Hyperkalaemia Requiring Postoperative DialysisNCT01075750
Perioperative Fluid Management in Patients Receiving Cadaveric Renal Transplants
An observational study of Hyperkalaemia Requiring Postoperative Dialysis and Metabolic Acidosis, run by Medical University of Vienna at 1 site in Austria.
Trial summary
In this study we want to show that the choice of a balanced type fluid solution for the perioperative fluid management of patients receiving cadaveric renal transplantation results in less occurrence of intra- and postoperative hyperkalemia, and thus the need for postoperative dialysis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hyperkalaemia Requiring Postoperative Dialysis, Metabolic Acidosis
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 1 siteAustria
- Study dates
- Jun 2010to Feb 2013
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All patients receiving a cadaveric renal transplant in the General Hospital of Vienna
Who may be able to join
- All patients with end-stage-renal disease admitted for cadaveric renal transplantation will be included in the study
Who cannot join
- Patients younger than 18 years of age
- Hyperkalemia defined as a serum potassium exceeding 5.5 mmol/L pre-operatively
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Austria1 site
Medical University of Vienna/General Hospital of Vienna
Vienna, State of Vienna, 1090
About this study
Official title: Perioperative Fluid Management in Patients Receiving Cadaveric Renal Transplants - Effects of Normal Saline Versus Balanced Infusates on the Incidence of Electrolyte and Acid-base Disturbances
In this study we want to show that the choice of a balanced type fluid solution for the perioperative fluid management of patients receiving cadaveric renal transplantation results in less occurrence of intra- and postoperative hyperkalemia, and thus the need for postoperative dialysis. Additionally, we aim to determine whether the use of a balanced infusion solution leads to less occurrence of metabolic acidosis and electrolyte disorders than the use of isotonic saline.
Furthermore we want to evaluate whether perioperative fluid management with balanced infusion solutions results in a higher frequency of primary graft function than with administration of isotonic saline.
We will test the hypothesis that the use of "Elomel isoton"(Fresenius Kabi Austria GmbH) a balanced infusion solution will result in less occurrence of hyperkalemia and consequent post-transplant dialysis, less occurrence of metabolic acidosis, decreased incidence of electrolyte disorders and higher incidence of primary graft function when compared to isotonic saline for perioperative fluid management in patients receiving cadaveric renal transplantation.
Read the detailed description
Background
Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage-renal-disease (ESRD). Successful renal transplantation improves quality of life and reduces mortality in eligible patients when compared to hemodialysis. In 2007, 44 kidney transplantations per million residents were performed in Austria. The number of patients with a renal transplant has continuously risen in the last ten years. 398 kidney transplantations were performed in Austria in 2007, of which only 61 were of living donors. This underlines the special role of cadaveric kidney transplantation in Austria.
Several studies have demonstrated that adequate intraoperative fluid administration is associated with earlier onset of graft function and improved graft survival in renal transplant recipients. However, which kind of solution should be chosen for the perioperative fluid management of renal transplant recipients remains to be clarified. A non-governmental US survey has shown that normal saline is the most commonly used fluid for renal transplantation. The most common cited reason for the administration of normal saline was the lack of potassium in the solution. Balanced salt type fluids were used in only less than 10% of kidney transplantations.
To our knowledge only three studies compared the effects of lactated ringer's solution versus normal saline in kidney transplantation. Taken together, the application of lactated ringer's solution led to less occurrence of metabolic acidosis, electrolyte derangements and in one study, the appearance of hyperkalemia was eliminated by the use of lactated ringer's instead of normal saline. However, it was also shown that the administration of lactated ringer's during kidney transplantation led to a significant rise in lactate levels compared to those treated with normal salin. Despite the knowledge that lactated ringer's can at least potentially lead to a rise in lactate levels, no studies using acetate based balanced salt type fluids have been performed so far in cadaveric renal transplantation. We therefore propose a prospective study in which patients undergoing cadaveric kidney transplantation will be randomized to receive either a solely acetate buffered balanced salt type fluid or a normal saline for infusion therapy.
Clinical considerations
Postoperative hyperkalemia is a common problem in patients receiving cadaveric renal transplantation, especially when primary graft function does not occur. Due to the acidifying effect of isotonic saline infusion via the generation of hyperchloremic acidosis and/or dilutional acidosis, a rise in serum potassium is only boosted. However, today isotonic saline is the most commonly used infusion solution for the perioperative period in renal transplantation.
