Acute Myeloblastic LeukemiaPhase 4NCT01041040
LAM07: Study to Analyze the Efficacy of a Risk Adapted Treatment Strategy, Including Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (GO) During Consolidation, for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
A Phase 4 study testing gemtuzumab in people with Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia, run by PETHEMA Foundation at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
Prospective, multicenter, uncontrolled cohort study to analyze the efficacy of a risk adapted treatment strategy, including gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) during consolidation, for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia
- What is being tested?
- gemtuzumab
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- Oct 2007to Jan 2013
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- For intensive chemotherapy:
- Patients with the novo AML or secondary to MDS or previous treatment, regardless of age.
- Signed written informed consent.
- ECOG ≤ 2. If ECOG is greater than 2 due to AML, the patient can be included in the study.
- LVEF > 40 % measured by means of echocardiography.
- If background of respiratory disease (not related to the AML), risk factors or clinical criteria for COPD, the values of functional tests, including DLCO, should be greater than 50% of the expected.
Show all 24Show fewer
- Bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase and ALT < of 3 fold the upper normal value, providing that it is not due to the disease that motivates the treatment (AML).
- Serum creatinine < 2,5 mg/dL providing that it is not due to the disease that motivates the treatment (AML).
- In fertile aged women, negative pregnancy test and use of contraception methods are required.
- Any patient who does not meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria for treatment with intensive chemotherapy can be evaluated individually when considering that could still obtain benefit from this treatment considering that could still obtain benefit from this treatment.
- Criteria for GO administration in patient candidates for intensive chemotherapy
- Same criteria for intensive chemotherapy, including the following specifications:
- CD33 positive (more than 5 % of the leukemic population)
- Exclusion for treatment with GO in cases of serious hepatic disease not due to AML.
- In patients who are going to receive GO in two cycles, the second one will be only administrated if the toxicity due to the first cycle is recovered.
- Though the GO administered dose is much lower than usual, it is recommended a period of two months between GO administration and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).
- Criteria for the modification of high dose ARA-C
- The dose of Ara-C in cycles containing HiDAC should be reduced in the following cases:
- The hematopoietic recovery in the previous cycle has been longer than 28 days.
- Presence in the previous cycles of a confluent maculopapular rash or drug-induced shedding.
- More than 4 episodes of watery diarrhea per day.
- Increase of 4 fold the previous normal value of aminotransferases or alkaline phosphatase in any of the cycles.
- Total bilirubin greater than 3 mg/dL in any of the cycles.
- Treatment with HiDAC will be definitively suspended (even that included in the BEA conditioning) when previous toxicity include severe cerebellar ataxia, confusion or another sign of central nervous toxicity that has not another clear explanation.
Who cannot join
- Patients with blastic crisis of a chronic myeloid leukemia or other myeloproliferative syndromes evolving to acute leukemia.
- Patients with AML in relapse.
- Acute promyelocytic leukemia (M3 or M3v).
- Absence of signed written informed consent.
- ECOG ≥ 3 that it is not due to the disease that motivates the treatment (AML).
- LVEF < 40 % determined by echocardiography study.
Show all 15Show fewer
- Values of respiratory functional tests, including DLCO, lower than 50% of the expected.
- Bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase or GOT > 3 fold the upper normal value, providing that it is not due to the disease that motivates the treatment (AML).
- Serum creatinine > of 2.5 mg/dL providing that it is not due to the disease that motivates the treatment (AML).
- Positive pregnancy test or not use of effective contraception in fertile aged women.
- Previous treatment with antileukemic chemotherapy, except hydroxyurea.
- Presence of an active neoplasia different from the AML.
- Presence of a serious psychiatric disease.
- Positive HIV test.
