Bone CancerNCT01091883
Study Comparing the Safety and Effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance Guided Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS) and External Beam Radiation (EBRT) for Treatment of Metastatic Bone Tumors and Multiple Myeloma
A study testing Exablate treatment and Radiation in people with Bone Cancer and Bone Metastases, run by InSightec at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
The goal of this study is to collect comparative data on safety and efficacy of MR Guided Focused Ultrasound and External Beam Radiation for treatment of metastatic bone tumors or multiple myeloma. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Bone Cancer, Bone Metastases, Pain
- What is being tested?
- Exablate treatment and Radiation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- May 2010to Mar 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Men and women age 18 years and older.
- Able and willing to give consent and to attend all study visits
- Patients with bone metastasis or primary bone lesion identifiable by imaging techniques.
- Worst NRS Pain Score of ≥ 4 from the tumor to be treated.
- Targeted tumor(s) are accessible to both ExAblate and EBRT (ExAblate accessible lesions are located in ribs, extremities (excluding joints), pelvis, shoulders and in the posterior aspects of the following spinal vertebra: Lumbar vertebra (L3 - L5), Sacral vertebra (S1 - S5), please see ExAblate "Information for Prescribers".
- Targeted tumor(s) area is smaller than 100cm2.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Tumor(s) clearly visible by non-contrast MRI.
- No radiation therapy to the treated lesion during one month prior to enrollment.
- Radiation therapy is not contraindicated
- Bisphosphonate, chemo or hormone therapy intake should remain stable throughout follow up duration.
Who cannot join
- Patients who either
- Need pre-treatment surgical stabilization of the affected bony structure OR
- prior surgical stabilization of tumor site
- Targeted tumor is in a vertebra body or in the posterior aspects of the cervical part of the vertebral column.
- Targeted tumor is in the skull.
- Patients on anti-coagulation therapy or with an underlying uncontrolled bleeding disorder.
Show all 18Show fewer
- Patients with life expectancy < 6-Months.
- Patients with unstable cardiac status including:
- Unstable angina pectoris on medication.
- Patients with documented myocardial infarction within last 40 days to protocol entry.
- Congestive heart failure NYHA Class IV
- Severe hypertension (diastolic BP > 100 on medication).
- Patients with standard contraindications for MR imaging such as non-MRI compatible implanted ferromagnetic objects/devices.
- Known intolerance or allergies to MRI contrast agent (e.g. Gadolinium or Magnevist)
- KPS score of below 60
- Severe cerebro-vascular disease (multiple CVA or CVA within 6 months)
- Individuals who are not able or willing to tolerate the required prolonged stationary position during treatment (approximately 2 hrs.)
- Target tumor is less then 1cm from spinal cord, skin, or hollow viscera.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Phase IIIA Study Comparing the Safety and Effectiveness of MR Guided Focused Ultrasound and External Beam Radiation for Treatment of Metastatic Bone Tumors and Multiple Myeloma
The goal of this study is to collect comparative data on safety and efficacy of MR Guided Focused Ultrasound and External Beam Radiation for treatment of metastatic bone tumors or multiple myeloma.
Read the detailed description
Bone is the third most common organ involved by metastatic disease behind lung and liver [6]. In breast cancer, bone is the second most common site of metastatic spread, and 90% of patients dying of breast cancer have bone metastasis. Breast and prostate cancer metastasize to bone most frequently, which reflects the high incidence of both these tumors, as well as their prolonged clinical courses. Post-cancer survival has increased with improvement in early detection and treatments. As a consequence, the number of patients developing metastatic bone disease during their lifetime has also increased.
Current treatments for patients with bone metastases are primarily palliative and include localized therapies (radiation and surgery), systemic therapies (chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, radiopharmaceutical, and bisphosphonates although the primary goal of the use of these therapies are often to address the disease itself), and analgesics (opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs). Recently, radiofrequency ablation has been tested as a treatment option for bone metastases [8]. Currently, an off label use of Cryoablation techniques are being tested as another alternative for bone Mets palliation. The main goals of these treatments are improvement of quality of life and functional level. These goals can be further described:
- Pain relief
- Preservation and restoration of function
- Local tumor control
- Skeletal stabilization
Treatment with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is the standard of care for patients with localized bone pain, and results in the palliation of pain for many of these patients. Twenty to 30% of patients treated with radiation therapy do not experience pain relief [9-13]. Re-treatment rates are generally reported in the range of 10-25%. Many patients with relapsed pain or poor response to initial radiation may be lost to follow up or may not be referred back to oncologists for consideration of re-radiation. In addition to relapse and re-treatment, there is an increased risk of pathologic fracture in the peri-radiation period. The fracture rate reported in radiation studies is generally in the range of 1% to 8%. The hyperemic response weakens the adjacent bone and increases the risk of spontaneous fracture. Furthermore, patients who have recurrent pain at a site previously irradiated may not be eligible for further radiation therapy secondary to limitations in normal tissue tolerance. Hesitation on the part of physicians to use a larger dose may be related to increased long-term toxicity. Larger radiation dose produces a greater risk of complications such as fibrosis of normal soft tissue, which can cause a decrement in the quality of life in cases of life expectancy longer than 6 months. There may also be a greater incidence of acute side effects of nausea and vomiting if the treatment field includes the stomach. The percent of patients experiencing vomiting following EBRT ranges from about 5% to 30%.
