AzTrials
AzTrials

PainPhase 2NCT00889499

Modulation of Central Hypersensitivity in Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain by Intravenous Tropisetron

A Phase 2 study testing Tropisetron 2 mg and Tropisetron 5mg in people with Pain and Chronic Disease, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Chronic pain is associated with hypersensitivity of the central nervous system. The drug under investigation (tropisetron) has been shown in animal studies to attenuate central hypersensitivity. It has therefore the potential to be effective in chronic pain. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pain, Chronic Disease
What is being tested?
Tropisetron 2 mg and Tropisetron 5mg
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteSwitzerland
Study dates
Mar 2009to Apr 2010
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Chronic musculoskeletal pain
  • Pain duration at least 6 months

Who cannot join

  • Pregnancy
  • Breast feeding

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Switzerland1 site
  • Dep. of Anesthesiology and Pain Therapy, Bern University Hospital, Inselspital

    Bern, 3010

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Chronic pain is associated with hypersensitivity of the central nervous system. The drug under investigation (tropisetron) has been shown in animal studies to attenuate central hypersensitivity. It has therefore the potential to be effective in chronic pain. We compare two doses of tropisetron with placebo in patients with chronic pain. We measure pain intensity and parameters that assess central hypersensitivity.

Read the detailed description

Background

Prolonged afferent nociceptive input induces an increase in the excitability of central sensory neurons. The hyperexcitable neurons amplify the nociceptive signal, thereby producing an exaggerated pain response. This state of central hypersensitivity very likely contributes to pain and disability in patients, even in the presence of limited tissue damage.

The 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT-3) receptor is involved in spinal nociceptive transmission. After experimentally induced inflammation, the selective 5-HT-3 receptor antagonist ondansetron inhibited the electrically evoked responses of dorsal horn neurones, but had no effect on these responses in the absence of inflammation. Importantly, the origin of this pathway is a spino-brainstem-spinal loop that includes areas of the brain involved in emotional and affective responses to pain. This suggests that the 5-HT-3 receptors have no significant role under normal conditions, but are activated by peripheral inflammation and contribute to spinal cord hyperexcitability. Their activity could be driven by anxiety and fear.

Spinal cord hyperexcitability elicited by trauma, inflammation or surgery is influenced by descending facilitatory and inhibitory pathways. The periaqueductal grey and endogenous opioid peptides play a central role in the inhibition of spinal cord neuronal responses. Release of enkephalin at supraspinal and spinal levels is evoked by noxious stimulation. Further inhibitory modulation is exerted by serotonergic and noradrenergic systems. These mechanisms may underlie a possible role of psychological disturbances in the spinal cord processing of nociceptive and non-nociceptive stimuli.

While central hypersensitivity mechanisms have been extensively investigated in the animal, data in patients are sparse. In patients, direct measurements at spinal cord or brain neurons can not be made. Therefore, it is impossible to provide direct evidence for neuronal hyperexcitability. However, hypersensitivity can be investigated indirectly by quantitative sensory tests. Typically, hypersensitivity is detected when sensory stimulation evokes pain at stimulus intensities that do not induce pain in normal subjects (lower pain threshold) or when a standardised painful stimulus evokes stronger pain in patients than in normal subjects. Other methods to explore the sensory system are available, but a detailed description is beyond the scope of this section. Whenever pain hypersensitivity is observed after sensory stimulation of healthy areas, its cause must be a hyperexcitability of the central nervous system. Indeed, there is no evidence that peripheral mechanisms could account for a higher pain sensitivity at healthy tissues.

Using the sensory tests, central hyperexcitability has been detected in different chronic musculoskeletal pain syndromes, such as neck pain after whiplash injury, fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis and temporomandibular disorders. Objective electrophysiological evidence for spinal cord hypersensitivity has recently been provided for patients with neck pain after whiplash injury and in fibromyalgia patients.

Few attempts have been made to modulate central hypersensitivity in patients. Infiltration of the local anaesthetic into the painful and tender muscles of patients with chronic neck pain did not reduce either neck pain nor pain thresholds. This indicated that the source of pain was not located in the infiltrated muscles and central hypersensitivity was not maintained by a nociceptive input arising from these muscles, at least in the patient population investigated. Selective 5-HT-3 receptor antagonists have proven effective in patients with fibromyalgia. Because fibromyalgia is associated with central hypersensitivity, one can postulate an activation of the spinal 5-HT-3 system as one of the mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology of this pain syndrome. The facilitatory pathway mediated by this receptor involves parts of the brain associated with emotional and affective responses to pain. An effect of selective 5-HT-3 receptor antagonists on other musculoskeletal pain syndromes associated with central hypersensitivity, such as whiplash or osteoarthritis, can not be ruled out. In a recent placebo-controlled study, a single intravenous injection of the selective 5-HT-3 receptor antagonist Ondansetron produced pain relief in patients with neuropathic pain.

Objective

The project will address the following main hypotheses. A. Reduction in pain and central hypersensitivity is accomplished by administration of the 5-HT-3 antagonist tropisetron.

  1. The analgesic effect of Tropisetron is predicted in individual patients by the electrophysiological measurements that assess central hypersensitivity.

Methods

Pain intensity is assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS). The following measures of central hypersensitivity will be employed: pain detection and pain tolerance threshold to electrical stimulation, heat and cold stimulation, spinal nociceptive reflexes, assessment of reflex receptive fields and temporal summation.

Being tested
Tropisetron 2 mg, Tropisetron 5mg, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Pain, Chronic Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Tropisetron 2 mgDrug

    Antagonist of the 5HT3 receptor.

  • Tropisetron 5mgDrug

    Antagonist of the 5HT3 receptor.

  • PlaceboDrug

    NHCL 0,9%

Study groups in NCT00889499
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Crossover studyPlacebo comparatorCrossover study
Receives: Drug: Tropisetron 2 mg
2Placebo comparatorCrossover Study
Receives: Drug: Tropisetron 5mg
3Placebo comparatorCrossover Study
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain intensity (VAS score)

    Measured: 2 h

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Measures of central hypersensitivity

    Measured: 2 h

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Apr 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2009
  3. Primary completionApr 2010
  4. Study completionApr 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00889499
Sponsor's protocol ID
KEK 146/04
Status last verified
Mar 2011
First submitted
28 Apr 2009
Last updated
24 Mar 2011
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Tropisetron 2 mg and Tropisetron 5mg in people with Pain and Chronic Disease, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Mar 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain intensity (VAS score) (time frame: 2 h). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Mar 2011.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in