Weight RegainWRNCT01040572
Laparoscopic Revision Gastric Bypass for Weight Recidivism
An observational study of Weight Regain and Weight Recidivism, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The main aim of this study is to analyze and report traditional, patient-centered, and composite intermediate-term outcomes after laparoscopic revision Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery for weight recidivism. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Weight Regain, Weight Recidivism, Obesity Recidivism
- How many people
- 132 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2009to Dec 2009
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with previously failed Roux-en-Y gastric bypass "RYGB" surgery with a weight recidivism pattern.
Who may be able to join
- patients that underwent laparoscopic revisional "RYGB" for failed "RYGB" with weight recidivism or weight regain "WR" pattern
Who cannot join
- failed RYGB with an Inadequate Initial Weight Loss "IIWL" pattern
- patients with prior major bariatric conversion or esophago-gastric surgeries
- RYGB patients revised by an open surgical approach
- RYGB patients who underwent laparoscopic revisional RYGB surgery somewhere else and continue their follow-up care with our program
- missing records and/or unreachable patients with scant information for analysis
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
UCSF Fresno Center for Medical Education and Research
Fresno, California, 93701
About this study
Official title: Laparoscopic Revision Gastric Bypass Surgery for Weight Recidivism: Our Experience in 170 Patients
The main aim of this study is to analyze and report traditional, patient-centered, and composite intermediate-term outcomes after laparoscopic revision Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery for weight recidivism.
Read the detailed description
There is lack of standardization of primary and revisional bariatric surgery compounded by a scant long-term outcome data. The treatment of inadequate weight loss, weight recidivism, and most severe technical complications after primary bariatric surgery remains refractory to non-operative treatment. Failure rates have been reported up to 20% and 35% for the morbidly obese (MO) and super obese (SO), respectively at 2 to 3 years after surgery. The indication for further surgical intervention remains controversial, as does what type of revisional procedure, both operative and endoscopic, to recommend. Furthermore, there is no standardization of the limb lengths, pouch size or the use of prosthetic reinforcement. Therefore the approach to these patients must be as individualized as their original operations. We formally analyze our experience with all laparoscopic revisional strategies for weigh regain after failed gastric bypass.
- Keywords
- Obesity recidivism, Weight Regain, Weight recidivism, Morbidity, Complication, Late complications, Revisional gastric bypass, Re-operative gastric bypass, Revisional bariatric surgery, Re-operative bariatric surgery
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Obesity recidivism after gastric bypass | Not described |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Weight loss expressed as Body Mass Index and Percentage Excess Weight Loss
Measured: At the lowest weight loss point and at last follow-up
Comorbidity status
Measured: throughout follow-up
Subjective Satisfaction
Measured: at last follow-up
Health-Related Quality of Life (HR-QoL).
Measured: at the last follow-up
Morbidity and mortality
Measured: throughout follow-up
Secondary outcomes (2)
To assess failures
Measured: at yearly intervals throughout follow-up
To evaluate the patients´ metabolic and nutritional status
Measured: throughout follow-up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Dec 2009 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2009
- Primary completionDec 2009
- Study completionDec 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (59)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Weight RegainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of California, San FranciscoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 132 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San Francisco
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Francisco M Tercero, MD, Study director, Research Associate, University of California San FranciscoKelvin D Higa, MD, Principal investigator, Professor of Surgery, University of California San Francisco
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01040572
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CMC IRB No. 2009078
- Other IDs
- U1111-1113-0216
- Acronym
- WR
- Status last verified
- Oct 2009
- First submitted
- 23 Dec 2009
- Last updated
- 29 Dec 2009
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Higa KD, Boone KB, Ho T, Davies OG. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: technique and preliminary results of our first 400 patients. Arch Surg. 2000 Sep;135(9):1029-33; discussion 1033-4. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.135.9.1029.
PubMed 10982506Hedley AA, Ogden CL, Johnson CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, Flegal KM. Prevalence of overweight and obesity among US children, adolescents, and adults, 1999-2002. JAMA. 2004 Jun 16;291(23):2847-50. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.23.2847.
PubMed 15199035Calle EE, Thun MJ, Petrelli JM, Rodriguez C, Heath CW Jr. Body-mass index and mortality in a prospective cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med. 1999 Oct 7;341(15):1097-105. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199910073411501.
PubMed 10511607McTigue KM, Harris R, Hemphill B, Lux L, Sutton S, Bunton AJ, Lohr KN. Screening and interventions for obesity in adults: summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Dec 2;139(11):933-49. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-11-200312020-00013.
PubMed 14644897Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, Jensen MD, Pories W, Fahrbach K, Schoelles K. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004 Oct 13;292(14):1724-37. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.14.1724.
