EpilepsyNCT01054599
Does Memantine Improve Verbal Memory Task Performance in Subjects With Partial Epilepsy and Memory Dysfunction?
A study testing Memantine and Sugar Pill in people with Epilepsy, run by American Academy of Neurology at 3 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Many patients with epilepsy have memory deficits in the setting of otherwise normal intelligence. Unfortunately, the treatment options for memory dysfunction in patients with epilepsy are limited. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Epilepsy
- What is being tested?
- Memantine and Sugar Pill
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 29 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jan 2009to May 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18-65 years of age
- Normal IQ as estimated by the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR)
- Able to give consent
- Able to live independently and complete activities of daily living
- Stable frequency of seizures. There is no minimum/maximum criteria for the frequency of partial seizures. Those with infrequent secondary generalized seizures may participate, with infrequent seizures defined as two or fewer per year.
- The subject's treating physician does not believe a change in anticonvulsant regimen to be warranted. The anticonvulsant drugs must remain unchanged during the 26 week trial.
- Partial-onset seizures. Seizure type will be determined by clinical history, MRI, SPECT and/or PET imaging, and interictal and/or ictal EEG.
- Either symptomatic or idiopathic seizures.
Who cannot join
- Non-epileptic seizures
- Prior surgical resection for treatment of seizures
- Progressive neurologic illness (i.e. tumor evident on MRI)
- Current alcohol or drug abuse, as this may affect memory by other mechanisms. This information may be obtained by self-report, from the referring physician or by medical record.
- Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, nutritional deficiency, infection or metabolic/electrolyte disorder causing memory loss.
- Non-native English speaking and/or multilingual.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Seizure(s) must not have occurred within 3 days of testing.
- Subjects who are pregnant will not be eligible to take part in the study, as memantine is classified as a Pregnancy Category B drug and may pose risk to the fetus.
- Women who are breastfeeding may not participate in this study.
- Those with renal tubular acidosis or infections of the urinary tract will not be eligible for participation, as memantine is renally cleared and conditions that alkalinize the urine may reduce clearance of the drug.
- Subjects with severe renal impairment, defined as a creatinine clearance of ≤29 mL/min, will be excluded as such patients may not tolerate the proposed dosing schedule.
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
United States3 sites
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Newton-Wellesley Hospital
Newton, Massachusetts, 02462
About this study
Official title: Does Memantine Improve Verbal Memory Task Performance in Subjects With Localization-related Epilepsy and Memory Dysfunction? A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
Many patients with epilepsy have memory deficits in the setting of otherwise normal intelligence. Unfortunately, the treatment options for memory dysfunction in patients with epilepsy are limited. The investigators are conducting a study to evaluate the effects of memantine for the treatment of verbal memory dysfunction in subjects with localization-related seizures. The study involves randomization to memantine therapy or placebo, with cognitive testing and EEG pre- and post-treatment, as well as after an open-label memantine treatment phase.
The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of memantine for the treatment of verbal memory dysfunction in subjects with left temporal lobe epilepsy. The investigators expect that verbal memory task performance will improve in those taking memantine, but not in those taking a placebo.
Read more
The investigators propose that the expected benefit of memantine is specific to verbal memory in subjects with left temporal lobe seizures, rather than representing an overall improvement in cognitive function. The investigators expect no improvement on other cognitive tasks in either the memantine or placebo groups.
The investigators will evaluate whether subjects with left temporal lobe epilepsy and memory difficulties have self-reported improvement in memory while taking memantine. The investigators expect improvement of self-rated memory function on the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Patient Inventory (QOLIE-89) in the memantine group, but no change on this scale in the placebo group.
Read the detailed description
Patients with epilepsy frequently demonstrate subtle cognitive difficulties in the setting of otherwise normal intelligence. Those with left temporal lobe seizures often have particular deficits in verbal memory (Blum 2001). These memory difficulties may be the most distressing aspect of epilepsy for the patients.