A palliative treatment for painful bone metastases that is non-invasive, without long-term toxicity and having minimal complications would be a useful tool for treating physicians and also a beneficial option for patients suffering from painful bone metastases. Results of preliminary studies indicate that ExAblate treatment of painful bone metastases may be a beneficial treatment option [14, 15]. The ExAblate system is a non-invasive thermal ablation device used in the coagulation of various types of soft tissue. The ExAblate system has the potential to achieve the first three of the four previously mentioned goals in the treatment of bone tumors; namely pain relief, preservation and restoration of functional levels and local tumor control [11].
This study will compare the safety and effectiveness of MR Guided Focused Ultrasound and External Beam Radiation for treatment of metastatic bone tumors or multiple myeloma.
- Conditions
- Bone Cancer, Bone Metastases, Pain
- Being tested
- Exablate treatment, Radiation
- Keywords
- Bone cancer, Bone Metastases, pain palliation, metastasis, breast cancer, lung cancer, prostate cancer, cancer related pain, tumors
- Medical subject headings
- Bone Neoplasms, Pain, Neoplasm Metastasis, Breast Neoplasms, Lung Neoplasms, Prostatic Neoplasms, Cancer Pain, Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Exablate treatmentDevice
MR Guided Focused Ultrasound
RadiationRadiation
External Beam Radiation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Exablate treatment | Experimental | Exablate 2000 Receives: Device: Exablate treatment |
| Radiation | Active comparator | External Beam Radiation Receives: Radiation: Radiation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Safety of treatment
Incidence and severity of adverse events associated with the ExAblate MRgFUS bone system used in the palliation of pain due to metastatic bone tumors or multiple myeloma to that of EBRT
Measured: 6 months
NRS score
Effect of treatment with MRgFUS ExAblate Bone System (BS) of painful bone tumors or multiple myeloma
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Pain Medication dose and quantity
Decrease in analgesics/opiate
Measured: 6 months
Quality of Life score
Improved quality of life (measured by questionnaires)
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Mar 2010 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2010
- Primary completionJan 2019
- Study completionMar 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Bone CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by InSightecThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- InSightec
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01091883
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BM016
- Status last verified
- Mar 2019
- First submitted
- 18 Mar 2010
- Last updated
- 13 Mar 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Bertrand AS, Iannessi A, Natale R, Beaumont H, Patriti S, Xiong-Ying J, Baudin G, Thyss A. Focused ultrasound for the treatment of bone metastases: effectiveness and feasibility. J Ther Ultrasound. 2018 Nov 30;6:8. doi: 10.1186/s40349-018-0117-3. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 30519467
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Mar 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase IIIA Study Comparing the Safety and Effectiveness of MR Guided Focused Ultrasound and External Beam Radiation for Treatment of Metastatic Bone Tumors and Multiple Myeloma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01091883
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BM016
- Conditions
- Bone Cancer, Bone Metastases, Pain
- Keywords
- Bone cancer, Bone Metastases, pain palliation, metastasis, breast cancer, lung cancer, prostate cancer, cancer related pain
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- InSightecIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- May 2010
- Primary completion
- Jan 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Mar 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this study is to collect comparative data on safety and efficacy of MR Guided Focused Ultrasound and External Beam Radiation for treatment of metastatic bone tumors or multiple myeloma.
Detailed description
Bone is the third most common organ involved by metastatic disease behind lung and liver [6]. In breast cancer, bone is the second most common site of metastatic spread, and 90% of patients dying of breast cancer have bone metastasis. Breast and prostate cancer metastasize to bone most frequently, which reflects the high incidence of both these tumors, as well as their prolonged clinical courses. Post-cancer survival has increased with improvement in early detection and treatments. As a consequence, the number of patients developing metastatic bone disease during their lifetime has also increased.