PubMed 15479938Christou NV, Sampalis JS, Liberman M, Look D, Auger S, McLean AP, MacLean LD. Surgery decreases long-term mortality, morbidity, and health care use in morbidly obese patients. Ann Surg. 2004 Sep;240(3):416-23; discussion 423-4. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000137343.63376.19.
PubMed 15319713Adams TD, Gress RE, Smith SC, Halverson RC, Simper SC, Rosamond WD, Lamonte MJ, Stroup AM, Hunt SC. Long-term mortality after gastric bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 23;357(8):753-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa066603.
PubMed 17715409Sjostrom L, Narbro K, Sjostrom CD, Karason K, Larsson B, Wedel H, Lystig T, Sullivan M, Bouchard C, Carlsson B, Bengtsson C, Dahlgren S, Gummesson A, Jacobson P, Karlsson J, Lindroos AK, Lonroth H, Naslund I, Olbers T, Stenlof K, Torgerson J, Agren G, Carlsson LM; Swedish Obese Subjects Study. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 23;357(8):741-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa066254.
PubMed 17715408Cremieux PY, Buchwald H, Shikora SA, Ghosh A, Yang HE, Buessing M. A study on the economic impact of bariatric surgery. Am J Manag Care. 2008 Sep;14(9):589-96.
PubMed 18778174Santry HP, Gillen DL, Lauderdale DS. Trends in bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA. 2005 Oct 19;294(15):1909-17. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.15.1909.
PubMed 16234497Flum DR, Khan TV, Dellinger EP. Toward the rational and equitable use of bariatric surgery. JAMA. 2007 Sep 26;298(12):1442-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.12.1442. No abstract available.
PubMed 17895461Meguid MM, Glade MJ, Middleton FA. Weight regain after Roux-en-Y: a significant 20% complication related to PYY. Nutrition. 2008 Sep;24(9):832-42. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2008.06.027.
PubMed 18725080Nguyen NT. Reoperations and revisions in bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc. 2007 Nov;21(11):1907-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9572-6. Epub 2007 Sep 8. No abstract available.
PubMed 17828427www.asbs.org/htm/Private/resolution.html. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.
O'Brien PE, McPhail T, Chaston TB, Dixon JB. Systematic review of medium-term weight loss after bariatric operations. Obes Surg. 2006 Aug;16(8):1032-40. doi: 10.1381/096089206778026316.
PubMed 16901357
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Dec 2009. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Laparoscopic Revision Gastric Bypass Surgery for Weight Recidivism: Our Experience in 170 Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01040572
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- WR / CMC IRB No. 2009078
- Keywords
- Obesity recidivism, Weight Regain, Weight recidivism, Morbidity, Complication, Late complications, Revisional gastric bypass, Re-operative gastric bypass
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 132 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San FranciscoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2009
- Primary completion
- Dec 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Dec 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main aim of this study is to analyze and report traditional, patient-centered, and composite intermediate-term outcomes after laparoscopic revision Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery for weight recidivism.
Detailed description
There is lack of standardization of primary and revisional bariatric surgery compounded by a scant long-term outcome data. The treatment of inadequate weight loss, weight recidivism, and most severe technical complications after primary bariatric surgery remains refractory to non-operative treatment. Failure rates have been reported up to 20% and 35% for the morbidly obese (MO) and super obese (SO), respectively at 2 to 3 years after surgery. The indication for further surgical intervention remains controversial, as does what type of revisional procedure, both operative and endoscopic, to recommend. Furthermore, there is no standardization of the limb lengths, pouch size or the use of prosthetic reinforcement. Therefore the approach to these patients must be as individualized as their original operations. We formally analyze our experience with all laparoscopic revisional strategies for weigh regain after failed gastric bypass.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Obesity recidivism after gastric bypass | – | – |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with previously failed Roux-en-Y gastric bypass "RYGB" surgery with a weight recidivism pattern.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- patients that underwent laparoscopic revisional "RYGB" for failed "RYGB" with weight recidivism or weight regain "WR" pattern
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- failed RYGB with an Inadequate Initial Weight Loss "IIWL" pattern
- patients with prior major bariatric conversion or esophago-gastric surgeries
- RYGB patients revised by an open surgical approach
- RYGB patients who underwent laparoscopic revisional RYGB surgery somewhere else and continue their follow-up care with our program
- missing records and/or unreachable patients with scant information for analysis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Weight loss expressed as Body Mass Index and Percentage Excess Weight Loss
Time frame: At the lowest weight loss point and at last follow-up
Comorbidity status
Time frame: throughout follow-up
Subjective Satisfaction
Time frame: at last follow-up
Health-Related Quality of Life (HR-QoL).