Unfortunately, treatment options for memory dysfunction are limited. Cognitive therapy, for example, may help patients to cope, but does not treat the memory loss or address the underlying pathologic process. Two studies examined the pharmacologic management of memory dysfunction in patients with epilepsy using donepezil (Aricept), but with inconsistent results and questionable benefit. A pilot study by Fisher et al. (2001) showed some promise for use of the drug. The study found improved immediate recall and consistent long-term retrieval scores on the Buschke Selective Reminding Test after three months of open-label treatment when compared to a pre-treatment baseline. A more recent randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over trial of donepezil, however, showed no effect on memory as measured by delayed recall on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (Hamberger et al. 2007).
Use of donepezil, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, may pose a risk of seizure exacerbation in this population. Fisher et al. (2001) reported a significant increase in the frequency of generalized tonic-clonic seizures during donepezil treatment. Cholinergic agents have been shown to cause seizures in animal models as well (Turski et al. 1989). Given isolated case reports of seizures associated with donepezil use, the manufacturer issued an advisory note warning of a possible relationship, although data have been insufficient to establish causality. While an increase in seizures was not noted in the Hamberger et al. (2007) study, seizure exacerbation remains a concern regarding the use of this drug in patients with epilepsy.
The mechanism for the postulated effect of donepezil is unclear. Cholinergic transmission has not traditionally been viewed as a contributor to hippocampal pathology. It is believed that excitotoxicity, mediated by glutamate acting on NMDA receptors in the hippocampus, causes hippocampal sclerosis. This process leads to further seizures and memory dysfunction. Alteration of this excitotoxic pathway would be a novel, and potentially safer and more effective, approach to the treatment of memory loss.
The possible effect of intervention at the level of excitotoxicity is supported by animal data. Such studies demonstrate that induced seizures in a rat model of epilepsy will lead to decrements in performance of a spatial memory task, the Morris water maze. This memory dysfunction, however, can be mitigated by NMDA antagonists, such as MK-801, administered prior to seizure induction. The underlying concept is that NMDA receptor antagonists would block the pathway of excitotoxicity that leads to hippocampal injury and memory loss (Kelsey et al. 2000).
An NMDA antagonist, memantine (Namenda), is prescribed in humans for treatment of moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease (Tariot et al. 2004, Reisberg et al. 2003, 2006). Patients with Alzheimer's disease have attained significant cognitive improvements with use of the drug, as measured by the Severe Impairment Battery. The time-course of benefit is less clear, with some studies demonstrating sustained improvement (Tariot et al. 2004) and others showing more transient benefits over the first several weeks of treatment (Reisberg et al. 2003).
It is unknown, however, if an NMDA antagonist such as memantine would be of benefit in humans with memory dysfunction and seizures. The proposed study tests the hypothesis that treatment with memantine would improve verbal memory test performance in patients with localization-related epilepsy. If beneficial, this would provide a much-needed treatment option.
The study will examine the primary specific aim:
Aim 1: Improvement in memory test performance. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of memantine for the treatment of verbal memory dysfunction in subjects with left temporal lobe epilepsy. We expect that verbal memory task performance, as measured by the Buschke Selective Reminding Test (SRT), will improve in those taking memantine, but not while taking a placebo. Such a finding would support the use of memantine for treatment of memory loss in this population, as well as more generally support the hypothesis that NMDA receptor hyperactivity is an appropriate target for intervention.
The study will examine two secondary specific aims:
Aim 2: Selectivity of response. We propose that the postulated benefit of memantine is specific to verbal memory in subjects with left temporal lobe seizures, and visuospatial memory in subjects with right temporal lobe seizures, rather than representing an overall improvement in cognitive function. We expect no improvement on other cognitive tasks in either the memantine or placebo groups, with measures including the Digit Span (for sustained attention, immediate span), Spatial Span (for visuospatial working memory and span), Block Design (for visuospatial construction), Verbal Fluency, Design Fluency, and Stroop Color Word Interference (for executive function) tests. This would lend support to the hypothesis that blockade of NMDA receptor hyperactivity in the hippocampus would lead to improved performance on cognitive tasks that depend specifically on the integrity of that hippocampus, as opposed to a general benefit in overall cognition.
