Heart FailureMORE-CARENCT00885677
MOnitoring REsynchronization deviCes and cARdiac patiEnts
A study testing Medtronic CareLink® Network in people with Heart Failure, run by Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure at 64 sites in 10 countries.
Trial summary
The objective of this study is to compare two different strategies of disease management in heart failure patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy devices 1. Remote monitoring with CareLink Network System 2. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Heart Failure
- What is being tested?
- Medtronic CareLink® Network
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 918 participants
- Where
- 64 sitesin 10 countries
- Study dates
- Jun 2009to Jan 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient indicated to CRT-ICD according to current guidelines:
- Left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVEF≤35%),
- New York Heart Association functional class III-IV,
- QRS≥120 ms
- Optimized medical treatment.
- Patient implanted within the last 8 weeks with Medtronic CRT-ICD device equipped with fluid accumulation diagnostics, AT/AF monitoring capability, wireless telemetry for automatic remote data transmission and alerting system for physician.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Patient with less than 8 weeks follow-up, who has not received Carelink® Network Monitor and was not managed by Cardiac Compass report reviewing.
- Carelink Network is available at patient's home
- Patient or the patient's caregiver is willing and able to use the Medtronic CareLink® Network Monitor and to perform the required duties at home or has a family member or assistant perform those duties.
- Patient is willing and able to sign an informed consent form.
Who cannot join
- Inability to fully understand the instructions relating to remote monitoring using CareLink® Network.
- Permanent AT/AF.
- Patient had not been previously implanted with a CRT/CRT-D device.
- Patient has medical conditions that would limit study participation.
- Patient is less than 18 years of age.
- Patient is enrolled in or intends to participate in another clinical trial that may have an impact on the study endpoints.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Patient meets any exclusion criteria required by local law.
- Inability or refusal to sign a patient informed consent form.
- Patient's life expectancy is less than one year in the opinion of the physician
- Patient is pregnant or breastfeeding.
Trial locations and contacts
64 sites in 10 countries.
64 sites in 10 countries
Italy29 sites
Policlinico Universitario
Bari
Cliniche Gavazzeni
Bergamo
Ospedali Riuniti
Bergamo
Policlinico Universitario S. Orsola-Malpighi
Bologna
Fondazione Poliambulanza
Brescia
Ospedale V.E. Ferrarotto
Catania
Ospedale Pugliese e Ciaccio
Catanzaro
Sant'Anna Hospital
Catanzaro
Ospedale Civile
Chioggia, Venezia
Ospedale Unico della Versilia
Lido Di Camaiore (LU)
Centro Cardiologico Monzino
Milan
Ospedale San Paolo
Milan
Ospedale Civile
Mirano, Venezia
A.O. Monaldi
Naples
Azienda Ospedaliera Sacro Cuore Don Calabria
Negrar
Ospedale Giovan Battista Grassi
Ostia Antica
Clinica San Carlo
Paderno Dugnano
Ospedali Civico e Benfratelli
Palermo
Ospedale San Salvatore
Pesaro
Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica - CNR
Pisa
Ospedale Santa Maria delle Croci
Ravenna
Azienda Complesso Ospedaliero San Filippo Neri
Roma
Policlinico Tor Vergata
Roma
Policlinico Umberto I
Roma
Ospedale Santa Maria Del Carmine
Rovereto
P.O. di Trento P.O.S.Chiara
Trento
Azienda Ospedaliera-Ospedali Riuniti
Trieste
Ospedale E. Macchi
Varese
Ospedale Civile Maggiore di Borgo Trento
Verona
France12 sites
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Angers
Angers
Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut Lévêque
Bordeaux
Centre Hospitalier
La Rochelle
Hopital Louis Pradel
Lyon
Hopital Saint Joseph
Marseille
Hopital Arnaud de Villeneuve
Montpellier
CHU
Narbonne
Hopital La Source
Orléans
Hopital La Pitie Salpetriere
Paris, 75651
Clinique Bizet
Paris
Hopital du Nord
Saint-Etienne
CHRU
Tours
Spain7 sites
Hospital De Torrevieja
Alicante
Hospital Reina Sofia
Córdoba
Hospital Insular de Gran Canaria
Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Hospital Universitario de Valme
Seville
Hospital General Universitario
Valencia
Hospital Universitario La Fé
Valencia
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo
Vigo
Greece5 sites
Evaggelismos Hospital
Athens, 10676
Henry Dynant Hospital - Athens
Athens, 11526
University Hospital Herakleion
Heraklion
HYGEIA - Hospital
Marousi
University Hospital AHEPA Thessaloniki
Thessaloniki, 54636
Switzerland4 sites
Universitätsspital
Basel
University Hospital
Geneva
Kantonsspital St. Gallen
Sankt Gallen
Triemli Hospital
Zurich
Hungary2 sites
Gottsegen György Országos Kardiológia Intézet GOKI
Budapest
Semmelweis University AOK
Budapest
About this study
The objective of this study is to compare two different strategies of disease management in heart failure patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy devices
- Remote monitoring with CareLink Network System
- Standard management of the disease by means of scheduled routine in-patient follow-ups; and to demonstrate that the remote monitoring strategy is superior to the standard strategy, both in terms of clinical effectiveness and total healthcare system utilization.
