AzTrials
AzTrials

Pancreatic CancerPhase 2PANTERNCT00964171

Efavirenz as Second-Line Therapy in Treating Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

A Phase 2 study testing Efavirenz 600mg in people with Pancreatic Cancer, run by Institut Bergonié at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

RATIONALE: Efavirenz may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well efavirenz works as second-line therapy in treating patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 120 years
Conditions the study is for
Pancreatic Cancer
What is being tested?
Efavirenz 600mg
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
19 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Aug 2008to Jul 2010
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 120 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the pancreas
  • No other histological types
  • Radiologically confirmed metastatic disease in a non-irradiated area
  • Measurable disease according to RECIST criteria
  • Must have exhausted first-line gemcitabine hydrochloride chemotherapy
  • No CNS metastases

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • WHO performance status (PS) 0-2 OR Karnofsky PS 70-100%
  • ANC ≥ 1,500/mm^3
  • Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm^3
  • Hemoglobin ≥ 10 g/dL
  • Creatinine ≤ 1.25 times upper limit of normal
  • Alkaline phosphatase < 5 times normal
  • Bilirubin < 3 times normal
  • Not pregnant or nursing
  • Negative pregnancy test
  • Fertile patients must use effective contraception
  • Has French Social Security in compliance with the French law relating to biomedical research
  • Able to comply with study treatment and follow-up
  • No severe renal failure
  • No severe hepatic impairment
  • No known hypersensitivity to the study drug and its excipients
  • No depression with a total score of ≥ 13 on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale
  • No active diarrhea that may affect the ability to absorb the study drug
  • No other cancer within the past 5 years except carcinoma in situ of the cervix or basal cell carcinoma of the skin
  • No geographical, psychiatric, social, or psychological reason that would preclude compliance with study procedures

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • Recovered from all prior anticancer therapy
  • More than 30 days since prior investigational drugs and/or participation in a clinical trial
  • Prior adjuvant chemotherapy (one-line only) and/or radiotherapy allowed
  • No prior enrollment on this study
  • No prior treatment acting on the signal transduction pathway
  • No prior yellow fever vaccine
  • No other concurrent second-line therapy
  • No concurrent terfenadine, astemizole, cisapride, midazolam, triazolam, pimozide, bepridil, rye alkaloids, voriconazole, or St. John wort (Hypericum perforatum)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Institut Bergonie

    Bordeaux, 33076

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: A Phase II Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Efavirenz as Second-line Monotherapy for the Treatment of Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinomas.

RATIONALE: Efavirenz may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth.

PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well efavirenz works as second-line therapy in treating patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • Evaluate the efficacy of efavirenz as second-line monotherapy, in terms of non-morphological progression at 2 months, in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

Secondary

  • Evaluate non-morphological progression in these patients at 4 months.
  • Evaluate non-biological progression in these patients at 2 and 4 months.
  • Evaluate the quality of life of these patients at 2 and 4 months.
  • Evaluate the overall, progression-free, and event-free survival of these patients.
  • Evaluate the tolerability and safety profile of efavirenz in these patients.

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study.

Patients receive oral efavirenz once daily in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Patients complete quality-of-life questionnaires using the QLQ-C30 at baseline and at 2 and 4 months.

After completion of study therapy patients are followed up every 2 months.

Being tested
Efavirenz 600mg
Keywords
adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, recurrent pancreatic cancer, stage IV pancreatic cancer
Medical subject headings
Pancreatic Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Efavirenz 600mgDrug

Study groups in NCT00964171
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
EfavirenzOtherEfavirenz will be provided by the sponsor as follows: capsule of efavirenz 200 mg. A bottle contains 90 capsules. Investigator will dispense efavirenz to the patients according to the dose adjustment. Each patient will receive efavirenz 600 mg/day until morphological progression. Study drug will be taken every day by oral route at bedtime and in fast condition (1-2 hours far from dinner).
Receives: Drug: Efavirenz 600mg

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Patients in Non-progression at 2 Months

    Non-progression is defined as partial response, complete response or stable disease according to RECIST V1.0. Complete response is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and partial response is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SLD (RECIST V1.0.).Stable disease is defined as no decrease or increase sufficient to qualify as partial response or progression with reference to SLD since the start of treatment. Radiologic assessment was carried out every 8 weeks.

    Measured: 2 months

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Percentage of Patients in Non-progression at 4 Months

    Non-progression is defined as partial response, complete response or stable disease according to RECIST V1.0. Complete response is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and partial response is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SLD (RECIST V1.0.).Stable disease is defined as no decrease or increase sufficient to qualify as partial response or progression with reference to SLD since the start of treatment. Radiologic assessment was carried out every 8 weeks.

    Measured: 4 months

  2. Percentage of Patients in Non-biological Progression at 2 Months

    Non-biological progression was assessed using CA 19-9 every 28 days until end of treatment, and was defined as a 2-month CA19.9 concentration lower than 1.5 times the baseline CA 19-9 concentration.

    Measured: 2 months

  3. Overall Survival

    OS was was defined as the time from the inclusion to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death were censored at the date of the last follow-up or last patient contact. The OS was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data.

    Measured: Through Database Cutoff Date of 06-July-2011 ( median follow-up time of 397 days)

  4. Event-free Survival

    Event-free survival (EFS) was defined as the delay between trial inclusion and the first of the following events: progression (biological or morphological), death, treatment interruption due to toxicity, initiation of another treatment. Morphological progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. Biological progression is defined as a confirmed increase in CA 19-9 concentration to more than 1.5 times the baseline value, sustained over two consecutive monthly assessments.

    Patients without any of the aforementioned events at the time of the statistical analysis will be censored at the time they were last known to be event-free. The EFS was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data.

    Measured: Through Database Cutoff Date of 06-July-2011 ( median follow-up time of 397 days)

  5. Progression-free Survival

    Progression was defined as morphological or biological progression. Progression-free survival was defined as the delay between trial inclusion and progression (morphological or biological) or death for any reason. Morphological progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. Biological progression is defined as a confirmed increase in CA 19-9 concentration to more than 1.5 times the baseline value, sustained over two consecutive monthly assessments. Patients who have not progressed nor died at the time of the statistical analysis will be censored at the time they were last known to be progression-free. The EFS was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data.

    Measured: Through Database Cutoff Date of 06-July-2011 ( median follow-up time of 397 days)

  6. Quality of Life Score

    EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a cancer-specific instrument with 30 questions to evaluate quality of life. The first 28 use a 4-point scale (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much) assessing 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain), six single symptoms (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, financial difficulties), and two global health/QoL questions. Items 29 and 30 use a 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=excellent).Scores are linearly transformed from 0 to 100 per EORTC guidelines. Higher scores mean better functioning or QoL for functional/global scales, but worse symptoms for symptom scales and items. Score ranges (0-100): higher Functional scores = better QoL; higher Symptom scores= worse QoL; Higher Global health score= better QoL.

    Measured: 2 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Aug 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2008
  3. Primary completionJul 2010
  4. Study completionJul 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
19 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00964171
Sponsor's protocol ID
CDR0000641759
Other IDs
IB-PANTER, IB 2008-33, INCA-RECF0888, EUDRACT-2008-004273-18
Acronym
PANTER
Status last verified
Aug 2025
First submitted
21 Aug 2009
Last updated
28 Aug 2025

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Efavirenz 600mg in people with Pancreatic Cancer, run by Institut Bergonié at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Aug 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Patients in Non-progression at 2 Months (time frame: 2 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Aug 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in