 200 Year 5 90 90 54 51 49 46 200 Total 450 428 234 205 146 93 678

  1. Data Analysis: This is primarily a descriptive study, comparing ultrasound and MR findings. Sonographic, MR, and postnatal diagnoses will be compared. Since this is a highly selected population, we cannot calculate sensitivity and specificity of each modality, but we can describe the type of findings visualized on one prenatal imaging modality that were not visualized on the other.

Data will be stored in an access database created specifically for this project

Keywords
Ventriculomegaly, ultrasound, MRI, fetus
Medical subject headings
Hydrocephalus

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT00870675
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ventriculomegalyPregnant women carrying a fetus with the ultrasound finding of enlarged ventricles (ventriculomegaly).

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Live birth

    Measured: within 6 months of enrollment

  2. Postnatal imaging abnormalities

    Measured: Within 3 years of birth

  3. Postnatal developmental delay

    Measured: Within 3 years of birth

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Mar 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 1996
  3. Primary completionMay 2009
  4. Study completionJun 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
434 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00870675
Sponsor's protocol ID
2001-P-00842/6
Other IDs
NIH NIBIB 01998
Status last verified
Sep 2014
First submitted
26 Mar 2009
Last updated
25 Sep 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Limperopoulos C, Robertson RL Jr, Khwaja OS, Robson CD, Estroff JA, Barnewolt C, Levine D, Morash D, Nemes L, Zaccagnini L, du Plessis AJ. How accurately does current fetal imaging identify posterior fossa anomalies? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Jun;190(6):1637-43. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3036.

    PubMed 18492918
  • Levine D, Feldman HA, Tannus JF, Estroff JA, Magnino M, Robson CD, Poussaint TY, Barnewolt CE, Mehta TS, Robertson RL. Frequency and cause of disagreements in diagnoses for fetuses referred for ventriculomegaly. Radiology. 2008 May;247(2):516-27. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2472071067.

    PubMed 18430880
  • Kazan-Tannus JF, Dialani V, Kataoka ML, Chiang G, Feldman HA, Brown JS, Levine D. MR volumetry of brain and CSF in fetuses referred for ventriculomegaly. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Jul;189(1):145-51. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2073.

    PubMed 17579164
  • Li Y, Estroff JA, Khwaja O, Mehta TS, Poussaint TY, Robson CD, Feldman HA, Ware J, Levine D. Callosal dysgenesis in fetuses with ventriculomegaly: levels of agreement between imaging modalities and postnatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Nov;40(5):522-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.11098.

    PubMed 22262510
  • Li Y, Estroff JA, Mehta TS, Robertson RL, Robson CD, Poussaint TY, Feldman HA, Ware J, Levine D. Ultrasound and MRI of fetuses with ventriculomegaly: can cortical development be used to predict postnatal outcome? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Jun;196(6):1457-67. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5422.

    PubMed 21606314
  • Pier DB, Levine D, Kataoka ML, Estroff JA, Werdich XQ, Ware J, Beeghly M, Poussaint TY, Duplessis A, Li Y, Feldman HA. Magnetic resonance volumetric assessments of brains in fetuses with ventriculomegaly correlated to outcomes. J Ultrasound Med. 2011 May;30(5):595-603. doi: 10.7863/jum.2011.30.5.595.

    PubMed 21527607
  • Li Y, Sansgiri RK, Estroff JA, Mehta TS, Poussaint TY, Robertson RL, Robson CD, Feldman HA, Barnewolt C, Levine D. Outcome of fetuses with cerebral ventriculomegaly and septum pellucidum leaflet abnormalities. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Jan;196(1):W83-92. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4434.

    PubMed 21178039
  • Senapati GM, Levine D, Smith C, Estroff JA, Barnewolt CE, Robertson RL, Poussaint TY, Mehta TS, Werdich XQ, Pier D, Feldman HA, Robson CD. Frequency and cause of disagreements in imaging diagnosis in children with ventriculomegaly diagnosed prenatally. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Nov;36(5):582-95. doi: 10.1002/uog.7680.

    PubMed 20499405
  • Beeghly M, Ware J, Soul J, du Plessis A, Khwaja O, Senapati GM, Robson CD, Robertson RL, Poussaint TY, Barnewolt CE, Feldman HA, Estroff JA, Levine D. Neurodevelopmental outcome of fetuses referred for ventriculomegaly. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Apr;35(4):405-16. doi: 10.1002/uog.7554.

    PubMed 20069560

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Ventriculomegaly, run by National Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Sep 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Live birth (time frame: within 6 months of enrollment). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00870675, which also lists 9 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Sep 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in