HemiparesisGT-1-tDCSNCT01040299
Mechanized Gait Trainer Combine Transcranial Galvanic Stimulation (tDCS) in Chronic Stroke
A study testing GangTrainer and tDCS in people with Hemiparesis and Cerebrovascular Disorders, run by Universita di Verona at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Transcranial galvanic stimulation (tDCS), seems to promote motor recovery after stroke by stimulating (anodal) or inhibiting (cathodal) neural circuits in the brain. In the treatment of severe lower limb paresis after stroke, the GangTrainer GT1 (GT) proved to be effective, but nevertheless only a few patients could… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hemiparesis, Cerebrovascular Disorders
- What is being tested?
- GangTrainer and tDCS
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- Jul 2010to Oct 2010
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- European Stroke scale between 75-85
- First time supratentorial, ischaemic or hemorrhagic stroke.
- Diagnosis of ischemic brain injury or intracerebral hemorrhage by MRI or computed tomography > 6 months after the onset of stroke.
- Age < 80 years.
- Ability to stand upright, supported or unsupported, for 1 minute.
- Patients with ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke.
Show all 9Show fewer
- In-patient participating in a comprehensive rehabilitation programme.
- patients written informed consent of participation in the study approved by the local ethical committee.
- absence of cardiac, psychological and orthopedic conditions that might interfere with the result.
Who cannot join
- Preceding epileptic fits.
- an EEG suspect of elevated cortical excitability.
- a sensitive scalp skin.
- severe cognitive impairment.
- metallic implants within the brain.
- previous brain neurosurgery.
- medications altering the level of cortical excitability
- medications with a presumed positive or negative effect on brain plasticity.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Italy1 site
Azienta Ospedaliera, SSO Rehabilitation Unit, Verona
Verona, Italy, Verona, 37134
About this study
Official title: Combine Mechanized Gait Trainer and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Chronic Stroke Patients: Randomized Control Trial
Transcranial galvanic stimulation (tDCS), seems to promote motor recovery after stroke by stimulating (anodal) or inhibiting (cathodal) neural circuits in the brain. In the treatment of severe lower limb paresis after stroke, the GangTrainer GT1 (GT) proved to be effective, but nevertheless only a few patients could use their affect lower limb functionally in daily life on deambulation after robot training. Therefore the present study intends to combine both approaches, tDCS + GT, apply at the same time every day for two weeks in order to improve the effectiveness of GangTrainer therapy in the gait rehabilitation.
Read the detailed description
Transcranial galvanic stimulation (tDCS), seems to promote motor recovery after stroke by stimulating (anodal) or inhibiting (cathodal) neural circuits in the brain. In the treatment of severe lower limb paresis after stroke, the GangTrainer GT1 (GT) proved to be effective. Therefore the present study intends to combine both approaches, tDCS + GT, apply at the same time every day for two weeks in order to improve the effectiveness of GangTrainer therapy in the gait rehabilitation. The rehabilitation programme are compose 3 kinds of locomotor training interventions (experimental group, control group 1 and control group 2).
During intervention experimental group, patients receive a total of 10 treatments of repetitive locomotor training with electromechanical gait device (duration 30 min) + tDCS (duration first 7 min) with the anodal electrode is place over the presumed lower limb area of the lesioned hemisphere, and the cathodal electrode is place above the controlateral orbital. The anodal stimulation is expected to facilitate the activity of the lower limb motor area side directly, while the cathodal stimulation of the non-lesioned hemisphere is expected to facilitate the lesioned side indirectly by decreasing inhibitory inputs. The control group 1 receive a total of 10 treatments with only GT (duration 30 min) with sham-stimulation, and the control group 2 receive a total of 10 treatments with convectional physiotherapy
- Conditions
- Hemiparesis, Cerebrovascular Disorders
- Being tested
- GangTrainer and tDCS, control group1, Control group2
- Keywords
- GangTrainer, Gait Rehabilitation, Cerebrovascular Disorders, Robot assisted, Transcranial direct current stimulation
- Medical subject headings
- Paresis, Cerebrovascular Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
GangTrainer and tDCSDevice
The experimental group patients receive a total of 10 treatments of repetitive locomotor training with electromechanical gait device (duration 30 min) + tDCS (duration first 7 min) with the anodal electrode is place over the presumed lower limb area of the lesioned hemisphere, and the cathodal electrode is place above the controlateral orbital.
control group1Device
Also called GangTrainerGT1
The control group 1 receive a total of 10 treatments with only GT (duration 30 min) with sham-stimulation.
