Oral CancerPhase 3NCT01039298
Efficacy of Optically-guided Surgery in the Management of Early-staged Oral Cancer - COOLS TRIAL
A Phase 3 study testing Fluorescence visualization device in people with Oral Cancer and High-grade Precancer, run by University of British Columbia at 8 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a global disease responsible for ~300,000 new cancer cases each year. Local recurrence (~30% of cases) and formation of second primary malignancy are common.2, 3 Cosmetic and/or functional compromise associated with treatment of disease stage is often significant. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Oral Cancer, High-grade Precancer
- What is being tested?
- Fluorescence visualization device
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 8 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- Jan 2013to Jun 2015
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients diagnosed with severe dysplasia, carcinoma in situ, invasive squamous cell carcinoma (T1 or T2) of the oral cavity (ICO-D site codes: C02.0-C06.9) who will be undergoing curative resection (primary disease).
Who cannot join
- Patients with a non-oral malignancy diagnosed (not including non-melanoma skin cancer and lymphoma outside of head and neck region) within the past 3 years.
- Patients with evidence of distant metastasis (as determined by CAT and X-ray) at the time of recruitment.
Trial locations and contacts
8 sites in 1 country.
8 sites in 1 country
Canada8 sites, 8 recruiting
- Recruiting
University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta
Joseph Dort, Dr., jcdort@gmail.com
- Recruiting
Victoria General Hospital, Dalhousie University
Halifax, Nova Scotia
Rob Hart, Dr., drrobhart@hotmail.com
- Recruiting
London Health Science Centre, University of Western Ontario
London, Ontario
John Yoo, Dr., John.yoo@lhsc.on.ca
- Recruiting
McGill University Health Centre
Montreal, Quebec
Karen Kost, Dr., kmkost@yahoo.com
- Recruiting
Ottawa General Hospital, University of Ontario
Ottawa, Ontario
Mike Odell, Dr., lesandmike@hotmail.com
- Recruiting
Sunnybrook Hospital
Toronto, Ontario
Kevin Higgins, Dr., kevin.higgins@sunnybrook.ca
- Recruiting
BC Cancer Agency (Vancouver & Fraser Valley Centres) & Vancouver General Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia
Helen Chiu, 604-675-8057, hchiu@bccancer.bc.ca
Sylvia Lam, 604-675-8057, sau@bccancer.bc.ca
- Recruiting
CancerCare Manitoba, University of Manitoba
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Paul Kerr, Dr., Pkerr@exchange.hsc.mb.ca
About this study
Official title: Canadian Optically Guided Approach for Oral Lesions Surgical Trial - COOLS
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a global disease responsible for ~300,000 new cancer cases each year. Local recurrence (~30% of cases) and formation of second primary malignancy are common.2, 3 Cosmetic and/or functional compromise associated with treatment of disease stage is often significant. These statistics underscore the urgent need to develop a better approach in order to control this deadly disease.
It is becoming increasingly apparent that oral cancers develop within wide fields of diseased tissue characterized by genetically altered cells that are widespread across the oral cavity and present in clinically and histologically normal oral mucosa. Complete removal of these lesions is difficult because high-risk changes frequently go beyond clinically visible tumor. In recognition of this, current 'best practice' is to remove SCC with a significant width (usually 10 mm) of surrounding normal-looking oral mucosa. However, since occult disease varies in size such approach often results in over-cutting (causing severe cosmetic and functional morbidity) or under removal of disease tissue, as evidenced by frequent positive surgical margins and high local and regional recurrence - a failure of the 'best practice.
Read more
There is a wealth of literature that supports the use of tissue autofluorescence in the screening and diagnosis of precancers in the lung, uterine cervix, skin and oral cavity. This approach is already in clinical use in the lung and the mechanism of action of tissue autofluorescence has been well described in the cervix. Changes in fluorescence reflect a complex interplay of alterations to fluorophores in the tissue and structural changes in tissue morphology, each associated with progression of the disease.
