AzTrials
AzTrials

Non-Small Cell Lung CancerLU02NCT00881712

Proton Therapy With Chemotherapy for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (LU02)

A study testing PET positive nodal disease measuring 15 mm or greater, PET positive nodal disease measuring less than 15 mm and Patients considered resectable in people with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by University of Florida at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to find out what effects, good and/or bad, proton radiation at a higher tumor dose (and lower normal surrounding lung dose) combined with standard chemotherapy has on lung cancer. The dose you receive to the tumor will be higher than the standard dose. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
What is being tested?
PET positive nodal disease measuring 15 mm or greater, PET positive nodal disease measuring less than 15 mm and Patients considered resectable
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
15 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jun 2009to Oct 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Histologically or cytologically documented non-small cell carcinoma of the lung diagnosed within 16 weeks prior to study enrollment.
  • Patient must be at least 18 years old at the time of consent.
  • Stage III A or III B disease.
  • Patients must be able to start study treatment within 6 weeks of study enrollment.
  • Induction chemotherapy is allowed.
  • Marginally resectable or unresectable at presentation.
  • If the patient had exploratory thoracotomy, it must be done at least 3 weeks prior to enrollment.

Who cannot join

  • Evidence of distant metastasis.
  • Prior thoracic radiotherapy.
  • Any history of allergic reaction to taxanes.
  • Prior tumor resection. Candidate for upfront curative surgery.
  • Pleural effusion visible on chest x-ray or the scout view of the CT chest.
  • Unintentional weight loss within the month prior to diagnosis ≥ 10%.
  • Previous or concomitant malignancy other than early stage tumor treated more than 3 years ago for cure.
  • The presence of PET positive contralateral hilar disease.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Florida Proton Therapy Institute

    Jacksonville, Florida, 32206

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Phase II Trial of 3 Dimensional Proton Radiotherapy With Concomitant Chemotherapy for Patients With Initially Unresectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The purpose of this study is to find out what effects, good and/or bad, proton radiation at a higher tumor dose (and lower normal surrounding lung dose) combined with standard chemotherapy has on lung cancer. The dose you receive to the tumor will be higher than the standard dose. This may be able to increase the control of the tumor. Due to the accuracy of radiation given with protons, the dose to the normal lung tissue that surrounds the tumor will be lower than standard. This may be able to reduce the frequency and severity of the usual radiation side effects.

Being tested
PET positive nodal disease measuring 15 mm or greater, PET positive nodal disease measuring less than 15 mm, Patients considered resectable
Keywords
Non-small cell lung Cancer, Proton Radiation, Stage III
Medical subject headings
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PET positive nodal disease measuring 15 mm or greaterRadiation

    Also called Proton Radiation

    Proton radiation at 2 cobalt gray equivalent per fraction to a total of 74 cobalt gray equivalent with concomitant weekly chemotherapy.

  • PET positive nodal disease measuring less than 15 mmRadiation

    Also called Proton Radiation

    Proton radiation at 2 cobalt gray equivalent per fraction to a total of 60 cobalt gray equivalent with concomitant weekly chemotherapy.

  • Patients considered resectableRadiation

    Also called Proton Radiation

    Proton radiation at 2 cobalt gray per fraction. Re-evaluation performed between days 18-22 of treatment. If considered resectable after re-evaluation, radiotherapy will discontinue after a total of 50 cobalt gray equivalent and surgery will be performed.

Study groups in NCT00881712
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PET positive nodal disease measuring 15 mm or greaterExperimentalProton radiation with concomitant chemotherapy
Receives: Radiation: PET positive nodal disease measuring 15 mm or greater
PET positive nodal disease measuring less than 15 mmExperimentalProton radiation
Receives: Radiation: PET positive nodal disease measuring less than 15 mm
Patients considered resectableExperimentalProton radiation plus surgery
Receives: Radiation: Patients considered resectable

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Grade 3 or Higher Rate of Non-hematologic, Acute Treatment-related Toxicities

    Measured: Six months after end of radiation therapy

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Percentage of Patients With Disease Control

    Disease control rate is defined as Complete Response (CR) + Partial Response (PR) + Stable Disease (SD). As per RECIST version 1.1, Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions, Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters, Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study."), as accurate.

    Measured: Following treatment every 6 months for 2 years, then annually for 4 years.

  2. Percentage of Patients Alive at 5 Years

    Measured: Five years following radiation treatment

  3. Feasibility, Safety and Efficacy of Delivering Proton Radiotherapy With Concomitant Chemotherapy

    Measured: Weekly during treatment, then every 3 months for 1 year, every 4 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 2 years, then annually

  4. Correlation of Functional CT-PET Imaging With Treatment Outcomes

    Measured: Prestudy, before surgery (if applicable) between days 18-22 if needed, then during follow-up every 6 months for 2 years, then annually for 4 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Apr 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2009
  3. Primary completionOct 2014
  4. Study completionOct 2014

Why it stopped: projected enrollment rate not feasible

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
15 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00881712
Sponsor's protocol ID
UFPTI 0802-LU02
Acronym
LU02
Status last verified
Aug 2017
First submitted
13 Apr 2009
Last updated
11 Sep 2017
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Cancer Facts and Figures 2008 - American Cancer Society http://www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/2008CAFFfinalsecured.pdf

  • Delaney, Kooy editors: Proton and Charged particle Radiotherapy; LWW, 2008

  • Chang JY, Zhang X, Wang X, Kang Y, Riley B, Bilton S, Mohan R, Komaki R, Cox JD. Significant reduction of normal tissue dose by proton radiotherapy compared with three-dimensional conformal or intensity-modulated radiation therapy in Stage I or Stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jul 15;65(4):1087-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.01.052. Epub 2006 May 6.