Read the detailed description
Major cardiovascular adverse events in patients with heart failure treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-D) represent a big concern to the medical community, as they require hospitalizations and may lead to death.
Subjects with a history of heart failure are counseled regarding the importance of contacting their clinicians promptly if they experience any changes or worsening of their condition.
Acute heart failure episodes with hospitalizations represent one of the most relevant causes of health status deterioration for these patients. Moreover, atrial arrhythmias occurrence is a big issue, as it increases the risk of heart failure itself, stroke and inappropriate shocks. In addition to affecting patient health, hospital admission resulting from these complications will impact healthcare costs.
Latest generations of Medtronic CRT-D devices are equipped with a system that triggers an alarm if possible fluid accumulation is detected (OptiVol). This may initiate patient-clinician contact before evident cardiac decompensation. Moreover, advanced diagnostic capabilities for detecting atrial arrhythmias occurrence and total burden are available on such devices.
Importantly, all these devices are now able to inform physician of these events by remote monitoring with CareLink Network parameters, and have the potential of playing a key role in patient monitoring.
Over the last years, interest has been increasing in remote monitoring models for delivering care to HF patients, either as telemonitoring (transfer of physiological data through telephone or digital cable from home to healthcare provider) or as regular structured telephone contacts between patients and healthcare providers, which may or may not include data transfer.
Several studies with relatively large numbers of patients have been published (see table).
A recent meta-analysis found that remote monitoring programs for patients with chronic HF living in the community reduced admissions to hospital and all cause mortality by nearly one fifth while improving health related quality of life, but had no significant effect on all cause admission to hospital.
However, none of the published studies considered remote monitoring systems able to provide device-detected information on fluid accumulation, AT/AF total burden, arrhythmias occurrence and device-related issues in patients treated with CRT-D devices.
Early intervention may then be a key element in avoiding major cardiovascular events to occur and possible deterioration of the disease progression. The Carelink Network remote monitoring system, through Care Alerts, may initiate subject-clinician contact before typical signs and symptoms are exhibited, since it provides the physician with an automatic alert for atrial arrhythmias occurrence, fluid accumulation, and system integrity issues. However, clinical evidence must be provided of the superiority of this patient management strategy with respect to standard clinical practice, based on routine in-office visits.
Very recent findings showed that the use of CareLink in European clinical practice is technically feasible and that remote follow-up is an efficient method of surveillance of implanted patients. Moreover, the early detection and review of device and clinical events suggest the potential impact of remote monitoring on overall patient care.
There are a number of possible limitations with remote monitoring. The CareLink Network system requires that the patient establishes an initial contact between the device and the remote monitor unit, and that the unit is properly hooked up to the phone line. Not all patients may be able to perform the setup properly. There may be a delay by the physician in consulting patient data (for example over weekends), with a risk of adverse events occurring during that interval. There may be difficulties in contacting patients (e.g. if they are traveling). These possible limitations need to be properly assessed, especially for monitoring atrial arrhythmias, where the time factor is of importance for avoiding complications.
Remote patients' disease management has the potential for avoiding hospitalization. Clear demonstration that remote monitoring of AT/AF/HF plus strict treatment guidelines leads to a reduction in hospitalization rates has not been proven, and it could be a major argument for using this technology in routine clinical practice.
The MORE-CARE Study is aimed at comparing two different strategies of disease management in heart failure patients treated with CRT-D devices:
- Remote disease management via Carelink Network system
- Standard disease management by means of scheduled routine in-patient follow-ups. The main objective of the study is to demonstrate that the remote management strategy is superior to the standard strategy, both in terms of clinical effectiveness and total healthcare system utilization.