As one of the internationally leading teams in applying tissue fluorescence technology, we have shown that direct fluorescence visualization (FV) tools can identify clinically visible or occult premalignant and malignant lesions that are associated with lesions at risk, with high-grade histology and high-risk molecular change. In a recently small scaled, retrospective study, we have shown that FV helped surgeons in the operating room to determine the extent of the high-risk FV field surrounding the cancer and resulted in remarkably lower 2-year recurrence rates (0% for FV-guided vs. 25% for those without FV-guided approach). There is need to design a larger scale prospective, randomized controlled (Phase III) trial to gather strong evidence in proving the efficacy of the surgery approach using this adjunct tool.
To establish the evidence supporting the change in clinical practice using FV-guided surgery. There are 3 objectives.
2.1. Objective 1 (Clinical evidence): To assess the effect of FV-guided surgery on the recurrence-free survival of histologically confirmed disease within the context of a randomized controlled trial (efficacy). Hypothesis: FV-guided surgery will increase the recurrence-free survival.
2.2. Objective 2 (Quality of Life evidence): To establish the cost per recurrence prevented for this approach and assess quality of life issues. Hypothesis: FV-guided surgery can be delivered in a cost effective manner and improve the quality of life of patients 2.3 Objective 3 (Scientific/Molecular evidence): To assess the presence of previously validated molecular markers (microsatellite analysis, LOH) and histological change (quantitative pathology) in surgical margins in a nested case-control study involving a tumor bank created within this project. Hypothesis: FV-guided surgery will spare normal tissue at the same time improving capture of high-risk tissue.
Read the detailed description
1.0. OBJECTIVES AND APPROACHES: 1.1. Objective 1 (Clinical evidence): To assess the effect of FV-guided surgery on the recurrence-free survival of histologically confirmed disease within the context of a randomized controlled trial (efficacy).
Hypothesis: FV-guided surgery will increase the recurrence-free survival. Approaches: This Aim requires the establishment of a randomized controlled trial of 200 patients which will compare outcome for patients in 2 arms: one with conventional surgery with margin delineated under white light, and the other using FV guidance for margin delineation. Please see attached Appendix 1 for a step-by-step protocol. This comprises a multidisciplinary team of surgeons, pathologists, project coordinators, and FV Specialists. In addition to the presurgery assessment, all participating patients will have 3-month follow-ups for the first 2 years and 6-month for the rest of the study period. Biopsy will occur when clinically warranted or at 2-year post-surgery.
1.2. Objective 2 (Quality of Life evidence): To establish the cost per recurrence prevented for this approach and assess quality of life issues.
Hypothesis: FV-guided surgery can be delivered in a cost effective manner and improve the quality of life of patients.
Approaches: This aim requires the collection of economic and quality of life (QoL) data to establish the cost per recurrence prevented for FV-guided surgery and to assess quality of life impacts. To asses potential psychosocial consequences of FV-guided surgery we will measure global QoL. We will use the validated EQ-5D and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Head and Neck Module (FACT-H\&N) to determine the participant's QoL at each assessment. The questionnaires will be applied at pre-surgery baseline, and at 6-week, 3-month, and 24-month post-surgery follow-ups.
1.3 Objective 3 (Scientific/Molecular evidence): To assess the presence of previously validated molecular markers (microsatellite analysis, LOH) and histological change (quantitative pathology) in surgical margins in a nested case-control study involving a tumor bank created within this project.
Hypothesis: FV-guided surgery will spare normal tissue at the same time improving capture of high-risk tissue.
Approaches: This Aim requires the retrieval and cutting of the archive material for a nested control study. The estimate number of cases reach outcome is 30 (5% of FV group (100) + 25% of control group (100). Additionally, 60 matched controls will be selected (matched by gender, age, smoking habit, and anatomical site). This Aim is critical to demonstrate a shift in field, sparing normal tissue while catching high-risk occult tissue. Samples for the nested molecular analysis will be performed in Rosin's Lab (for microsatellite analysis) and Cancer Imaging at BC Cancer Agency (Dr. MacAulay for qualitative Pathology). The protocols used to analyze these samples have been published.