- Any other condition which limits or dissuades from the treatment with intensive chemotherapy, especially with anthracyclines
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: PETHEMA LAM07: Prospective, Multicenter, Uncontrolled Cohort Study to Analyze the Efficacy of a Risk Adapted Treatment Strategy, Including Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (GO) During Consolidation, for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Prospective, multicenter, uncontrolled cohort study to analyze the efficacy of a risk adapted treatment strategy, including gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) during consolidation, for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
Read the detailed description
Patients will be stratified according to age in a first step, with a cut-point of 65 years old. For patients younger than 65 years old who achieve complete response, a second stratification will be made before first consolidation treatment. This second stratification will be performed according to the follow parameters: MDR at the end of induction, karyotype and molecular findings, including FLT3 internal tandem duplication (ITD) and NPM1 mutations. The following groups can be identified according to these parameters:
Group A:
Patients aged 65 or younger who are candidates for intensive chemotherapy.
Group A1:
Patients who are in first CR with negative MRD (less than 0.1%), good prognosis karyotype and, in the case of t(8;21) or inv(16), absence of mutations in the exon 17 of c-kit.
Group A2:
Patients who are in first CR with negative MRD (less than 0.1%), intermediate-risk karyotype, NPM1 positive and FLT3 negative.
Group A3:
Patients who are in first CR with negative MRD (less than 0.1%), intermediate-risk karyotype, absence of NPM1 mutations and who are negative for FLT3-ITD or FLT3-ITD positive with a ratio less than 0.8, regardless NPM1 status.
Group A4:
Patients who are in first CR with positive MRD (greater than 0.1%), t(8;21) or inv(16) with mutations in the exon 17 of c-kit, intermediate risk karyotype with positive FLT3-ITD and ratio greater or equal to 0.8 or high-risk karyotype.
Group B:
Patients over 65 years who are able to receive intensive chemotherapy.
TREATMENT SCHEDULE:
Treatment is tailored for each of the previously defined groups:
Group A:
Induction with Idarubicin and ARA-C in "3 +7" schedule (IDA 12 mg/m2 x 3 days and ARA-C 200 mg/m2 x 7 days).
Group A1:
Two consolidation cycles with ARA-C at a dose of 3 g/m2 on days 1, 3 and 5. Collection of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) after the first consolidation. Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) with Busulphan 1 mg/kg/6 VO or 0,8 mg/kg/6 h IV (Busilvex®) from day -8 to -5; Etoposide 20 mg/kg/d from day -4 to -3 and ARA-C 3 g/m2/12 h from on days -3 and -2 (see criteria for HiDAC modification); and G-CSF 10 µg/kg/d from day -9 to -2 (BEA schedule). Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is not recommended in first CR in this group of patients.
Group A2:
First consolidation with Idarubicin and ARA-C at the same dose than induction plus GO 3 mg/m2 at day 1. Collection of PBSC after first consolidation. Second consolidation with ARA-C 3 g/m2 on days 1, 3 and 5 followed by ASCT with BEA conditioning. It is not recommended to perform Allo-HSCT, especially from alternative donors, in first CR.
Group A3:
First consolidation with Ida and ARA-C at the same dose than induction plus GO 3 mg/m2 at day 1. Collection of PBSC after first consolidation. Second consolidation with ARA-C 3 g/m2 on days 1, 3 and 5 followed by ASCT with BEA schedule if no HLA-identical sibling is available. Patients in this group are candidates for allo-HSCT in first CR if HLA-identical sibling is available. Allo-HSCT will be performed after first consolidation.
Group A4:
First consolidation with Ida and ARA-C at the same dose than induction plus GO 3 mg/m2 at day 1. Collection of PBSC after first consolidation. Second consolidation with ARA-C 3 g/m2 on days 1, 3 and 5 followed by ASCT with BEA schedule if no donor is available. Patients in this group are candidates for allo-HSCT in first CR, including alternative donors. Allo-HSCT will be performed after first consolidation or later if no donor is available at this time.
Group C:
Induction with Idarubicin and ARA-C "2 + 5" (IDA 12 mg/m2 x 2 days and ARA-C 200 mg/m2 x 5 days). Two consolidations with GO 3 mg/m2 day 1 and ARA-C 100 mg/m2 continuous infusion days 1 to 5.
