PainNCT01087931
Pain Relief at Iliac Crest Bone Harvest Sites in Spine Surgery Using Bupivacaine
A study testing Bupivacaine and Normal Saline in people with Pain, run by Vanderbilt University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The use of iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) remains the gold-standard in spinal reconstructive surgery for achieving fusion. Major complications from the harvesting of ICBG are rare, but chronic pain has been reported in 10-39%. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain
- What is being tested?
- Bupivacaine and Normal Saline
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Apr 2010to Oct 2011
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- patients 18 years of age or older undergoing posterior cervical, thoracic, or lumbar surgery
- willingness to participate in the study.
Who cannot join
- individuals who underwent surgical intervention in the past 6 months
- previous iliac crest bone harvesting
- history of tumor and spondyloarthropathies (rheumatoid arthritis, seronegative arthritis)
- history of adverse reaction to local anesthetic
- history of severe pelvic and hip conditions that can interfere with the outcome assessment of the study
- opioid addiction
Show all 12Show fewer
- pregnancy
- acute mental illness
- uncontrolled major depression and any other psychiatric disorders
- prisoners
- non-english speaking patients
- inability to understand the informed consent and demands of the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Vanderbilt Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37209
About this study
Official title: Local Anesthetic Use at Iliac Crest Bone Graft Site in Spinal Reconstructive Surgery
The use of iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) remains the gold-standard in spinal reconstructive surgery for achieving fusion. Major complications from the harvesting of ICBG are rare, but chronic pain has been reported in 10-39%. Catheters implanted at the time of surgery have been used to provide local anesthetic at the harvest site for 24-48 hours after surgery. This has been shown to decrease chronic pain at 4 years post-operatively. A single application of local anesthetic at surgery has been shown to decrease pain at the harvest site for up to 5 days. No study has demonstrated a benefit to using a single application of local anesthetic at the ICBG site beyond 5 days. In current clinical practice, the use of a local anesthetic at the ICBG site is determined according to surgeon preference. The purpose of this study is to determine if a single application of bupivacaine at the ICBG site, as currently done in some cases, provides any pain relief beyond 5 days such as that demonstrated with longer infusions of local anesthetics.
Read the detailed description
The use of local anesthetic at the donor site has been investigated to decrease the morbidity of iliac crest bone harvesting. Along with a decrease in early post-operative pain that may be expected a decrease in chronic pain and improved long-term results have also been demonstrated. Local anesthetics may cause such long-term results by dampening the initial chemical response to injury by reducing the release of inflammatory mediators from neutrophils, neutrophil adhesion to the endothelium, and the formation of free oxygen radicals. Most studies have utilized continuous or periodic infusions of anesthetic through a catheter placed at the time of surgery for 24-48 hours postoperatively. The drawbacks to using a catheter include increased infection risk and increased cost if a continuous infusion is used . A single treatment of local anesthetic at the time of surgery is therefore preferable. Only one study has evaluated a single injection of local anesthetic in adult spine patients, demonstrating decreased pain and narcotic usage through 5 post-operative days. No study to date has demonstrated a decrease in intermediate or long-term donor site pain through a single application of anesthetic, as achieved in previous studies utilizing post-operative infusions via a catheter.
Participants in the study will be identified in by the attending surgeons on this study who are clinical faculty within the department of orthopaedics and board certified in spine surgery. Randomization will be done by random selection of a sealed envelope by the attending physician at the time of enrollment. Sealed envelopes will contain a paper that assigns the patient to the treatment (bupivacaine at bone harvest site) or placebo (normal saline at bone harvest site) group. Note that all surgical wounds are routinely irrigated with normal saline prior to skin closure. In the control group, 10ml more of normal saline will be used in the ICBG site. In the treatment group, 10ml of bupivacaine 0.5% will be administered directly into the surgical wound, as done in some cases currently. Therefore, there are no new procedures in this protocol outside of what is already being done in practice. The current practice of using versus not using local anesthetic at the iliac crest bone graft site is at the discretion of the attending surgeon. Please note that the randomization in this study has nothing to do with the surgery that is done, and all patients will be treated according to standard of care regardless of this randomization. There are no other differences between treatments in the two study groups. There are no deviations from normal post-operative care received.
Patients will not be told whether or not they receive bupivacaine at the iliac crest bone graft site at the time of surgery. The patient will be blinded to their treatment group throughout the study. At the patient's request, they will be informed of their treatment group at the end of the study. The attending surgeon will not be blinded to the treatment group. The PI will not be blinded to the treatment group.
Background information about the patient and a pain assessment will be done at the time of enrollment by asking participants to fill out a paper questionnaire. Paper questionnaires to assess the patient's pain level will be given to and collected from patients at discharge from the hospital, the first follow up appointment (approximately 2-4 weeks postoperatively), and at the next follow up appointment (approximately 3 months postoperatively). In addition, patients will be given a paper narcotics log to enter their daily oral narcotic usage between the time of discharge and their first follow up appointment.
