Heart FailurePhase 4EARTHNCT00900549
Evaluation of Resynchronization Therapy for Heart Failure
A Phase 4 study testing CRT on and CRT off in people with Heart Failure, run by Montreal Heart Institute at 11 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
Heart failure is a major health problem in Canada. Recent advances in medical and device therapy have helped to reduce the morbidity and mortality of patients with this problem. Among these treatments, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has very recently been shown to be effective to improve functional class… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Heart Failure
- What is being tested?
- CRT on and CRT off
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 11 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- Oct 2003to Jul 2011
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The patients are eligible if they undergo an ICD implantation or replacement
- They have a documented LVEF ≤ 35% measured in the previous 6 months (without major clinical subsequent event, such as heart surgery, since the LVEF measurement)
- If measured by echocardiography, the LV end-diastolic diameter must be ≥ 60 mm
- The duration of the QRS is < 120 ms
- They are in sinus rhythm
- They cannot walk more than 400 meters during the screening 6-minute walk test (the patients must be limited by heart failure symptoms)
Who cannot join
- Patients with an indication for permanent ventricular pacing or with chronotropic insufficiency defined as follow:
- Any condition where the treating physician believes it would not be acceptable for the patient to have his device NOT programmed with the SENSOR at ON for the duration of the study
- Second or third degree AV block, either persistent or intermittent
- Patients with a pacemaker or an ICD who are paced in the ventricular chamber more than 5% of the time
- Patients with LV dysfunction associated with a reversible cause such as post-partum cardiomyopathy, tachycardia induced cardiomyopathy, acute myocarditis or acute toxic cardiomyopathy (including acute alcoholic)
- Patients who had a myocardial infarction within the past 6 weeks* defined by 2 of the 3 following conditions:
Show all 17Show fewer
- Prolonged chest pain
- ECG changes suggesting of AMI
- Cardiac enzymes elevation more than twice the local upper limit of normal)
- Patients who had cardiac surgery within the past 6 weeks*
- Patients with moderate or severe cardiac valve stenosis (aortic, mitral, pulmonary or tricuspid)
- Patients with an inability or a limitation to walk for reasons other than heart failure symptoms (e.g., angina, intermittent claudication, severe lung condition or arthrosis)
- Patients with severe coexisting illnesses making survival > 6 months unlikely
- Patients who are pregnant and/or nursing.
- Patients with inability or unwillingness to consent or comply with follow-up requirements
- Patients participating in another study
- The 6-week period is calculated prior to the beginning of the baseline evaluation and not the implant procedure itself. This difference comes from the fact that the protocol includes a delay of 2 to 8 weeks between the implant procedure and the actual beginning of the patient's evaluation.
Trial locations and contacts
11 sites in 1 country.
11 sites in 1 country
Canada11 sites
University of Alberta Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7
CHUS-Fleurimont
Fleurimont, Quebec, J1H 5N4
QEII Health Sciences Centre
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 3A7
Hamilton Health Sciences Center
Hamilton, Ontario, L8L 2X2
CHUM-Hôpital Hotel-Dieu
Montreal, Quebec, H2W 1T8
Sacre-Coeur Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H4J 1C5
Montreal Heart Institute Research Center
Montreal, Quebec, HIT1C8
University of Ottawa Heart Institute
Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4W7
Institut Univ de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec
Québec, Quebec, G1V 4G5
Sunnybrook & Women's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5
St-Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8
About this study
Official title: EvaluAtion of Resynchronization Therapy for Heart Failure (EARTH)
Heart failure is a major health problem in Canada. Recent advances in medical and device therapy have helped to reduce the morbidity and mortality of patients with this problem. Among these treatments, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has very recently been shown to be effective to improve functional class, quality of life and exercise tolerance of the patients with the most severe symptoms of heart failure and a prolonged duration of the QRS on the 12-lead Electrocardiography (ECG).
Read the detailed description
Resynchronization of the failing ventricle is currently achieved by pacing the left and right ventricles simultaneously with specialized electrodes and a cardiac stimulator. However, controversy persists concerning the optimal configuration for cardiac pacing in these patients. Right ventricular pacing alone has been shown to be deleterious in some patient populations. The benefits of biventricular pacing in heart failure patients may be due primarily to left ventricular stimulation and may, in some patients, be decreased by the presence of simultaneous RV stimulation. Preliminary data from our own animal work suggest that in the majority of cases, LV stimulation alone is better than RV stimulation, and that BiV stimulation represents an intermediary situation between LV and RV stimulation.
- Conditions
- Heart Failure
- Being tested
- CRT on, CRT off
- Keywords
- Heart failure, Cardiac resynchronization therapy, ICD
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Failure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CRT onDevice
12 months
CRT offDevice
12-month
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CRT | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: CRT on |
| No CRT | Sham comparator | Not described Receives: Device: CRT off |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Total exercise duration at a constant submaximal load (defined as 75% of peak exercise during the baseline metabolic evaluation); study is powered to detect a min difference of 300 sec (+25% from baseline) in the primary endpoint between the 2 treatments
Measured: one year
Secondary outcomes (1)
Clinical & electrical endpoints and echocardiographic & nuclear medicine evaluation of LV function. Dyssynchrony evaluation will help advancing the understanding of the physiopathology of heart failure and response to resynchronization therapy.