    PubMed 16682145
  • Auberger T, Seydl K, Futschek T, Sztankay A, Sweeney RA, Lukas P. Photons or protons: precision radiotherapy of lung cancer. Strahlenther Onkol. 2007 Dec;183 Spec No 2:3-6. doi: 10.1007/s00066-007-2002-9. No abstract available.

    PubMed 18166995
  • Nichols RC, Henderson RH, Huh SN, Flampouri S, Cury JD, Pham DC, D'Agostino HJ, Louis D, Li Z, Mendenhall NP. Proton Radiotherapy Offers Reduced Bone Marrow and Normal Lung Exposure for Patients Receiving Dose Escalated Radiotherapy with Concomitant Chemotherapy for Regionally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Presented at the LALCa 2008 - 3rd Latin American Conference on Lung Cancer - Tercera Conferencia Latinoamericana sobre Cancer Pulmonar - Vina del Mar, Chile - October 9 and 10, 2008

  • Graham MV, Purdy JA, Emami B, Harms W, Bosch W, Lockett MA, Perez CA. Clinical dose-volume histogram analysis for pneumonitis after 3D treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999 Sep 1;45(2):323-9. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00183-2.

    PubMed 10487552
  • Lee HK, Vaporciyan AA, Cox JD, Tucker SL, Putnam JB Jr, Ajani JA, Liao Z, Swisher SG, Roth JA, Smythe WR, Walsh GL, Mohan R, Liu HH, Mooring D, Komaki R. Postoperative pulmonary complications after preoperative chemoradiation for esophageal carcinoma: correlation with pulmonary dose-volume histogram parameters. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Dec 1;57(5):1317-22. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)01373-7.

    PubMed 14630268
  • Komaki R, Sejpal S, Wei X, et al. Reduction of Bone Marrow Suppression for Patients with Stage III NSCLC Treated by Proton and Chemotherapy Compared with IMRT and Chemotherapy. Proceedings of the PTCOG 47, May 19-24, 2008.

  • Curran W, Scott C, Langer C, et al. Long term benefit is observed in a phase III comparison of sequential vs. concurrent chemo-radiation for patients with unresectable NSCLC: RTOG 9410. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2003;61(abstr).

  • Furuse K, Fukuoka M, Kawahara M, Nishikawa H, Takada Y, Kudoh S, Katagami N, Ariyoshi Y. Phase III study of concurrent versus sequential thoracic radiotherapy in combination with mitomycin, vindesine, and cisplatin in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Sep;17(9):2692-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.9.2692.

    PubMed 10561343
  • Rosenzweig KE, Sim SE, Mychalczak B, Braban LE, Schindelheim R, Leibel SA. Elective nodal irradiation in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Jul 1;50(3):681-5. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)01482-1.

    PubMed 11395236
  • Martel MK, et al. Incidental doses to clinically negative nodes from conformal treatment fields for non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys. 45(3 (supplement)): 244, 1999.

  • Nichols RC, Huh SN, Hoppe BS, Henderson RH, Li Z, Mendenhall NP. Protons Safely Allow Coverage of High Risk Nodes for Patients with Regionally Advanced NSCLC, University of Florida Proton Therapy Institute. Submitted for consideration. American Radium Society, 2009.

  • Rosenman JG, Halle JS, Socinski MA, Deschesne K, Moore DT, Johnson H, Fraser R, Morris DE. High-dose conformal radiotherapy for treatment of stage IIIA/IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer: technical issues and results of a phase I/II trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Oct 1;54(2):348-56. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)02958-9.

    PubMed 12243807
  • Perez CA, Pajak TF, Rubin P, Simpson JR, Mohiuddin M, Brady LW, Perez-Tamayo R, Rotman M. Long-term observations of the patterns of failure in patients with unresectable non-oat cell carcinoma of the lung treated with definitive radiotherapy. Report by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Cancer. 1987 Jun 1;59(11):1874-81. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19870601)59:113.0.co;2-z.

    PubMed 3032394

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing PET positive nodal disease measuring 15 mm or greater, PET positive nodal disease measuring less than 15 mm and Patients considered resectable in people with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by University of Florida at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Sep 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Jun 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Grade 3 or Higher Rate of Non-hematologic, Acute Treatment-related Toxicities (time frame: Six months after end of radiation therapy). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00881712, which also lists 26 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Sep 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in