- Conditions
- Pain
- Being tested
- Bupivacaine, Normal Saline
- Keywords
- Local anesthetic, Iliac crest bone harvest, Patients undergoing spine surgery that require use of iliac crest bone autograft
- Medical subject headings
- Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BupivacaineDrug
Also called Marcaine.
Single application of 10ml of bupivacaine 0.5% into the iliac crest bone harvest surgical site.
Normal SalineOther
Normal saline 0.9%, 10ml, single application directly into iliac crest bone harvest surgical site.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Bupivacaine | Active comparator | This group will receive bupivacaine (10ml of 0.5%) administered directly into the surgical wound at the iliac crest bone harvest site. Receives: Drug: Bupivacaine |
| Saline | Placebo comparator | This group will receive normal saline (10ml) administered directly into the surgical wound at the iliac crest bone harvest site. Receives: Other: Normal Saline |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain, Cumulative Visual Analog Score, 1st Follow Up
Cumulative Visual Analog Score pain score scores were calculated using the sum of scores (at rest and with movement, pain on average at rest and with movement, and maximum pain at rest and with movement) Range = 0-60 for cumulative visual analog pain score with 0=no pain and 60=worst pain ever.
Measured: about 4 to 5 weeks after surgery
Pain, Cumulative Visual Analog Score, Final Follow up
Cumulative Visual Analog Score pain score scores were calculated using the sum of scores (at rest and with movement, pain on average at rest and with movement, and maximum pain at rest and with movement) Range = 0-60 for cumulative visual analog pain score with 0=no pain and 60=worst pain ever.
Measured: about 18 to 20 weeks after surgery
Secondary outcomes (2)
Narcotic Use, 1st Follow up
Number of participants using narcotics for pain
Measured: about 4 to 5 weeks after surgery
Narcotic Use, Final Follow up
Number of participants using narcotics for pain
Measured: about 18 to 20 weeks after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Mar 2010 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2010
- Primary completionOct 2011
- Study completionOct 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Vanderbilt University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Kevin R O'Neill, MD, MS, Principal investigator, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department or OrthopaedicsRichard A Davis, MD, Study chair, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department or OrthopaedicsClint Devin, MD, Study chair, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department or Orthopaedics
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01087931
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 100096
- Status last verified
- May 2018
- First submitted
- 11 Mar 2010
- Last updated
- 25 Jun 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
O'Neill KR, Lockney DT, Bible JE, Crosby CG, Devin CJ. Bupivacaine for pain reduction after iliac crest bone graft harvest. Orthopedics. 2014 May;37(5):e428-34. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20140430-52.
PubMed 24810818
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jun 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Local Anesthetic Use at Iliac Crest Bone Graft Site in Spinal Reconstructive Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01087931
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 100096
- Conditions
- Pain
- Keywords
- Local anesthetic, Iliac crest bone harvest, Patients undergoing spine surgery that require use of iliac crest bone autograft
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Vanderbilt UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Apr 2010
- Primary completion
- Oct 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Mar 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 25 Jun 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The use of iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) remains the gold-standard in spinal reconstructive surgery for achieving fusion. Major complications from the harvesting of ICBG are rare, but chronic pain has been reported in 10-39%. Catheters implanted at the time of surgery have been used to provide local anesthetic at the harvest site for 24-48 hours after surgery. This has been shown to decrease chronic pain at 4 years post-operatively. A single application of local anesthetic at surgery has been shown to decrease pain at the harvest site for up to 5 days. No study has demonstrated a benefit to using a single application of local anesthetic at the ICBG site beyond 5 days. In current clinical practice, the use of a local anesthetic at the ICBG site is determined according to surgeon preference. The purpose of this study is to determine if a single application of bupivacaine at the ICBG site, as currently done in some cases, provides any pain relief beyond 5 days such as that demonstrated with longer infusions of local anesthetics.
Detailed description
The use of local anesthetic at the donor site has been investigated to decrease the morbidity of iliac crest bone harvesting. Along with a decrease in early post-operative pain that may be expected a decrease in chronic pain and improved long-term results have also been demonstrated. Local anesthetics may cause such long-term results by dampening the initial chemical response to injury by reducing the release of inflammatory mediators from neutrophils, neutrophil adhesion to the endothelium, and the formation of free oxygen radicals. Most studies have utilized continuous or periodic infusions of anesthetic through a catheter placed at the time of surgery for 24-48 hours postoperatively. The drawbacks to using a catheter include increased infection risk and increased cost if a continuous infusion is used . A single treatment of local anesthetic at the time of surgery is therefore preferable. Only one study has evaluated a single injection of local anesthetic in adult spine patients, demonstrating decreased pain and narcotic usage through 5 post-operative days. No study to date has demonstrated a decrease in intermediate or long-term donor site pain through a single application of anesthetic, as achieved in previous studies utilizing post-operative infusions via a catheter.