Measured: one year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 May 2009 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2003
- Primary completionFeb 2011
- Study completionJul 2011
Why it stopped: Futility reason, no difference between study groups
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Heart FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Montreal Heart Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Abbott Medical Devices, Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
- Investigators
- Bernard Thibault, MD, Study chair, Montreal Heart Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00900549
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UCT67914 (Lesser Earth)
- Other IDs
- ISRCTN 42560370
- Acronym
- EARTH
- Status last verified
- Jul 2011
- First submitted
- 12 May 2009
- Last updated
- 21 Jul 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Thibault B, Harel F, Ducharme A, White M, Ellenbogen KA, Frasure-Smith N, Roy D, Philippon F, Dorian P, Talajic M, Dubuc M, Guerra PG, Macle L, Rivard L, Andrade J, Khairy P; LESSER-EARTH Investigators. Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and a QRS complex <120 milliseconds: the Evaluation of Resynchronization Therapy for Heart Failure (LESSER-EARTH) trial. Circulation. 2013 Feb 26;127(8):873-81. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.001239. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
PubMed 23388213
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Jul 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- EvaluAtion of Resynchronization Therapy for Heart Failure (EARTH)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00900549
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EARTH / UCT67914 (Lesser Earth)
- Conditions
- Heart Failure
- Keywords
- Heart failure, Cardiac resynchronization therapy, ICD
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Futility reason, no difference between study groups
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Montreal Heart InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Abbott Medical Devices, Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
- Study start
- Oct 2003
- Primary completion
- Feb 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 May 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Heart failure is a major health problem in Canada. Recent advances in medical and device therapy have helped to reduce the morbidity and mortality of patients with this problem. Among these treatments, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has very recently been shown to be effective to improve functional class, quality of life and exercise tolerance of the patients with the most severe symptoms of heart failure and a prolonged duration of the QRS on the 12-lead Electrocardiography (ECG).
Detailed description
Resynchronization of the failing ventricle is currently achieved by pacing the left and right ventricles simultaneously with specialized electrodes and a cardiac stimulator. However, controversy persists concerning the optimal configuration for cardiac pacing in these patients. Right ventricular pacing alone has been shown to be deleterious in some patient populations. The benefits of biventricular pacing in heart failure patients may be due primarily to left ventricular stimulation and may, in some patients, be decreased by the presence of simultaneous RV stimulation. Preliminary data from our own animal work suggest that in the majority of cases, LV stimulation alone is better than RV stimulation, and that BiV stimulation represents an intermediary situation between LV and RV stimulation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CRT | Experimental | Device: CRT on |
| No CRT | Sham comparator | Device: CRT off |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- The patients are eligible if they undergo an ICD implantation or replacement
- They have a documented LVEF ≤ 35% measured in the previous 6 months (without major clinical subsequent event, such as heart surgery, since the LVEF measurement)
- If measured by echocardiography, the LV end-diastolic diameter must be ≥ 60 mm
- The duration of the QRS is < 120 ms
- They are in sinus rhythm
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Patients with an indication for permanent ventricular pacing or with chronotropic insufficiency defined as follow:
- Patients with LV dysfunction associated with a reversible cause such as post-partum cardiomyopathy, tachycardia induced cardiomyopathy, acute myocarditis or acute toxic cardiomyopathy (including acute alcoholic)
- Patients who had a myocardial infarction within the past 6 weeks* defined by 2 of the 3 following conditions:
- Patients who had cardiac surgery within the past 6 weeks*
- Patients with moderate or severe cardiac valve stenosis (aortic, mitral, pulmonary or tricuspid)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CRT on12 months | Device | CRT |
| CRT off12-month | Device | No CRT |
Primary outcome
Total exercise duration at a constant submaximal load (defined as 75% of peak exercise during the baseline metabolic evaluation); study is powered to detect a min difference of 300 sec (+25% from baseline) in the primary endpoint between the 2 treatments
Time frame: one year
1 secondary outcome
Clinical & electrical endpoints and echocardiographic & nuclear medicine evaluation of LV function. Dyssynchrony evaluation will help advancing the understanding of the physiopathology of heart failure and response to resynchronization therapy.
Time frame: one year
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Futility reason, no difference between study groups). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Jul 2011.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23388213Thibault B, Harel F, Ducharme A, White M, Ellenbogen KA, Frasure-Smith N, Roy D, Philippon F, Dorian P, Talajic M, Dubuc M, Guerra PG, Macle L, Rivard L, Andrade J, Khairy P; LESSER-EARTH Investigators. Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and a QRS complex <120 milliseconds: the Evaluation of Resynchronization Therapy for Heart Failure (LESSER-EARTH) trial. Circulation. 2013 Feb 26;127(8):873-81. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.001239. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
Related trials for Heart Failure
RecruitingPhase 3
Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Weekly Lonapegsomatropin Compared to Daily Somatropin in Children and Adolescents With Short Stature or Growth Failure Due to Growth Hormone Sufficient Disorders
Turner Syndrome, Short Stature Homeobox Gene Mutation
RecruitingObservational study
Heart Failure and Aortic Stenosis Transcriptome
Heart Failure, Aortic Stenosis
Active, not recruiting
REsynchronization Comparison In LBBB and Normal or Mildly Reduced VENTricular Function With CRT (REINVENT-CRT)
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction, Heart Failure (HF)
RecruitingObservational study
Product Performance Report: Evaluate Long-term Reliability & Performance of Medtronic Marketed Cardiac Therapy Products
Arrhythmia, Bradycardia
Recruiting
Determining Efficacy of an Artificial Intelligence-based System for Heart Failure Detection Through Interpretation of Electrocardiograms (DECISION)
Heart Failure, Cardiovascular Risk Factors
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bernard Thibault, MD study chair
Montreal Heart Institute
11 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing CRT on and CRT off in people with Heart Failure, run by Montreal Heart Institute at 11 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jul 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 11 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Futility reason, no difference between study groups). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Total exercise duration at a constant submaximal load (defined as 75% of peak exercise during the baseline metabolic evaluation); study is powered to detect a min difference of 300 sec (+25% from baseline) in the primary endpoint between the 2 treatments (time frame: one year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00900549, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jul 2011.