- Conditions
- Heart Failure
- Being tested
- Medtronic CareLink® Network
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Failure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Medtronic CareLink® NetworkDevice
Continuous monitoring via a disease remote management system.
Patients of the Study group will receive a remote monitor and their device will be programmed to have wireless telemetry, Care Alerts, and the ability to transmit over the Medtronic CareLink® network. Clinical and device conditions will be then monitored continuously and alarms for the physician will be generated if a set of pre-defined potentially harming conditions should occur.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Study Group | Active comparator | Patients of the study arm are CRT-D patients followed-up by means of a remote disease management system (Medtronic Carelink® Network), for which an automatic alerting system is enabled for fluid accumulation, AT/AF episodes and system integrity. Receives: Device: Medtronic CareLink® Network |
| Control Group | No intervention | Patients are CRT-D patients managed according to current standard clinical practice, based on routinely performed in-office visits. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Phase 1: Median Time Between Event Onset Time and Clinical Decision for Each Subject.
The median delay from device-detected events to clinical decisions was considerably shorter in the Remote group compared to the Control group
Measured: 1 year since the randomization
Phase 2: Combined Endpoint of Death From Any Cause, Cardiovascular and Device-related Hospitalizations (at Least 48 Hours Stay), Calculated as Number of Subjects With at Least One Event
Time to first event
Measured: 2 years after randomization
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Apr 2009 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2009
- Primary completionDec 2015
- Study completionJan 2016
Why it stopped: Low enrollment rate
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Heart FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart FailureThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 918 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Haran Burri, MD, Principal investigator, University Hospitals of Geneva SwitzerlandGiuseppe Boriani, MD, Principal investigator, Policlinico Universitario Sant'Orsola, Bologna, ItalyRenato Pietro Ricci, MD, Principal investigator, Azienda Ospedaliera San Filippo Neri, Roma, ItalyAurelio Quesada, MD, Principal investigator, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, SpainStefano Favale, MD, Principal investigator, Policlinico Universitario di Bari, ItalyJosef Kautzner, MD, Principal investigator, IKEM, Prague, Czech RepublicAntoine Da Costa, MD, Principal investigator, Hopital du Nord, Saint Etienne, France
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00885677
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MDT-MORE-CARE
- Acronym
- MORE-CARE
- Status last verified
- Feb 2017
- First submitted
- 21 Apr 2009
- Last updated
- 2 Jul 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Burri H, Quesada A, Ricci RP, Boriani G, Davinelli M, Favale S, Da Costa A, Kautzner J, Moser R, Navarro X, Santini M. The MOnitoring Resynchronization dEvices and CARdiac patiEnts (MORE-CARE) study: rationale and design. Am Heart J. 2010 Jul;160(1):42-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.04.005.
PubMed 20598971Boriani G, Da Costa A, Ricci RP, Quesada A, Favale S, Iacopino S, Romeo F, Risi A, Mangoni di S Stefano L, Navarro X, Biffi M, Santini M, Burri H; MORE-CARE Investigators. The MOnitoring Resynchronization dEvices and CARdiac patiEnts (MORE-CARE) randomized controlled trial: phase 1 results on dynamics of early intervention with remote monitoring. J Med Internet Res. 2013 Aug 21;15(8):e167. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2608.
PubMed 23965236Burri H, da Costa A, Quesada A, Ricci RP, Favale S, Clementy N, Boscolo G, Villalobos FS, Mangoni di S Stefano L, Sharma V, Boriani G; MORE-CARE Investigators. Risk stratification of cardiovascular and heart failure hospitalizations using integrated device diagnostics in patients with a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator. Europace. 2018 May 1;20(5):e69-e77. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux206.
PubMed 28679168Boriani G, Da Costa A, Quesada A, Ricci RP, Favale S, Boscolo G, Clementy N, Amori V, Mangoni di S Stefano L, Burri H; MORE-CARE Study Investigators. Effects of remote monitoring on clinical outcomes and use of healthcare resources in heart failure patients with biventricular defibrillators: results of the MORE-CARE multicentre randomized controlled trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 Mar;19(3):416-425. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.626. Epub 2016 Aug 28.