2.0. STUDY TOOL - VELSCOPE® We have recently developed a simple hand-held field-of-view device for direct visualization of tissue fluorescence in the oral cavity. This tool is currently commercially available as VELScope® (LED Med Inc., White Rock, BC). We have begun a longitudinal study to explore the effect of FV in defining the surgical margin on outcome of oral cancer surgery27. Between 2004 and 2008, 60 patients with a ≤4 cm oral cancer entered the study. Each case was treated with surgical excision alone and was followed for at least 12 months. Thirty-eight patients had FV-guided surgery, with the surgical margin placed at 10 mm beyond the perimeter of autofluorescence loss. The remaining patients (control group) had the surgical margin placed at 10 mm beyond the tumor edge defined by standard white-light examination. Among those, 7 of the 60 cases (12%) have developed a recurrence of severe dysplasia, carcinoma in situ or squamous cell carcinoma at the treated site, all in the control group (25% versus 0%, P = 0.002). These data suggest the potential utility of autofluorescence changes within this clinical setting. There is a need to design a larger scaled randomized controlled clinical trial to confirm the efficacy of FV-guided surgery.
We are also using FV to monitor the potential re-emergence of regions of autofluorescence loss at treated sites in the cases accrued to the longitudinal study and are currently completing an interim assessment of these monitoring results. Autofluorescence loss persists in some cases, increasing in size and intensity over time and giving rise to a clinical lesion containing dysplasia or cancer.
3.0 Core members of the trial and project management We have a well-built core group with long-term and strong working relationships, including surgeons (Drs. Anderson (Co-PI) and Durham), Pathologists (Drs. Berean (Co-PI) and Zhang), and Oral Medicine (Drs. Poh (PI) and Williams), and are in a world-leading position in using fluorescence visualization in operating room and in follow-up. Dr. J. Lee, collaborator, from M.D. Anderson Cancer Centre and has extensive experience in clinical trials with special expertise in randomized controlled trial. He will be the trialist in this project, design a program for patient randomization, oversee the trial protocol, and work with local statistician (Prof. Chen) for day-to-day data management. Professor Jiahua Chen, Department of Statistics, the University of British Columbia will serve as the biostatistician to the trial and will be responsible for the data analysis and submission of interim analyses to the Data Safety Monitoring Board.
4.0 Basic trial design The proposed study will be a double-blinded, randomized controlled Phase III study to evaluate the effect of FV-guided surgery in patients diagnosed with severe dysplasia, carcinoma in situ and invasive squamous cell carcinoma and undergoing surgery treatment with an intent-to-cure. The trial will randomize 200 patients -100 in the FV arm (using FV guided the surgery margin) and 100 in the control arm (using conventional white light approach). The trial period is 5 years - 2 years to complete accrual and 3 more years of follow-up.
- Conditions
- Oral Cancer, High-grade Precancer
- Being tested
- Fluorescence visualization device
- Keywords
- Oral cancer, fluorescence visualization, surgical margin, recurrence
- Medical subject headings
- Mouth Neoplasms, Margins of Excision, Recurrence
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Fluorescence visualization deviceProcedure or surgery
The trial will randomize 200 patients - 100 in the control arm (using conventional white light approach).
Fluorescence visualization deviceProcedure or surgery
The trial will randomize 200 patients - 100 in the FV arm (using FV guided the surgery margin)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| A | Active comparator | All subjects in this study will receive surgery to treat their oral lesions. The margins (or boundaries) of the tissue to be removed during surgery will be defined by 2 different procedures (or study arms) in the operating room.
The Control arm. Surgical boundaries for oral lesions will be defined under regular white light. Receives: Procedure: Fluorescence visualization device |
| B | Experimental | All subjects in this study will receive surgery to treat their oral lesions. The margins (or boundaries) of the tissue to be removed during surgery will be defined by 2 different procedures (or study arms) in the operating room.
The FV arm (experimental arm). Surgical boundaries for oral lesions will be defined by FV. Receives: Procedure: Fluorescence visualization device |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Recurrence-free survival
Measured: 5 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
Histological and molecular evidence of positive margins and quality of life
Measured: 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Dec 2009 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2013
- Primary completionDec 2014 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2015 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Oral CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of British ColumbiaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of British Columbia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Terry Fox Research Institute, British Columbia Cancer Agency
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Catherine Poh, DDS, PhD, Principal investigator, University of British ColumbiaScott Durham, Dr., Principal investigator, University of British ColumbiaMiriam Rosen, Ph.D, Principal investigator, Simon Fraser UniversityCalum MacAulay, Ph.D, Study director, BC Cancer Agency Research CentrePenelope Brasher, Ph.D, Study director, University of British ColumbiaStuart Peacock, Ph.D, Study director, BC Cancer Agency Research CentreKitty Corbett, Ph.D, Study director, Simon Fraser UniversityKenneth Berean, Dr., Study director, University of British Columbia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01039298
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H09-03090
- Status last verified
- Sep 2014
- First submitted
- 22 Dec 2009
- Last updated
- 10 Sep 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Durham JS, Brasher P, Anderson DW, Yoo J, Hart R, Dort JC, Seikaly H, Kerr P, Rosin MP, Poh CF. Effect of Fluorescence Visualization-Guided Surgery on Local Recurrence of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Dec 1;146(12):1149-1155. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.3147.
