AzTrials
AzTrials

Acne VulgarisPhase 4NCT00887484

A Comparative Study of the Tolerability of Two Combination Therapies for the Treatment of Acne

A Phase 4 study testing BENZOYL PEROXIDE/ CLINDAMYCIN and BENZOYL PEROXIDE/ ADAPALENE in people with Acne Vulgaris, run by Stiefel, a GSK Company at 4 sites in Argentina.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the tolerability of topical combination therapies in the treatment of facial acne. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Acne Vulgaris
What is being tested?
BENZOYL PEROXIDE/ CLINDAMYCIN and BENZOYL PEROXIDE/ ADAPALENE
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
4 sitesArgentina
Study dates
Feb 2009to Jun 2009
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female subjects at least 21 years of age, in good general health with documented diagnosis of acne vulgaris.
  • Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test. Sexually active women of childbearing potential participating in the study must use a medically acceptable form of contraception Abstinence is considered an acceptable method of contraception.
  • Inflammatory (papules and pustules) and non-inflammatory (open and closed comedones) facial lesions.
  • The ability and willingness to follow all study procedures, attend all scheduled visits, and successfully complete the study
  • Capable of understanding and willing to provide signed and dated written voluntary informed consent (and any local or national authorization requirements) before any protocol specific procedures are performed

Who cannot join

  • Female subjects who are pregnant, trying to become pregnant or breastfeeding.
  • Subjects who have any clinically relevant finding at their baseline physical other than acne vulgaris.
  • History or presence of regional enteritis or inflammatory bowel disease (eg, ulcerative colitis, pseudomembranous colitis, chronic diarrhea, or a history of antibiotic-associated colitis) or similar symptoms.
  • Use of topical antibiotics or anti-acne medications on the face and systemic antibiotics within the past 2 and 4 weeks, respectively.
  • Use of topical corticosteroids on the face or systemic corticosteroids within the past 4 weeks. Use of inhaled, intra-articular or intra-lesional (other than for facial acne lesions) steroids is acceptable.
  • Use of systemic retinoids within the past 6 months.
  • Facial procedures performed by an esthetician, beautician, physician, nurse, or other practitioner, within the past 4 weeks or during the conduct of the study.
  • Known hypersensitivity or previous allergic reaction to any of the active components, lincomycin, adapalene, clindamycin, benzoyl peroxide or excipients of the study product.

Trial locations and contacts

4 sites in 1 country.

Argentina4 sites
  • Centro de Investigación y Prevencion de Enfermidades Cardiovasculares

    Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, 1119

  • Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires

    Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, 1181 ACH

  • LUMIPIEL - Centro Dermatológico

    Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, 1181 ACH

  • Buenos Aires Skin

    Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1055AAO

Other trials in Argentina

About this study

Official title: A Single-blind, Randomized, Comparative Pilot Study Evaluating the Tolerability of Two Topical Combination Therapies in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris

The purpose of this study is to compare the tolerability of topical combination therapies in the treatment of facial acne.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is to compare the tolerability of topical combination therapies in the treatment of facial acne.

Conditions
Acne Vulgaris
Being tested
BENZOYL PEROXIDE/ CLINDAMYCIN, BENZOYL PEROXIDE/ ADAPALENE
Keywords
Acne, Acne Vulgaris
Medical subject headings
Acne Vulgaris

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BENZOYL PEROXIDE/ CLINDAMYCINDrug

    Commencing at baseline, subjects will apply once daily both treatment arm #1 and treatment arm #2 in a bilateral split-face fashion (allocation to left and right side randomly assigned) for an initial 2 weeks. At 2 weeks, subjects will apply benzoyl peroxide/clindamycin gel to the entire face for an additional 6 weeks.

  • BENZOYL PEROXIDE/ ADAPALENEDrug

    Commencing at baseline, subjects will apply once daily both treatment arm #1 and treatment arm #2 in a bilateral split-face fashion (allocation to left and right side randomly assigned) for an initial 2 weeks. At 2 weeks, subjects will apply benzoyl peroxide/clindamycin gel to the entire face for an additional 6 weeks.