PubMed 27568392
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Jul 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- MOnitoring REsynchronization deviCes and cARdiac patiEnts
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00885677
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MORE-CARE / MDT-MORE-CARE
- Conditions
- Heart Failure
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Low enrollment rate
- Enrolment
- 918 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart FailureIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jun 2009
- Primary completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Apr 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 4 Apr 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this study is to compare two different strategies of disease management in heart failure patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy devices
- Remote monitoring with CareLink Network System
- Standard management of the disease by means of scheduled routine in-patient follow-ups; and to demonstrate that the remote monitoring strategy is superior to the standard strategy, both in terms of clinical effectiveness and total healthcare system utilization.
Detailed description
Major cardiovascular adverse events in patients with heart failure treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-D) represent a big concern to the medical community, as they require hospitalizations and may lead to death.
Subjects with a history of heart failure are counseled regarding the importance of contacting their clinicians promptly if they experience any changes or worsening of their condition.
Acute heart failure episodes with hospitalizations represent one of the most relevant causes of health status deterioration for these patients. Moreover, atrial arrhythmias occurrence is a big issue, as it increases the risk of heart failure itself, stroke and inappropriate shocks. In addition to affecting patient health, hospital admission resulting from these complications will impact healthcare costs.
Latest generations of Medtronic CRT-D devices are equipped with a system that triggers an alarm if possible fluid accumulation is detected (OptiVol). This may initiate patient-clinician contact before evident cardiac decompensation. Moreover, advanced diagnostic capabilities for detecting atrial arrhythmias occurrence and total burden are available on such devices.
Importantly, all these devices are now able to inform physician of these events by remote monitoring with CareLink Network parameters, and have the potential of playing a key role in patient monitoring.
Over the last years, interest has been increasing in remote monitoring models for delivering care to HF patients, either as telemonitoring (transfer of physiological data through telephone or digital cable from home to healthcare provider) or as regular structured telephone contacts between patients and healthcare providers, which may or may not include data transfer.
Several studies with relatively large numbers of patients have been published (see table).
A recent meta-analysis found that remote monitoring programs for patients with chronic HF living in the community reduced admissions to hospital and all cause mortality by nearly one fifth while improving health related quality of life, but had no significant effect on all cause admission to hospital.
However, none of the published studies considered remote monitoring systems able to provide device-detected information on fluid accumulation, AT/AF total burden, arrhythmias occurrence and device-related issues in patients treated with CRT-D devices.
Early intervention may then be a key element in avoiding major cardiovascular events to occur and possible deterioration of the disease progression. The Carelink Network remote monitoring system, through Care Alerts, may initiate subject-clinician contact before typical signs and symptoms are exhibited, since it provides the physician with an automatic alert for atrial arrhythmias occurrence, fluid accumulation, and system integrity issues. However, clinical evidence must be provided of the superiority of this patient management strategy with respect to standard clinical practice, based on routine in-office visits.
Very recent findings showed that the use of CareLink in European clinical practice is technically feasible and that remote follow-up is an efficient method of surveillance of implanted patients. Moreover, the early detection and review of device and clinical events suggest the potential impact of remote monitoring on overall patient care.
There are a number of possible limitations with remote monitoring. The CareLink Network system requires that the patient establishes an initial contact between the device and the remote monitor unit, and that the unit is properly hooked up to the phone line. Not all patients may be able to perform the setup properly. There may be a delay by the physician in consulting patient data (for example over weekends), with a risk of adverse events occurring during that interval. There may be difficulties in contacting patients (e.g. if they are traveling). These possible limitations need to be properly assessed, especially for monitoring atrial arrhythmias, where the time factor is of importance for avoiding complications.
Remote patients' disease management has the potential for avoiding hospitalization. Clear demonstration that remote monitoring of AT/AF/HF plus strict treatment guidelines leads to a reduction in hospitalization rates has not been proven, and it could be a major argument for using this technology in routine clinical practice.
The MORE-CARE Study is aimed at comparing two different strategies of disease management in heart failure patients treated with CRT-D devices:
- Remote disease management via Carelink Network system
- Standard disease management by means of scheduled routine in-patient follow-ups. The main objective of the study is to demonstrate that the remote management strategy is superior to the standard strategy, both in terms of clinical effectiveness and total healthcare system utilization.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Study Group | Active comparator | Device: Medtronic CareLink® NetworkPatients of the study arm are CRT-D patients followed-up by means of a remote disease management system (Medtronic Carelink® Network), for which an automatic alerting system is enabled for fluid accumulation, AT/AF episodes and system integrity. |
| Control Group | No intervention | –Patients are CRT-D patients managed according to current standard clinical practice, based on routinely performed in-office visits. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Patient indicated to CRT-ICD according to current guidelines:
- Left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVEF≤35%),
- New York Heart Association functional class III-IV,
- QRS≥120 ms
- Optimized medical treatment.
