AzTrials
AzTrials

BehaviorNCT00907816

Concurrent Electronic Order Entry Variation Reporting Impact on Ordering Behavior

An observational study of Behavior, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Display of information regarding utilization and quality to primary care physicians as they use our computer based system to order radiologic imaging (CT, MR, etc) will reduce unnecessary imaging. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Behavior
How many people
72 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Apr 2009to Apr 2010
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: PCPs at MGH

Who may be able to join

  • PCPs at MGH with patient panel > 99 loyal patients

Who cannot join

  • PCPs at MGH with patient panel < 99 loyal patients

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Mass General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Concurrent Electronic Order Entry Variation Reporting Impact on Ordering

Display of information regarding utilization and quality to primary care physicians as they use our computer based system to order radiologic imaging (CT, MR, etc) will reduce unnecessary imaging.

Conditions
Behavior
Keywords
this study does not look at patient conditions
Medical subject headings
Behavior

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT00907816
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
interventionPCPs at MGH who receive display of utilization and quality during computer order entry
controlNot described

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Health status adjusted utilization of imaging by each PCP in the intervention group, compared to themselves before intervention, and as a group to the control group

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 May 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2009
  3. Primary completionDec 2009 (estimated)
  4. Study completionApr 2010 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
72 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00907816
Sponsor's protocol ID
PHRC Study 2009P-000611
Status last verified
May 2009
First submitted
21 May 2009
Last updated
25 May 2009
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Behavior, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 May 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Health status adjusted utilization of imaging by each PCP in the intervention group, compared to themselves before intervention, and as a group to the control group (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 May 2009.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in