AzTrials
AzTrials

Bone CancerNCT01091883

Study Comparing the Safety and Effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance Guided Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS) and External Beam Radiation (EBRT) for Treatment of Metastatic Bone Tumors and Multiple Myeloma

A study testing Exablate treatment and Radiation in people with Bone Cancer and Bone Metastases, run by InSightec at 1 site in Taiwan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this study is to collect comparative data on safety and efficacy of MR Guided Focused Ultrasound and External Beam Radiation for treatment of metastatic bone tumors or multiple myeloma. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Bone Cancer, Bone Metastases, Pain
What is being tested?
Exablate treatment and Radiation
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
May 2010to Mar 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Men and women age 18 years and older.
  • Able and willing to give consent and to attend all study visits
  • Patients with bone metastasis or primary bone lesion identifiable by imaging techniques.
  • Worst NRS Pain Score of ≥ 4 from the tumor to be treated.
  • Targeted tumor(s) are accessible to both ExAblate and EBRT (ExAblate accessible lesions are located in ribs, extremities (excluding joints), pelvis, shoulders and in the posterior aspects of the following spinal vertebra: Lumbar vertebra (L3 - L5), Sacral vertebra (S1 - S5), please see ExAblate "Information for Prescribers".
  • Targeted tumor(s) area is smaller than 100cm2.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Tumor(s) clearly visible by non-contrast MRI.
  • No radiation therapy to the treated lesion during one month prior to enrollment.
  • Radiation therapy is not contraindicated
  • Bisphosphonate, chemo or hormone therapy intake should remain stable throughout follow up duration.

Who cannot join

  • Patients who either
  • Need pre-treatment surgical stabilization of the affected bony structure OR
  • prior surgical stabilization of tumor site
  • Targeted tumor is in a vertebra body or in the posterior aspects of the cervical part of the vertebral column.
  • Targeted tumor is in the skull.
  • Patients on anti-coagulation therapy or with an underlying uncontrolled bleeding disorder.
Show all 18Show fewer
  • Patients with life expectancy < 6-Months.
  • Patients with unstable cardiac status including:
  • Unstable angina pectoris on medication.
  • Patients with documented myocardial infarction within last 40 days to protocol entry.
  • Congestive heart failure NYHA Class IV
  • Severe hypertension (diastolic BP > 100 on medication).
  • Patients with standard contraindications for MR imaging such as non-MRI compatible implanted ferromagnetic objects/devices.
  • Known intolerance or allergies to MRI contrast agent (e.g. Gadolinium or Magnevist)
  • KPS score of below 60
  • Severe cerebro-vascular disease (multiple CVA or CVA within 6 months)
  • Individuals who are not able or willing to tolerate the required prolonged stationary position during treatment (approximately 2 hrs.)
  • Target tumor is less then 1cm from spinal cord, skin, or hollow viscera.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Taiwan1 site
  • Taipei Medical University Hospital

    Taipei City, Taipei, 11031

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Official title: Phase IIIA Study Comparing the Safety and Effectiveness of MR Guided Focused Ultrasound and External Beam Radiation for Treatment of Metastatic Bone Tumors and Multiple Myeloma

The goal of this study is to collect comparative data on safety and efficacy of MR Guided Focused Ultrasound and External Beam Radiation for treatment of metastatic bone tumors or multiple myeloma.

Read the detailed description

Bone is the third most common organ involved by metastatic disease behind lung and liver [6]. In breast cancer, bone is the second most common site of metastatic spread, and 90% of patients dying of breast cancer have bone metastasis. Breast and prostate cancer metastasize to bone most frequently, which reflects the high incidence of both these tumors, as well as their prolonged clinical courses. Post-cancer survival has increased with improvement in early detection and treatments. As a consequence, the number of patients developing metastatic bone disease during their lifetime has also increased.

