AzTrials
AzTrials

Child Nutrition DisordersNCT01097889

Evaluating the Relative Effectiveness of Two Feeding Interventions for the Treatment of Moderate Acute Malnutrition

A study testing Fortified blended foods, Corn Soya Bean Flour (CSB) with oil. and RUSF (ready-to-use supplementary foods) Supplementary Plumpy® in people with Child Nutrition Disorders, run by The Hospital for Sick Children at 2 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Supplementary feeding programs for children with moderate acute malnutrition have been implemented in developing countries using treatment foods with minimal or no evidence of their effectiveness. Fortified peanut paste is a popular new treatment food for children with severe and moderate malnutrition. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 to 60 months
Conditions the study is for
Child Nutrition Disorders
What is being tested?
Fortified blended foods, Corn Soya Bean Flour (CSB) with oil. and RUSF (ready-to-use supplementary foods) Supplementary Plumpy®
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
2,600 participants
Where
2 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
Apr 2009to Jul 2010
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 to 60 months
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • All children 6 to 60 months of age who are identified as malnourished based on MUAC measurements with WFH ≥70 to <80%.

Who cannot join

  • Children with WFH < 70% or presenting with bilateral pitting oedema (they will be referred to therapeutic feeding programme).
  • Children with any illness or clinical condition that prevents them from safely ingesting either supplementary foods. A child is medically assessed upon admission for any complicated clinical condition (oedema, malaria, vomiting, chronic diarrhea, infections, appetite, etc) that would require medical care and those children will be referred to the therapeutic feeding programme.
  • All children transferred from the therapeutic feeding programme directly into the supplementary feeding programme - however they will not be included in the research study.
  • Children with WFH > 80% but MUAC 110 to 120 mm- they will be admitted to SFP however will not be included in the research study.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 2 countries.

2 sites in 2 countries

Canada1 site
  • The Hospital for Sick Children

    Toronto, Ontario

Other trials in Canada

Ethiopia1 site
  • Regional Health Board - Health Posts in South Nations and Nationalities Peoples Region (SNNPR

    Sidama Zone, Southern Ethiopia

Other trials in Ethiopia

About this study

Official title: Evaluating the Relative Effectiveness of Two Feeding Interventions for the Treatment of Moderate Acute Malnutrition in Children 6-60 Months of Age in Southern Ethiopia

Supplementary feeding programs for children with moderate acute malnutrition have been implemented in developing countries using treatment foods with minimal or no evidence of their effectiveness. Fortified peanut paste is a popular new treatment food for children with severe and moderate malnutrition.

Objectives: To investigate the relative effectiveness of two non-identical therapeutic foods in children with moderate malnutrition by comparing differences in performance indicators (i.e. recovery rates), recovery times, and change in weight-for-height z-scores in each group.

This proposed research project will evaluate the relative effectiveness of two non-identical treatment foods for the treatment of moderate acute malnutrition in children

Read the detailed description

This research protocol will be embedded as a component of the UN World Food Programme (WFP) -supported Supplementary Feeding programmes in Ethiopia. The proposed study is a prospective cluster-randomized equivalence trial that will compare the relative effectiveness of two feeding interventions in four woredas (districts). Research will be implemented in two comparable woredas (one with CSB and one with RUSF), in two different areas in Sidama zone that represent different livelihood zones, main source of crop income, and level of food insecurity

Being tested
Fortified blended foods, Corn Soya Bean Flour (CSB) with oil., RUSF (ready-to-use supplementary foods) Supplementary Plumpy®
Keywords
United Nations World Food Programme, blended food (CSB), ready-to-use supplementary foods (RUSF), Plumpy®
Medical subject headings
Child Nutrition Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Fortified blended foods, Corn Soya Bean Flour (CSB) with oil.Dietary supplement

    A daily ration equivalent of 300g CSB and 32g vegetable oil Bi-weekly distribution of premix of 4.2kg CSB with 0.5L vegetable oil. Estimated 1413 kcal, 47g protein

  • RUSF (ready-to-use supplementary foods) Supplementary Plumpy®Dietary supplement

    Peanut-based fortified supplement

    One 92g sachet eaten throughout the day Bi-weekly distributions of 14 sachets 500 kcal and 13g protein

Study groups in NCT01097889
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Treatment Group 1Active comparatorNot described
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Fortified blended foods, Corn Soya Bean Flour (CSB) with oil.
Treatment Group 2ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Dietary Supplement: RUSF (ready-to-use supplementary foods) Supplementary Plumpy®

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Survival Analysis

    Recovery rates in children from malnutrition

    Measured: Baseline and at 16 Weeks

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Anthropometrics Changes

    Height, weight and middle upper arm circumference (MUAC)

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16

  2. Household Practices Questionnaire

    Measured: At 16 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Apr 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2009
  3. Primary completionNov 2009
  4. Study completionJul 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
2,600 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01097889
Sponsor's protocol ID
1000013545
Status last verified
Apr 2021
First submitted
31 Mar 2010
Last updated
19 Apr 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Karakochuk C, van den Briel T, Stephens D, Zlotkin S. Treatment of moderate acute malnutrition with ready-to-use supplementary food results in higher overall recovery rates compared with a corn-soya blend in children in southern Ethiopia: an operations research trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Oct;96(4):911-6. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.029744. Epub 2012 Sep 5.

    PubMed 22952175

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Fortified blended foods, Corn Soya Bean Flour (CSB) with oil. and RUSF (ready-to-use supplementary foods) Supplementary Plumpy® in people with Child Nutrition Disorders, run by The Hospital for Sick Children at 2 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Canada, Ethiopia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Survival Analysis (time frame: Baseline and at 16 Weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01097889, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Apr 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in