Bile Duct ObstructionPhase 4NCT01125865
Uncovered Self-expandable Metal Stent Versus Double Layer Plastic Stent for Malignant Hilar Stricture
A Phase 4 study testing SEMS insertion and DLS insertion in people with Bile Duct Obstruction and Klatskin's Tumor, run by Soon Chun Hyang University at 4 sites in South Korea.
Trial summary
The overall median survival of nonresectable malignant hilar obstruction in most series has been less than 6 months. Most patients with malignant hilar obstruction present with advanced disease, making palliative endoscopic drainage the principal therapeutic option. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Bile Duct Obstruction, Klatskin's Tumor
- What is being tested?
- SEMS insertion and DLS insertion
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesSouth Korea
- Study dates
- May 2010to Dec 2011
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient over 18 years old
- Patient with malignant hilar obstruction
Who cannot join
- No written informed consent
- Patient with uncorrectable severe coagulopathy
- Indication for surgical operation
- Karnofsky score < 60%
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
South Korea4 sites, 4 recruiting
- Recruiting
Soon Chun Hyang University Cheonan Hospital
Cheonan, 23-20 Bongmyung-dong, 330-721
Tae Hoon Lee, MD, +82-41-570-3662, thlee9@lycos.co.kr
- Recruiting
Eulji University Hospital
Daejeon, Seo-gu, Dunsan-dong, 302-799
Sang Woo Cha, MD, +82-42-611-3052, swcha@eulji.ac.kr
- Recruiting
Inje University Pusan Paik Hospital
Pusan, Busanjin-gu, Gaegeum-dong, 614-735
Jung Sik Choi, MD, +82-51-890-6114, cwj1225@medigate.net
- Recruiting
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, Pungnap-2dong, Songpagu, 388-1
Do Hyun Park, MD, +82-2-3010-3180, dhpark@amc.seoul.kr
About this study
Official title: Uncovered Self-expandable Metal Stent Versus DoubleLayer Plastic Stent for Malignant Hilar Stricture: a Prospective Randomized Multicenter Trial
The overall median survival of nonresectable malignant hilar obstruction in most series has been less than 6 months. Most patients with malignant hilar obstruction present with advanced disease, making palliative endoscopic drainage the principal therapeutic option. However, the optimal endoscopic management strategy is contentious. Almost all of the published data comparing plastic and metallic stents relate to distal tumors (those of the pancreas, common bile duct and ampulla). Stent patency, complication rates, and cost-effectiveness have favored metallic stents when compared with plastic stents in patients with distal malignant obstruction expected to live at least 3 to 6 months.
There are few comparative study as to whether self-expanding metallic or plastic stent, especially DLS (double layer plastic stent) are preferable in the technical success, stent patency, and cost-effectiveness for palliating malignant hilar obstruction.
The study was designed to compare the the technical success, stent patency, and cost-effectiveness of self-expandable metal stent and DLS in patients with malignant hilar obstruction.
- Conditions
- Bile Duct Obstruction, Klatskin's Tumor
- Being tested
- SEMS insertion, DLS insertion
- Keywords
- Malignant hilar stricture
- Medical subject headings
- Cholestasis, Klatskin Tumor
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SEMS insertionDevice
Also called Bona stent, TaeWoong stent
Self-expandable metallic stent will be inserted for malignant hilar obstruction.
DLS insertionDevice
Also called Olympus DoubleLayer stent
DoubleLayer plastic stent will be inserted for malignant hilar obstruction.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SEMS | Active comparator | Self-expandable metallic stent will be inserted for the malignant hilar obstruction. Receives: Device: SEMS insertion |
| DLS | Active comparator | DoubleLayer plastic stent (Olympus) will be inserted for malignant hilar obstruction. Receives: Device: DLS insertion |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Stent patency
Interval time (d) from stent insertion to occlusion
Measured: Up to 2 years
Secondary outcomes (4)
All cause complications
Early or Late complications
- asymptomatic hyperamylasemia
- pancreatitis (mild/moderate/severe)
- cholecystitis
- cholangitis
- recurrent jaundice
- Internal migration
- external migration
- occlusion
Measured: Up to 2 years
Cost-effectiveness
Total Cost for SEMS and DLS group
- ERCP cost
- Total ERBD cost (DLS or metal)
- Total hospitalization cost
- Cost for session x No. of session
- Total (DLS vs. metal)cost /session
Measured: Up to 2 years
Mortality
Measured: Up to 2 years
Technical success
- Successful insertion of bilateral or unilateral stent insertion.