PubMed 33034628Poh CF, Durham JS, Brasher PM, Anderson DW, Berean KW, MacAulay CE, Lee JJ, Rosin MP. Canadian Optically-guided approach for Oral Lesions Surgical (COOLS) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2011 Oct 25;11:462. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-462.
PubMed 22026481
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Sep 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Canadian Optically Guided Approach for Oral Lesions Surgical Trial - COOLS
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01039298
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- H09-03090
- Conditions
- Oral Cancer, High-grade Precancer
- Keywords
- Oral cancer, fluorescence visualization, surgical margin, recurrence
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of British ColumbiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Terry Fox Research Institute, British Columbia Cancer Agency
- Study start
- Jan 2013
- Primary completion
- Dec 2014 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2015 (estimated)
- First posted
- 24 Dec 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a global disease responsible for ~300,000 new cancer cases each year. Local recurrence (~30% of cases) and formation of second primary malignancy are common.2, 3 Cosmetic and/or functional compromise associated with treatment of disease stage is often significant. These statistics underscore the urgent need to develop a better approach in order to control this deadly disease.
It is becoming increasingly apparent that oral cancers develop within wide fields of diseased tissue characterized by genetically altered cells that are widespread across the oral cavity and present in clinically and histologically normal oral mucosa. Complete removal of these lesions is difficult because high-risk changes frequently go beyond clinically visible tumor. In recognition of this, current 'best practice' is to remove SCC with a significant width (usually 10 mm) of surrounding normal-looking oral mucosa. However, since occult disease varies in size such approach often results in over-cutting (causing severe cosmetic and functional morbidity) or under removal of disease tissue, as evidenced by frequent positive surgical margins and high local and regional recurrence - a failure of the 'best practice.
There is a wealth of literature that supports the use of tissue autofluorescence in the screening and diagnosis of precancers in the lung, uterine cervix, skin and oral cavity. This approach is already in clinical use in the lung and the mechanism of action of tissue autofluorescence has been well described in the cervix. Changes in fluorescence reflect a complex interplay of alterations to fluorophores in the tissue and structural changes in tissue morphology, each associated with progression of the disease.
As one of the internationally leading teams in applying tissue fluorescence technology, we have shown that direct fluorescence visualization (FV) tools can identify clinically visible or occult premalignant and malignant lesions that are associated with lesions at risk, with high-grade histology and high-risk molecular change. In a recently small scaled, retrospective study, we have shown that FV helped surgeons in the operating room to determine the extent of the high-risk FV field surrounding the cancer and resulted in remarkably lower 2-year recurrence rates (0% for FV-guided vs. 25% for those without FV-guided approach). There is need to design a larger scale prospective, randomized controlled (Phase III) trial to gather strong evidence in proving the efficacy of the surgery approach using this adjunct tool.
To establish the evidence supporting the change in clinical practice using FV-guided surgery. There are 3 objectives.
2.1. Objective 1 (Clinical evidence): To assess the effect of FV-guided surgery on the recurrence-free survival of histologically confirmed disease within the context of a randomized controlled trial (efficacy). Hypothesis: FV-guided surgery will increase the recurrence-free survival.
2.2. Objective 2 (Quality of Life evidence): To establish the cost per recurrence prevented for this approach and assess quality of life issues. Hypothesis: FV-guided surgery can be delivered in a cost effective manner and improve the quality of life of patients 2.3 Objective 3 (Scientific/Molecular evidence): To assess the presence of previously validated molecular markers (microsatellite analysis, LOH) and histological change (quantitative pathology) in surgical margins in a nested case-control study involving a tumor bank created within this project. Hypothesis: FV-guided surgery will spare normal tissue at the same time improving capture of high-risk tissue.