Aim 3: Improvement in self-reported memory function. We will evaluate whether subjects with localization-related epilepsy and memory difficulties have subjective improvement in memory with the administration of memantine. We expect improvement of self-rated memory function on the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Patient Inventory (QOLIE-89) with memantine, but no change on this scale with placebo. This measure serves to evaluate the hypothesis that memantine treatment leads to clinically meaningful improvement.
- Conditions
- Epilepsy
- Being tested
- Memantine, Sugar Pill
- Keywords
- epilepsy, memory, memantine, localization related epilepsy, focal epilepsy
- Medical subject headings
- Epilepsy, Epilepsies, Partial
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MemantineDrug
Also called Namenda
All subjects in the treatment group will be placed on memantine. The dosage of memantine will begin at 5mg once per day (qday), and increase by 5mg every week. The titration will continue over a period of 3 weeks until a goal of 10mg bid is reached. The dosing will increase slowly, to minimize the risk of side effects. The subject will then remain on memantine at 10mg bid for 10 weeks, until the conclusion of the first phase of the study. At the conclusion of the first 13 weeks, subjects will discontinue the treatment (memantine or placebo) and enter the open label phase.
Sugar PillOther
Also called Placebo
In the control arm of the study, subjects will take one placebo sugar pill per day for one week, then increase to one tablet twice per day for the following 12 weeks. At the end of this phase of the study, subjects will enter the open-label phase (unblinded treatment with memantine).
MemantineDrug
Also called Namenda
Open label: When the blinded phase is complete (Weeks 1-13), all subjects will receive open-label treatment with memantine (Weeks 14-26). The dosage of memantine will begin at 5mg once per day (qday), and increase by 5mg every week. The titration will continue over a period of 3 weeks until a goal of 10mg bid is reached. The dosing will increase slowly, to minimize the risk of side effects. The subject will then remain on memantine at 10mg bid for 10 weeks, until the conclusion of the study. At the conclusion of the study, subjects will discontinue the treatment.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Memantine | Experimental | Subjects will randomly assigned to take either a placebo or memantine for 13 weeks. The assignment will be double-blind, neither the study members nor the subject will know if he/she is taking memantine or a placebo. Receives: Drug: Memantine |
| Sugar Pill | Placebo comparator | Subjects will be randomly assigned to take either memantine or a placebo. The study is double-blind, and neither the study members nor the subject will know if he/she is taking memantine or a placebo. Receives: Other: Sugar Pill |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The Change Scores in Memory Measures From Baseline to Post-treatment/Placebo Will be Compared Between the Memantine Treatment and Placebo Groups.
Change scores from pre- to post-treatment/placebo were calculated for the primary outcome measures, the Selective Reminding Test Continuous Long-Term Retrieval (range 0-72; higher scores indicate better memory) and 7-24 Spatial Recall Test Total Learning (range 0-35; total correct across 5 learning trials are summed, with higher scores indicating better memory) scores. These measures are scores on a scale, rather than representing standard units.
Measured: 13 weeks
Secondary outcomes (3)
To Test the Hypothesis That Improvement Will be Selective for Verbal Memory, Change Scores on the Non-verbal Tasks Will be Compared Between the Placebo and Memantine Treatment Groups.
Measured: 5 years
To Test the Hypothesis That Treatment With Memantine Will Result in Subjective Improvement of Memory Function, the Change Scores From the QOLIE-89 Will be Evaluated.
Measured: 5 years
A Secondary Analysis Will Examine the Possible Sustained Benefit of Continued Memantine Use.
