PainPhase 2NCT00889499
Modulation of Central Hypersensitivity in Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain by Intravenous Tropisetron
A Phase 2 study testing Tropisetron 2 mg and Tropisetron 5mg in people with Pain and Chronic Disease, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
Chronic pain is associated with hypersensitivity of the central nervous system. The drug under investigation (tropisetron) has been shown in animal studies to attenuate central hypersensitivity. It has therefore the potential to be effective in chronic pain. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain, Chronic Disease
- What is being tested?
- Tropisetron 2 mg and Tropisetron 5mg
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- Mar 2009to Apr 2010
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Chronic musculoskeletal pain
- Pain duration at least 6 months
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy
- Breast feeding
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Switzerland1 site
Dep. of Anesthesiology and Pain Therapy, Bern University Hospital, Inselspital
Bern, 3010
About this study
Chronic pain is associated with hypersensitivity of the central nervous system. The drug under investigation (tropisetron) has been shown in animal studies to attenuate central hypersensitivity. It has therefore the potential to be effective in chronic pain. We compare two doses of tropisetron with placebo in patients with chronic pain. We measure pain intensity and parameters that assess central hypersensitivity.
Read the detailed description
Background
Prolonged afferent nociceptive input induces an increase in the excitability of central sensory neurons. The hyperexcitable neurons amplify the nociceptive signal, thereby producing an exaggerated pain response. This state of central hypersensitivity very likely contributes to pain and disability in patients, even in the presence of limited tissue damage.
The 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT-3) receptor is involved in spinal nociceptive transmission. After experimentally induced inflammation, the selective 5-HT-3 receptor antagonist ondansetron inhibited the electrically evoked responses of dorsal horn neurones, but had no effect on these responses in the absence of inflammation. Importantly, the origin of this pathway is a spino-brainstem-spinal loop that includes areas of the brain involved in emotional and affective responses to pain. This suggests that the 5-HT-3 receptors have no significant role under normal conditions, but are activated by peripheral inflammation and contribute to spinal cord hyperexcitability. Their activity could be driven by anxiety and fear.
Spinal cord hyperexcitability elicited by trauma, inflammation or surgery is influenced by descending facilitatory and inhibitory pathways. The periaqueductal grey and endogenous opioid peptides play a central role in the inhibition of spinal cord neuronal responses. Release of enkephalin at supraspinal and spinal levels is evoked by noxious stimulation. Further inhibitory modulation is exerted by serotonergic and noradrenergic systems. These mechanisms may underlie a possible role of psychological disturbances in the spinal cord processing of nociceptive and non-nociceptive stimuli.
While central hypersensitivity mechanisms have been extensively investigated in the animal, data in patients are sparse. In patients, direct measurements at spinal cord or brain neurons can not be made. Therefore, it is impossible to provide direct evidence for neuronal hyperexcitability. However, hypersensitivity can be investigated indirectly by quantitative sensory tests. Typically, hypersensitivity is detected when sensory stimulation evokes pain at stimulus intensities that do not induce pain in normal subjects (lower pain threshold) or when a standardised painful stimulus evokes stronger pain in patients than in normal subjects. Other methods to explore the sensory system are available, but a detailed description is beyond the scope of this section. Whenever pain hypersensitivity is observed after sensory stimulation of healthy areas, its cause must be a hyperexcitability of the central nervous system. Indeed, there is no evidence that peripheral mechanisms could account for a higher pain sensitivity at healthy tissues.
Using the sensory tests, central hyperexcitability has been detected in different chronic musculoskeletal pain syndromes, such as neck pain after whiplash injury, fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis and temporomandibular disorders. Objective electrophysiological evidence for spinal cord hypersensitivity has recently been provided for patients with neck pain after whiplash injury and in fibromyalgia patients.