Detailed description
1.0. OBJECTIVES AND APPROACHES: 1.1. Objective 1 (Clinical evidence): To assess the effect of FV-guided surgery on the recurrence-free survival of histologically confirmed disease within the context of a randomized controlled trial (efficacy).
Hypothesis: FV-guided surgery will increase the recurrence-free survival. Approaches: This Aim requires the establishment of a randomized controlled trial of 200 patients which will compare outcome for patients in 2 arms: one with conventional surgery with margin delineated under white light, and the other using FV guidance for margin delineation. Please see attached Appendix 1 for a step-by-step protocol. This comprises a multidisciplinary team of surgeons, pathologists, project coordinators, and FV Specialists. In addition to the presurgery assessment, all participating patients will have 3-month follow-ups for the first 2 years and 6-month for the rest of the study period. Biopsy will occur when clinically warranted or at 2-year post-surgery.
1.2. Objective 2 (Quality of Life evidence): To establish the cost per recurrence prevented for this approach and assess quality of life issues.
Hypothesis: FV-guided surgery can be delivered in a cost effective manner and improve the quality of life of patients.
Approaches: This aim requires the collection of economic and quality of life (QoL) data to establish the cost per recurrence prevented for FV-guided surgery and to assess quality of life impacts. To asses potential psychosocial consequences of FV-guided surgery we will measure global QoL. We will use the validated EQ-5D and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Head and Neck Module (FACT-H\&N) to determine the participant's QoL at each assessment. The questionnaires will be applied at pre-surgery baseline, and at 6-week, 3-month, and 24-month post-surgery follow-ups.
1.3 Objective 3 (Scientific/Molecular evidence): To assess the presence of previously validated molecular markers (microsatellite analysis, LOH) and histological change (quantitative pathology) in surgical margins in a nested case-control study involving a tumor bank created within this project.
Hypothesis: FV-guided surgery will spare normal tissue at the same time improving capture of high-risk tissue.
Approaches: This Aim requires the retrieval and cutting of the archive material for a nested control study. The estimate number of cases reach outcome is 30 (5% of FV group (100) + 25% of control group (100). Additionally, 60 matched controls will be selected (matched by gender, age, smoking habit, and anatomical site). This Aim is critical to demonstrate a shift in field, sparing normal tissue while catching high-risk occult tissue. Samples for the nested molecular analysis will be performed in Rosin's Lab (for microsatellite analysis) and Cancer Imaging at BC Cancer Agency (Dr. MacAulay for qualitative Pathology). The protocols used to analyze these samples have been published.
2.0. STUDY TOOL - VELSCOPE® We have recently developed a simple hand-held field-of-view device for direct visualization of tissue fluorescence in the oral cavity. This tool is currently commercially available as VELScope® (LED Med Inc., White Rock, BC). We have begun a longitudinal study to explore the effect of FV in defining the surgical margin on outcome of oral cancer surgery27. Between 2004 and 2008, 60 patients with a ≤4 cm oral cancer entered the study. Each case was treated with surgical excision alone and was followed for at least 12 months. Thirty-eight patients had FV-guided surgery, with the surgical margin placed at 10 mm beyond the perimeter of autofluorescence loss. The remaining patients (control group) had the surgical margin placed at 10 mm beyond the tumor edge defined by standard white-light examination. Among those, 7 of the 60 cases (12%) have developed a recurrence of severe dysplasia, carcinoma in situ or squamous cell carcinoma at the treated site, all in the control group (25% versus 0%, P = 0.002). These data suggest the potential utility of autofluorescence changes within this clinical setting. There is a need to design a larger scaled randomized controlled clinical trial to confirm the efficacy of FV-guided surgery.
We are also using FV to monitor the potential re-emergence of regions of autofluorescence loss at treated sites in the cases accrued to the longitudinal study and are currently completing an interim assessment of these monitoring results. Autofluorescence loss persists in some cases, increasing in size and intensity over time and giving rise to a clinical lesion containing dysplasia or cancer.
