AzTrials
AzTrials

Lung TransplantNCT01033201

Alveoscopy, Endoscopic Confocal Microscopy and Lung Rejection, Parenchymal Lung Diseases in Vivo

An observational study of Lung Transplant, run by Mayo Clinic at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Lung transplantation is indicated when end-stage lung diseases no longer respond to available standard therapy, making life expectancy short and associated with disability. Acute and chronic rejection are common complications following transplantation, indicating screening bronchoscopies and transbronchial biopsies at… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Lung Transplant
What is being tested?
Confocal imaging
How many people
71 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Apr 2008to Mar 2011
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients scheduled to undergo bronchoscopy either before or after lung transplantation.

Who may be able to join

  • Age above 18 years
  • Any patient undergoing surveillance or clinically indicated bronchoscopies during or after lung transplantation
  • Any patient undergoing bronchoscopy prior lung transplant

Who cannot join

  • Unwilling to consent
  • Unable to safely tolerate a bronchoscopic procedure

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Mayo Clinic Florida

    Jacksonville, Florida, 32224

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: The Role Of Endoscopic Alveoscopy by Confocal Endomicroscopy in Diagnosing Acute and Chronic Rejection in Lung Transplant Recipients, Diagnosis of End Stage Lung Disease, and Other Pulmonary Pathologies in Vivo

Lung transplantation is indicated when end-stage lung diseases no longer respond to available standard therapy, making life expectancy short and associated with disability. Acute and chronic rejection are common complications following transplantation, indicating screening bronchoscopies and transbronchial biopsies at three month intervals the first two years, in addition to clinically indicated procedures when rejection or infection is suspected. Transbronchial biopsies carry associated risks (bleeding, pneumothorax). Chronic rejection is characterized by progressive obliteration of distal airways (Bronchiolitis Obliterans-BO-). BO requires open lung biopsy for diagnosis. Alternatively, a clinical surrogate (Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome), characterized by decline in Forced Expired Volume in 1 second not explained by acute rejection or infection is used for diagnosis. The new technique of confocal endo-microscopy enables sub-surface visualization of tissue in vivo during bronchoscopic procedures using a probe-based confocal microscope, integrated to a standard endoscope. Bronchiolar and alveolar structures can be visualized at a cellular and nuclear level, and these images can be saved and reviewed. This new technology could potentially identify acute and chronic rejection, thus offering and alternative to transbronchial biopsies. We expect to describe a new alternative to diagnose acute and chronic rejection using confocal microscopy images obtained endoscopically, obviating complications of transbronchial biopsies.

Endoscopic confocal endomicroscopy can detect and classify common bronchiolar and alveolar pathological conditions in real time. Specifically, we hypothesize that confocal endomicroscopy images of bronchiolar and alveolar structures during standard bronchoscopy could help to recognize and classify the presence/absence of acute rejection and/or bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome in lung transplant recipients. This technology could also identify the histological characteristics lung diseases such as interstitial, obstructive or vascular end stage lung diseases, and thus lead to more efficient, safer and more accurate diagnosis of these lung conditions during routine bronchoscopies.

Conditions
Lung Transplant
Being tested
Confocal imaging
Keywords
Lung rejection

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Confocal imagingOther

    Also called AlveoloFlex Confocal Miniprobes, Cellvizio-Lung system

    At the time of the standard of care bronchoscopy, confocal images will be obtained from each consented patient.

Study groups in NCT01033201
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Lung transplantAll lung transplant patients presenting for screening/surveillance and diagnostic bronchoscopies at Mayo Clinic Florida are eligible for participation.
Receives: Other: Confocal imaging

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. To determine in an unblinded study, the key image features of acute lung rejection and chronic lung rejection (BOS), and estimate which morphologic features best distinguish these conditions.

    Measured: One year

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. To determine the initial sensitivity and specificity of confocal imaging for the classification of acute lung rejection among lung transplant recipients.

    Measured: One year

  2. To develop a library of confocal images with the most optimal confocal imaging characteristics of other lung pathologies requiring lung transplantation.

    Measured: One year

  3. To determine the inter-examiner differences and learning curve for accurate detection of acute rejection as well as the confocal images of other lung pathologies.

    Measured: One year

  4. To determine in a unblinded pilot study, the key image features of chronic lung rejection as defined by the Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS), and estimate which morphologic features best distinguish this conditions.

    Measured: One year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Dec 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2008
  3. Primary completionMar 2011
  4. Study completionMar 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
71 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01033201
Sponsor's protocol ID
08-000800
Other IDs
ACA00001534
Status last verified
Jan 2012
First submitted
15 Dec 2009
Last updated
26 Jan 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • St Croix CM, Leelavanichkul K, Watkins SC. Intravital fluorescence microscopy in pulmonary research. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2006 Sep 15;58(7):834-40. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2006.07.007. Epub 2006 Aug 11.

