Wrist InjuriesNCT01012271
Diagnostic Accuracy of Direct MR Arthrography Of The Wrist At 1.5, 3.0 And 7.0T
An observational study of Wrist Injuries, run by University of Zurich at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
The purpose of our study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MR arthrography of the wrist at 1.5, 3.0, and 7.0T with wrist arthroscopy as reference standard. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Wrist Injuries
- What is being tested?
- MRI
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- Oct 2010to Jan 2016
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: primary care clinic
Who may be able to join
- age >18;
- clinical evidence for wrist joint abnormalities;
- request for MR arthrography prior to wrist arthroscopy;
- willingness to take part in our study with written informed consent;
Who cannot join
- age<18;
- history of prior wrist surgery; systemic diseases e.g. rheumatoid arthritis;
- infection; history of adverse contrast reactions;
- contraindication for MR imaging (e.g. pacemaker, metallic implants, etc.);
- history or possible signs of renal failure (see section "nephrogenic systemic fibrosis")
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The purpose of our study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MR arthrography of the wrist at 1.5, 3.0, and 7.0T with wrist arthroscopy as reference standard.
- Conditions
- Wrist Injuries
- Being tested
- MRI
- Keywords
- Wrist abnormalities
- Medical subject headings
- Wrist Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MRIOther
MR arthrography is used to evaluate wrist abnormalities
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Nov 2009 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2010
- Primary completionJan 2016
- Study completionJan 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Wrist InjuriesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of ZurichThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Zurich
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Gustav Andreisek, University of Zurich
- Investigators
- 01 Studienregister MasterAdmins, Study director, UniversitaetsSpital Zuerich
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01012271
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 002
- Status last verified
- Mar 2016
- First submitted
- 11 Nov 2009
- Last updated
- 30 Mar 2016
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Mar 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Direct MR Arthrography Of The Wrist At 1.5, 3.0 And 7.0T
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01012271
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 002
- Conditions
- Wrist Injuries
- Keywords
- Wrist abnormalities
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of ZurichUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2010
- Primary completion
- Jan 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Nov 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of our study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MR arthrography of the wrist at 1.5, 3.0, and 7.0T with wrist arthroscopy as reference standard.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- primary care clinic
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- age >18;
- clinical evidence for wrist joint abnormalities;
- request for MR arthrography prior to wrist arthroscopy;
- willingness to take part in our study with written informed consent;
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- age<18;
- history of prior wrist surgery; systemic diseases e.g. rheumatoid arthritis;
- infection; history of adverse contrast reactions;
- contraindication for MR imaging (e.g. pacemaker, metallic implants, etc.);
- history or possible signs of renal failure (see section "nephrogenic systemic fibrosis")
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MRIMR arthrography is used to evaluate wrist abnormalities | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Mar 2016.
Related trials for Wrist Injuries
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Postural Control and Balance Performance in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS), Postural Assessment
Recruiting
No Reduction Compared to Closed Reduction for Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Over 65 or Older
Distal Radius Fracture, Casting
Recruiting
Comparison of Wrist Splint Positions in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS), Peripheral Neuropathies
Active, not recruiting
Immediate Mobilization Versus 2 Weeks Cast Immobilization After Distal Radius Fracture Treated With Volar Locking Plate
Distal Radius Fracture
Recruiting
Effects of Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation(rPMS) on CTS(Carpal Tunnel Syndrome)
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
01 Studienregister MasterAdmins study director
UniversitaetsSpital Zuerich
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Wrist Injuries, run by University of Zurich at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Mar 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Mar 2016.