Osteoarthritis, KneePhase 2NCT00904462
Pilot Study of Lidocaine 5% Patch Versus Placebo in Patients With Osteoarthritis Pain of the Knee
A Phase 2 study testing Lidoderm in people with Osteoarthritis, Knee, run by Endo USA Inc., a Keenova Therapeutics Company at 24 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Patients with unilateral or bilateral osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee participated in a Phase II clinical trial to assess the efficacy of lidocaine 5% patch compared with placebo in the treatment of pain from OA of the knee. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
- What is being tested?
- Lidoderm
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 224 participants
- Where
- 24 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Aug 2004to Sep 2005
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Had unilateral or bilateral OA of the knee diagnosed according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria based on clinical and radiographic evidence (presence of osteophytes on x-ray and written evaluation) of OA
- Had functional capacity class rating of I, II, or III according to ACR classification
- Had normal 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) without any clinically significant abnormalities in heart rate, rhythm, or conduction
- Had discontinued use of all analgesic medications (including over-the-counter [OTC] analgesics) prior to randomization (patients were allowed limited use of analgesic medications for non study pain
- At baseline visit, patients were randomized to double-blind treatment if they had an average pain intensity rating for the index joint of 6 or greater (on a 0 to 10 scale) for at least 3 days out of the 5 consecutive days immediately prior to the baseline visit; 0 is defined as "no pain" and 10 is defined as "pain as bad as ever imagined" as measured by Question 5 of the BPI and recorded in a diary
- At baseline visit, patients were randomized to double-blind treatment if they had, at the baseline visit, an OA severity score for the index joint of 7 or greater on a composite scale of 0 to 24 as measured by the Index of Severity for Osteoarthrosis of the Knee
Who cannot join
- Had been diagnosed with inflammatory arthritis, gout, pseudo-gout or Paget's disease that in the investigator's opinion would have interfered with the assessment of pain and other symptoms of OA
- Had serious medical conditions requiring daily medications, such as anticonvulsants and tricyclic antidepressants, that could have confounded study results
- Had any other clinically significant joint disease or prior joint replacement surgery at the index joint
- Had severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance of <30 mL/min)
- Had moderate or greater hepatic impairment
- Were taking analgesic medications, glucosamine, or chondroitin that could not be discontinued during the study. Patients taking these medications prior to the study were required to discontinue use for the duration of the study. Patients using opioid analgesics at study entry were required to taper off these medications.
Show all 12Show fewer
- Were taking long-acting opioids or opioids that could not be discontinued over the first 5 days of the placebo run-in period.
- Were using lidocaine-containing product that could not be discontinued during the study
- Had previously failed treatment with Lidoderm analgesic patch for OA
- Had recently received either a corticosteroid injection (within 8 weeks) or hyaluronic acid (within 6 months) of study entry
- Were unable to discontinue use of topical drugs applied to the knee
- Were taking class I anti-arrhythmic drugs (e.g. mexiletine, tocainide)
Trial locations and contacts
24 sites in 1 country.
24 sites in 1 country
United States24 sites
Study site
Bartlett, Tennessee
Study site
Berlin, New Jersey
Study site
Bingham Farms, Michigan
Study site
Birmingham, Alabama
Study site
Boulder, Colorado
Study site
Charleston, South Carolina
Study site
Chicago, Illinois
Study site
Cordova, Tennessee
Study site
Dayton, Ohio
Study site
DeLand, Florida
Study site
Duncansville, Pennsylvania
Study site
Hueytown, Alabama
Study site
Largo, Florida
Study site
Memphis, Tennessee
Study site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Study site
Palm Harbor, Florida
Study site
Peabody, Massachusetts
Study site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Study site
Phoenix, Arizona
Study site
Reno, Nevada
Study site
Springfield, Illinois
Study site
St. Petersburg, Florida
Study site
Tallassee, Alabama
Study site
Wheaton, Maryland
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Pilot Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine 5% Patch With Placebo in Patients With Pain From Osteoarthritis of the Knee
Patients with unilateral or bilateral osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee participated in a Phase II clinical trial to assess the efficacy of lidocaine 5% patch compared with placebo in the treatment of pain from OA of the knee.
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
- Being tested
- Lidoderm, Placebo patch
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LidodermDrug
Also called Lidocaine 5% patch
Eligible patients were randomly allocated to receive one of two treatments for 12 weeks: lidocaine 5% patch or matching placebo patch.
