AzTrials
AzTrials

Self HarmNCT00884078

Self Harm in Females of South Asian Family Origin

A study testing Culturally adapted manualized problem solving training in people with Self Harm and Suicidal Idealtion, run by Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust at 3 sites in United Kingdom.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Aim of the study is to adapt and develop a culturally appropriate psychological intervention and to pilot test it's feasibility, and acceptability for the adult South Asian females presenting to general hospital emergency department following self-harm. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 to 65 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Self Harm, Suicidal Idealtion, Hopelessness
What is being tested?
Culturally adapted manualized problem solving training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
20 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited Kingdom
Study dates
May 2009to Dec 2009
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 to 65 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • All females of self ascribe south Asian family origin presenting to an emergency department of the proposed study centers after an episode of self-harm.
  • By self harm we mean self inflicted injury, and/or ingestion of drugs in excess of the recommended therapeutic dose, with some intention of ending one's life (Vajda and Steinbeck 2000).
  • Age: 16 - 65 years
  • Resident in the trial site catchment area

Who cannot join

  • Participants will not be excluded based on limited knowledge of English.
  • Temporary resident unlikely to be available for follow up.
  • ICD 10 diagnosis organic (F.0), of alcohol and drug dependence (F.1x.2) Schizophrenia (F.2) or Bipolar Affective Disorder (F.31) because these patients require a different treatment approach.
  • Psychiatric admission required after deliberate self-harm.

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

United Kingdom3 sites
  • Royal Blackburn Hospital

    Blackburn, Lancashire, BB2 3HH

    Nusrat Husain, Consultant Psychiatrist, 00441772 773502, nusrat.husain@manchester.ac.uk

    Diwakar Nagaraj, Registrar, 00441254 226253, drdiwakarnagaraj@gmail.com

  • Manchester Royal Infirmary

    Manchester, Greater Manchester, M13 9WL

    Nusrat Husain, Consultant Psychiatrist, 004401772 773502, nusrat.husain@manchester.ac.uk

    Stewart Duriraj, Registrar

  • North Manchester General Hospital

    Manchester, Greater Manchester, M8 5RB

    Nasim Chaudhry, Consultant Psychiatrist, nasimchaudhry@btinternet.com

    Nasim Chaudhry, Consultant Psychiatrist

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Exploratory RCT of Culturally Adapted Manual Assisted Problem Solving Training (C-MAP) for Self Harm in Females of South Asian Family Origin

Aim of the study is to adapt and develop a culturally appropriate psychological intervention and to pilot test it's feasibility, and acceptability for the adult South Asian females presenting to general hospital emergency department following self-harm. Primary hypothesis for the study is to determine whether a brief psychological intervention compared with treatment as usual for self-harm results in decreased hopelessness and suicidal ideation. Further to this to collect necessary information on recruitment, the assessment instruments, effect size, the optimal delivery and acceptability of the intervention in preparation for a definitive RCT using repetition of self harm and cost effectiveness as the primary outcome measures.

Read the detailed description

Secondary Hypothesis for the study is to compare the impact of the intervention and treatment as usual on patients' satisfaction with care, resolution of interpersonal and family problems and attributions to fully understand the mechanism of action of the intervention.

Background and Significance:

Most economically developed nations are multi-ethnic. If current demographic trends continue societies will become more ethnically diverse. UK censuses revealed that the proportion of the UK population belonging to a non-white minority ethnic group increased by 53% between 1991 and 2001, from 3 million to 4.6 million (or 7.9% of the UK population). Half of the total ethnic minority population is of south Asian family origin (UK census 2001).

Suicide, a self-directed violence, is a global public health problem. According to a recent report from the World Health Organization, world wide, suicide claimed the lives of an estimated 815,000 people in the year 2000, for an over all age-adjusted rate of 14.5 per 100,000 (WHO, 2002). In the United Kingdom, suicide is the second most common cause of death in people aged 15-24 (Hawton et al, 1998).

Prevention of suicide is now included in health policy initiatives in several countries and reduction in suicidal behavior, both fatal and non-fatal, is part of the Health for All targets of the World Health Organization (WHO, 1992). Prevention of suicide is also a priority for health services in England (Department of health, 1999a,b, 2002).