Control group2Other
Also called convectional physiotherapy
The control group 2 receive a total of 10 treatments with convectional physiotherapy.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| GangTrainer and tDCS | Experimental | The experimental group patients receive a total of 10 treatments of repetitive locomotor training with electromechanical gait device (duration 30 min) + tDCS (duration first 7 min) with the anodal electrode is place over the presumed lower limb area of the lesioned hemisphere, and the cathodal electrode is place above the controlateral orbital. Receives: Device: GangTrainer and tDCS |
| control group1 | Sham comparator | The control group 1 receive a total of 10 treatments with only GT (duration 30 min) with sham-stimulation. Receives: Device: control group1 |
| control group2 | Active comparator | The control group 2 receive a total of 10 treatments with convectional physiotherapy. Receives: Other: Control group2 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Motricity Index
Measured: All patients enrolled in the study will be evaluated before the beginning (baseline time 0) of treatment and after the end (after 6 weeks) of the treatment.
Secondary outcomes (10)
Barthel Index
Measured: All patients enrolled in the study will be evaluated before the beginning (baseline time 0) of treatment, after the end (after 6 weeks) of the treatment and at 1 month FU
European Stroke Scale
Measured: All patients enrolled in the study will be evaluated before the beginning (baseline time 0) of treatment, after the end (after 6 weeks) of the treatment and at 1 month FU
Modified Ashworth Scale
Measured: All patients enrolled in the study will be evaluated before the beginning (baseline time 0) of treatment, after the end (after 6 weeks) of the treatment and at 1 month FU
Questionary of Ambulation
Measured: All patients enrolled in the study will be evaluated before the beginning (baseline time 0) of treatment, after the end (after 6 weeks) of the treatment and at 1 month FU
Rivermead Motor Assessment Score
Measured: All patients enrolled in the study will be evaluated before the beginning (baseline time 0) of treatment, after the end (after 6 weeks) of the treatment and at 1 month FU
Functional Ambulation Category
Measured: All patients enrolled in the study will be evaluated before the beginning (baseline time 0) of treatment, after the end (after 6 weeks) of the treatment and at 1 month FU
Ten Meters Walking Test
Measured: All patients enrolled in the study will be evaluated before the beginning (baseline time 0) of treatment, after the end (after 6 weeks) of the treatment and at 1 month FU
Six Minutes Walking Test
Measured: All patients enrolled in the study will be evaluated before the beginning (baseline time 0) of treatment, after the end (after 6 weeks) of the treatment and at 1 month FU
Spatia-temporal Gait analysis
Measured: All patients enrolled in the study will be evaluated before the beginning (baseline time 0) of treatment, after the end (after 6 weeks) of the treatment and at 1 month FU
Motricity Index
Measured: All patients enrolled in the study will be evaluated before the beginning (baseline time 0) of treatment, after the end (after 6 weeks) of the treatment and at 1 month FU
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Dec 2009 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2010
- Primary completionOct 2010
- Study completionOct 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HemiparesisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universita di Verona
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Nicola Smania, MD, Universita di Verona
- Investigators
- Nicola Smania Nicola Smania, Doctor, Principal investigator
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01040299
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GT-1-tDCS
- Acronym
- GT-1-tDCS
- Status last verified
- Mar 2012
- First submitted
- 28 Dec 2009
- Last updated
- 26 Mar 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Hesse S, Werner C, Schonhardt EM, Bardeleben A, Jenrich W, Kirker SG. Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted arm training in subacute stroke patients: a pilot study. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007;25(1):9-15.
PubMed 17473391Pohl M, Werner C, Holzgraefe M, Kroczek G, Mehrholz J, Wingendorf I, Hoolig G, Koch R, Hesse S. Repetitive locomotor training and physiotherapy improve walking and basic activities of daily living after stroke: a single-blind, randomized multicentre trial (DEutsche GAngtrainerStudie, DEGAS). Clin Rehabil. 2007 Jan;21(1):17-27. doi: 10.1177/0269215506071281.
