Hypertension, Resistant to Conventional TherapyPhase 4Pathway 1NCT00994617
Monotherapy Versus Dual Therapy for Initial Treatment for Hypertension
A Phase 4 study testing Losartan and hydrochlorothiazide and Hydrochlorothiazide switched over with Losartan at 8 weeks in people with Hypertension, Resistant to Conventional Therapy and Essential Hypertension, run by University of Cambridge at 13 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
To test whether the current custom of initiating treatment for hypertension with a single drug is less effective in the short-term than initial combination therapy, and results in the eventual need for comparatively more antihypertensive drug therapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 79 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hypertension, Resistant to Conventional Therapy, Essential Hypertension
- What is being tested?
- Losartan and hydrochlorothiazide and Hydrochlorothiazide switched over with Losartan at 8 weeks
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 600 participants
- Where
- 13 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Jan 2010to Dec 2014
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 79 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Patients must meet ALL inclusion criteria
- Aged 18-79
- Male subjects or female subjects taking adequate contraception such as the oral contraceptive pill, an intra uterine device or who are surgically sterilised or postmenopausal Females
- BP ≥150 mmHg (systolic) OR ≥ 95 mmHg (diastolic). Patients may be included if the PI anticipates BP criteria for inclusion will be met at randomisation
- Either never-treated or received a maximum of one antihypertensive drug class in the previous year
Patients will be excluded for ANY ONE of the following reasons
- Clinic SBP > 200 mmHg or DBP > 120 mmHg, with PI discretion to override if home BP measurements are lower
- Secondary or accelerated phase hypertension
- eGFR < 45 mls/min
- Contra-indication or previous intolerance to any trial therapy
- Failure to record required home BP readings during placebo run-in.
- Significant co-morbidity (investigator opinion but to include alcoholism, terminal illness, documented non-attendance at clinics etc)
- Diabetes type 1
- Plasma K+ outside normal range on two successive measurements during screening
- Requirement for treatment with ≥2 drugs (which can be a CCB and/or {ACEi OR ARB OR direct renin inhibitor OR β-blocker}) in order to reduce blood pressure to ≤180/120 mmHg
- Requirement for diuretic therapy (other than for hypertension)
- Requirement for ACE inhibitor (or ARB) therapy (other than for hypertension)
- Absolute contra-indications to any of the study drugs (listed on their data-sheet)
- Current therapy for cancer
- Anticipation of change in medical status during course of trial (e.g. planned surgical intervention requiring >2 weeks convalescence , actual or planned pregnancy)
- Inability to give informed consent
- Participation in a clinical study involving an investigational drug or device within 4 weeks of screening.
- Any concomitant condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, may adversely affect the safety and/or efficacy of the study drug or severely limit the subject's lifespan or ability to complete the study (eg, alcohol or drug abuse, disabling or terminal illness, mental disorders).
- Treatment with any of the following prohibited medications:
- Oral corticosteroids within 3 months of screening. Treatment with systemic corticosteroids is also prohibited during study participation. Chronic stable or unstable use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) other than acetylsalicylic acid is prohibited. Chronic use is defined as >3 consecutive or nonconsecutive days of treatment per week. In addition, the intermittent use of NSAIDs is strongly discouraged throughout the duration of this study. If intermittent treatment is required, NSAIDs must not be used for more than a total of 2 days. For all subjects requiring analgesic or anti-pyretic agents, the use of paracetamol is recommended during study participation.
- The use of short-acting oral nitrates (eg, sublingual nitroglycerin) is permitted; however, subjects should not take short-acting oral nitrates within 4 hours of screening or any subsequent study visit.
- The use of long-acting oral nitrates (eg, Isordil) is permitted; however, the dose must be stable for at least 2 weeks prior to screening and randomisation.
- The use of sympathomimetic decongestants is permitted; however, not within 1 day prior to any clinic visit/BP assessment.
- The use of theophylline is permitted; however, the dose must be stable for at least 4 weeks prior to screening and throughout study participation.
- The use of phosphodiesterase (PDE) type V inhibitors is permitted; however, subjects must refrain from taking these medications within 1 day of screening or any subsequent study visit.
- The use of alpha-blockers is not permitted - with the exception of afluzosin and tamsulosin for prostatic symptoms
Trial locations and contacts
13 sites in 1 country.
