Heart FailurePhase 4PING-EPNCT01109641
PhrenIc Nerve mappinG and Stimulation EP Catheter Study: PING-EP Study
A Phase 4 study testing diagnostic electrophysiology catheter in people with Heart Failure, run by Medtronic Italia at 4 sites in Italy.
Trial summary
The PING-EP study is designed to evaluate electrode properties on phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) in coronary sinus using a commercially available diagnostic electrophysiology catheter. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Heart Failure
- What is being tested?
- diagnostic electrophysiology catheter
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesItaly
- Study dates
- Feb 2010to Oct 2010
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subject is indicated for a cardiac resynchronization therapy-pacemaker or defibrillator (CRT-P/CRT-D) implant, for an upgrading from a previously implanted single/dual chamber pacemaker/implantable cardioverter (ICD) or for system revision requiring repositioning of the transvenous left ventricular (LV) lead
- Patient has signed and dated the study-specific Patient Informed Consent form
- Subject is at least 18 years of age
Who cannot join
- Patient has a previous LV lead implanted not requiring repositioning
- Pregnant woman
- Patient is enrolled or planning to participate in any concurrent study, which would confound the results of this trial as determined by Medtronic, during the course of this clinical study
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
Italy4 sites
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitana di Bologna, Policlinico S. Orsola Malpighi
Bologna, Bologna, 40138
Azienda Ospedaliero-universitaria Careggi
Florence, Firenze, 50141
Azienda Unità Socio Sanitaria di Dolo Mirano
Mirano, Venezia, 30035
Ospedale S. Maria della Misericordia
Rovigo, Rovigo, 45100
About this study
The PING-EP study is designed to evaluate electrode properties on phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) in coronary sinus using a commercially available diagnostic electrophysiology catheter.
- Conditions
- Heart Failure
- Being tested
- diagnostic electrophysiology catheter
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Failure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
diagnostic electrophysiology catheterDevice
electrical measurements through a diagnostic electrophysiology catheter
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Effect of electrode property on phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS)
Effect of electrode property on PNS in the cardiac veins
Measured: at implant
Secondary outcomes (4)
Effect of electrode configuration on phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS)
Measured: at implant
Electrode polarity effect on phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS)
Measured: at implant
Effect of electrode property on sensing (r-wave amplitude)
Measured: at implant
Incidence of phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) in the cardiac veins
Incidence of PNS occurrence in different locations in the cardiac vein
Measured: at implant
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Apr 2010 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2010
- Primary completionOct 2010
- Study completionOct 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Heart FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medtronic Italia
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- Mauro Biffi, Principal investigator, Policlinico S. Orsola Malpighi, Bologna, ItalyFrancesco Zanon, Principal investigator, Ospedale S. Maria della Misericordia, Rovigo, ItalyLuigi Padeletti, Principal investigator, Azienda ospedaliero-universitaria Careggi, Firenze, ItalyManuel Bertaglia, Principal investigator, Azienda Unità Socio Sanitaria di Dolo Mirano, Mirano (VE), Italy
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01109641
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MDT-PINGEP
- Acronym
- PING-EP
- Status last verified
- Oct 2010
- First submitted
- 21 Apr 2010
- Last updated
- 7 Oct 2010
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
McAlister FA, Ezekowitz J, Hooton N, Vandermeer B, Spooner C, Dryden DM, Page RL, Hlatky MA, Rowe BH. Cardiac resynchronization therapy for patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a systematic review. JAMA. 2007 Jun 13;297(22):2502-14. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.22.2502.
PubMed 17565085Gurevitz O, Nof E, Carasso S, Luria D, Bar-Lev D, Tanami N, Eldar M, Glikson M. Programmable multiple pacing configurations help to overcome high left ventricular pacing thresholds and avoid phrenic nerve stimulation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005 Dec;28(12):1255-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00265.x.
PubMed 16403156Albertsen AE, Nielsen JC, Pedersen AK, Hansen PS, Jensen HK, Mortensen PT. Left ventricular lead performance in cardiac resynchronization therapy: impact of lead localization and complications. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005 Jun;28(6):483-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.40066.x.
PubMed 15955178Alonso C, Leclercq C, d'Allonnes FR, Pavin D, Victor F, Mabo P, Daubert JC. Six year experience of transvenous left ventricular lead implantation for permanent biventricular pacing in patients with advanced heart failure: technical aspects. Heart. 2001 Oct;86(4):405-10. doi: 10.1136/heart.86.4.405.
PubMed 11559679Knight BP, Desai A, Coman J, Faddis M, Yong P. Long-term retention of cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Jul 7;44(1):72-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.03.054.
PubMed 15234410Ellery S, Paul V, Prenner G, Tscheliessnigg K, Merkely B, Malinowski K, Frohlig G, Hintringer F, Bosse O, Diotallevi P, Ravazzi AP, Flathmann H, Danilovic D, Unterberg-Buchwald C; OVID Study Investigators. A new endocardial "over-the-wire" or stylet-driven left ventricular lead: first clinical experience. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005 Jan;28 Suppl 1:S31-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00084.x.