PubMed 17213237Dias D, Lains J, Pereira A, Nunes R, Caldas J, Amaral C, Pires S, Costa A, Alves P, Moreira M, Garrido N, Loureiro L. Can we improve gait skills in chronic hemiplegics? A randomised control trial with gait trainer. Eura Medicophys. 2007 Dec;43(4):499-504.
PubMed 18084173
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Mar 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Combine Mechanized Gait Trainer and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Chronic Stroke Patients: Randomized Control Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01040299
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GT-1-tDCS / GT-1-tDCS
- Conditions
- Hemiparesis, Cerebrovascular Disorders
- Keywords
- GangTrainer, Gait Rehabilitation, Cerebrovascular Disorders, Robot assisted, Transcranial direct current stimulation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universita di VeronaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2010
- Primary completion
- Oct 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Dec 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Transcranial galvanic stimulation (tDCS), seems to promote motor recovery after stroke by stimulating (anodal) or inhibiting (cathodal) neural circuits in the brain. In the treatment of severe lower limb paresis after stroke, the GangTrainer GT1 (GT) proved to be effective, but nevertheless only a few patients could use their affect lower limb functionally in daily life on deambulation after robot training. Therefore the present study intends to combine both approaches, tDCS + GT, apply at the same time every day for two weeks in order to improve the effectiveness of GangTrainer therapy in the gait rehabilitation.
Detailed description
Transcranial galvanic stimulation (tDCS), seems to promote motor recovery after stroke by stimulating (anodal) or inhibiting (cathodal) neural circuits in the brain. In the treatment of severe lower limb paresis after stroke, the GangTrainer GT1 (GT) proved to be effective. Therefore the present study intends to combine both approaches, tDCS + GT, apply at the same time every day for two weeks in order to improve the effectiveness of GangTrainer therapy in the gait rehabilitation. The rehabilitation programme are compose 3 kinds of locomotor training interventions (experimental group, control group 1 and control group 2).
During intervention experimental group, patients receive a total of 10 treatments of repetitive locomotor training with electromechanical gait device (duration 30 min) + tDCS (duration first 7 min) with the anodal electrode is place over the presumed lower limb area of the lesioned hemisphere, and the cathodal electrode is place above the controlateral orbital. The anodal stimulation is expected to facilitate the activity of the lower limb motor area side directly, while the cathodal stimulation of the non-lesioned hemisphere is expected to facilitate the lesioned side indirectly by decreasing inhibitory inputs. The control group 1 receive a total of 10 treatments with only GT (duration 30 min) with sham-stimulation, and the control group 2 receive a total of 10 treatments with convectional physiotherapy
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| GangTrainer and tDCS | Experimental | Device: GangTrainer and tDCSThe experimental group patients receive a total of 10 treatments of repetitive locomotor training with electromechanical gait device (duration 30 min) + tDCS (duration first 7 min) with the anodal electrode is place over the presumed lower limb area of the lesioned hemisphere, and the cathodal electrode is place above the controlateral orbital. |
| control group1 | Sham comparator | Device: control group1The control group 1 receive a total of 10 treatments with only GT (duration 30 min) with sham-stimulation. |
| control group2 | Active comparator | Other: Control group2The control group 2 receive a total of 10 treatments with convectional physiotherapy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- European Stroke scale between 75-85
- First time supratentorial, ischaemic or hemorrhagic stroke.
- Diagnosis of ischemic brain injury or intracerebral hemorrhage by MRI or computed tomography > 6 months after the onset of stroke.
- Age < 80 years.
- Ability to stand upright, supported or unsupported, for 1 minute.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Preceding epileptic fits.
- an EEG suspect of elevated cortical excitability.
- a sensitive scalp skin.
- severe cognitive impairment.
- metallic implants within the brain.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| GangTrainer and tDCSThe experimental group patients receive a total of 10 treatments of repetitive locomotor training with electromechanical gait device (duration 30 min) + tDCS (duration first 7 min) with the anodal electrode is place over the presumed lower limb area of the lesioned hemisphere, and the cathodal electrode is place above the controlateral orbital. | Device | GangTrainer and tDCS |
| control group1Also: GangTrainerGT1The control group 1 receive a total of 10 treatments with only GT (duration 30 min) with sham-stimulation. | Device | control group1 |
| Control group2Also: convectional physiotherapyThe control group 2 receive a total of 10 treatments with convectional physiotherapy. | Other | control group2 |
Primary outcome
Motricity Index
Time frame: All patients enrolled in the study will be evaluated before the beginning (baseline time 0) of treatment and after the end (after 6 weeks) of the treatment.