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Inability to fully understand the instructions relating to remote monitoring using CareLink® Network.
- Permanent AT/AF.
- Patient had not been previously implanted with a CRT/CRT-D device.
- Patient has medical conditions that would limit study participation.
- Patient is less than 18 years of age.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Medtronic CareLink® NetworkContinuous monitoring via a disease remote management system. Patients of the Study group will receive a remote monitor and their device will be programmed to have wireless telemetry, Care Alerts, and the ability to transmit over the Medtronic CareLink® network. Clinical and device conditions will be then monitored continuously and alarms for the physician will be generated if a set of pre-defined potentially harming conditions should occur. | Device | Study Group |
Primary outcome
Phase 1: Median Time Between Event Onset Time and Clinical Decision for Each Subject.
Time frame: 1 year since the randomization
The median delay from device-detected events to clinical decisions was considerably shorter in the Remote group compared to the Control group
Phase 2: Combined Endpoint of Death From Any Cause, Cardiovascular and Device-related Hospitalizations (at Least 48 Hours Stay), Calculated as Number of Subjects With at Least One Event
Time frame: 2 years after randomization
Time to first event
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Jul 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 20598971Burri H, Quesada A, Ricci RP, Boriani G, Davinelli M, Favale S, Da Costa A, Kautzner J, Moser R, Navarro X, Santini M. The MOnitoring Resynchronization dEvices and CARdiac patiEnts (MORE-CARE) study: rationale and design. Am Heart J. 2010 Jul;160(1):42-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.04.005.
- Results publication: PubMed 23965236Boriani G, Da Costa A, Ricci RP, Quesada A, Favale S, Iacopino S, Romeo F, Risi A, Mangoni di S Stefano L, Navarro X, Biffi M, Santini M, Burri H; MORE-CARE Investigators. The MOnitoring Resynchronization dEvices and CARdiac patiEnts (MORE-CARE) randomized controlled trial: phase 1 results on dynamics of early intervention with remote monitoring. J Med Internet Res. 2013 Aug 21;15(8):e167. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2608.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28679168Burri H, da Costa A, Quesada A, Ricci RP, Favale S, Clementy N, Boscolo G, Villalobos FS, Mangoni di S Stefano L, Sharma V, Boriani G; MORE-CARE Investigators. Risk stratification of cardiovascular and heart failure hospitalizations using integrated device diagnostics in patients with a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator. Europace. 2018 May 1;20(5):e69-e77. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux206.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27568392Boriani G, Da Costa A, Quesada A, Ricci RP, Favale S, Boscolo G, Clementy N, Amori V, Mangoni di S Stefano L, Burri H; MORE-CARE Study Investigators. Effects of remote monitoring on clinical outcomes and use of healthcare resources in heart failure patients with biventricular defibrillators: results of the MORE-CARE multicentre randomized controlled trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 Mar;19(3):416-425. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.626. Epub 2016 Aug 28.
Related trials for Heart Failure
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life(COREVIVE-HFrEF)
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiency
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Bimagrumab in Participants With HFpEF
Heart Failure, Diastolic, Diastolic Heart Failure
Recruiting
Evaluation of a French Hospital Discharge Therapeutic Education Program by Nurses for Heart Failure Patient (EduSor)
Heart Failure
Active, not recruiting
Assessment of Combined CCM and ICD Device in HFrEF
Heart Failure, Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Not yet recruiting
RELIEVE-HFrEF TRIAL: REducing Lung congestIon Symptoms Using the v-wavE Shunt in adVancEd Heart Failure With Reduced EF
Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction, Heart Failure Chronic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Haran Burri, MD principal investigator
University Hospitals of Geneva Switzerland
Giuseppe Boriani, MD principal investigator
Policlinico Universitario Sant'Orsola, Bologna, Italy
Renato Pietro Ricci, MD principal investigator
Azienda Ospedaliera San Filippo Neri, Roma, Italy
64 sites in 10 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Medtronic CareLink® Network in people with Heart Failure, run by Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure at 64 sites in 10 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 64 sites in Italy, France, Spain, Greece, Switzerland and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Apr 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Phase 1: Median Time Between Event Onset Time and Clinical Decision for Each Subject. (time frame: 1 year since the randomization). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00885677, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jul 2025.