Few attempts have been made to modulate central hypersensitivity in patients. Infiltration of the local anaesthetic into the painful and tender muscles of patients with chronic neck pain did not reduce either neck pain nor pain thresholds. This indicated that the source of pain was not located in the infiltrated muscles and central hypersensitivity was not maintained by a nociceptive input arising from these muscles, at least in the patient population investigated. Selective 5-HT-3 receptor antagonists have proven effective in patients with fibromyalgia. Because fibromyalgia is associated with central hypersensitivity, one can postulate an activation of the spinal 5-HT-3 system as one of the mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology of this pain syndrome. The facilitatory pathway mediated by this receptor involves parts of the brain associated with emotional and affective responses to pain. An effect of selective 5-HT-3 receptor antagonists on other musculoskeletal pain syndromes associated with central hypersensitivity, such as whiplash or osteoarthritis, can not be ruled out. In a recent placebo-controlled study, a single intravenous injection of the selective 5-HT-3 receptor antagonist Ondansetron produced pain relief in patients with neuropathic pain.
Objective
The project will address the following main hypotheses. A. Reduction in pain and central hypersensitivity is accomplished by administration of the 5-HT-3 antagonist tropisetron.
- The analgesic effect of Tropisetron is predicted in individual patients by the electrophysiological measurements that assess central hypersensitivity.
Methods
Pain intensity is assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS). The following measures of central hypersensitivity will be employed: pain detection and pain tolerance threshold to electrical stimulation, heat and cold stimulation, spinal nociceptive reflexes, assessment of reflex receptive fields and temporal summation.
- Conditions
- Pain, Chronic Disease
- Being tested
- Tropisetron 2 mg, Tropisetron 5mg, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Chronic Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Tropisetron 2 mgDrug
Antagonist of the 5HT3 receptor.
Tropisetron 5mgDrug
Antagonist of the 5HT3 receptor.
PlaceboDrug
NHCL 0,9%
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Crossover study | Placebo comparator | Crossover study Receives: Drug: Tropisetron 2 mg |
| 2 | Placebo comparator | Crossover Study Receives: Drug: Tropisetron 5mg |
| 3 | Placebo comparator | Crossover Study Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain intensity (VAS score)
Measured: 2 h
Secondary outcomes (1)
Measures of central hypersensitivity
Measured: 2 h
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Apr 2009 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2009
- Primary completionApr 2010
- Study completionApr 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Michele Curatolo, Prof, Study director, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00889499
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- KEK 146/04
- Status last verified
- Mar 2011
- First submitted
- 28 Apr 2009
- Last updated
- 24 Mar 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Mar 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Modulation of Central Hypersensitivity in Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain by Intravenous Tropisetron
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00889499
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KEK 146/04
- Conditions
- Pain, Chronic Disease
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2009
- Primary completion
- Apr 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Apr 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Chronic pain is associated with hypersensitivity of the central nervous system. The drug under investigation (tropisetron) has been shown in animal studies to attenuate central hypersensitivity. It has therefore the potential to be effective in chronic pain. We compare two doses of tropisetron with placebo in patients with chronic pain. We measure pain intensity and parameters that assess central hypersensitivity.
Detailed description
Background
Prolonged afferent nociceptive input induces an increase in the excitability of central sensory neurons. The hyperexcitable neurons amplify the nociceptive signal, thereby producing an exaggerated pain response. This state of central hypersensitivity very likely contributes to pain and disability in patients, even in the presence of limited tissue damage.
The 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT-3) receptor is involved in spinal nociceptive transmission. After experimentally induced inflammation, the selective 5-HT-3 receptor antagonist ondansetron inhibited the electrically evoked responses of dorsal horn neurones, but had no effect on these responses in the absence of inflammation. Importantly, the origin of this pathway is a spino-brainstem-spinal loop that includes areas of the brain involved in emotional and affective responses to pain. This suggests that the 5-HT-3 receptors have no significant role under normal conditions, but are activated by peripheral inflammation and contribute to spinal cord hyperexcitability. Their activity could be driven by anxiety and fear.
Spinal cord hyperexcitability elicited by trauma, inflammation or surgery is influenced by descending facilitatory and inhibitory pathways. The periaqueductal grey and endogenous opioid peptides play a central role in the inhibition of spinal cord neuronal responses. Release of enkephalin at supraspinal and spinal levels is evoked by noxious stimulation. Further inhibitory modulation is exerted by serotonergic and noradrenergic systems. These mechanisms may underlie a possible role of psychological disturbances in the spinal cord processing of nociceptive and non-nociceptive stimuli.