10 secondary outcomes
Barthel Index
Time frame: All patients enrolled in the study will be evaluated before the beginning (baseline time 0) of treatment, after the end (after 6 weeks) of the treatment and at 1 month FU
European Stroke Scale
Time frame: All patients enrolled in the study will be evaluated before the beginning (baseline time 0) of treatment, after the end (after 6 weeks) of the treatment and at 1 month FU
Modified Ashworth Scale
Time frame: All patients enrolled in the study will be evaluated before the beginning (baseline time 0) of treatment, after the end (after 6 weeks) of the treatment and at 1 month FU
Questionary of Ambulation
Time frame: All patients enrolled in the study will be evaluated before the beginning (baseline time 0) of treatment, after the end (after 6 weeks) of the treatment and at 1 month FU
Rivermead Motor Assessment Score
Time frame: All patients enrolled in the study will be evaluated before the beginning (baseline time 0) of treatment, after the end (after 6 weeks) of the treatment and at 1 month FU
Functional Ambulation Category
Time frame: All patients enrolled in the study will be evaluated before the beginning (baseline time 0) of treatment, after the end (after 6 weeks) of the treatment and at 1 month FU
Ten Meters Walking Test
Time frame: All patients enrolled in the study will be evaluated before the beginning (baseline time 0) of treatment, after the end (after 6 weeks) of the treatment and at 1 month FU
Six Minutes Walking Test
Time frame: All patients enrolled in the study will be evaluated before the beginning (baseline time 0) of treatment, after the end (after 6 weeks) of the treatment and at 1 month FU
Spatia-temporal Gait analysis
Time frame: All patients enrolled in the study will be evaluated before the beginning (baseline time 0) of treatment, after the end (after 6 weeks) of the treatment and at 1 month FU
Motricity Index
Time frame: All patients enrolled in the study will be evaluated before the beginning (baseline time 0) of treatment, after the end (after 6 weeks) of the treatment and at 1 month FU
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Mar 2012.
- Background: PubMed 17473391Hesse S, Werner C, Schonhardt EM, Bardeleben A, Jenrich W, Kirker SG. Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted arm training in subacute stroke patients: a pilot study. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007;25(1):9-15.
- Results publication: PubMed 17213237Pohl M, Werner C, Holzgraefe M, Kroczek G, Mehrholz J, Wingendorf I, Hoolig G, Koch R, Hesse S. Repetitive locomotor training and physiotherapy improve walking and basic activities of daily living after stroke: a single-blind, randomized multicentre trial (DEutsche GAngtrainerStudie, DEGAS). Clin Rehabil. 2007 Jan;21(1):17-27. doi: 10.1177/0269215506071281.
- Results publication: PubMed 18084173Dias D, Lains J, Pereira A, Nunes R, Caldas J, Amaral C, Pires S, Costa A, Alves P, Moreira M, Garrido N, Loureiro L. Can we improve gait skills in chronic hemiplegics? A randomised control trial with gait trainer. Eura Medicophys. 2007 Dec;43(4):499-504.
Related trials for Hemiparesis
Not yet recruiting
Dynamic Stabilometry Combined With Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Balance and Motor Recovery After Ischemic Stroke
Hemiparesis, Ischemic Stroke
Active, not recruiting
Stimulation Combined With Powered Motorized Orthoses for Walking After Stroke
Stroke, Hemiparesis
Recruiting
Telerehabilitation for Post-Stroke Hand Function
Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
Kinematic Analysis of Manual Dexterity
Down Syndrome, Hemiparesis
Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of the Safety and Performance of the AWAKE Device in Patients With Hemiplegia or Hemiparesis Secondary to Stroke (ACV).
Hemiplegia, Hemiparesis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nicola Smania Nicola Smania, Doctor principal investigator
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing GangTrainer and tDCS in people with Hemiparesis and Cerebrovascular Disorders, run by Universita di Verona at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Mar 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Motricity Index (time frame: All patients enrolled in the study will be evaluated before the beginning (baseline time 0) of treatment and after the end (after 6 weeks) of the treatment.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01040299, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Mar 2012; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.