AzTrials
AzTrials

Bone MetastasesNCT00981578

ExAblate Conformal Bone System Treatment of Metastatic Bone Tumors for the Palliation of Pain

A study testing ExAblate 2100 in people with Bone Metastases, run by InSightec at 5 sites in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A study to evaluate the safety and initial effectiveness of the ExAblate 2100 Conformal Bone System in the treatment of pain resulting from metastatic bone tumors. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Bone Metastases
What is being tested?
ExAblate 2100
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
37 participants
Where
5 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Sep 2009to 14 Nov 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Men and women age 18 and older
  • Patients who are able and willing to give consent and able to attend all study visits
  • Patients who are suffering from symptoms of bone metastases
  • One to 3 painful lesions.
  • Targeted tumor(s) are ExAblate device accessible and are located in ribs, extremities (excluding joints), pelvis, shoulders and in the posterior aspects of the following spinal vertebra: Lumbar vertebra (L3 - L5), Sacral vertebra (S1 - S5)
  • Patients with persistent distinguishable pain associated with up to 3 tumors of which a maximum of 2 tumors will be treated:
Show all 14Show fewer
  • o If patient has pain from additional sites that are not planned for treatment, the pain from the additional sites must be evaluated as being less intense by at least 2 points on the NRS compared to the site(s) to be treated.
  • Patient with NRS (0-10 scale) pain score ≥ 4 at the targeted tumors (i.e: both tumors targeted for treatment must have NRS ≥ 4) irrespective of medication
  • Targeted tumors (most painful) size up to 8 cm in diameter
  • Patient whose targeted (most painful) tumors are on bone and bone-lesion interface is deeper than 1cm from the skin.
  • Targeted (most painful) tumors clearly visible by non-contrast MRI, and ExAblate MRgFUS device accessible
  • Able to communicate sensations during the ExAblate MRgFUS treatment
  • At least 2 weeks since chemotherapy
  • No radiation therapy to targeted (most painful) tumors in the past two weeks

Who cannot join

  • Patients who either
  • Need surgical stabilization of the affected weight bearing bony structure (>7 fracture risk score, see Section 6.9) OR
  • Targeted tumor is at an impending fracture site of the weigh bearing bone (>7 on fracture risk score, see Section 6.9).
  • OR
  • o Patients with surgical stabilization of tumor site with metallic hardware
  • More than 3 painful lesions or more than 2 requiring immediate localized treatment
Show all 32Show fewer
  • The targeted tumor(s) is (are) less than 2 points more painful compared to other non-targeted painful lesions on the site specific NRS.
  • Targeted tumor is in the skull
  • Patients on dialysis
  • Patients with life expectancy < 6-Months
  • Patients with an acute medical condition (e.g., pneumonia, sepsis) that is expected to hinder them from completing this study.
  • Patients with unstable cardiac status including:
  • Unstable angina pectoris on medication
  • Patients with documented myocardial infarction within six months of protocol entry
  • Congestive heart failure requiring medication (other than diuretic)
  • Patients on anti-arrhythmic drugs
  • Severe hypertension (diastolic BP > 100 on medication)
  • Patients with standard contraindications for MR imaging such as non-MRI compatible implanted metallic devices including cardiac pacemakers, size limitations, etc.
  • Patients with an active infection or severe hematological, neurological, or other uncontrolled disease.
  • Known intolerance or allergies to the MRI contrast agent (e.g. Gadolinium or Magnevist) including advanced kidney disease
  • KPS Score < 60 (See "Definitions" below)
  • Severe cerebrovascular disease (multiple CVA or CVA within 6 months)
  • Individuals who are not able or willing to tolerate the required prolonged stationary position during treatment (can be up to 4 hrs of total table time.)
  • Target (most painful) tumor-bone interface is less then 1cm from nerve bundles, bowels or bladder.
  • Are participating or have participated in another clinical trial for the palliation of their targeted bone metastasis tumors in the last 30 days
  • Patients receiving chemotherapy or radiation (i.e., to the targeted lesion (s)) within the last two weeks
  • Patients unable to communicate with the investigator and staff.
  • Patients with persistent undistinguishable pain (pain source unidentifiable)
  • Targeted (most painful) tumors size > 8 cm in diameter
  • Targeted (most painful) tumors:
  • NOT visible by non-contrast MRI, OR
  • NOT accessible to ExAblate device

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 1 country.

5 sites in 1 country

United States5 sites
  • University of Virginia

    Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908

  • City of Hope

    Duarte, California, 91010

  • Methodist Hospital Research Institute

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • University of California San Francisco

    San Francisco, California, 94107

  • Stanford University Medical Center

    Stanford, California, 94305

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Safety and Initial Effectiveness of ExAblate MR Guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery in the Treatment of Pain Resulting From Metastatic Bone Tumors With the ExAblate 2100 Conformal Bone System

A study to evaluate the safety and initial effectiveness of the ExAblate 2100 Conformal Bone System in the treatment of pain resulting from metastatic bone tumors.