The use of a balanced infusion solution, containing a metabolizable anion, such as acetate, could result in less metabolic acidosis and therefore a decreased need for post-transplant dialysis. Moreover, since balanced infusion solutions have a by far lower chloride content than isotonic saline, the adverse effects of a rise in serum chloride on renal perfusion could be avoided. This could ultimately result in improved graft function.
Preliminary studies
O'Malley et al. compared the effects of lactated Ringer's to isotonic saline in 51 renal transplant patients. 48 patients received living donor transplantation and 3 received cadaveric renal transplantation. 26 patients received isotonic saline and 25 lactated Ringer's. 19% of patients receiving isotonic saline reached postassium concentrations > 6mmol/L and required treatment versus 0% in the lactated Ringer's group. 31% of patients in the isotonic saline group versus 0% in the lactated Ringer's group required treatment for metabolic acidosis. No effect on primary graft function could be shown.
Hadimioglu et al. randomized patients undergoing living-related kidney transplantation to three groups receiving either isotonic saline, lactated Ringer's or Plasmalyte (a balanced infusion solution using acetate and gluconate). No effects on potassium levels could be shown in this study. Patients receiving isotonic saline showed significant decreases in pH, base excess and a significant rises in serum chloride. In the lactated Ringer's group lactate levels increased significantly. The study showed no differences in the need for postoperative dialysis.
Khajavi et al. randomized patients undergoing kidney transplantation to either normal saline or lactated Ringer's. The authors noticed a higher incidence of hyperkalemia and acidosis in the isotonic saline group while 2 patients in the lactated Ringer's group lost their kidneys due to vascular graft thrombosis.
- Keywords
- hyperkalaemia, metabolic acidosis, renal transplantation, normal saline, elomel isoton, fluid management in renal transplantation
- Medical subject headings
- Acidosis, Hyperkalemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Normal Saline | Patients receiving Normal Saline during and after the renal transplantation. | |
| Elomel Isoton | Patients receiving Elomel Isoton during and after renal transplantation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
intra or postoperative hyperkalaemia
Measured: 7 days
Secondary outcomes (1)
metabolic acidosis
Measured: 7 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Feb 2010 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2010
- Primary completionFeb 2013
- Study completionFeb 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Hyperkalaemia Requiring Postoperative DialysisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Medical University of ViennaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medical University of Vienna
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Eva Meitner, Medical University of Vienna
- Investigators
- Edith Fleischmann, Univ.Prof, Study chair, Medical University of ViennaGregor Lindner, MD, Study director, Inselspital Bern, University of BernEva Meitner, MD, Principal investigator, Medical University of ViennaPeter Biesenbach, MD, Principal investigator, Medical University of Vienna
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01075750
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MUViennaAnemev
- Status last verified
- Feb 2013
- First submitted
- 24 Feb 2010
- Last updated
- 12 Feb 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Feb 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Perioperative Fluid Management in Patients Receiving Cadaveric Renal Transplants - Effects of Normal Saline Versus Balanced Infusates on the Incidence of Electrolyte and Acid-base Disturbances
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01075750
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MUViennaAnemev
- Keywords
- hyperkalaemia, metabolic acidosis, renal transplantation, normal saline, elomel isoton, fluid management in renal transplantation
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Medical University of ViennaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2010
- Primary completion
- Feb 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Feb 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In this study we want to show that the choice of a balanced type fluid solution for the perioperative fluid management of patients receiving cadaveric renal transplantation results in less occurrence of intra- and postoperative hyperkalemia, and thus the need for postoperative dialysis. Additionally, we aim to determine whether the use of a balanced infusion solution leads to less occurrence of metabolic acidosis and electrolyte disorders than the use of isotonic saline.
Furthermore we want to evaluate whether perioperative fluid management with balanced infusion solutions results in a higher frequency of primary graft function than with administration of isotonic saline.
We will test the hypothesis that the use of "Elomel isoton"(Fresenius Kabi Austria GmbH) a balanced infusion solution will result in less occurrence of hyperkalemia and consequent post-transplant dialysis, less occurrence of metabolic acidosis, decreased incidence of electrolyte disorders and higher incidence of primary graft function when compared to isotonic saline for perioperative fluid management in patients receiving cadaveric renal transplantation.
Detailed description
Background
Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage-renal-disease (ESRD). Successful renal transplantation improves quality of life and reduces mortality in eligible patients when compared to hemodialysis. In 2007, 44 kidney transplantations per million residents were performed in Austria. The number of patients with a renal transplant has continuously risen in the last ten years. 398 kidney transplantations were performed in Austria in 2007, of which only 61 were of living donors. This underlines the special role of cadaveric kidney transplantation in Austria.