AML CHARACTERIZATION AND SAMPLES COLLECTION:
To achieve a complete characterization of AML, inmunophenotype analysis (defining the pattern for MRD studies), cytogenetics, FISH for inv(16), t(8;21) and t(15;17), and molecular study for AML1/ETO, CBFβ/MYH11, NPM1 and FLT3-ITD will be performed in all cases. For FLT3-ITD, the ratio between the mutated and not mutated allele will be calculated.
During the phase of samples collection, DNA, RNA and viable cells will be stored.
- Conditions
- Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia
- Being tested
- gemtuzumab
- Keywords
- Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
gemtuzumabDrug
gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) during consolidation for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML)
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
To provide prognosis stratification of AML patients at the end of the induction treatment, based on minimal residual disease (MRD), cytogenetics and molecular findings.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a post-remission therapy strategy adapted to the prognosis of the patients, which optimizes the currently available treatment options and includes GO
Secondary outcomes (1)
To analyze the different prognosis factors in AML, including the karyotype and the molecular findings at diagnosis and the MRD level at the end of the induction.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Dec 2009 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2007
- Primary completionDec 2012
- Study completionJan 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Acute Myeloblastic LeukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- PETHEMA Foundation
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Sanz Miguel Angel, Dr, Study chair, PETHEMA Foundation
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01041040
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PETHEMA-LAM07
- Status last verified
- Jul 2013
- First submitted
- 28 Dec 2009
- Last updated
- 31 Jul 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Jul 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- PETHEMA LAM07: Prospective, Multicenter, Uncontrolled Cohort Study to Analyze the Efficacy of a Risk Adapted Treatment Strategy, Including Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (GO) During Consolidation, for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01041040
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PETHEMA-LAM07
- Conditions
- Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia
- Keywords
- Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PETHEMA FoundationUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2007
- Primary completion
- Dec 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Dec 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Prospective, multicenter, uncontrolled cohort study to analyze the efficacy of a risk adapted treatment strategy, including gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) during consolidation, for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
Detailed description
Patients will be stratified according to age in a first step, with a cut-point of 65 years old. For patients younger than 65 years old who achieve complete response, a second stratification will be made before first consolidation treatment. This second stratification will be performed according to the follow parameters: MDR at the end of induction, karyotype and molecular findings, including FLT3 internal tandem duplication (ITD) and NPM1 mutations. The following groups can be identified according to these parameters:
Group A:
Patients aged 65 or younger who are candidates for intensive chemotherapy.
Group A1:
Patients who are in first CR with negative MRD (less than 0.1%), good prognosis karyotype and, in the case of t(8;21) or inv(16), absence of mutations in the exon 17 of c-kit.
Group A2:
Patients who are in first CR with negative MRD (less than 0.1%), intermediate-risk karyotype, NPM1 positive and FLT3 negative.
Group A3:
Patients who are in first CR with negative MRD (less than 0.1%), intermediate-risk karyotype, absence of NPM1 mutations and who are negative for FLT3-ITD or FLT3-ITD positive with a ratio less than 0.8, regardless NPM1 status.
Group A4:
Patients who are in first CR with positive MRD (greater than 0.1%), t(8;21) or inv(16) with mutations in the exon 17 of c-kit, intermediate risk karyotype with positive FLT3-ITD and ratio greater or equal to 0.8 or high-risk karyotype.
Group B:
Patients over 65 years who are able to receive intensive chemotherapy.
TREATMENT SCHEDULE:
Treatment is tailored for each of the previously defined groups:
Group A:
Induction with Idarubicin and ARA-C in "3 +7" schedule (IDA 12 mg/m2 x 3 days and ARA-C 200 mg/m2 x 7 days).
Group A1:
Two consolidation cycles with ARA-C at a dose of 3 g/m2 on days 1, 3 and 5. Collection of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) after the first consolidation. Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) with Busulphan 1 mg/kg/6 VO or 0,8 mg/kg/6 h IV (Busilvex®) from day -8 to -5; Etoposide 20 mg/kg/d from day -4 to -3 and ARA-C 3 g/m2/12 h from on days -3 and -2 (see criteria for HiDAC modification); and G-CSF 10 µg/kg/d from day -9 to -2 (BEA schedule). Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is not recommended in first CR in this group of patients.