While central hypersensitivity mechanisms have been extensively investigated in the animal, data in patients are sparse. In patients, direct measurements at spinal cord or brain neurons can not be made. Therefore, it is impossible to provide direct evidence for neuronal hyperexcitability. However, hypersensitivity can be investigated indirectly by quantitative sensory tests. Typically, hypersensitivity is detected when sensory stimulation evokes pain at stimulus intensities that do not induce pain in normal subjects (lower pain threshold) or when a standardised painful stimulus evokes stronger pain in patients than in normal subjects. Other methods to explore the sensory system are available, but a detailed description is beyond the scope of this section. Whenever pain hypersensitivity is observed after sensory stimulation of healthy areas, its cause must be a hyperexcitability of the central nervous system. Indeed, there is no evidence that peripheral mechanisms could account for a higher pain sensitivity at healthy tissues.
Using the sensory tests, central hyperexcitability has been detected in different chronic musculoskeletal pain syndromes, such as neck pain after whiplash injury, fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis and temporomandibular disorders. Objective electrophysiological evidence for spinal cord hypersensitivity has recently been provided for patients with neck pain after whiplash injury and in fibromyalgia patients.
Few attempts have been made to modulate central hypersensitivity in patients. Infiltration of the local anaesthetic into the painful and tender muscles of patients with chronic neck pain did not reduce either neck pain nor pain thresholds. This indicated that the source of pain was not located in the infiltrated muscles and central hypersensitivity was not maintained by a nociceptive input arising from these muscles, at least in the patient population investigated. Selective 5-HT-3 receptor antagonists have proven effective in patients with fibromyalgia. Because fibromyalgia is associated with central hypersensitivity, one can postulate an activation of the spinal 5-HT-3 system as one of the mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology of this pain syndrome. The facilitatory pathway mediated by this receptor involves parts of the brain associated with emotional and affective responses to pain. An effect of selective 5-HT-3 receptor antagonists on other musculoskeletal pain syndromes associated with central hypersensitivity, such as whiplash or osteoarthritis, can not be ruled out. In a recent placebo-controlled study, a single intravenous injection of the selective 5-HT-3 receptor antagonist Ondansetron produced pain relief in patients with neuropathic pain.
Objective
The project will address the following main hypotheses. A. Reduction in pain and central hypersensitivity is accomplished by administration of the 5-HT-3 antagonist tropisetron.
- The analgesic effect of Tropisetron is predicted in individual patients by the electrophysiological measurements that assess central hypersensitivity.
Methods
Pain intensity is assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS). The following measures of central hypersensitivity will be employed: pain detection and pain tolerance threshold to electrical stimulation, heat and cold stimulation, spinal nociceptive reflexes, assessment of reflex receptive fields and temporal summation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Crossover study | Placebo comparator | Drug: Tropisetron 2 mgCrossover study |
| 2 | Placebo comparator | Drug: Tropisetron 5mgCrossover Study |
| 3 | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboCrossover Study |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Chronic musculoskeletal pain
- Pain duration at least 6 months
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Pregnancy
- Breast feeding
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Tropisetron 2 mgAntagonist of the 5HT3 receptor. | Drug | Crossover study |
| Tropisetron 5mgAntagonist of the 5HT3 receptor. | Drug | 2 |
| PlaceboNHCL 0,9% | Drug | 3 |
Primary outcome
Pain intensity (VAS score)
Time frame: 2 h
1 secondary outcome
Measures of central hypersensitivity
Time frame: 2 h
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Mar 2011.
Related trials for Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Recruiting
Empowered Relief® for Cancer Survivors With Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain Due to Cancer, Pain Catastrophizing
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michele Curatolo, Prof study director
Inselspital, Bern University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Tropisetron 2 mg and Tropisetron 5mg in people with Pain and Chronic Disease, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Mar 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain intensity (VAS score) (time frame: 2 h). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Mar 2011.