SRT-CLTR (range 0-72; higher scores indicate better memory), and 7-24 Spatial Memory Test (range 0-35; scores are summed across the 5 learning trials, with higher scores indicating better memory) scores will be assessed across the first (baseline) and third (post-open label memantine) testing sessions. These measures are considered to be scores on a scale, rather than standard units. The hypothesis was that subjects randomized to memantine would demonstrate sustained improvement from baseline, while the placebo group would demonstrate improvements after taking open label memantine (compared to baseline).
Measured: 26 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jan 2010 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2009
- Primary completionMay 2014
- Study completionMay 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (25)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for EpilepsyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 29 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- American Academy of Neurology
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Forest Laboratories
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Beth Leeman, M.D., Massachusetts General Hospital
- Investigators
- Lauren Moo, M.D., Principal investigator, Massachusetts General Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01054599
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2008P000107
- Status last verified
- Jun 2017
- First submitted
- 1 Dec 2009
- Last updated
- 11 Jul 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Blum D. Decline in Verbal Memory Associated with Duration of Epilepsy: An Intracarotid Amobarbital Study. Epilepsy Behav. 2001 Oct;2(5):448-453. doi: 10.1006/ebeh.2001.0239.
PubMed 12609282Busch RM, Frazier TW, Haggerty KA, Kubu CS. Utility of the Boston naming test in predicting ultimate side of surgery in patients with medically intractable temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2005 Nov;46(11):1773-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2005.00300.x.
PubMed 16302857Diaz-Asper CM, Dopkins S, Potolicchio SJ Jr, Caputy A. Spatial memory following temporal lobe resection. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2006 Nov;28(8):1462-81. doi: 10.1080/13803390500434359.
PubMed 17050270Dodrill CB, Ojemann GA. Do recent seizures and recent changes in antiepileptic drugs impact performances on neuropsychological tests in subtle ways that might easily be missed? Epilepsia. 2007 Oct;48(10):1833-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01140.x. Epub 2007 May 23.
PubMed 17521340Fisher RS, Bortz JJ, Blum DE, Duncan B, Burke H. A pilot study of donepezil for memory problems in epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2001 Aug;2(4):330-4. doi: 10.1006/ebeh.2001.0221.
PubMed 12609209Halsband U. Bilingual and multilingual language processing. J Physiol Paris. 2006 Jun;99(4-6):355-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.03.016. Epub 2006 May 24.
PubMed 16723214Hamberger MJ, Palmese CA, Scarmeas N, Weintraub D, Choi H, Hirsch LJ. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of donepezil to improve memory in epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2007 Jul;48(7):1283-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01114.x. Epub 2007 May 1.
PubMed 17484756Helmstaedter C, Elger CE, Lendt M. Postictal courses of cognitive deficits in focal epilepsies. Epilepsia. 1994 Sep-Oct;35(5):1073-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1994.tb02557.x.
PubMed 7925154Hermann BP, Seidenberg M, Schoenfeld J, Peterson J, Leveroni C, Wyler AR. Empirical techniques for determining the reliability, magnitude, and pattern of neuropsychological change after epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia. 1996 Oct;37(10):942-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1996.tb00531.x.
PubMed 8822692Kelsey JE, Sanderson KL, Frye CA. Perforant path stimulation in rats produces seizures, loss of hippocampal neurons, and a deficit in spatial mapping which are reduced by prior MK-801. Behav Brain Res. 2000 Jan;107(1-2):59-69. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(99)00107-2.
PubMed 10628730Kim KH, Relkin NR, Lee KM, Hirsch J. Distinct cortical areas associated with native and second languages. Nature. 1997 Jul 10;388(6638):171-4. doi: 10.1038/40623.