Time frame: at the last follow-up
Morbidity and mortality
Time frame: throughout follow-up
2 secondary outcomes
To assess failures
Time frame: at yearly intervals throughout follow-up
To evaluate the patients´ metabolic and nutritional status
Time frame: throughout follow-up
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Dec 2009.
- Background: PubMed 10982506Higa KD, Boone KB, Ho T, Davies OG. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: technique and preliminary results of our first 400 patients. Arch Surg. 2000 Sep;135(9):1029-33; discussion 1033-4. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.135.9.1029.
- Background: PubMed 15199035Hedley AA, Ogden CL, Johnson CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, Flegal KM. Prevalence of overweight and obesity among US children, adolescents, and adults, 1999-2002. JAMA. 2004 Jun 16;291(23):2847-50. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.23.2847.
- Background: PubMed 10511607Calle EE, Thun MJ, Petrelli JM, Rodriguez C, Heath CW Jr. Body-mass index and mortality in a prospective cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med. 1999 Oct 7;341(15):1097-105. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199910073411501.
- Background: PubMed 14644897McTigue KM, Harris R, Hemphill B, Lux L, Sutton S, Bunton AJ, Lohr KN. Screening and interventions for obesity in adults: summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Dec 2;139(11):933-49. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-11-200312020-00013.
- Background: PubMed 15479938Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, Jensen MD, Pories W, Fahrbach K, Schoelles K. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004 Oct 13;292(14):1724-37. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.14.1724.
- Background: PubMed 15319713Christou NV, Sampalis JS, Liberman M, Look D, Auger S, McLean AP, MacLean LD. Surgery decreases long-term mortality, morbidity, and health care use in morbidly obese patients. Ann Surg. 2004 Sep;240(3):416-23; discussion 423-4. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000137343.63376.19.
- Background: PubMed 17715409Adams TD, Gress RE, Smith SC, Halverson RC, Simper SC, Rosamond WD, Lamonte MJ, Stroup AM, Hunt SC. Long-term mortality after gastric bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 23;357(8):753-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa066603.
- Background: PubMed 17715408Sjostrom L, Narbro K, Sjostrom CD, Karason K, Larsson B, Wedel H, Lystig T, Sullivan M, Bouchard C, Carlsson B, Bengtsson C, Dahlgren S, Gummesson A, Jacobson P, Karlsson J, Lindroos AK, Lonroth H, Naslund I, Olbers T, Stenlof K, Torgerson J, Agren G, Carlsson LM; Swedish Obese Subjects Study. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 23;357(8):741-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa066254.
- Background: PubMed 18778174Cremieux PY, Buchwald H, Shikora SA, Ghosh A, Yang HE, Buessing M. A study on the economic impact of bariatric surgery. Am J Manag Care. 2008 Sep;14(9):589-96.
- Background: PubMed 16234497Santry HP, Gillen DL, Lauderdale DS. Trends in bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA. 2005 Oct 19;294(15):1909-17. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.15.1909.
- Background: PubMed 17895461Flum DR, Khan TV, Dellinger EP. Toward the rational and equitable use of bariatric surgery. JAMA. 2007 Sep 26;298(12):1442-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.12.1442. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 18725080Meguid MM, Glade MJ, Middleton FA. Weight regain after Roux-en-Y: a significant 20% complication related to PYY. Nutrition. 2008 Sep;24(9):832-42. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2008.06.027.
- "Click here for more information about the department sponsor´s web site"Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Weight Regain
Not yet recruiting
ERCG vs Intensive Lifestyle Intervention for Weight Regain After GLP-1 RA Discontinuation
Obesity & Overweight
Active, not recruiting
Napoleon Measurement of Gastrojejunal Anastomosis
Gastric Bypass, Weight Regain
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Changes in Body Composition Following Pharmacological Treatment for Obesity.
Obesity (BMI Equal to or >30), Weight Regain After Bariatric Surgery
RecruitingPhase 4
Pharmacotherapy in Conjunction With Lifestyle Counseling for Management of Weight Regain After Bariatric Surgery
Obesity
Recruiting
Randomized Study on Transoral Outlet Reduction and Lifestyle Changes for Weight Regain After Gastric Bypass
Weight Regain, Weight Loss
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Francisco M Tercero, MD study director
Research Associate, University of California San Francisco
Kelvin D Higa, MD principal investigator
Professor of Surgery, University of California San Francisco
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Weight Regain and Weight Recidivism, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Dec 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Weight loss expressed as Body Mass Index and Percentage Excess Weight Loss (time frame: At the lowest weight loss point and at last follow-up). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01040572, which also lists 59 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Dec 2009.