AzTrials
AzTrials

PainNCT01106846

Analgesic Effect of Ketamine in Patients Undergoing Hysteroscopic Endometrial Thermal Ablation Surgery

A study testing Group A: Saline Group and Group B: 1% Ketamine group in people with Pain, run by Northwestern University at 2 sites in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Hypothesis: The intraoperative administration of ketamine will result in a 30% reduction in opiate requirement following endometrial ablation surgery and the intraoperative administration of ketamine will result in a decreased time to meet discharge criteria in the PACU following endometrial ablation surgery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Pain
What is being tested?
Group A: Saline Group and Group B: 1% Ketamine group
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
22 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Mar 2010to Mar 2013
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Gender: Female
  • Age: 18-65 years
  • Non-pregnant, non-lactating
  • Surgery: Outpatient hysteroscopic Novasure® endometrial ablation
  • Language: English speaking
  • Consent: Obtained

Who cannot join

  • Patient refusal
  • Under 18 or over age 65
  • Non-English Speaking
  • Pregnancy, Breast feeding
  • Hysteroscopic procedures using Thermachoice® ablation device
  • Chronic use or addiction to opiates, sedatives, non-opiate analgesics
Show all 12Show fewer
  • History of heavy alcohol usage (>4 drinks/day)
  • Significant cardiovascular or pulmonary disease
  • Psychiatric or emotional disorder
  • Allergy to anesthetic agents utilized in the protocol
  • Glaucoma
  • Thyrotoxicosis

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • Northwestern University

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • Prentice Women's Hosptial

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

Other trials in United States

About this study

Hypothesis: The intraoperative administration of ketamine will result in a 30% reduction in opiate requirement following endometrial ablation surgery and the intraoperative administration of ketamine will result in a decreased time to meet discharge criteria in the PACU following endometrial ablation surgery.

The research question is "Does intraoperative administration of ketamine result in decreased postoperative opiate requirement and time to discharge from the postanesthesia recovery unit (PACU) following hysteroscopic endometrial ablation".

Read the detailed description

Preoperatively:

Subjects will be recruited up to 21days prior to the day of surgery. After informed consent is obtained, subjects will be randomly assigned to one of two groups:

Group A: Saline group Group B: 1% Ketamine group

A verbal rating scale (VRS) will be used to assess pain preoperatively. The patient will be asked to identify the severity of pain by indicating on a scale of 0-10 where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "the worst pain imaginable".

Baseline Quality of Recovery will be obtained. (Appendix F)

Subjects will be randomized prior to surgery to either Group A or Group B. The randomization table is computer generated. There is a 50% allocation to each group.

Intraoperatively:

Standard anesthetic monitoring will be used including monitoring of processed EEG including either the bi-spectral index (BIS) or similar standard of care ASA monitor. A standardized intraoperative anesthetic plan will be utilized by the anesthesia personnel. (Appendix A). Study drug will be prepared and labeled in 10mL syringes by research personnel who will not be involved in the study assessments. Study drug will be administered on initial insertion of Novasure® device (Appendix B).

Postoperatively:

Pain scores in the PACU will be assessed using the VRS upon admission and every 30 minutes thereafter until discharge criteria are met.

Additionally, nausea, vomiting and retching episodes will be recorded using a VRS.

Postoperative analgesic and antiemetic therapy will be standardized and total amounts of these agents will be recorded Assessment of psychomimetic effects including sedation and agitation will be assess postoperatively prior to discharge using the Richmond Agitation/Sedation Scale (Appendix D).

Acute recovery will be assessed using the Modified Post Anesthesia Discharge Scoring System (MPADSS) (Appendix E). A score of 8 or greater will indicate discharge readiness. Time to fulfill discharge criteria will be recorded.

Any other adverse events and medications required will be recorded. These data will be recorded by research personnel who will be blinded to the study group assignments.

Subjects will be contacted by telephone 24 hours after surgery to assess post-discharge quality of recovery (Appendix F).

Conditions
Pain
Being tested
Group A: Saline Group, Group B: 1% Ketamine group
Keywords
Ketamine, Anesthesia, Pain, Outpatient surgery
Medical subject headings
Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Group A: Saline GroupDrug

    Also called Saline

    Saline continuous infusion

  • Group B: 1% Ketamine groupDrug

    Also called Ketamine

    Administration of 1% ketamine intravenously.

Study groups in NCT01106846
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group A: Saline groupPlacebo comparatorGroup A: Saline group , infusion of saline intravenously
Receives: Drug: Group A: Saline Group
Group B: 1% Ketamine groupActive comparatorGroup B: Infusion of ketamine 1% intravenously
Receives: Drug: Group B: 1% Ketamine group

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Quality of Recovery Score Post Operative at 24 Hours

    Quality of recovery 40 score at 24 hours after the surgical procedure. 40 being a poor recovery and 200 being a good recovery.

    Measured: 24 hours post operative

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Apr 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2010
  3. Primary completionMar 2013
  4. Study completionMar 2013

Why it stopped: Resources not available to complete.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
22 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01106846
Sponsor's protocol ID
STU00026695
Status last verified
Jul 2015
First submitted
16 Apr 2010
Last updated
7 Aug 2015
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Schenker JG, Margalioth EJ. Intrauterine adhesions: an updated appraisal. Fertil Steril. 1982 May;37(5):593-610. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)46268-0. No abstract available.

    PubMed 6281085
  • Jansen FW, Vredevoogd CB, van Ulzen K, Hermans J, Trimbos JB, Trimbos-Kemper TC. Complications of hysteroscopy: a prospective, multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Aug;96(2):266-70. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)00865-6.

    PubMed 10908775
  • Wong AY, Wong K, Tang LC. Stepwise pain score analysis of the effect of local lignocaine on outpatient hysteroscopy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2000 Jun;73(6):1234-7. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00498-2.

    PubMed 10856489
  • Lau WC, Ho RY, Tsang MK, Yuen PM. Patient's acceptance of outpatient hysteroscopy. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1999;47(3):191-3. doi: 10.1159/000010092.

    PubMed 10087415
  • De Iaco P, Marabini A, Stefanetti M, Del Vecchio C, Bovicelli L. Acceptability and pain of outpatient hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2000 Feb;7(1):71-5. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(00)80012-2.

    PubMed 10648742
  • MacPherson RD, Woods D, Penfold J. Ketamine and midazolam delivered by patient-controlled analgesia in relieving pain associated with burns dressings. Clin J Pain. 2008 Sep;24(7):568-71. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31816cdb20.

    PubMed 18716494
  • White PF, Way WL, Trevor AJ. Ketamine--its pharmacology and therapeutic uses. Anesthesiology. 1982 Feb;56(2):119-36. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198202000-00007. No abstract available.

    PubMed 6892475
  • Bowdle TA, Radant AD, Cowley DS, Kharasch ED, Strassman RJ, Roy-Byrne PP. Psychedelic effects of ketamine in healthy volunteers: relationship to steady-state plasma concentrations. Anesthesiology. 1998 Jan;88(1):82-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199801000-00015.

    PubMed 9447860
  • Deng XM, Xiao WJ, Luo MP, Tang GZ, Xu KL. The use of midazolam and small-dose ketamine for sedation and analgesia during local anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2001 Nov;93(5):1174-7. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200111000-00023.

    PubMed 11682390

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Group A: Saline Group and Group B: 1% Ketamine group in people with Pain, run by Northwestern University at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Aug 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Jul 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Quality of Recovery Score Post Operative at 24 Hours (time frame: 24 hours post operative). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01106846, which also lists 9 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Aug 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in