Study groups in NCT00887484
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Clindoxyl GelExperimentalSubject will apply both study products in a split-face fashion. Study products will be applied once-daily in the evening.
Receives: Drug: BENZOYL PEROXIDE/ CLINDAMYCIN
Epiduo gelActive comparatorSubject will apply both study products in a split-face fashion. Study products will be applied once-daily in the evening.
Receives: Drug: BENZOYL PEROXIDE/ ADAPALENE

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Erythema (Redness)

    Signs and symptoms of tolerability (erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis)on the face.

    Erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis were graded using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Slight; 2, Moderate; 3, Intense.

    Measured: Weeks 1 and 2

  2. Skin Dryness

    Signs and symptoms of tolerability (erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis)on the face.

    Erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis were graded using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Slight; 2, Moderate; 3, Intense.

    Measured: Weeks 1 and 2

  3. Skin Peeling

    Signs and symptoms of tolerability (erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis)on the face.

    Erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis were graded using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Slight; 2, Moderate; 3,Intense.

    Measured: Weeks 1 and 2

  4. Irritant/Allergic Contact Dermatitis

    Signs and symptoms of tolerability (erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis)on the face.

    Erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis were graded using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Slight; 2, Moderate; 3, Intense.

    Measured: Weeks 1 and 2

Secondary outcomes (40)
  1. Erythema (Redness)

    Signs and symptoms of tolerability (erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis)on the face.

    Erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis were graded using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Slight; 2, Moderate; 3, Intense.

    Measured: Weeks 5 and 8

  2. Skin Dryness

    Signs and symptoms of tolerability (erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis)on the face.

    Erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis were graded using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Slight; 2, Moderate; 3, Intense.

    Measured: Weeks 5 and 8

  3. Skin Peeling

    Signs and symptoms of tolerability (erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis)on the face.

    Erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis were graded using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Slight; 2, Moderate; 3, Intense.

    Measured: Weeks 5 and 8

  4. Irritant/Allergic Contact Dermatitis

    Signs and symptoms of tolerability (erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis)on the face.

    Erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis were graded using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Slight; 2, Moderate; 3, Intense.

    Measured: Weeks 5 and 8

  5. Investigators Static Global Assessment

    ISGA is evaluated using the following scale: 0, Clear: Clear skin with no lesions; 1, Almost Clear: Rare non-inflammatory lesions; 2, Mild: Some non-inflammatory lesions with no more than a few inflammatory lesions but no nodular lesions); 3, Moderate: Up to many non-inflammatory lesions and may have some inflammatory lesions, but no more than 1 small nodular lesion; 4, Severe: Up to many non-inflammatory and inflammatory lesions, but no more than a few nodular lesions; 5, Very Severe: Many non-inflammatory and inflammatory lesions and more than a few nodular lesions. May have cystic lesions.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 5, 8

  6. Total Acne Lesion Counts

    Total acne lesion counts - includes both inflammatory acne lesions (pustules, papules), noninflammatory lesions (whiteheads and blackheads),

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 5 and 8

  7. Inflammatory Acne Lesion Counts

    Total number of inflammatory acne lesions (pustules, papules) at each timepoint.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 5 and 8

  8. Non-inflammatory Acne Lesion Counts

    Total number of non-inflammatory acne lesions (whiteheads and blackheads) at each timepoint.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 5 and 8

  9. Skindex-29 Quality of Life Questionnaire (QoL) - Symptomatic Domain

    Skindex-29 is a self-administered (by participants at each time point) QoL questionnaire comprised of 29 items (it.) scored on a 5-point scale (0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=often, 4=all the time) covering 3 domains: emotional (10 it.); symptomatic (7 it.); functional (12 it.). Domain scores range from 0 to 40, 0 to 28, and 0 to 48, respectively. Lower scores=better QoL. The symptomatic score (score=0 to 28)=(sum of the 7 individual item scores) * 100/28.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2 and 8

