AzTrials
AzTrials

Vulvovaginal CandidiasisNCT00895453

Monthly Itraconazole Versus Classic Homeopathy for Treatment of Recurrent Vulvovaginal Candidiasis (RVVC)

A study testing itraconazole, lactobacillus gasseri and classic homeopathy (carcinosin M, nux vomica, pulsatilla M, ferrum metallicum, sepia M, etc. as prescribed) in people with Vulvovaginal Candidiasis, run by Medical University of Vienna at 1 site in Austria.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of classic homeopathic therapy compared to maintenance itraconazole therapy with and without additional exogenous lactobacillus for treatment of recurrent Candida vaginitis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Vulvovaginal Candidiasis
What is being tested?
itraconazole, lactobacillus gasseri and classic homeopathy (carcinosin M, nux vomica, pulsatilla M, ferrum metallicum, sepia M, etc. as prescribed)
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
144 participants
Where
1 siteAustria
Study dates
May 2000to Feb 2006
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients over 18 years, premenopausal
  • Negative pregnancy test
  • Signed informed consent
  • At least 4 Episodes of Candidiasis within the last year
  • Candida detectable by culture
  • Negative Hepatitis- and HIV-Serology
  • No Allergy to Itraconazole

Who cannot join

  • Under 18 years

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Austria1 site
  • Vienna Medical School

    Vienna, 1090

Other trials in Austria

About this study

Official title: Monthly Itraconazole Versus Classic Homeopathy for the Treatment of Recurrent Vulvovaginal Candidiasis: a Randomised Trial

A prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of classic homeopathic therapy compared to maintenance itraconazole therapy with and without additional exogenous lactobacillus for treatment of recurrent Candida vaginitis.

Read the detailed description

Objective:

Antimycotics effectively treat sporadic and recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVC). Classic homeopathy (CH) is also used to treat this condition. We compared the efficacy of CH and itraconazole in reducing the frequency of RVVC episodes.

Design:

Single-centre, prospective, randomized.

Sample:

One-hundred-and-fifty patients with a history of RVVC and an acute episode of VVC.

Methods:

Women were randomised into 3 groups: itraconazole with lactobacilli (group 1), itraconazole without lactobacilli (group 2) and CH (group 3). Itraconazole treatment of acute infection was followed by a 6-months maintenance regimen with monthly single-day itraconazole (200 mg bid). Thereafter, patients were followed without treatment for 6 months. Women in group 1 were given additional vaginal lactobacilli for six days per month. CH treatment was performed for 12 months.

Being tested
itraconazole, lactobacillus gasseri, classic homeopathy (carcinosin M, nux vomica, pulsatilla M, ferrum metallicum, sepia M, etc. as prescribed)
Keywords
recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis, itraconazole, classic homeopathy
Medical subject headings
Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • itraconazoleDrug

    6-months maintenance regimen with monthly single-day itraconazole 200mg twice daily (bid)

  • lactobacillus gasseriDrug

    Lactobacillus vaginal tablets monthly given through 6 days

  • classic homeopathy (carcinosin M, nux vomica, pulsatilla M, ferrum metallicum, sepia M, etc. as prescribed)Drug

    CH treatment was provided by a licensed CH practitioner. Specifically, a personal history was taken and an individualised treatment scheme was prescribed. The most often used homeopathic remedies were carcinosin M, nux vomica, pulsatilla M, ferrum metallicum, and sepia M. Potencies of homeopathic remedies ranged from C 30 to C 1000.

Study groups in NCT00895453
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
itraconazoleActive comparator6-months maintenance regimen with monthly single-day itraconazole 200mg twice daily (bid).
Receives: Drug: itraconazole
itraconazole + lactobacilli agentActive comparator6-months maintenance regimen with monthly single-day itraconazole 200mg twice daily (bid). Additionally, Lactobacillus vaginal tablets monthly given through 6 days.
Receives: Drug: itraconazole; Drug: lactobacillus gasseri
classic homeopathy (CH)Active comparatorCH treatment was provided by a licensed CH practitioner. Specifically, a personal history was taken and an individualised treatment scheme was prescribed. The most often used homeopathic remedies were carcinosin M, nux vomica, pulsatilla M, ferrum metallicum, and sepia M. Potencies of homeopathic remedies ranged from C 30 to C 1000.
Receives: Drug: classic homeopathy (carcinosin M, nux vomica, pulsatilla M, ferrum metallicum, sepia M, etc. as prescribed)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Candida Culture Free After Maintenance Therapy

    candida culture free (monthly vaginal cultures were obtained)

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 May 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2000
  3. Primary completionFeb 2006
  4. Study completionFeb 2006

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
144 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00895453
Sponsor's protocol ID
134/2000
Status last verified
May 2009
First submitted
16 Jan 2009
Last updated
11 Nov 2016
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing itraconazole, lactobacillus gasseri and classic homeopathy (carcinosin M, nux vomica, pulsatilla M, ferrum metallicum, sepia M, etc. as prescribed) in people with Vulvovaginal Candidiasis, run by Medical University of Vienna at 1 site in Austria.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Nov 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Austria. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 May 2009). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Candida Culture Free After Maintenance Therapy (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Nov 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in