Deliberate self-poisoning is one of the commonest reasons for medical admission in the United Kingdom. (NHS Centre for R\&D 1998) it is a major public health problem with over 170,000 hospital attendances per annum (Kapur et al, 1998). Health significance of attempted suicide is further underlined by the links with suicide. Of patients presenting to hospital with deliberate self-harm, up to 15% eventually kill themselves. (Nordentoft et al, 1993). It has been estimated that in the year following a suicide attempt, the risk of a repeat attempt or death by suicide may be up to 100 times greater than that seen in people who have never attempted suicide (Garland \& Zigler, 1993)

Among the ethnic minority groups in UK there are reports of high rates of suicide in Asian women (Soni Raleigh et al, 1990; 1992; Neelman et al, 1996; Patel \& Gaw, 1996). Previous studies from the United Kingdom have also suggested that rates of self-harm in young Asian women are higher than in the white population (Burke, 1976; Merrill \& Owens, 1986; Glover et al, 1989, Husain et al, 2006). Recent hospital data in London indicate that self harm was 2.5 times more frequent among young Asian women (16-30 years) than white women of the same age and 62% of the former expressed regret that they had survived compared to 36% of the white women (Bhugra et al, 1999).

There are concerns about the acceptability of current services to ethnic minority patients (Parkman et al, 1997; Goater et al, 1999; Sashidharan, 2001). The high rate of suicide in young women of South Asian origin in the UK may be related to untreat self-harm. Of the known risk factors for suicide, the most strongly predictive of a future suicide attempt or completed suicide are hopelessness and a prior history of self harm (Brown et al, 2000).

In Manchester (MASH project) using data collected in Emergency departments over a four years period we have found a higher rate of self harm in South Asian than white European females (relative risk 1.5 times 16-24 years age group). Interpersonal conflicts within the family were the main precipitating factor, which was significantly more frequent than in white females. In spite of no differences in clinical presentation and suicidal intent there were significant differences in the Emergency departments' management of the two groups. Referral back to primary care was the most common management plan for South Asians while European whites were referred to psychiatric services for further management (Cooper et al, 2006). It is extremely important that effective treatments for deliberate self-harm patients that can be widely utilized in clinical practice be identified (Arsensman et al, 2001). We are not aware of any such intervention trials in the ethnic minorities in UK. As our population becomes increasingly diverse, tailoring practice to the area's demographics is crucial to providing effective treatment. For mental health providers in areas with large black and minority ethnic populations, it is essential to provide culturally acceptable services.

The National Service Framework (NSF) for Mental Health in UK (DoH, 1999) reaffirms the issue of inappropriate services for black and ethnic minority communities. Standard one of the NSF requires working with both individuals and communities so that disparities can be combated. The mental health services should work against social exclusion, especially with regards to people from black and minority groups. The standard seven of the NSF focuses on reduction of rates of suicide.

The NICE (National Institute of Clinical Excellence) guidelines also make recommendations for culturally sensitive services and suggest that the NHS Trusts must identify a board member to take responsibility for diversity and ethnic issues. Responsibilities must include adequacy of service provision, training on cultural difference, and monitoring service usage by ethnicity, consultation with local black and minority ethnic groups and achieving targets set in advance on a year by year basis.

The low uptake of statutory services within the South Asian community in the UK calls into question the appropriateness of the existing services. There is a need to move away from stereotypes and overgeneralizations and start from the user's frame of reference, taking account of family dynamics, belief systems and cultural constraints. This indicates the urgent need for all those concerned with the mental health services for ethnic minorities to take positive action to eradicate these barriers.

The Case for Action in Inside Outside (DOH, 2003) highlights the significantly raised risk of suicide and attempted suicide among young Asian women in the UK. Cutting the suicide rate by 20% by 2010 is a key national mental health target. Catering for the needs of this high-risk group is a vital component of meeting this target.