Group A2:
First consolidation with Idarubicin and ARA-C at the same dose than induction plus GO 3 mg/m2 at day 1. Collection of PBSC after first consolidation. Second consolidation with ARA-C 3 g/m2 on days 1, 3 and 5 followed by ASCT with BEA conditioning. It is not recommended to perform Allo-HSCT, especially from alternative donors, in first CR.
Group A3:
First consolidation with Ida and ARA-C at the same dose than induction plus GO 3 mg/m2 at day 1. Collection of PBSC after first consolidation. Second consolidation with ARA-C 3 g/m2 on days 1, 3 and 5 followed by ASCT with BEA schedule if no HLA-identical sibling is available. Patients in this group are candidates for allo-HSCT in first CR if HLA-identical sibling is available. Allo-HSCT will be performed after first consolidation.
Group A4:
First consolidation with Ida and ARA-C at the same dose than induction plus GO 3 mg/m2 at day 1. Collection of PBSC after first consolidation. Second consolidation with ARA-C 3 g/m2 on days 1, 3 and 5 followed by ASCT with BEA schedule if no donor is available. Patients in this group are candidates for allo-HSCT in first CR, including alternative donors. Allo-HSCT will be performed after first consolidation or later if no donor is available at this time.
Group C:
Induction with Idarubicin and ARA-C "2 + 5" (IDA 12 mg/m2 x 2 days and ARA-C 200 mg/m2 x 5 days). Two consolidations with GO 3 mg/m2 day 1 and ARA-C 100 mg/m2 continuous infusion days 1 to 5.
AML CHARACTERIZATION AND SAMPLES COLLECTION:
To achieve a complete characterization of AML, inmunophenotype analysis (defining the pattern for MRD studies), cytogenetics, FISH for inv(16), t(8;21) and t(15;17), and molecular study for AML1/ETO, CBFβ/MYH11, NPM1 and FLT3-ITD will be performed in all cases. For FLT3-ITD, the ratio between the mutated and not mutated allele will be calculated.
During the phase of samples collection, DNA, RNA and viable cells will be stored.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (24 listed)
- Patients with the novo AML or secondary to MDS or previous treatment, regardless of age.
- Signed written informed consent.
- ECOG ≤ 2. If ECOG is greater than 2 due to AML, the patient can be included in the study.
- LVEF > 40 % measured by means of echocardiography.
- If background of respiratory disease (not related to the AML), risk factors or clinical criteria for COPD, the values of functional tests, including DLCO, should be greater than 50% of the expected.
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Patients with blastic crisis of a chronic myeloid leukemia or other myeloproliferative syndromes evolving to acute leukemia.
- Patients with AML in relapse.
- Acute promyelocytic leukemia (M3 or M3v).
- Absence of signed written informed consent.
- ECOG ≥ 3 that it is not due to the disease that motivates the treatment (AML).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| gemtuzumabgemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) during consolidation for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
To provide prognosis stratification of AML patients at the end of the induction treatment, based on minimal residual disease (MRD), cytogenetics and molecular findings.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a post-remission therapy strategy adapted to the prognosis of the patients, which optimizes the currently available treatment options and includes GO
1 secondary outcome
To analyze the different prognosis factors in AML, including the karyotype and the molecular findings at diagnosis and the MRD level at the end of the induction.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Jul 2013.
Related trials for Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of CHM-029 in Participants With NPM1 Mutated, KMT2A or NUP98 Rearranged AML
AML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Venetoclax and CLAG-M for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia and High-Grade Myeloid Neoplasms
Acute Biphenotypic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
ATRN-119 in Combination With Decitabine in Patients With TP53-Mutated AML or Higher-Risk MDS
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sanz Miguel Angel, Dr study chair
PETHEMA Foundation
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing gemtuzumab in people with Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia, run by PETHEMA Foundation at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 24 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jul 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
To provide prognosis stratification of AML patients at the end of the induction treatment, based on minimal residual disease (MRD), cytogenetics and molecular findings.. The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jul 2013.