PubMed 9217156Lee S, Sziklas V, Andermann F, Farnham S, Risse G, Gustafson M, Gates J, Penovich P, Al-Asmi A, Dubeau F, Jones-Gotman M. The effects of adjunctive topiramate on cognitive function in patients with epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2003 Mar;44(3):339-47. doi: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2003.27402.x.
PubMed 12614389Lucas TH 2nd, McKhann GM 2nd, Ojemann GA. Functional separation of languages in the bilingual brain: a comparison of electrical stimulation language mapping in 25 bilingual patients and 117 monolingual control patients. J Neurosurg. 2004 Sep;101(3):449-57. doi: 10.3171/jns.2004.101.3.0449.
PubMed 15352603Lutz MT, Helmstaedter C. EpiTrack: tracking cognitive side effects of medication on attention and executive functions in patients with epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2005 Dec;7(4):708-14. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2005.08.015. Epub 2005 Nov 2.
PubMed 16266826McLean MJ, Gupta RC, Dettbarn WD, Wamil AW. Prophylactic and therapeutic efficacy of memantine against seizures produced by soman in the rat. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1992 Jan;112(1):95-103. doi: 10.1016/0041-008x(92)90284-y.
PubMed 1733053
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Jul 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Does Memantine Improve Verbal Memory Task Performance in Subjects With Localization-related Epilepsy and Memory Dysfunction? A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01054599
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2008P000107
- Conditions
- Epilepsy
- Keywords
- epilepsy, memory, memantine, localization related epilepsy, focal epilepsy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 29 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- American Academy of NeurologyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Forest Laboratories
- Study start
- Jan 2009
- Primary completion
- May 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Jan 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 11 Jul 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Many patients with epilepsy have memory deficits in the setting of otherwise normal intelligence. Unfortunately, the treatment options for memory dysfunction in patients with epilepsy are limited. The investigators are conducting a study to evaluate the effects of memantine for the treatment of verbal memory dysfunction in subjects with localization-related seizures. The study involves randomization to memantine therapy or placebo, with cognitive testing and EEG pre- and post-treatment, as well as after an open-label memantine treatment phase.
The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of memantine for the treatment of verbal memory dysfunction in subjects with left temporal lobe epilepsy. The investigators expect that verbal memory task performance will improve in those taking memantine, but not in those taking a placebo.
The investigators propose that the expected benefit of memantine is specific to verbal memory in subjects with left temporal lobe seizures, rather than representing an overall improvement in cognitive function. The investigators expect no improvement on other cognitive tasks in either the memantine or placebo groups.
The investigators will evaluate whether subjects with left temporal lobe epilepsy and memory difficulties have self-reported improvement in memory while taking memantine. The investigators expect improvement of self-rated memory function on the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Patient Inventory (QOLIE-89) in the memantine group, but no change on this scale in the placebo group.
Detailed description
Patients with epilepsy frequently demonstrate subtle cognitive difficulties in the setting of otherwise normal intelligence. Those with left temporal lobe seizures often have particular deficits in verbal memory (Blum 2001). These memory difficulties may be the most distressing aspect of epilepsy for the patients.
Unfortunately, treatment options for memory dysfunction are limited. Cognitive therapy, for example, may help patients to cope, but does not treat the memory loss or address the underlying pathologic process. Two studies examined the pharmacologic management of memory dysfunction in patients with epilepsy using donepezil (Aricept), but with inconsistent results and questionable benefit. A pilot study by Fisher et al. (2001) showed some promise for use of the drug. The study found improved immediate recall and consistent long-term retrieval scores on the Buschke Selective Reminding Test after three months of open-label treatment when compared to a pre-treatment baseline. A more recent randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over trial of donepezil, however, showed no effect on memory as measured by delayed recall on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (Hamberger et al. 2007).