PubMed 15683519Matsumoto Y, Krishnan S, Fowler SJ, Saremi F, Kondo T, Ahsan C, Narula J, Gurudevan S. Detection of phrenic nerves and their relation to cardiac anatomy using 64-slice multidetector computed tomography. Am J Cardiol. 2007 Jul 1;100(1):133-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.01.072. Epub 2007 May 21.
PubMed 17599455
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Oct 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- PhrenIc Nerve mappinG and Stimulation EP Catheter Study: PING-EP Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01109641
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PING-EP / MDT-PINGEP
- Conditions
- Heart Failure
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Medtronic ItaliaIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Feb 2010
- Primary completion
- Oct 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Apr 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The PING-EP study is designed to evaluate electrode properties on phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) in coronary sinus using a commercially available diagnostic electrophysiology catheter.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Subject is indicated for a cardiac resynchronization therapy-pacemaker or defibrillator (CRT-P/CRT-D) implant, for an upgrading from a previously implanted single/dual chamber pacemaker/implantable cardioverter (ICD) or for system revision requiring repositioning of the transvenous left ventricular (LV) lead
- Patient has signed and dated the study-specific Patient Informed Consent form
- Subject is at least 18 years of age
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patient has a previous LV lead implanted not requiring repositioning
- Pregnant woman
- Patient is enrolled or planning to participate in any concurrent study, which would confound the results of this trial as determined by Medtronic, during the course of this clinical study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| diagnostic electrophysiology catheterelectrical measurements through a diagnostic electrophysiology catheter | Device | – |
Primary outcome
Effect of electrode property on phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS)
Time frame: at implant
Effect of electrode property on PNS in the cardiac veins
4 secondary outcomes
Effect of electrode configuration on phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS)
Time frame: at implant
Electrode polarity effect on phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS)
Time frame: at implant
Effect of electrode property on sensing (r-wave amplitude)
Time frame: at implant
Incidence of phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) in the cardiac veins
Time frame: at implant
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Oct 2010.
- Background: PubMed 17565085McAlister FA, Ezekowitz J, Hooton N, Vandermeer B, Spooner C, Dryden DM, Page RL, Hlatky MA, Rowe BH. Cardiac resynchronization therapy for patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a systematic review. JAMA. 2007 Jun 13;297(22):2502-14. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.22.2502.
- Background: PubMed 16403156Gurevitz O, Nof E, Carasso S, Luria D, Bar-Lev D, Tanami N, Eldar M, Glikson M. Programmable multiple pacing configurations help to overcome high left ventricular pacing thresholds and avoid phrenic nerve stimulation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005 Dec;28(12):1255-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00265.x.
- Background: PubMed 15955178Albertsen AE, Nielsen JC, Pedersen AK, Hansen PS, Jensen HK, Mortensen PT. Left ventricular lead performance in cardiac resynchronization therapy: impact of lead localization and complications. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005 Jun;28(6):483-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.40066.x.
- Background: PubMed 11559679Alonso C, Leclercq C, d'Allonnes FR, Pavin D, Victor F, Mabo P, Daubert JC. Six year experience of transvenous left ventricular lead implantation for permanent biventricular pacing in patients with advanced heart failure: technical aspects. Heart. 2001 Oct;86(4):405-10. doi: 10.1136/heart.86.4.405.
- Background: PubMed 15234410Knight BP, Desai A, Coman J, Faddis M, Yong P. Long-term retention of cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Jul 7;44(1):72-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.03.054.
- Background: PubMed 15683519Ellery S, Paul V, Prenner G, Tscheliessnigg K, Merkely B, Malinowski K, Frohlig G, Hintringer F, Bosse O, Diotallevi P, Ravazzi AP, Flathmann H, Danilovic D, Unterberg-Buchwald C; OVID Study Investigators. A new endocardial "over-the-wire" or stylet-driven left ventricular lead: first clinical experience. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005 Jan;28 Suppl 1:S31-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00084.x.
- Background: PubMed 17599455Matsumoto Y, Krishnan S, Fowler SJ, Saremi F, Kondo T, Ahsan C, Narula J, Gurudevan S. Detection of phrenic nerves and their relation to cardiac anatomy using 64-slice multidetector computed tomography. Am J Cardiol. 2007 Jul 1;100(1):133-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.01.072. Epub 2007 May 21.
Related trials for Heart Failure
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Multi-Scale Analysis of Phenotypes in Heart Failure (MAP-HEART)
Heart Failure
Recruiting
Leg Heat Therapy in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Recruiting
Vsling™ III: Clinical Evaluation of the Vsling™ Device for Ventricular Repair in Patients With Heart Failure
HFrEF - Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Test Whether Vicadrostat in Combination With Empagliflozin Helps People With Heart Failure
Heart Failure
Active, not recruiting
Fast Induced Remodeling in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction, Concentric Hypertrophy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mauro Biffi principal investigator
Policlinico S. Orsola Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
Francesco Zanon principal investigator
Ospedale S. Maria della Misericordia, Rovigo, Italy
Luigi Padeletti principal investigator
Azienda ospedaliero-universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing diagnostic electrophysiology catheter in people with Heart Failure, run by Medtronic Italia at 4 sites in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Oct 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Effect of electrode property on phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) (time frame: at implant). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01109641, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Oct 2010.