3.0 Core members of the trial and project management We have a well-built core group with long-term and strong working relationships, including surgeons (Drs. Anderson (Co-PI) and Durham), Pathologists (Drs. Berean (Co-PI) and Zhang), and Oral Medicine (Drs. Poh (PI) and Williams), and are in a world-leading position in using fluorescence visualization in operating room and in follow-up. Dr. J. Lee, collaborator, from M.D. Anderson Cancer Centre and has extensive experience in clinical trials with special expertise in randomized controlled trial. He will be the trialist in this project, design a program for patient randomization, oversee the trial protocol, and work with local statistician (Prof. Chen) for day-to-day data management. Professor Jiahua Chen, Department of Statistics, the University of British Columbia will serve as the biostatistician to the trial and will be responsible for the data analysis and submission of interim analyses to the Data Safety Monitoring Board.
4.0 Basic trial design The proposed study will be a double-blinded, randomized controlled Phase III study to evaluate the effect of FV-guided surgery in patients diagnosed with severe dysplasia, carcinoma in situ and invasive squamous cell carcinoma and undergoing surgery treatment with an intent-to-cure. The trial will randomize 200 patients -100 in the FV arm (using FV guided the surgery margin) and 100 in the control arm (using conventional white light approach). The trial period is 5 years - 2 years to complete accrual and 3 more years of follow-up.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| A | Active comparator | Procedure: Fluorescence visualization deviceAll subjects in this study will receive surgery to treat their oral lesions. The margins (or boundaries) of the tissue to be removed during surgery will be defined by 2 different procedures (or study arms) in the operating room. The Control arm. Surgical boundaries for oral lesions will be defined under regular white light. |
| B | Experimental | Procedure: Fluorescence visualization deviceAll subjects in this study will receive surgery to treat their oral lesions. The margins (or boundaries) of the tissue to be removed during surgery will be defined by 2 different procedures (or study arms) in the operating room. The FV arm (experimental arm). Surgical boundaries for oral lesions will be defined by FV. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients diagnosed with severe dysplasia, carcinoma in situ, invasive squamous cell carcinoma (T1 or T2) of the oral cavity (ICO-D site codes: C02.0-C06.9) who will be undergoing curative resection (primary disease).
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients with a non-oral malignancy diagnosed (not including non-melanoma skin cancer and lymphoma outside of head and neck region) within the past 3 years.
- Patients with evidence of distant metastasis (as determined by CAT and X-ray) at the time of recruitment.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Fluorescence visualization deviceThe trial will randomize 200 patients - 100 in the control arm (using conventional white light approach). | Procedure or surgery | B |
| Fluorescence visualization deviceThe trial will randomize 200 patients - 100 in the FV arm (using FV guided the surgery margin) | Procedure or surgery | A |
Primary outcome
Recurrence-free survival
Time frame: 5 years
1 secondary outcome
Histological and molecular evidence of positive margins and quality of life
Time frame: 5 years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Sep 2014.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33034628Durham JS, Brasher P, Anderson DW, Yoo J, Hart R, Dort JC, Seikaly H, Kerr P, Rosin MP, Poh CF. Effect of Fluorescence Visualization-Guided Surgery on Local Recurrence of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Dec 1;146(12):1149-1155. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.3147.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22026481Poh CF, Durham JS, Brasher PM, Anderson DW, Berean KW, MacAulay CE, Lee JJ, Rosin MP. Canadian Optically-guided approach for Oral Lesions Surgical (COOLS) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2011 Oct 25;11:462. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-462.
Related trials for Oral Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Proton Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy or Photon Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Combination With Pembrolizumab Before Surgery for the Treatment of Locally Advanced and Radiation-Naive Locoregionally Recurrent Oral Cavity Cancer, OSPRI Trial
Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Locally Recurrent Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Study of Oral MRT-2359 in Selected Cancer Patients
NSCLC, SCLC
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Docetaxel and SX-682 in Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Salivary Gland Carcinoma, and Advanced Prostate Cancer
Head and Neck Cancer, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Oral Gallium Maltolate for the Treatment of Relapsed and Refractory Glioblastoma
Glioblastoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Catherine Poh, DDS, PhD principal investigator
University of British Columbia
Scott Durham, Dr. principal investigator
University of British Columbia
Miriam Rosen, Ph.D principal investigator
Simon Fraser University
8 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Fluorescence visualization device in people with Oral Cancer and High-grade Precancer, run by University of British Columbia at 8 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 8 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Helen Chiu (604-675-8057, hchiu@bccancer.bc.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Recurrence-free survival (time frame: 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01039298, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2014.