Participants in the study will be identified in by the attending surgeons on this study who are clinical faculty within the department of orthopaedics and board certified in spine surgery. Randomization will be done by random selection of a sealed envelope by the attending physician at the time of enrollment. Sealed envelopes will contain a paper that assigns the patient to the treatment (bupivacaine at bone harvest site) or placebo (normal saline at bone harvest site) group. Note that all surgical wounds are routinely irrigated with normal saline prior to skin closure. In the control group, 10ml more of normal saline will be used in the ICBG site. In the treatment group, 10ml of bupivacaine 0.5% will be administered directly into the surgical wound, as done in some cases currently. Therefore, there are no new procedures in this protocol outside of what is already being done in practice. The current practice of using versus not using local anesthetic at the iliac crest bone graft site is at the discretion of the attending surgeon. Please note that the randomization in this study has nothing to do with the surgery that is done, and all patients will be treated according to standard of care regardless of this randomization. There are no other differences between treatments in the two study groups. There are no deviations from normal post-operative care received.
Patients will not be told whether or not they receive bupivacaine at the iliac crest bone graft site at the time of surgery. The patient will be blinded to their treatment group throughout the study. At the patient's request, they will be informed of their treatment group at the end of the study. The attending surgeon will not be blinded to the treatment group. The PI will not be blinded to the treatment group.
Background information about the patient and a pain assessment will be done at the time of enrollment by asking participants to fill out a paper questionnaire. Paper questionnaires to assess the patient's pain level will be given to and collected from patients at discharge from the hospital, the first follow up appointment (approximately 2-4 weeks postoperatively), and at the next follow up appointment (approximately 3 months postoperatively). In addition, patients will be given a paper narcotics log to enter their daily oral narcotic usage between the time of discharge and their first follow up appointment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Bupivacaine | Active comparator | Drug: BupivacaineThis group will receive bupivacaine (10ml of 0.5%) administered directly into the surgical wound at the iliac crest bone harvest site. |
| Saline | Placebo comparator | Other: Normal SalineThis group will receive normal saline (10ml) administered directly into the surgical wound at the iliac crest bone harvest site. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- patients 18 years of age or older undergoing posterior cervical, thoracic, or lumbar surgery
- willingness to participate in the study.
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- individuals who underwent surgical intervention in the past 6 months
- previous iliac crest bone harvesting
- history of tumor and spondyloarthropathies (rheumatoid arthritis, seronegative arthritis)
- history of adverse reaction to local anesthetic
- history of severe pelvic and hip conditions that can interfere with the outcome assessment of the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BupivacaineAlso: Marcaine.Single application of 10ml of bupivacaine 0.5% into the iliac crest bone harvest surgical site. | Drug | Bupivacaine |
| Normal SalineNormal saline 0.9%, 10ml, single application directly into iliac crest bone harvest surgical site. | Other | Saline |
Primary outcome
Pain, Cumulative Visual Analog Score, 1st Follow Up
Time frame: about 4 to 5 weeks after surgery
Cumulative Visual Analog Score pain score scores were calculated using the sum of scores (at rest and with movement, pain on average at rest and with movement, and maximum pain at rest and with movement) Range = 0-60 for cumulative visual analog pain score with 0=no pain and 60=worst pain ever.
Pain, Cumulative Visual Analog Score, Final Follow up
Time frame: about 18 to 20 weeks after surgery
Cumulative Visual Analog Score pain score scores were calculated using the sum of scores (at rest and with movement, pain on average at rest and with movement, and maximum pain at rest and with movement) Range = 0-60 for cumulative visual analog pain score with 0=no pain and 60=worst pain ever.
2 secondary outcomes
Narcotic Use, 1st Follow up
Time frame: about 4 to 5 weeks after surgery
Narcotic Use, Final Follow up
Time frame: about 18 to 20 weeks after surgery
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jun 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 24810818O'Neill KR, Lockney DT, Bible JE, Crosby CG, Devin CJ. Bupivacaine for pain reduction after iliac crest bone graft harvest. Orthopedics. 2014 May;37(5):e428-34. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20140430-52.
Related trials for Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Recruiting
Empowered Relief® for Cancer Survivors With Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain Due to Cancer, Pain Catastrophizing
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kevin R O'Neill, MD, MS principal investigator
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department or Orthopaedics
Richard A Davis, MD study chair
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department or Orthopaedics
Clint Devin, MD study chair
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department or Orthopaedics
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Bupivacaine and Normal Saline in people with Pain, run by Vanderbilt University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jun 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Jun 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain, Cumulative Visual Analog Score, 1st Follow Up (time frame: about 4 to 5 weeks after surgery). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01087931, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jun 2018.