13 sites in 1 country
United Kingdom13 sites, 13 recruiting
- Recruiting
NHS Ayrshire
Ayrshire
Dr E Spalding
- Recruiting
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
Birmingham
Dr U Martin
- Recruiting
Professor Morris Brown
Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB22QQ
Jackie Salsbury, Nursing, 01223 586878, js811@medschl.cam.ac.uk
- Recruiting
NHS Tayside/University of Dundee
Dundee
Prof T MacDonald
- Recruiting
NHS Lothian/University of Edinburgh
Edinburgh
Prof D Webb
- Recruiting
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde/University of Glasgow
Glasgow
Dr S Padmanabhan
- Recruiting
Ixworth GP Practice
Ixworth
Dr J Cannon
- Recruiting
University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
Leicester
Dr A Stanley
- Recruiting
Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry
London
Prof M Caulfield
Prof M Caulfield
- Recruiting
Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
London
Prof K Cruickshank
- Recruiting
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
London
Prof P Sever
- Recruiting
Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Manchester
Dr H Soran
- Recruiting
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust
Norwich
Dr S Myint-Khin
About this study
To test whether the current custom of initiating treatment for hypertension with a single drug is less effective in the short-term than initial combination therapy, and results in the eventual need for comparatively more antihypertensive drug therapy.
Read the detailed description
To determine if patients randomised to more aggressive (combination therapy) treatment for the initial treatment of hypertension have better blood pressure control compared to those randomised to less aggressive (monotherapy) treatment despite subsequent add-on treatment being similar in each group. This will test the hypothesis that monotherapy patients 'never catch up' with combination therapy patients.
- To determine if this 'never catch-up' phenomenon of improved BP control persists for at least one year.
- To understand the underlying mechanism of improved BP control; specifically:
- To determine if it is due to haemodynamic compensation, such as increased sodium retention and volume expansion.
- To determine if it is due to increased peripheral resistance.
- To understand the predictors of BP control i.e. age, baseline renin status, sodium status and plasma volume.
- To validate the National Institute for Clinical Excellence / British Hypertension Society joint guideline ACD algorithm by comparing BP control in the monotherapy crossover arm of phase 1 and to correlate this with age (≤ 55 or > 55y), and baseline characteristics such as renin.
- To determine the safety and tolerability of a strategy of prescribing combination therapy as the initial step versus monotherapy as the initial step.
- Being tested
- Losartan and hydrochlorothiazide, Hydrochlorothiazide switched over with Losartan at 8 weeks
- Medical subject headings
- Hypertension Resistant to Conventional Therapy, Essential Hypertension
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Losartan and hydrochlorothiazideDrug
Losartan 50 -100mg Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5mg -25mg
Hydrochlorothiazide switched over with Losartan at 8 weeksDrug
Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25mg crossed over with Losartan 50-100mg
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Combination Therapy | Experimental | Patients treated with combination therapy of Hydrochlorthiazide plus Losartan. Losartan will be force-titrated from 50 to 100mg, Hydrochlorothiazide will be force-titrated from 12.5mg to 25mg Receives: Drug: Losartan and hydrochlorothiazide |
| Monotherapy | Active comparator | Initial monotherapy Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5mg -25mg Crossed over with Losartan 50 -100mg at 8 weeks Receives: Drug: Hydrochlorothiazide switched over with Losartan at 8 weeks |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in mean home systolic BP for the group treated initially with monotherapy compared to the group treated initially with combination therapy.
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (1)
A comparison the proportion of patients who drop out of the trial at any stage after randomisation or who require further antihypertensive treatment
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Oct 2009 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2010
- Primary completionDec 2014 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2014 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hypertension, Resistant to Conventional TherapyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 600 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Cambridge
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- British Heart Foundation
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Morris Brown, University of Cambridge
- Investigators
- Professor MJ Brown, FMedSci, Principal investigator, University of Cambridge
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00994617
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2008-007749-29
- Other IDs
- 2008
- Acronym
- Pathway 1
- Status last verified
- Jun 2013
- First submitted
- 13 Oct 2009
- Last updated
- 12 Jun 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
MacDonald TM, Williams B, Webb DJ, Morant S, Caulfield M, Cruickshank JK, Ford I, Sever P, Mackenzie IS, Padmanabhan S, McCann GP, Salsbury J, McInnes G, Brown MJ; British Hypertension Society Programme of Prevention And Treatment of Hypertension With Algorithm-based Therapy (PATHWAY). Combination Therapy Is Superior to Sequential Monotherapy for the Initial Treatment of Hypertension: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Nov 18;6(11):e006986. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006986.