Current treatments for patients with bone metastases are primarily palliative and include localized therapies (radiation and surgery), systemic therapies (chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, radiopharmaceutical, and bisphosphonates although the primary goal of the use of these therapies are often to address the disease itself), and analgesics (opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs). Recently, radiofrequency ablation has been tested as a treatment option for bone metastases [8]. Currently, an off label use of Cryoablation techniques are being tested as another alternative for bone Mets palliation. The main goals of these treatments are improvement of quality of life and functional level. These goals can be further described:
- Pain relief
- Preservation and restoration of function
- Local tumor control
- Skeletal stabilization
Treatment with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is the standard of care for patients with localized bone pain, and results in the palliation of pain for many of these patients. Twenty to 30% of patients treated with radiation therapy do not experience pain relief [9-13]. Re-treatment rates are generally reported in the range of 10-25%. Many patients with relapsed pain or poor response to initial radiation may be lost to follow up or may not be referred back to oncologists for consideration of re-radiation. In addition to relapse and re-treatment, there is an increased risk of pathologic fracture in the peri-radiation period. The fracture rate reported in radiation studies is generally in the range of 1% to 8%. The hyperemic response weakens the adjacent bone and increases the risk of spontaneous fracture. Furthermore, patients who have recurrent pain at a site previously irradiated may not be eligible for further radiation therapy secondary to limitations in normal tissue tolerance. Hesitation on the part of physicians to use a larger dose may be related to increased long-term toxicity. Larger radiation dose produces a greater risk of complications such as fibrosis of normal soft tissue, which can cause a decrement in the quality of life in cases of life expectancy longer than 6 months. There may also be a greater incidence of acute side effects of nausea and vomiting if the treatment field includes the stomach. The percent of patients experiencing vomiting following EBRT ranges from about 5% to 30%.
A palliative treatment for painful bone metastases that is non-invasive, without long-term toxicity and having minimal complications would be a useful tool for treating physicians and also a beneficial option for patients suffering from painful bone metastases. Results of preliminary studies indicate that ExAblate treatment of painful bone metastases may be a beneficial treatment option [14, 15]. The ExAblate system is a non-invasive thermal ablation device used in the coagulation of various types of soft tissue. The ExAblate system has the potential to achieve the first three of the four previously mentioned goals in the treatment of bone tumors; namely pain relief, preservation and restoration of functional levels and local tumor control [11].
This study will compare the safety and effectiveness of MR Guided Focused Ultrasound and External Beam Radiation for treatment of metastatic bone tumors or multiple myeloma.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Exablate treatment | Experimental | Device: Exablate treatmentExablate 2000 |
| Radiation | Active comparator | Radiation: RadiationExternal Beam Radiation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Men and women age 18 years and older.
- Able and willing to give consent and to attend all study visits
- Patients with bone metastasis or primary bone lesion identifiable by imaging techniques.
- Worst NRS Pain Score of ≥ 4 from the tumor to be treated.
- Targeted tumor(s) are accessible to both ExAblate and EBRT (ExAblate accessible lesions are located in ribs, extremities (excluding joints), pelvis, shoulders and in the posterior aspects of the following spinal vertebra: Lumbar vertebra (L3 - L5), Sacral vertebra (S1 - S5), please see ExAblate "Information for Prescribers".
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Patients who either
- Targeted tumor is in a vertebra body or in the posterior aspects of the cervical part of the vertebral column.
- Targeted tumor is in the skull.
- Patients on anti-coagulation therapy or with an underlying uncontrolled bleeding disorder.
- Patients with life expectancy < 6-Months.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Exablate treatmentMR Guided Focused Ultrasound | Device | Exablate treatment |
| RadiationExternal Beam Radiation | Radiation | Radiation |
Primary outcome
Safety of treatment
Time frame: 6 months
Incidence and severity of adverse events associated with the ExAblate MRgFUS bone system used in the palliation of pain due to metastatic bone tumors or multiple myeloma to that of EBRT
NRS score
Time frame: 6 months
Effect of treatment with MRgFUS ExAblate Bone System (BS) of painful bone tumors or multiple myeloma
2 secondary outcomes
Pain Medication dose and quantity
Time frame: 6 months
Quality of Life score
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Mar 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30519467Bertrand AS, Iannessi A, Natale R, Beaumont H, Patriti S, Xiong-Ying J, Baudin G, Thyss A. Focused ultrasound for the treatment of bone metastases: effectiveness and feasibility. J Ther Ultrasound. 2018 Nov 30;6:8. doi: 10.1186/s40349-018-0117-3. eCollection 2018.
- Sponsor's WebsiteLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Bone Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
Vididencel in CML-CP Patients With MRD
CML (Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Pacritinib, a Kinase Inhibitor of CSF1R, IRAK1, JAK2, and FLT3, in Adults and Pediatric Participants 12 Years of Age or Older With Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History Study to Determine Drug Metabolism Phenotype and Appropriate Germline Source DNA in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
Leukemia, Lymphoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Exablate treatment and Radiation in people with Bone Cancer and Bone Metastases, run by InSightec at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Safety of treatment (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01091883, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Mar 2019.