Under representation of ethnic minorities in mental health research: Despite the evidence for a relationship between ethnicity and increased risk for mental disorders, very little is known about providing mental health services to these groups. (Waheed et al, 2003). A new research agenda is needed to drive the development and evaluation of culturally sensitive and appropriate psychosocial interventions for ethnic minority groups. Not only studying effectiveness of these interventions but the efficiency of delivery systems as well are priorities for these special populations. (Miranda et al, 2003)

UK clinical trials are not catering for the needs of ethnic minorities (Mason 2003), unlike USA where all National Institute of health (NIH) funded research has to be sensitive to these specific needs (Sheikh 2004). This compromises their generalisability and external validity. We have ourselves carried a systematic review and have found that few studies provided information on outcomes of mental health care for ethnic minorities. In UK to date only one RCT of an educational intervention for depression has been reported (Jacob 2002). This under reporting mainly due to under-representation of ethnic minorities in health research is concerning. In fact contrary to this prevalent under investment greater resources and effort should be directed toward researching those sections of society that have the greatest capacity to benefit from such research (i.e. those at high risk and/or not currently accessing or receiving appropriate care). (Sheikh 2006)

High prevalence of suicidal ideations and depression among women of South Asian origin:

In our previous study in primary care (Husain et 1997) and in the MRC funded population-based project (Gater et al (2008)) concerning the mental health needs of people of Pakistani family origin we have demonstrated that women of Pakistani origin living in the north west of England have high rates of psychological distress and depression, 13.8% of Pakistani women from the community based sample of the 475 women reported suicidal ideations on Self Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ). This was associated with increased psychological distress (mean SRQ score of 12.3 in participants with suicidal ideas as compare to 5.23 in those who did not report suicidal thoughts). This presumably reflects the hopelessness of some South Asian women in UK.

Socio cultural determinants of deliberate self harm in women of South Asian origin:

Primary care and hospital based research in the UK has demonstrated that there are socio cultural determinants such as cultural a synchronization between women of South Asian origin and their culture of family origin characteristically in realms of overprotective home environment, differences in social norms, interpersonal conflicts with in the family, issues around personal choices like relationships and marriage as the main precipitating factors (Hicks\& Bhugra 2003). Compared to match GP attenders, who had not self harmed, the Asian self-harm group was significantly less in favour of arranged marriage and was more likely to have experienced a severe life event in a close relationship (Bhugra et al, 1999b). It has been shown that younger women are not restrained by religion from being involved in self-harm as compare to older women. (Glover et al 1989). In a survey in London 180 women reported the top three causes of suicide attempts by Asian women to be 'violence by the husband' (92%), 'being trapped in an unhappy family situation' (90%), and 'depression' (90%) (Bhugra 2004).

Failure to access care as a determinant of chronic distress:

The higher rate of suicide in young women of South Asian origin (Raleigh VS, 1996) may be related to untreated self harm. A previous qualitative study has shown that young South Asian women tend to access care only at the point of desperation rather than before this crisis is reached (Chew-Graham et al 2002). There appears to be reluctance to seek early help thus prolonging the course of distress, which may be explained by a cultural attitude to mental disorders. Among South Asians, women are less likely to seek help (Fenton \& Sadiq; 1993). Furthermore psychologically distressed Asian patients consulting their GP are more likely to present with a physical problem than their white counterparts, and are less likely to have their distress identified than their white counterparts (Wilson \& MacCarthy1994). The literature suggests services fail to engage with ethnic minorities (Beliappa, 1991; Newham Project, 1998; Chew-Graham et al, 2001). Language problems may be a barrier to accessing appropriate treatment, although it is likely that most of the young South Asian women who self harmed were second or third generation and would be fluent in English. Low intensity of treatment and/or adverse experience of services may prevent South Asians from presenting again to hospital following subsequent self-harm episodes.

A higher proportion of South Asians (particularly women) have cited an interpersonal problem with family members as the main precipitant of the self-harm episode in our study in Manchester (Cooper et al, 2006). The psychosocial stressors which precipitate self-harm in South Asian women may be culturally influenced, but this should not exclude them from psychological help. Both problem solving therapies (Salkovskis PM et al, 1990; Hawton et al, 1998) and interpersonal forms of psychotherapy (Guthrie E et al, 1998) are of benefit in the treatment of patients who self-harm, and could potentially be of help to this group. However, work to adapt either approach, specifically to cater for the needs of South Asian women, is required. A recent systematic review of self harm concluded that while some treatments showed promise, further randomised intervention trials were required (Hawton K et al, 1998). Since most episodes of deliberate self-harm in South Asian women are precipitated by an interpersonal problem with family members there is a strong rationale for investigating the efficacy of an intervention, which addresses such issues.