Use of donepezil, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, may pose a risk of seizure exacerbation in this population. Fisher et al. (2001) reported a significant increase in the frequency of generalized tonic-clonic seizures during donepezil treatment. Cholinergic agents have been shown to cause seizures in animal models as well (Turski et al. 1989). Given isolated case reports of seizures associated with donepezil use, the manufacturer issued an advisory note warning of a possible relationship, although data have been insufficient to establish causality. While an increase in seizures was not noted in the Hamberger et al. (2007) study, seizure exacerbation remains a concern regarding the use of this drug in patients with epilepsy.
The mechanism for the postulated effect of donepezil is unclear. Cholinergic transmission has not traditionally been viewed as a contributor to hippocampal pathology. It is believed that excitotoxicity, mediated by glutamate acting on NMDA receptors in the hippocampus, causes hippocampal sclerosis. This process leads to further seizures and memory dysfunction. Alteration of this excitotoxic pathway would be a novel, and potentially safer and more effective, approach to the treatment of memory loss.
The possible effect of intervention at the level of excitotoxicity is supported by animal data. Such studies demonstrate that induced seizures in a rat model of epilepsy will lead to decrements in performance of a spatial memory task, the Morris water maze. This memory dysfunction, however, can be mitigated by NMDA antagonists, such as MK-801, administered prior to seizure induction. The underlying concept is that NMDA receptor antagonists would block the pathway of excitotoxicity that leads to hippocampal injury and memory loss (Kelsey et al. 2000).
An NMDA antagonist, memantine (Namenda), is prescribed in humans for treatment of moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease (Tariot et al. 2004, Reisberg et al. 2003, 2006). Patients with Alzheimer's disease have attained significant cognitive improvements with use of the drug, as measured by the Severe Impairment Battery. The time-course of benefit is less clear, with some studies demonstrating sustained improvement (Tariot et al. 2004) and others showing more transient benefits over the first several weeks of treatment (Reisberg et al. 2003).
It is unknown, however, if an NMDA antagonist such as memantine would be of benefit in humans with memory dysfunction and seizures. The proposed study tests the hypothesis that treatment with memantine would improve verbal memory test performance in patients with localization-related epilepsy. If beneficial, this would provide a much-needed treatment option.
The study will examine the primary specific aim:
Aim 1: Improvement in memory test performance. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of memantine for the treatment of verbal memory dysfunction in subjects with left temporal lobe epilepsy. We expect that verbal memory task performance, as measured by the Buschke Selective Reminding Test (SRT), will improve in those taking memantine, but not while taking a placebo. Such a finding would support the use of memantine for treatment of memory loss in this population, as well as more generally support the hypothesis that NMDA receptor hyperactivity is an appropriate target for intervention.
The study will examine two secondary specific aims:
Aim 2: Selectivity of response. We propose that the postulated benefit of memantine is specific to verbal memory in subjects with left temporal lobe seizures, and visuospatial memory in subjects with right temporal lobe seizures, rather than representing an overall improvement in cognitive function. We expect no improvement on other cognitive tasks in either the memantine or placebo groups, with measures including the Digit Span (for sustained attention, immediate span), Spatial Span (for visuospatial working memory and span), Block Design (for visuospatial construction), Verbal Fluency, Design Fluency, and Stroop Color Word Interference (for executive function) tests. This would lend support to the hypothesis that blockade of NMDA receptor hyperactivity in the hippocampus would lead to improved performance on cognitive tasks that depend specifically on the integrity of that hippocampus, as opposed to a general benefit in overall cognition.