  10. Quality of Life Questionnaire - Emotional Domain

    Skindex-29 is a self-administered (by participants at each time point) QoL questionnaire comprised of 29 items (it.) scored on a 5-point scale (0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=often, 4=all the time) covering 3 domains: emotional (10 it.); symptomatic (7 it.); functional (12 it.). Domain scores range from 0 to 40, 0 to 28, and 0 to 48, respectively. Lower scores=better QoL. The emotional score (score=0 to 40)=(sum of the 10 individual item scores) * 100/40.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2 and 8

  11. Quality of Life Questionnaire - Functional Domain

    Skindex-29 is a self-administered (by participants at each time point) QoL questionnaire comprised of 29 items (it.) scored on a 5-point scale (0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=often, 4=all the time) covering 3 domains: emotional (10 it.); symptomatic (7 it.); functional (12 it.). Domain scores range from 0 to 40, 0 to 28, and 0 to 48, respectively. Lower scores=better QoL. The functional score (score=0 to 48)=(sum of the 12 individual item scores) * 100/48.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2 and 8

  12. Quality of Life Questionnaire - Global Score

    Skindex-29 is a self-administered (by participants at each time point) QoL questionnaire comprised of 29 items (it.) scored on a 5-point scale (0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=often, 4=all the time) covering 3 domains: emotional (10 it.); symptomatic (7 it.); functional (12 it.). Domain scores range from 0 to 40, 0 to 28, and 0 to 48, respectively. Lower scores=better QoL. A Global Score (range 0-100)=(sum of all 29 individual item scores) * 100/116.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2 and 8

  13. Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Severity of Redness at Weeks 1 and 2

    Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Very minimal; 2, Mild; 3, Moderate; 4, Severe.

    Measured: Weeks 1 and 2

  14. Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Severity of Redness at Week 8

    Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire was completed by the subject at week 8 using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Very minimal; 2, Mild; 3, Moderate; 4, Severe.

    Measured: Week 8

  15. Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Severity of Dryness at Weeks 1 and 2

    Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Very minimal; 2, Mild; 3, Moderate; 4, Severe.

    Measured: Weeks 1 and 2

  16. Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Severity of Dryness at Week 8

    Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire was completed by the subject at week 8 using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Very minimal; 2, Mild; 3, Moderate; 4, Severe.

    Measured: Week 8

  17. Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Severity of Burning at Weeks 1 and 2

    Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Very minimal; 2, Mild; 3, Moderate; 4, Severe.

    Measured: Weeks 1 and 2

  18. Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Severity of Burning at Week 8

    Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire was completed by the subject at week 8 using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Very minimal; 2, Mild; 3, Moderate; 4, Severe.

    Measured: Week 8

  19. Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Severity of Itching at Weeks 1 and 2

    Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Very minimal; 2, Mild; 3, Moderate; 4, Severe.

    Measured: Weeks 1 and 2

  20. Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Severity of Itching at Week 8

    Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire was completed by the subject at week 8 using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Very minimal; 2, Mild; 3, Moderate; 4, Severe.

    Measured: Week 8

  21. Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Severity of Scaling at Weeks 1 and 2

    Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Very minimal; 2, Mild; 3, Moderate; 4, Severe; 5, Very Severe.

    Measured: Weeks 1 and 2

  22. Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Severity of Scaling at Week 8

    Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire was completed by the subject at week 8 using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Very minimal; 2, Mild; 3, Moderate; 4, Severe; 5, Very Severe.

    Measured: Week 8

  23. Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Ease of Application of Product at Weeks 1 and 2

    Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 1, Very easy; 2, Easy; 3, Neutral; 4, Difficult.

    Measured: Weeks 1 and 2

  24. Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Ease of Application of Product at Week 8

    Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire was completed by the subject at week 8 using the following scale: 1, Very easy; 2, Easy; 3, Neutral; 4, Difficult.

    Measured: Week 8

  25. Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Comfort of Skin at Weeks 1 and 2

    Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 1, Very Comfortable; 2, Comfortable; 3, Somewhat Comfortable; 4, Somewhat Uncomfortable; 5, Uncomfortable.

    Measured: Weeks 1 and 2

  26. Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Comfort of Skin at Week 8

    Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 1, Very Comfortable; 2, Comfortable; 3, Somewhat Comfortable; 4, Somewhat Uncomfortable; 5, Uncomfortable.