Read the detailed description

Bone is the third most common organ involved by metastatic disease behind lung and liver [6]. In breast cancer, bone is the second most common site of metastatic spread, and 90% of patients dying of breast cancer have bone metastasis. Breast and prostate cancer metastasize to bone most frequently, which reflects the high incidence of both these tumors, as well as their prolonged clinical courses. Post-cancer survival has increased with improvement in early detection and treatments. As a consequence, the number of patients developing metastatic bone disease during their lifetime has also increased.

Current treatments for patients with bone metastases are primarily palliative and include localized therapies (radiation and surgery), systemic therapies (chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, radiopharmaceutical, and bisphosphonates although the primary goal of the use of these therapies are often to address the disease itself), and analgesics (opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs). Recently, radiofrequency ablation has been tested as a treatment option for bone metastases [8]. Currently, an off label use of Cryoablation techniques are being tested as another alternative for bone Mets palliation. The main goals of these treatments are improvement of quality of life and functional level. These goals can be further described:

  1. Pain relief
  2. Preservation and restoration of function
  3. Local tumor control
  4. Skeletal stabilization

Treatment with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is the standard of care for patients with localized bone pain, and results in the palliation of pain for many of these patients. Twenty to 30% of patients treated with radiation therapy do not experience pain relief [9-13]. Re-treatment rates are generally reported in the range of 10-25%. Many patients with relapsed pain or poor response to initial radiation may be lost to follow up or may not be referred back to oncologists for consideration of re-radiation. In addition to relapse and re-treatment, there is an increased risk of pathologic fracture in the peri-radiation period. The fracture rate reported in radiation studies is generally in the range of 1% to 8%. The hyperemic response weakens the adjacent bone and increases the risk of spontaneous fracture. Furthermore, patients who have recurrent pain at a site previously irradiated may not be eligible for further radiation therapy secondary to limitations in normal tissue tolerance. Hesitation on the part of physicians to use a larger dose may be related to increased long-term toxicity. Larger radiation dose produces a greater risk of complications such as fibrosis of normal soft tissue, which can cause a decrement in the quality of life in cases of life expectancy longer than 6 months. There may also be a greater incidence of acute side effects of nausea and vomiting if the treatment field includes the stomach. The percent of patients experiencing vomiting following EBRT ranges from about 5% to 30%.

A palliative treatment for painful bone metastases that is non-invasive, without long-term toxicity and having minimal complications would be a useful tool for treating physicians and also a beneficial option for patients suffering from painful bone metastases. Results of preliminary studies indicate that ExAblate treatment of painful bone metastases may be a beneficial treatment option [14, 15]. The ExAblate system is a non-invasive thermal ablation device used in the coagulation of various types of soft tissue. The ExAblate system has the potential to achieve the first three of the four previously mentioned goals in the treatment of bone tumors; namely pain relief, preservation and restoration of functional levels and local tumor control [11]. The ExAblate system used in the present study is a technological advance over the ExAblate 2000 fixed transducer system in terms of flexibility of use and reduction of positioning related pain to the patients. The ExAblate system used in this study conforms to the patient's body shape at the location of the bone mets location.

Conditions
Bone Metastases
Being tested
ExAblate 2100
Keywords
bone cancer, pain palliation, metastasis, breast cancer, lung cancer, prostate cancer, cancer related pain, tumors
Medical subject headings
Bone Neoplasms, Neoplasm Metastasis, Breast Neoplasms, Lung Neoplasms, Prostatic Neoplasms, Cancer Pain, Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ExAblate 2100Device

    Also called Focused ultrasound ablation, MRgFUS

    Conformal Bone System

Study groups in NCT00981578
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ExAblate 2100 TreatmentExperimentalExAblate 2100 ablation for the treatment of painful bone metastases.
Receives: Device: ExAblate 2100

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Adverse Device Effects

    Adverse effects outcomes are reported in the adverse events module.

    Measured: 3 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Change in NRS Pain Scores From Baseline at 3 Months

    Efficacy was evaluated by change in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores at 3 months post treatment The NRS is an 11 point scale (0-10) with 0 as no pain and 10 as the worst pain. Larger numbers in score change from baseline indicate improvement (decrease) in pain. Two points improvement has been reported as a clinically meaningful.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months

  2. Change Brief Pain Inventory - Pain Interference From Baseline at 3 Months

    Quality of life was evaluated using average change from baseline at 3 Months using the Pain Interference section of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI-Pain Interference). Larger change from Baseline numbers indicate improved function. Pain Interference is the mean of seven questions scored on an 11-point scale of 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes). A positive change from Baseline (higher values) at the 3 Month visit indicates improvement or a reduction in pain interference

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Sep 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2009
  3. Primary completion14 Nov 2016
  4. Study completion14 Nov 2016

Why it stopped: Terminated due to low enrollment.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
37 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00981578
Sponsor's protocol ID
BM010
Status last verified
Mar 2020
First submitted
21 Sep 2009
Last updated
11 Mar 2020

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing ExAblate 2100 in people with Bone Metastases, run by InSightec at 5 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 14 inclusion and 32 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Mar 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Adverse Device Effects (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Mar 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in