AzTrials
AzTrials

Fibromyalgia(FIBCOG)NCT01004458

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Trial in Fibromyalgia

A study testing Cognitive behavioral therapy and Waiting list in people with Fibromyalgia, run by Uppsala University at 1 site in Sweden.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Previous studies have shown that the disorder fibromyalgia often is preceded by long-term stress. Moreover, an association has been shown between stress, pain and co-morbidity in these patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Fibromyalgia
What is being tested?
Cognitive behavioral therapy and Waiting list
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
48 participants
Where
1 siteSweden
Study dates
Jan 2001to Dec 2008
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Fibromyalgia according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria
  • Women
  • Age 18-65
  • Living in Östhammar municipality, Sweden
  • Swedish speaking

Who cannot join

  • severe mental disease
  • drug or alcohol abuse

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Sweden1 site
  • Dept of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Family Medicin and Clinical Epidemiology Section

    Uppsala, SE-75122

Other trials in Sweden

About this study

Official title: Randomized Clinical Trial of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Women With the Fibromyalgia Disorder

Previous studies have shown that the disorder fibromyalgia often is preceded by long-term stress. Moreover, an association has been shown between stress, pain and co-morbidity in these patients. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has been shown effective in reducing stress, anxiety and pain in rheumatoid arthritis and fibromyalgia. The purpose of the present trial was to assess whether CBT may reduce pain and other symptoms and increase well-being and general function, affect biological markers for pain and long-term stress, to a larger extent than treatment "as usual".

Forty eight women with verified fibromyalgia were randomly allocated to an early treatment group or a waiting list group. The early treatment group received CBT group treatment during six months. Measurements of outcome and potential outcome affecting variables were made at baseline, after six months and one year after baseline. The waiting list group received the same CBT treatment as the early treatment group after six months on the waiting list.

The design is thus a traditional "waiting list design", allowing a two parallel group comparison during the first six months and a "before-after" analysis in both groups when the treatment was concluded.

Read the detailed description

Long-lasting pain is a common cause for disability. In several studies 30-40% of the adult general population suffer from pain. In this group of subjects the fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is common,. This is a well defined disorder with generalized pain, well defined tenderpoints according to the American Collage of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, and a number of other associated symptoms. About 5-10% of the general female population suffers from fibromyalgia. The disorder is infrequent among men.

The etiology of the condition is unknown. However, a multi-factorial origin is postulated, where some form of stress is a contributing factor. Also neuro-endocrine disturbances have been observed. Cognitive behavioral therapy CBT) is an evidence based efficient treatment method in depression and panic disorder. In open studies it has proved to be an effective stress and pain reducer.

The purpose of the trial was to evaluate the effect of CBT in a group of female FMS patients regarding pain, stress, and well-being (outcome). A purpose was also to study mediating factors, such as biological markers for stress and pain, and psycho-social factors.

The study population consisted of 48 women, 27-62 years of age, living in Östhammar municipality, central Sweden, with a verified FMS according to the 1992 ACR criteria, and no other serious disorder. The were recruited by advertising in the local printed press and meetings with the local rheumatology patient association.

54 subjects were screened for participation. A physical examination was performed, a medical history was taken, blood samples and saliva specimens for biological markers regarding metabolic status, pain and stress were taken, and a questionnaire was filled out. 48 women fulfilled the inclusion criteria and gave informed consent to participation. A randomized block design was used by which the women were randomly allocated to two groups, an early treatment group and a waiting list group.

The early treatment group was subdivided into four treatment groups with six participants in each. The CBT treatment was given by certified therapists and supervised by the chief therapist, an experienced psychologist. Each group had the same therapist throughout the trial. The therapy was given as group sessions once a week for 20 weeks. When the therapy was completed the outcome variables were measured by means of questionnaire, and the same blood and saliva specimens as at baseline were taken. During the next six months two booster CBT sessions were performed. One year after baseline a final follow-up evaluation was made.

The waiting list group served as reference (or control) group to the early treatment group during the first six months from baseline. No CBT therapy was given, but otherwise exactly the same procedure was followed. When the control period was over the waiting list group got their CBT treatment and evaluations following the same protocol as the early treatment group.

The outcome evaluation are based on a number of questionnaire instruments, such as the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI), the Type A behavior instrument (Everyday stress), The Maastricht Questionnaire ("Vital exhaustion"), and the self administered Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS-S) instrument. The blood sampling aimed at analyzing the neuro-peptides substance P, Met-Enkephalin-Arginine-Phenylalanine (MEAP), beta-endorphin, and neuro-peptide Y, in addition to estrogen, testosterone, prolactin and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA). The saliva specimens were intended to measure diurnal variation of cortisol. To standardize the hormonal level all evaluations were done in ovulation phase of the menstrual cycle.

Conditions
Fibromyalgia
Being tested
Cognitive behavioral therapy, Waiting list
Keywords
fibromyalgia, cognitive behavioral therapy, women, pain, stress, type A behavior
Medical subject headings
Fibromyalgia, Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cognitive behavioral therapyBehavioural

    The treatment, adopted to reduce hostility and stress behavior, was given during group sessions once a week during six months with two follow-up occasions during the next six months

  • Waiting listOther

    The group served as referents during the trial and received no intervention other than measurements at the same points in time as the intervention group

Study groups in NCT01004458
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Early treatment groupActive comparatorThe experimental group receiving CBT
Receives: Behavioral: Cognitive behavioral therapy
Waiting list groupNo interventionThe waiting list group served as referents during the trial
Receives: Other: Waiting list

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI) score

    Measured: At baseline and at 6 and 12 months after baseline

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Type A behavior measures

    Measured: At baseline and at 6 and 12 months after baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Oct 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2001
  3. Primary completionDec 2003
  4. Study completionDec 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
48 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01004458
Sponsor's protocol ID
UCC2000
Acronym
(FIBCOG)
Status last verified
Oct 2009
First submitted
29 Oct 2009
Last updated
30 Oct 2009
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Karlsson B, Nyberg F, Svardsudd K, Burell G, Bjorkegren K, Kristiansson P. Neuropeptide Y and measures of stress in a longitudinal study of women with the fibromyalgia syndrome. Scand J Pain. 2022 Jun 21;23(1):59-65. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2022-0016. Print 2023 Jan 27.

    PubMed 35728621

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Cognitive behavioral therapy and Waiting list in people with Fibromyalgia, run by Uppsala University at 1 site in Sweden.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Oct 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI) score (time frame: At baseline and at 6 and 12 months after baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01004458, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Oct 2009.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in