Placebo patchDrug
Eligible patients were randomly allocated to receive one of two treatments for 12 weeks: lidocaine 5% patch or matching placebo patch.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Lidocaine 5% patch | Experimental | Lidocaine 5% patch (Lidoderm®, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.), 1⅓ patches applied on each affected knee once every 24 hours Receives: Drug: Lidoderm |
| Placebo patch | Placebo comparator | Matching placebo patch, 1⅓ patches applied on each affected knee once every 24 hours Receives: Drug: Placebo patch |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) OA Index
Measured: Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)
Pain intensity and pain relief (BPI Questions 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8)
Measured: Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)
Pain Quality Assessment Scale (PQAS)
Measured: Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)
Patient-rated and Investigator-rated Global Impression of Change in OA pain (categorical scale)
Measured: Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)
Patient-rated and Investigator-rated Global Assessment of Treatment Satisfaction (categorical scale)
Measured: Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)
Secondary outcomes (4)
QoL: Pain interference on activities of daily living using Question 9 of the BPI
Measured: Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)
QoL: Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
Measured: Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)
Quality of Sleep (QOS)
Measured: Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)
Safety assessments included AEs, dermal assessments, clinical laboratory tests (including urinalysis), vital sign measurements, physical examination results, and plasma lidocaine concentrations
Measured: Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 May 2009 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2004
- Primary completionSep 2005
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Osteoarthritis, KneeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 224 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Endo USA Inc., a Keenova Therapeutics Company
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- Study Director, Study director, Endo USA Inc., a Keenova Therapeutics Company
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00904462
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EN3260-001
- Status last verified
- Feb 2010
- First submitted
- 15 May 2009
- Last updated
- 10 Feb 2010
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Feb 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-Blind, Pilot Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine 5% Patch With Placebo in Patients With Pain From Osteoarthritis of the Knee
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00904462
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EN3260-001
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 224 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Endo USA Inc., a Keenova Therapeutics CompanyIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Aug 2004
- Primary completion
- Sep 2005 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 May 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients with unilateral or bilateral osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee participated in a Phase II clinical trial to assess the efficacy of lidocaine 5% patch compared with placebo in the treatment of pain from OA of the knee.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Lidocaine 5% patch | Experimental | Drug: LidodermLidocaine 5% patch (Lidoderm®, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.), 1⅓ patches applied on each affected knee once every 24 hours |
| Placebo patch | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo patchMatching placebo patch, 1⅓ patches applied on each affected knee once every 24 hours |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Had unilateral or bilateral OA of the knee diagnosed according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria based on clinical and radiographic evidence (presence of osteophytes on x-ray and written evaluation) of OA
- Had functional capacity class rating of I, II, or III according to ACR classification
- Had normal 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) without any clinically significant abnormalities in heart rate, rhythm, or conduction
- Had discontinued use of all analgesic medications (including over-the-counter [OTC] analgesics) prior to randomization (patients were allowed limited use of analgesic medications for non study pain
- At baseline visit, patients were randomized to double-blind treatment if they had an average pain intensity rating for the index joint of 6 or greater (on a 0 to 10 scale) for at least 3 days out of the 5 consecutive days immediately prior to the baseline visit; 0 is defined as "no pain" and 10 is defined as "pain as bad as ever imagined" as measured by Question 5 of the BPI and recorded in a diary
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Had been diagnosed with inflammatory arthritis, gout, pseudo-gout or Paget's disease that in the investigator's opinion would have interfered with the assessment of pain and other symptoms of OA
- Had serious medical conditions requiring daily medications, such as anticonvulsants and tricyclic antidepressants, that could have confounded study results
- Had any other clinically significant joint disease or prior joint replacement surgery at the index joint
- Had severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance of <30 mL/min)
- Had moderate or greater hepatic impairment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LidodermAlso: Lidocaine 5% patchEligible patients were randomly allocated to receive one of two treatments for 12 weeks: lidocaine 5% patch or matching placebo patch. | Drug | Lidocaine 5% patch |
| Placebo patchEligible patients were randomly allocated to receive one of two treatments for 12 weeks: lidocaine 5% patch or matching placebo patch. | Drug | Placebo patch |
Primary outcome
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) OA Index
Time frame: Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)
Pain intensity and pain relief (BPI Questions 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8)
Time frame: Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)
Pain Quality Assessment Scale (PQAS)
Time frame: Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)
Patient-rated and Investigator-rated Global Impression of Change in OA pain (categorical scale)
Time frame: Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)
Patient-rated and Investigator-rated Global Assessment of Treatment Satisfaction (categorical scale)
Time frame: Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)
4 secondary outcomes
QoL: Pain interference on activities of daily living using Question 9 of the BPI
Time frame: Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)
QoL: Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
Time frame: Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)
Quality of Sleep (QOS)
Time frame: Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)
Safety assessments included AEs, dermal assessments, clinical laboratory tests (including urinalysis), vital sign measurements, physical examination results, and plasma lidocaine concentrations
Time frame: Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Feb 2010.
Related trials for Osteoarthritis, Knee
Not yet recruiting
Holistic Healing for Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
Recruiting
Effect of Anti-inflammatory Diet in Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Single vs Triple Hyaluronic Acid in Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Not yet recruiting
The Feasibility of a Virtual/Home-based OA Treatment Program in Older Adults With OA and Multimorbidity
Osteoarthritis of the Knee
RecruitingObservational study
Exploring Factors Linked to Worsening Over Time in People With Early-stage Knee Osteoarthritis and Those With Prior Proven Acute Knee Injury.
Knee Osteoarthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Study Director study director
Endo USA Inc., a Keenova Therapeutics Company
24 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Lidoderm in people with Osteoarthritis, Knee, run by Endo USA Inc., a Keenova Therapeutics Company at 24 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Feb 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 24 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) OA Index (time frame: Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Feb 2010.