Problem solving therapy has a sound theoretical basis. Consistent evidence has shown that people who attempt suicide have poor problem solving skills (Linehan, Camper, Chiles et al, 1987, Schotte \& Clum, 1987; McLeavey, Day, Murray et al, 1987; Pollock \& Williams, 2001). It is hypothesized that problem-solving deficits contribute to hopelessness and depression, which in turn increase the probability of suicidal ideation and intent (Schotte \& Clum, 1987; D'Zurilla et al, 1998). Problem solving therapy has been found to be effective in reducing levels of depression and hopelessness in patients who have attempted suicide (Townsend et al, 2001). In addition, problem-solving therapy is a brief, cost effective, pragmatic intervention that has the potential to be widely utilized in clinical practice. Thus, the problem solving deficits seen in suicidal individuals indicate that systematic training in problem solving skills with a focus on problems precipitating the suicide attempt is likely to have a positive effect on predictors of suicidality and repetition of suicidal behavior. Thus strong rationale exists for the pilot study of problem solving therapy in order to clearly determine the acceptability of this intervention following self harm in South Asian population.

Being tested
Culturally adapted manualized problem solving training
Keywords
Self harm in south asian women, depression, suicidal ideations, problem solving training
Medical subject headings
Self-Injurious Behavior, Depression, Suicidal Ideation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Culturally adapted manualized problem solving trainingOther

    The areas covered by the manual include an evaluation of the self-harm attempt, crisis skills, problem solving, and basic cognitive techniques to manage emotions and negative thinking and relapse prevention strategies. The treatment will be structured around patient's current problems with the relevant sections of the manual helping the patient to deal with specific problems leading to the self-harm act. Between the sessions the manual can be used for homework tasks by the patient. We will be able to linguistically match the therapist and the participant in three most common languages spoken and understood in South Asian population i.e. Urdu, Hindi and Punjabi.

Study groups in NCT00884078
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1ExperimentalC-MAPS (Culturally adapted manualized problem solving training) will be a brief problem focused therapy comprising of 8 sessions within three months after a self-harm episode. We will have two engagement sessions before the actual therapy. The adapted therapy/training will be delivered by therapists/trained counselors in the patient's home/GP practice depending upon patient's choice. Sessions will be offered weekly in the first month and than fortnightly and will last 50 minutes.
Receives: Other: Culturally adapted manualized problem solving training
2 Control groupNo interventionPatients who will be randomized to the "treatment as usual" arm will receive routine care. In most cases this consists of an assessment by a casualty doctor or a junior psychiatrist in the emergency department, on the basis of which about one third patients are referred for follow up as a psychiatry outpatient, a small number are referred to addiction services, and the remainder are advised to consult their own general practitioner (Kapur 1998) this is particularly so in case of Asian females (Cooper et al, 2006). No patients are routinely referred to psychotherapy or psychology services. Participants will receive an initial assessment along with treatment as usual (TAU) as ascertained by the general practitioner or mental health professional any type of treatment apart from C-MAPS will be permitted. We will record the degree of patient adherence to standard care.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Suicidal Ideation (Beck scale for suicidal ideation)

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Hopelessness (Beck hopelessness scale)

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Time to self-reported repetition of self harm (estimate for RCT)

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Depressive symptoms assessed by Beck Depression Inventory

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Apr 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2009
  3. Primary completionOct 2009 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2009 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
20 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00884078
Sponsor's protocol ID
08/H1013/6
Status last verified
Apr 2009
First submitted
19 Feb 2009
Last updated
20 Apr 2009
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Culturally adapted manualized problem solving training in people with Self Harm and Suicidal Idealtion, run by Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust at 3 sites in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Apr 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Nusrat Husain (00441772 773502, nusrat.husain@manchester.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Suicidal Ideation (Beck scale for suicidal ideation) (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Apr 2009.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in