AzTrials
AzTrials

Atrial FlutterNCT01113788

Tricuspid Isthmus Imaged by CARTOsound, Patients With Typical Atrial Flutter

An observational study of Atrial Flutter, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 1 site in Canada.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The investigators propose a third hypothesis based on the anatomic observations made in pathological studies. The investigators hypothesize that the anatomic architecture determines the functional properties of the TV-IVC isthmus. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Atrial Flutter
What is being tested?
tricuspid isthmus imaging with Cartosound
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
15 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Mar 2010to Dec 2010
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: patients with typical atrial flutter

Who may be able to join

  • Patients must be over 18 years of age provided written informed consent documented atrial flutter by ECG , holter monitor or TTM

Who cannot join

  • previous atrial flutter ablation non isthmus dependent atrial flutter prior right atrial surgery

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Allan Skanes, MD contact

519-663-3746

askanes@uwo.ca

Cathy Bentley contact

519-685-8500-32835

cbentl@uwo.ca

Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
  • London Health Sciences Center

    London, Ontario, N6A 5A5

    Recruiting

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Tricuspid Isthmus Architecture as Imaged by CARTOsound, Determines Ablation Times in Patients With Typical Atrial Flutter

The investigators propose a third hypothesis based on the anatomic observations made in pathological studies. The investigators hypothesize that the anatomic architecture determines the functional properties of the TV-IVC isthmus. As a result,

  • Muscular bundles are preferential routes of conduction through the TV-IVC isthmus. The isthmus acts like a series of discreet conduction routes rather than as a sheet of tissue.

The muscular bundles form selective targets for ablation and therefore the entire anatomic line need not be ablated. This has direct implications for ablation of the isthmus.

Read the detailed description

Patients undergoing atrial flutter ablation will have cartosound imaging done during procedure to determine if this will shorten ablation times.

Conditions
Atrial Flutter
Being tested
tricuspid isthmus imaging with Cartosound
Keywords
atrial flutter, tricuspid isthmus, ablation
Medical subject headings
Atrial Flutter

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • tricuspid isthmus imaging with CartosoundDevice

    Also called Cartosound

    tricuspid isthmus imaging with Cartosound

Study groups in NCT01113788
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
imagingimaging with usual catheter/fluoroscopy, no cartosound
Receives: Device: tricuspid isthmus imaging with Cartosound

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. observational including ablation lesion number, ablation time in minutes, fluoroscopic

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Apr 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2010
  3. Primary completionDec 2010 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2010 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
15 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01113788
Sponsor's protocol ID
R-09-414
Other IDs
16214
Status last verified
Apr 2010
First submitted
11 Jan 2010
Last updated
30 Apr 2010
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Atrial Flutter, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Apr 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Allan Skanes, MD (519-663-3746, askanes@uwo.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

observational including ablation lesion number, ablation time in minutes, fluoroscopic (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Apr 2010.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in