Several studies have demonstrated that adequate intraoperative fluid administration is associated with earlier onset of graft function and improved graft survival in renal transplant recipients. However, which kind of solution should be chosen for the perioperative fluid management of renal transplant recipients remains to be clarified. A non-governmental US survey has shown that normal saline is the most commonly used fluid for renal transplantation. The most common cited reason for the administration of normal saline was the lack of potassium in the solution. Balanced salt type fluids were used in only less than 10% of kidney transplantations.
To our knowledge only three studies compared the effects of lactated ringer's solution versus normal saline in kidney transplantation. Taken together, the application of lactated ringer's solution led to less occurrence of metabolic acidosis, electrolyte derangements and in one study, the appearance of hyperkalemia was eliminated by the use of lactated ringer's instead of normal saline. However, it was also shown that the administration of lactated ringer's during kidney transplantation led to a significant rise in lactate levels compared to those treated with normal salin. Despite the knowledge that lactated ringer's can at least potentially lead to a rise in lactate levels, no studies using acetate based balanced salt type fluids have been performed so far in cadaveric renal transplantation. We therefore propose a prospective study in which patients undergoing cadaveric kidney transplantation will be randomized to receive either a solely acetate buffered balanced salt type fluid or a normal saline for infusion therapy.
Clinical considerations
Postoperative hyperkalemia is a common problem in patients receiving cadaveric renal transplantation, especially when primary graft function does not occur. Due to the acidifying effect of isotonic saline infusion via the generation of hyperchloremic acidosis and/or dilutional acidosis, a rise in serum potassium is only boosted. However, today isotonic saline is the most commonly used infusion solution for the perioperative period in renal transplantation.
The use of a balanced infusion solution, containing a metabolizable anion, such as acetate, could result in less metabolic acidosis and therefore a decreased need for post-transplant dialysis. Moreover, since balanced infusion solutions have a by far lower chloride content than isotonic saline, the adverse effects of a rise in serum chloride on renal perfusion could be avoided. This could ultimately result in improved graft function.
Preliminary studies
O'Malley et al. compared the effects of lactated Ringer's to isotonic saline in 51 renal transplant patients. 48 patients received living donor transplantation and 3 received cadaveric renal transplantation. 26 patients received isotonic saline and 25 lactated Ringer's. 19% of patients receiving isotonic saline reached postassium concentrations > 6mmol/L and required treatment versus 0% in the lactated Ringer's group. 31% of patients in the isotonic saline group versus 0% in the lactated Ringer's group required treatment for metabolic acidosis. No effect on primary graft function could be shown.
Hadimioglu et al. randomized patients undergoing living-related kidney transplantation to three groups receiving either isotonic saline, lactated Ringer's or Plasmalyte (a balanced infusion solution using acetate and gluconate). No effects on potassium levels could be shown in this study. Patients receiving isotonic saline showed significant decreases in pH, base excess and a significant rises in serum chloride. In the lactated Ringer's group lactate levels increased significantly. The study showed no differences in the need for postoperative dialysis.
Khajavi et al. randomized patients undergoing kidney transplantation to either normal saline or lactated Ringer's. The authors noticed a higher incidence of hyperkalemia and acidosis in the isotonic saline group while 2 patients in the lactated Ringer's group lost their kidneys due to vascular graft thrombosis.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Normal Saline | – | –Patients receiving Normal Saline during and after the renal transplantation. |
| Elomel Isoton | – | –Patients receiving Elomel Isoton during and after renal transplantation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All patients receiving a cadaveric renal transplant in the General Hospital of Vienna
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All patients with end-stage-renal disease admitted for cadaveric renal transplantation will be included in the study
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients younger than 18 years of age
- Hyperkalemia defined as a serum potassium exceeding 5.5 mmol/L pre-operatively
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
intra or postoperative hyperkalaemia
Time frame: 7 days
1 secondary outcome
metabolic acidosis
Time frame: 7 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Feb 2013.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Edith Fleischmann, Univ.Prof study chair
Medical University of Vienna
Gregor Lindner, MD study director
Inselspital Bern, University of Bern
Eva Meitner, MD principal investigator
Medical University of Vienna
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Hyperkalaemia Requiring Postoperative Dialysis and Metabolic Acidosis, run by Medical University of Vienna at 1 site in Austria.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Feb 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Austria. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
intra or postoperative hyperkalaemia (time frame: 7 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Feb 2013.