Current treatments for patients with bone metastases are primarily palliative and include localized therapies (radiation and surgery), systemic therapies (chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, radiopharmaceutical, and bisphosphonates although the primary goal of the use of these therapies are often to address the disease itself), and analgesics (opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs). Recently, radiofrequency ablation has been tested as a treatment option for bone metastases [8]. Currently, an off label use of Cryoablation techniques are being tested as another alternative for bone Mets palliation. The main goals of these treatments are improvement of quality of life and functional level. These goals can be further described:

  • Pain relief
  • Preservation and restoration of function
  • Local tumor control
  • Skeletal stabilization

Treatment with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is the standard of care for patients with localized bone pain, and results in the palliation of pain for many of these patients. Twenty to 30% of patients treated with radiation therapy do not experience pain relief [9-13]. Re-treatment rates are generally reported in the range of 10-25%. Many patients with relapsed pain or poor response to initial radiation may be lost to follow up or may not be referred back to oncologists for consideration of re-radiation. In addition to relapse and re-treatment, there is an increased risk of pathologic fracture in the peri-radiation period. The fracture rate reported in radiation studies is generally in the range of 1% to 8%. The hyperemic response weakens the adjacent bone and increases the risk of spontaneous fracture. Furthermore, patients who have recurrent pain at a site previously irradiated may not be eligible for further radiation therapy secondary to limitations in normal tissue tolerance. Hesitation on the part of physicians to use a larger dose may be related to increased long-term toxicity. Larger radiation dose produces a greater risk of complications such as fibrosis of normal soft tissue, which can cause a decrement in the quality of life in cases of life expectancy longer than 6 months. There may also be a greater incidence of acute side effects of nausea and vomiting if the treatment field includes the stomach. The percent of patients experiencing vomiting following EBRT ranges from about 5% to 30%.

A palliative treatment for painful bone metastases that is non-invasive, without long-term toxicity and having minimal complications would be a useful tool for treating physicians and also a beneficial option for patients suffering from painful bone metastases. Results of preliminary studies indicate that ExAblate treatment of painful bone metastases may be a beneficial treatment option [14, 15]. The ExAblate system is a non-invasive thermal ablation device used in the coagulation of various types of soft tissue. The ExAblate system has the potential to achieve the first three of the four previously mentioned goals in the treatment of bone tumors; namely pain relief, preservation and restoration of functional levels and local tumor control [11].

This study will compare the safety and effectiveness of MR Guided Focused Ultrasound and External Beam Radiation for treatment of metastatic bone tumors or multiple myeloma.

Being tested
Exablate treatment, Radiation
Keywords
Bone cancer, Bone Metastases, pain palliation, metastasis, breast cancer, lung cancer, prostate cancer, cancer related pain, tumors
Medical subject headings
Bone Neoplasms, Pain, Neoplasm Metastasis, Breast Neoplasms, Lung Neoplasms, Prostatic Neoplasms, Cancer Pain, Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Exablate treatmentDevice

    MR Guided Focused Ultrasound

  • RadiationRadiation

    External Beam Radiation

Study groups in NCT01091883
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Exablate treatmentExperimentalExablate 2000
Receives: Device: Exablate treatment
RadiationActive comparatorExternal Beam Radiation
Receives: Radiation: Radiation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Safety of treatment

    Incidence and severity of adverse events associated with the ExAblate MRgFUS bone system used in the palliation of pain due to metastatic bone tumors or multiple myeloma to that of EBRT

    Measured: 6 months

  2. NRS score

    Effect of treatment with MRgFUS ExAblate Bone System (BS) of painful bone tumors or multiple myeloma

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Pain Medication dose and quantity

    Decrease in analgesics/opiate

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Quality of Life score

    Improved quality of life (measured by questionnaires)

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Mar 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2010
  3. Primary completionJan 2019
  4. Study completionMar 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01091883
Sponsor's protocol ID
BM016
Status last verified
Mar 2019
First submitted
18 Mar 2010
Last updated
13 Mar 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Bertrand AS, Iannessi A, Natale R, Beaumont H, Patriti S, Xiong-Ying J, Baudin G, Thyss A. Focused ultrasound for the treatment of bone metastases: effectiveness and feasibility. J Ther Ultrasound. 2018 Nov 30;6:8. doi: 10.1186/s40349-018-0117-3. eCollection 2018.

    PubMed 30519467

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Exablate treatment and Radiation in people with Bone Cancer and Bone Metastases, run by InSightec at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Safety of treatment (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01091883, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Mar 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in