Aim 3: Improvement in self-reported memory function. We will evaluate whether subjects with localization-related epilepsy and memory difficulties have subjective improvement in memory with the administration of memantine. We expect improvement of self-rated memory function on the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Patient Inventory (QOLIE-89) with memantine, but no change on this scale with placebo. This measure serves to evaluate the hypothesis that memantine treatment leads to clinically meaningful improvement.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Memantine | Experimental | Drug: MemantineSubjects will randomly assigned to take either a placebo or memantine for 13 weeks. The assignment will be double-blind, neither the study members nor the subject will know if he/she is taking memantine or a placebo. |
| Sugar Pill | Placebo comparator | Other: Sugar PillSubjects will be randomly assigned to take either memantine or a placebo. The study is double-blind, and neither the study members nor the subject will know if he/she is taking memantine or a placebo. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- 18-65 years of age
- Normal IQ as estimated by the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR)
- Able to give consent
- Able to live independently and complete activities of daily living
- Stable frequency of seizures. There is no minimum/maximum criteria for the frequency of partial seizures. Those with infrequent secondary generalized seizures may participate, with infrequent seizures defined as two or fewer per year.
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Non-epileptic seizures
- Prior surgical resection for treatment of seizures
- Progressive neurologic illness (i.e. tumor evident on MRI)
- Current alcohol or drug abuse, as this may affect memory by other mechanisms. This information may be obtained by self-report, from the referring physician or by medical record.
- Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, nutritional deficiency, infection or metabolic/electrolyte disorder causing memory loss.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MemantineAlso: NamendaAll subjects in the treatment group will be placed on memantine. The dosage of memantine will begin at 5mg once per day (qday), and increase by 5mg every week. The titration will continue over a period of 3 weeks until a goal of 10mg bid is reached. The dosing will increase slowly, to minimize the risk of side effects. The subject will then remain on memantine at 10mg bid for 10 weeks, until the conclusion of the first phase of the study. At the conclusion of the first 13 weeks, subjects will discontinue the treatment (memantine or placebo) and enter the open label phase. | Drug | Memantine |
| Sugar PillAlso: PlaceboIn the control arm of the study, subjects will take one placebo sugar pill per day for one week, then increase to one tablet twice per day for the following 12 weeks. At the end of this phase of the study, subjects will enter the open-label phase (unblinded treatment with memantine). | Other | Sugar Pill |
| MemantineAlso: NamendaOpen label: When the blinded phase is complete (Weeks 1-13), all subjects will receive open-label treatment with memantine (Weeks 14-26). The dosage of memantine will begin at 5mg once per day (qday), and increase by 5mg every week. The titration will continue over a period of 3 weeks until a goal of 10mg bid is reached. The dosing will increase slowly, to minimize the risk of side effects. The subject will then remain on memantine at 10mg bid for 10 weeks, until the conclusion of the study. At the conclusion of the study, subjects will discontinue the treatment. | Drug | Memantine |
Primary outcome
The Change Scores in Memory Measures From Baseline to Post-treatment/Placebo Will be Compared Between the Memantine Treatment and Placebo Groups.
Time frame: 13 weeks
Change scores from pre- to post-treatment/placebo were calculated for the primary outcome measures, the Selective Reminding Test Continuous Long-Term Retrieval (range 0-72; higher scores indicate better memory) and 7-24 Spatial Recall Test Total Learning (range 0-35; total correct across 5 learning trials are summed, with higher scores indicating better memory) scores. These measures are scores on a scale, rather than representing standard units.
3 secondary outcomes
To Test the Hypothesis That Improvement Will be Selective for Verbal Memory, Change Scores on the Non-verbal Tasks Will be Compared Between the Placebo and Memantine Treatment Groups.
Time frame: 5 years
To Test the Hypothesis That Treatment With Memantine Will Result in Subjective Improvement of Memory Function, the Change Scores From the QOLIE-89 Will be Evaluated.
Time frame: 5 years
A Secondary Analysis Will Examine the Possible Sustained Benefit of Continued Memantine Use.
Time frame: 26 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Jul 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 12609282Blum D. Decline in Verbal Memory Associated with Duration of Epilepsy: An Intracarotid Amobarbital Study. Epilepsy Behav. 2001 Oct;2(5):448-453. doi: 10.1006/ebeh.2001.0239.
- Background: PubMed 16302857Busch RM, Frazier TW, Haggerty KA, Kubu CS. Utility of the Boston naming test in predicting ultimate side of surgery in patients with medically intractable temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2005 Nov;46(11):1773-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2005.00300.x.