PubMed 29151036
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Jun 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Monotherapy Versus Dual Therapy for Initial Treatment for Hypertension
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00994617
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Pathway 1 / 2008-007749-29
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 600 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of CambridgeUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- British Heart Foundation
- Study start
- Jan 2010
- Primary completion
- Dec 2014 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2014 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 Oct 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To test whether the current custom of initiating treatment for hypertension with a single drug is less effective in the short-term than initial combination therapy, and results in the eventual need for comparatively more antihypertensive drug therapy.
Detailed description
To determine if patients randomised to more aggressive (combination therapy) treatment for the initial treatment of hypertension have better blood pressure control compared to those randomised to less aggressive (monotherapy) treatment despite subsequent add-on treatment being similar in each group. This will test the hypothesis that monotherapy patients 'never catch up' with combination therapy patients.
- To determine if this 'never catch-up' phenomenon of improved BP control persists for at least one year.
- To understand the underlying mechanism of improved BP control; specifically:
- To determine if it is due to haemodynamic compensation, such as increased sodium retention and volume expansion.
- To determine if it is due to increased peripheral resistance.
- To understand the predictors of BP control i.e. age, baseline renin status, sodium status and plasma volume.
- To validate the National Institute for Clinical Excellence / British Hypertension Society joint guideline ACD algorithm by comparing BP control in the monotherapy crossover arm of phase 1 and to correlate this with age (≤ 55 or > 55y), and baseline characteristics such as renin.
- To determine the safety and tolerability of a strategy of prescribing combination therapy as the initial step versus monotherapy as the initial step.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Combination Therapy | Experimental | Drug: Losartan and hydrochlorothiazidePatients treated with combination therapy of Hydrochlorthiazide plus Losartan. Losartan will be force-titrated from 50 to 100mg, Hydrochlorothiazide will be force-titrated from 12.5mg to 25mg |
| Monotherapy | Active comparator | Drug: Hydrochlorothiazide switched over with Losartan at 8 weeksInitial monotherapy Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5mg -25mg Crossed over with Losartan 50 -100mg at 8 weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 79 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Losartan and hydrochlorothiazideLosartan 50 -100mg Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5mg -25mg | Drug | Combination Therapy |
| Hydrochlorothiazide switched over with Losartan at 8 weeksHydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25mg crossed over with Losartan 50-100mg | Drug | Monotherapy |
Primary outcome
Change in mean home systolic BP for the group treated initially with monotherapy compared to the group treated initially with combination therapy.
Time frame: 1 year
1 secondary outcome
A comparison the proportion of patients who drop out of the trial at any stage after randomisation or who require further antihypertensive treatment
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Jun 2013.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29151036MacDonald TM, Williams B, Webb DJ, Morant S, Caulfield M, Cruickshank JK, Ford I, Sever P, Mackenzie IS, Padmanabhan S, McCann GP, Salsbury J, McInnes G, Brown MJ; British Hypertension Society Programme of Prevention And Treatment of Hypertension With Algorithm-based Therapy (PATHWAY). Combination Therapy Is Superior to Sequential Monotherapy for the Initial Treatment of Hypertension: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Nov 18;6(11):e006986. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006986.
Related trials for Hypertension, Resistant to Conventional Therapy
RecruitingPhase 4
Antihypertensive Mechanisms of Minocycline in Resistant Hypertension
Hypertension, Resistant to Conventional Therapy
Not yet recruiting
Expand Management of Blood Pressure With Renal Denervation in Patients Undergoing Staged PCI for Advanced Coronary Artery diseasE
Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease, Hypertension Resistant to Conventional Therapy
Recruiting
Physical Activity Program for Reducing Blood Pressure in Sleep Apnea Patients With Resistant Hypertension
Hypertension, Resistant to Conventional Therapy, Sleep Apnea
Active, not recruiting
RADIANCE Continued Access Protocol
Hypertension, Hypertension, Resistant to Conventional Therapy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Professor MJ Brown, FMedSci principal investigator
University of Cambridge
13 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Losartan and hydrochlorothiazide and Hydrochlorothiazide switched over with Losartan at 8 weeks in people with Hypertension, Resistant to Conventional Therapy and Essential Hypertension, run by University of Cambridge at 13 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jun 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 13 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Professor Morris Brown, FMedSCI (+44 (0)1223 336743, mjb14@hermes.cam.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in mean home systolic BP for the group treated initially with monotherapy compared to the group treated initially with combination therapy. (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00994617, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jun 2013.