AzTrials
AzTrials

CarcinomaPhase 2INVIBONCT01070537

Evaluation of the Bonfils Fiberscope for Predicted Difficult Intubation in Awake Patients With Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) Cancer (INVIBO)

A Phase 2 study testing Bonfils fiberscope intubation in people with Carcinoma, run by Centre Leon Berard at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The Bonfils intubation fiberscope (BF), a rigid medical device with a curved tip, is exclusively used in anesthesiology for orotracheal intubation (OTI). The objective of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and the tolerance of an intubation procedure realized by means of the BF (BFI) in awake adult patients… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Carcinoma
What is being tested?
Bonfils fiberscope intubation
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
41 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Feb 2008to Apr 2009
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female patients aged ≥ 18 years
  • Requiring a surgical intervention for an ENT carcinoma
  • Presenting with a PDI defined either as an Arne Score > 11, or a previous history of DI or by the surgeon's judgment.
  • Able to understand, read and write French
  • Signed, written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Impossible mask ventilation
  • Patient with a laryngeal stridor indicative of upper airway stenosis
  • Patient requiring an intubation by nasal route
  • Glasgow score < 12
  • BMI > 35
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Documented history of cognitive or psychiatric disorders
  • Difficult follow-up

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Centre Léon Bérard

    Lyon, 69373

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: INVIBO: Evaluation of the Feasibility and Tolerance of an Intubation Procedure Performed by Means of the Bonfils Fiberscope in Awake Patients With Predicted Difficult Intubation in the Context of ENT Cancer Surgery

The Bonfils intubation fiberscope (BF), a rigid medical device with a curved tip, is exclusively used in anesthesiology for orotracheal intubation (OTI). The objective of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and the tolerance of an intubation procedure realized by means of the BF (BFI) in awake adult patients with predicted difficult intubation (PDI), in the context of ENT cancer surgery.

The intubation is performed under local anesthesia (either nasal, oral, or intercricothyroidal) and sedation using Remifentanyl (AIVOC) with spontaneous ventilation. The primary endpoint is the rate of BFI meeting quality requirements: the procedure must be both successful (≤ 2 attempts and duration < 180 sec) and well tolerated (Fahey score < 2). The secondary endpoints include the difficulties met by the operator during the BFI and patient's perception of the intubation procedure, evaluated in the recovery room and 7 days after the intervention. Sample size is calculated using a one-stage Fleming design with p0=80%, p1=95%, alpha=5% and 80% power, for a total of 32 evaluable patients.

Conditions
Carcinoma
Being tested
Bonfils fiberscope intubation
Keywords
Otolaryngology, Equipment and Supplies, Intubation
Medical subject headings
Carcinoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Bonfils fiberscope intubationDevice

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The rate of BFI meeting quality requirements: the procedure must be successful on the one hand (≤ 2 attempts and duration < 180 sec); and well tolerated on the other hand (Fahey score < 2).

    Measured: 180 sec after the beginning of the intubation

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Number of well-tolerated BFI procedures

    Measured: At the end of the intubation

  2. Duration of the intubation procedure among patients with a successful BFI (≤ 2 attempts and duration < 180 sec)

    Measured: At the end of the intubation

  3. Frequency and type of difficulties met by the operator

    Measured: At the end of the intubation

  4. Frequency and type of adverse events experienced by the patient

    Measured: At the end of the intubation

  5. Patient's perception of the intubation procedure

    Measured: In the recovery room and 7 days after the intubation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Feb 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2008
  3. Primary completionApr 2009
  4. Study completionApr 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Enrolment
41 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01070537
Sponsor's protocol ID
INVIBO
Other IDs
ET2007-036
Acronym
INVIBO
Status last verified
Feb 2010
First submitted
15 Feb 2010
Last updated
18 Feb 2010
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Benumof JL. Management of the difficult adult airway. With special emphasis on awake tracheal intubation. Anesthesiology. 1991 Dec;75(6):1087-110. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199112000-00021.

    PubMed 1824555
  • Arne J, Descoins P, Fusciardi J, Ingrand P, Ferrier B, Boudigues D, Aries J. Preoperative assessment for difficult intubation in general and ENT surgery: predictive value of a clinical multivariate risk index. Br J Anaesth. 1998 Feb;80(2):140-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/80.2.140.

    PubMed 9602574
  • Boisson-Bertrand D, Bourgain JL, Camboulives J, Crinquette V, Cros AM, Dubreuil M, Eurin B, Haberer JP, Pottecher T, Thorin D, Ravussin P, Riou B. [Difficult intubation. French Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care. A collective expertise]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1996;15(2):207-14. No abstract available. French.

    PubMed 8734245
  • Halligan M, Charters P. A clinical evaluation of the Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope. Anaesthesia. 2003 Nov;58(11):1087-91. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.03407.x.

    PubMed 14616594
  • Bein B, Worthmann F, Scholz J, Brinkmann F, Tonner PH, Steinfath M, Dorges V. A comparison of the intubating laryngeal mask airway and the Bonfils intubation fibrescope in patients with predicted difficult airways. Anaesthesia. 2004 Jul;59(7):668-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03778.x.

    PubMed 15200542
  • Bein B, Yan M, Tonner PH, Scholz J, Steinfath M, Dorges V. Tracheal intubation using the Bonfils intubation fibrescope after failed direct laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia. 2004 Dec;59(12):1207-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03967.x.

    PubMed 15549980
  • Fahey MR, Morris RB, Miller RD, Sohn YJ, Cronnelly R, Gencarelli P. Clinical pharmacology of ORG NC45 (NorcuronTM): a new nondepolarizing muscle relaxant. Anesthesiology. 1981 Jul;55(1):6-11. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198107000-00003.

    PubMed 6113794
  • Cormack RS, Lehane J. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia. 1984 Nov;39(11):1105-11.

    PubMed 6507827
  • Fleming TR. One-sample multiple testing procedure for phase II clinical trials. Biometrics. 1982 Mar;38(1):143-51.

    PubMed 7082756
  • Ramsay MA, Savege TM, Simpson BR, Goodwin R. Controlled sedation with alphaxalone-alphadolone. Br Med J. 1974 Jun 22;2(5920):656-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5920.656.

    PubMed 4835444
  • Mallampati SR, Gatt SP, Gugino LD, Desai SP, Waraksa B, Freiberger D, Liu PL. A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective study. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1985 Jul;32(4):429-34. doi: 10.1007/BF03011357.

    PubMed 4027773
  • Loh KS, Irish JC. Traumatic complications of intubation and other airway management procedures. Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2002 Dec;20(4):953-69. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8537(02)00022-6.

    PubMed 12512271
  • Mazeres JE, Lefranc A, Cropet C, Steghens A, Bachmann P, Perol O, Rosay H. Evaluation of the Bonfils intubating fibrescope for predicted difficult intubation in awake patients with ear, nose and throat cancer. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Sep;28(9):646-50. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283495b85.

    PubMed 21743336

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Bonfils fiberscope intubation in people with Carcinoma, run by Centre Leon Berard at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Feb 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The rate of BFI meeting quality requirements: the procedure must be successful on the one hand (≤ 2 attempts and duration < 180 sec); and well tolerated on the other hand (Fahey score < 2). (time frame: 180 sec after the beginning of the intubation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01070537, which also lists 13 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Feb 2010.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in