- Background: PubMed 17050270Diaz-Asper CM, Dopkins S, Potolicchio SJ Jr, Caputy A. Spatial memory following temporal lobe resection. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2006 Nov;28(8):1462-81. doi: 10.1080/13803390500434359.
- Background: PubMed 17521340Dodrill CB, Ojemann GA. Do recent seizures and recent changes in antiepileptic drugs impact performances on neuropsychological tests in subtle ways that might easily be missed? Epilepsia. 2007 Oct;48(10):1833-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01140.x. Epub 2007 May 23.
- Background: PubMed 12609209Fisher RS, Bortz JJ, Blum DE, Duncan B, Burke H. A pilot study of donepezil for memory problems in epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2001 Aug;2(4):330-4. doi: 10.1006/ebeh.2001.0221.
- Background: PubMed 16723214Halsband U. Bilingual and multilingual language processing. J Physiol Paris. 2006 Jun;99(4-6):355-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.03.016. Epub 2006 May 24.
- Background: PubMed 17484756Hamberger MJ, Palmese CA, Scarmeas N, Weintraub D, Choi H, Hirsch LJ. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of donepezil to improve memory in epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2007 Jul;48(7):1283-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01114.x. Epub 2007 May 1.
- Background: PubMed 7925154Helmstaedter C, Elger CE, Lendt M. Postictal courses of cognitive deficits in focal epilepsies. Epilepsia. 1994 Sep-Oct;35(5):1073-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1994.tb02557.x.
- Background: PubMed 8822692Hermann BP, Seidenberg M, Schoenfeld J, Peterson J, Leveroni C, Wyler AR. Empirical techniques for determining the reliability, magnitude, and pattern of neuropsychological change after epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia. 1996 Oct;37(10):942-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1996.tb00531.x.
- Background: PubMed 10628730Kelsey JE, Sanderson KL, Frye CA. Perforant path stimulation in rats produces seizures, loss of hippocampal neurons, and a deficit in spatial mapping which are reduced by prior MK-801. Behav Brain Res. 2000 Jan;107(1-2):59-69. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(99)00107-2.
- Background: PubMed 9217156Kim KH, Relkin NR, Lee KM, Hirsch J. Distinct cortical areas associated with native and second languages. Nature. 1997 Jul 10;388(6638):171-4. doi: 10.1038/40623.
- Background: PubMed 12614389Lee S, Sziklas V, Andermann F, Farnham S, Risse G, Gustafson M, Gates J, Penovich P, Al-Asmi A, Dubeau F, Jones-Gotman M. The effects of adjunctive topiramate on cognitive function in patients with epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2003 Mar;44(3):339-47. doi: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2003.27402.x.
Related trials for Epilepsy
Not yet recruiting
High-Intensity Focused Ultrasonic Ablation of the Centromedian Thalamic Nucleus for Treatment of Medically Refractory Generalized Epilepsy in Patients Ages 18 Years to 89 Years
Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
Not yet recruiting
Peri-procedural Weighted Blanket Use for ECT
Post-ect Agitation, Post-ictal Agitation
RecruitingObservational study
PET/MRI/EEG Imaging Study in Epilepsy
Epilepsy
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Open-label Study of Cenobamate Monotherapy in Adult Subjects With Newly Diagnosed or Recurrent Partial-Onset Epilepsy
Focal Onset Seizure
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lauren Moo, M.D. principal investigator
Massachusetts General Hospital
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Memantine and Sugar Pill in people with Epilepsy, run by American Academy of Neurology at 3 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jul 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Jul 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The Change Scores in Memory Measures From Baseline to Post-treatment/Placebo Will be Compared Between the Memantine Treatment and Placebo Groups. (time frame: 13 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01054599, which also lists 25 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jul 2017.