AzTrials
AzTrials

Diaphragm InjuryNCT01044550

Laparoscopy Versus Clinical Follow up to Detect Diaphragm Injury

A study testing Laparoscopy and Clinical follow up in people with Diaphragm Injury, run by University of Cape Town at 1 site in South Africa.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Title: A randomized prospective study comparing non operative management with laparoscopic treatment in patients with a diaphragm injury following left thoracoabdominal stab wounds. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 years
Conditions the study is for
Diaphragm Injury
What is being tested?
Laparoscopy and Clinical follow up
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
66 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Africa
Study dates
Sep 2009to Oct 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Hemodynamically stable patients
  • Patients with penetrating stab wounds bounded by
  • Superiorly the 4th intercostal space
  • Lateral the tip of the left scapula
  • Inferior by the left costal margin
  • Medially by the sternum
  • Signed informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Hemodynamically unstable patients
  • Previous penetrating injury to the area mentioned under inclusion criteria
  • Patients requiring early surgical exploration for injuries other than diaphragm injuries
  • If a diaphragm injury is detected on imaging
  • A positive pregnancy test

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Africa1 site
  • University of Cape Town

    Cape Town, Western Cape

Other trials in South Africa

About this study

Official title: Laparoscopy (to Detect Occult Diaphragm Injury) Versus Clinical and Radiological Follow up to Detect Diaphragm Injury and Herniation, in Patients With Asymptomatic Left Thoracoabdominal Stab Wounds: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Title: A randomized prospective study comparing non operative management with laparoscopic treatment in patients with a diaphragm injury following left thoracoabdominal stab wounds.

Aim of the Study: The aim of this study is to access the clinical outcome of potential occult diaphragm injuries in a group of patients presenting at the Groote Schuur trauma centre with left sided thoracoabdominal stab wounds, if an expectant non operative management course is taken.

Read more

Objects of the Study: To obtain the above mentioned aim the study will undertake;

  • to do laparoscopy on a group of randomly selected patients with left thoracoabdominal stab wounds to obtain the incidence of occult diaphragm injury.
  • to assess the incidence and clinical outcome of delayed diaphragm visceral herniation in the study group.
Being tested
Laparoscopy, Clinical follow up
Keywords
Diaphragm injury, Herniation
Medical subject headings
Hernia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • LaparoscopyProcedure or surgery

    Treatment group will undergo a laparoscopy, with repair of the diaphragm if injury found

  • Clinical follow upOther

    Control group will undergo no treatment except suturing of wounds and drainage of the hemo-pneumothorax, if present. Then clinical follow up.

Study groups in NCT01044550
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TreatmentOtherLaparoscopy on a group of randomly selected patients with left thoracoabdominal stab wounds to obtain the incidence of occult diaphragm injury
Receives: Procedure: Laparoscopy
ControlActive comparatorAssess the incidence and clinical outcome of delayed diaphragm visceral herniation in the study group.
Receives: Other: Clinical follow up

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. To assess the clinical outcome of potential occult diaphragm injuries in patients presenting at the Groote Schuur trauma centre with left sided thoracoabdominal stab wounds, if an expectant non operative management course is taken.

    Measured: 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jan 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2009
  3. Primary completionOct 2014
  4. Study completionOct 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
66 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01044550
Sponsor's protocol ID
mlhgid004
Status last verified
Jan 2015
First submitted
7 Jan 2010
Last updated
22 Jan 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Laparoscopy and Clinical follow up in people with Diaphragm Injury, run by University of Cape Town at 1 site in South Africa.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jan 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Africa. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

To assess the clinical outcome of potential occult diaphragm injuries in patients presenting at the Groote Schuur trauma centre with left sided thoracoabdominal stab wounds, if an expectant non operative management course is taken. (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jan 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in