    PubMed 16996641
  • Herth FJ, Eberhardt R, Ernst A. The future of bronchoscopy in diagnosing, staging and treatment of lung cancer. Respiration. 2006;73(4):399-409. doi: 10.1159/000093369.

    PubMed 16775411
  • Trulock EP, Christie JD, Edwards LB, Boucek MM, Aurora P, Taylor DO, Dobbels F, Rahmel AO, Keck BM, Hertz MI. Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: twenty-fourth official adult lung and heart-lung transplantation report-2007. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2007 Aug;26(8):782-95. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2007.06.003. No abstract available.

    PubMed 17692782
  • Moffatt SD, Demers P, Robbins RC, Doyle R, Wienacker A, Henig N, Theodore J, Reitz BA, Whyte RI. Lung transplantation: a decade of experience. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005 Feb;24(2):145-51. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2003.10.020.

    PubMed 15701428
  • Sibley RK, Berry GJ, Tazelaar HD, Kraemer MR, Theodore J, Marshall SE, Billingham ME, Starnes VA. The role of transbronchial biopsies in the management of lung transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1993 Mar-Apr;12(2):308-24.

    PubMed 8476904
  • Bowdish ME, Arcasoy SM, Wilt JS, Conte JV, Davis RD, Garrity ER, Hertz ML, Orens JB, Rosengard BR, Barr ML. Surrogate markers and risk factors for chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Am J Transplant. 2004 Jul;4(7):1171-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00483.x.

    PubMed 15196078
  • Colombat M, Groussard O, Lautrette A, Thabut G, Marrash-Chahla R, Brugiere O, Mal H, Leseche G, Fournier M, Degott C. Analysis of the different histologic lesions observed in transbronchial biopsy for the diagnosis of acute rejection. Clinicopathologic correlations during the first 6 months after lung transplantation. Hum Pathol. 2005 Apr;36(4):387-94. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2005.01.022.

    PubMed 15892000
  • Khalifah AP, Hachem RR, Chakinala MM, Yusen RD, Aloush A, Patterson GA, Mohanakumar T, Trulock EP, Walter MJ. Minimal acute rejection after lung transplantation: a risk for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. Am J Transplant. 2005 Aug;5(8):2022-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.00953.x.

    PubMed 15996255
  • Hachem RR, Yusen RD, Chakinala MM, Meyers BF, Lynch JP, Aloush AA, Patterson GA, Trulock EP. A randomized controlled trial of tacrolimus versus cyclosporine after lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2007 Oct;26(10):1012-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2007.07.027.

    PubMed 17919621
  • Tazelaar HD, Nilsson FN, Rinaldi M, Murtaugh P, McDougall JC, McGregor CG. The sensitivity of transbronchial biopsy for the diagnosis of acute lung rejection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993 Apr;105(4):674-8.

    PubMed 8469001
  • Yousem SA, Berry GJ, Cagle PT, Chamberlain D, Husain AN, Hruban RH, Marchevsky A, Ohori NP, Ritter J, Stewart S, Tazelaar HD. Revision of the 1990 working formulation for the classification of pulmonary allograft rejection: Lung Rejection Study Group. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1996 Jan;15(1 Pt 1):1-15.

    PubMed 8820078
  • Estenne M, Maurer JR, Boehler A, Egan JJ, Frost A, Hertz M, Mallory GB, Snell GI, Yousem S. Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome 2001: an update of the diagnostic criteria. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2002 Mar;21(3):297-310. doi: 10.1016/s1053-2498(02)00398-4. No abstract available.

    PubMed 11897517
  • Kiesslich R, Burg J, Vieth M, Gnaendiger J, Enders M, Delaney P, Polglase A, McLaren W, Janell D, Thomas S, Nafe B, Galle PR, Neurath MF. Confocal laser endoscopy for diagnosing intraepithelial neoplasias and colorectal cancer in vivo. Gastroenterology. 2004 Sep;127(3):706-13. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.06.050.

    PubMed 15362025
  • Thiberville L, Moreno-Swirc S, Vercauteren T, Peltier E, Cave C, Bourg Heckly G. In vivo imaging of the bronchial wall microstructure using fibered confocal fluorescence microscopy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan 1;175(1):22-31. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200605-684OC. Epub 2006 Oct 5.

    PubMed 17023733
  • Pacurariu RI. Low incidence of side effects following intravenous fluorescein angiography. Ann Ophthalmol. 1982 Jan;14(1):32-6.

    PubMed 7125438

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Lung Transplant, run by Mayo Clinic at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jan 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

To determine in an unblinded study, the key image features of acute lung rejection and chronic lung rejection (BOS), and estimate which morphologic features best distinguish these conditions. (time frame: One year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01033201, which also lists 15 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jan 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in