    Measured: Week 8

  27. Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Which Study Product is Subject More Satisfied With? at Weeks 1 and 2

    Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following choices: Epiduo, Clindoxyl Gel, Both Treatments Equally.

    Measured: Weeks 1 and 2

  28. Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Comparison of Study Products Used in the Past at Week 8

    Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire was completed by the subject at week 8 using the following scale: 1, More Satisfied; 2, Somewhat More Satisfied; 3, Neither Satisfied or Dissatisfied; 4, Somewhat More Dissatisfied; 5, More Dissatisfied.

    Measured: Week 8

  29. Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Decrease of Acne Breakouts by Study Products at Weeks 1 and 2

    Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 1, Highly Favorable; 2, Favorable; 3, Neutral; 4, Unfavorable; 5, Uncomfortable.

    Measured: Weeks 1 and 2

  30. Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Decrease of Acne Breakouts by Study Products at Week 8

    Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire was completed by the subject at week 8 using the following scale: 1, Highly Favorable; 2, Favorable; 3, Neutral; 4, Unfavorable; 5, More Dissatisfied.

    Measured: Week 8

  31. Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Compliance at Weeks 1 and 2

    Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 0, Not Compliant at all; 1, Mostly Compliant; 2, Very Compliant.

    Measured: Weeks 1 and 2

  32. Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Compliance at Week 8

    Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at week 8 by answering Yes or No to the following question: Did you use the product every day?. When only one product was applied to the face, subjects were asked to rate their compliance by answering the aforementioned question, rather than rating compliance on a 0-2 scale.

    Measured: Week 8

  33. Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Feeling of Hydrated and Moisturized Skin at Weeks 1 and 2

    Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint by answering Yes or No to the following question: Did you feel that your skin was hydrated and moisturized while you were on your study product?

    Measured: Weeks 1 and 2

  34. Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Feeling of Hydrated and Moisturized Skin at Week 8

    Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint by answering Yes or No to the following question: Did you feel that your skin was hydrated and moisturized while you were on your study product?

    Measured: Week 8

  35. Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Use of Study Product if Choice to Continue Acne Treatment at Week 1 and 2

    Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint by answering Yes or No to the following question: If you were to choose to continue treatment for your acne, would you use the study product?

    Measured: Weeks 1 and 2

  36. Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Use of Study Product if Choice to Continue Acne Treatment at Week 8

    Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at 8 week timepoint by answering Yes or No to the following question: If you were to choose to continue treatment for your acne, would you use the study product?

    Measured: Week 8

  37. Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Ease of Use Wtih Make-Up at Weeks 1 and 2

    Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 0, Not Applicable; 1, Very Easy; 2, Easy; 3, Neutral; 4, Difficult; 5, Very Difficult.

    Measured: Weeks 1 and 2

  38. Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Ease of Use With Make-Up at Week 8

    Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 0, Not Applicable; 1, Very Easy; 2, Easy; 3, Neutral; 4, Difficult; 5, Very Difficult.

    Measured: Week 8

  39. Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Overall Satisfaction of Study Product at Weeks 1 and 2

    Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 1, Very Satisfied; 2, Satisfied; 3, Neutral; 4, Unsatisfied; 5, Very Unsatisfied.

    Measured: Weeks 1 and 2

  40. Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Overall Satisfaction of Study Product at Week 8

    Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 1, Very Satisfied; 2, Satisfied; 3, Neutral; 4, Unsatisfied; 5, Very Unsatisfied.

    Measured: Week 8

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Apr 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2009
  3. Primary completionJun 2009
  4. Study completionJun 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00887484
Sponsor's protocol ID
114544
Status last verified
Oct 2016
First submitted
23 Apr 2009
Last updated
13 Dec 2016
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing BENZOYL PEROXIDE/ CLINDAMYCIN and BENZOYL PEROXIDE/ ADAPALENE in people with Acne Vulgaris, run by Stiefel, a GSK Company at 4 sites in Argentina.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Dec 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 4 sites in Argentina. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Oct 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Erythema (Redness) (time frame: Weeks 1 and 2). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Dec 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in