- Time to adequate expansion (70% of maximal expanded diameter was dilated state) in metal stent ≤ 24 hrs
- No stent migration within 24 hrs
Measured: within 24 hr after stent insertion
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 May 2010 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2010
- Primary completionJul 2011 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2011 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Bile Duct ObstructionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Soon Chun Hyang University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01125865
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SCH-2010-04
- Status last verified
- May 2010
- First submitted
- 14 May 2010
- Last updated
- 10 Mar 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Tringali A, Mutignani M, Perri V, Zuccala G, Cipolletta L, Bianco MA, Rotondano G, Philipper M, Schumacher B, Neuhaus H, Schmit A, Deviere J, Costamagna G. A prospective, randomized multicenter trial comparing DoubleLayer and polyethylene stents for malignant distal common bile duct strictures. Endoscopy. 2003 Dec;35(12):992-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-44601.
PubMed 14648409Wagner HJ, Knyrim K, Vakil N, Klose KJ. Plastic endoprostheses versus metal stents in the palliative treatment of malignant hilar biliary obstruction. A prospective and randomized trial. Endoscopy. 1993 Mar;25(3):213-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1010295.
PubMed 7686100de Groen PC, Gores GJ, LaRusso NF, Gunderson LL, Nagorney DM. Biliary tract cancers. N Engl J Med. 1999 Oct 28;341(18):1368-78. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199910283411807. No abstract available.
PubMed 10536130Yeoh KG, Zimmerman MJ, Cunningham JT, Cotton PB. Comparative costs of metal versus plastic biliary stent strategies for malignant obstructive jaundice by decision analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999 Apr;49(4 Pt 1):466-71. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(99)70044-1.
PubMed 10202060Chang WH, Kortan P, Haber GB. Outcome in patients with bifurcation tumors who undergo unilateral versus bilateral hepatic duct drainage. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998 May;47(5):354-62. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70218-4.
PubMed 9609426Davids PH, Groen AK, Rauws EA, Tytgat GN, Huibregtse K. Randomised trial of self-expanding metal stents versus polyethylene stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction. Lancet. 1992 Dec 19-26;340(8834-8835):1488-92. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92752-2.
PubMed 1281903Prat F, Chapat O, Ducot B, Ponchon T, Pelletier G, Fritsch J, Choury AD, Buffet C. A randomized trial of endoscopic drainage methods for inoperable malignant strictures of the common bile duct. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998 Jan;47(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70291-3.
PubMed 9468416Cheng JL, Bruno MJ, Bergman JJ, Rauws EA, Tytgat GN, Huibregtse K. Endoscopic palliation of patients with biliary obstruction caused by nonresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma: efficacy of self-expandable metallic Wallstents. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Jul;56(1):33-9. doi: 10.1067/mge.2002.125364.
PubMed 12085032
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Mar 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Uncovered Self-expandable Metal Stent Versus DoubleLayer Plastic Stent for Malignant Hilar Stricture: a Prospective Randomized Multicenter Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01125865
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SCH-2010-04
- Conditions
- Bile Duct Obstruction, Klatskin's Tumor
- Keywords
- Malignant hilar stricture
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Soon Chun Hyang UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2010
- Primary completion
- Jul 2011 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2011 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 May 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The overall median survival of nonresectable malignant hilar obstruction in most series has been less than 6 months. Most patients with malignant hilar obstruction present with advanced disease, making palliative endoscopic drainage the principal therapeutic option. However, the optimal endoscopic management strategy is contentious. Almost all of the published data comparing plastic and metallic stents relate to distal tumors (those of the pancreas, common bile duct and ampulla). Stent patency, complication rates, and cost-effectiveness have favored metallic stents when compared with plastic stents in patients with distal malignant obstruction expected to live at least 3 to 6 months.
There are few comparative study as to whether self-expanding metallic or plastic stent, especially DLS (double layer plastic stent) are preferable in the technical success, stent patency, and cost-effectiveness for palliating malignant hilar obstruction.
The study was designed to compare the the technical success, stent patency, and cost-effectiveness of self-expandable metal stent and DLS in patients with malignant hilar obstruction.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SEMS | Active comparator | Device: SEMS insertionSelf-expandable metallic stent will be inserted for the malignant hilar obstruction. |
| DLS | Active comparator | Device: DLS insertionDoubleLayer plastic stent (Olympus) will be inserted for malignant hilar obstruction. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patient over 18 years old
- Patient with malignant hilar obstruction
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- No written informed consent
- Patient with uncorrectable severe coagulopathy
- Indication for surgical operation
- Karnofsky score < 60%
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SEMS insertionAlso: Bona stent, TaeWoong stentSelf-expandable metallic stent will be inserted for malignant hilar obstruction. | Device | SEMS |
| DLS insertionAlso: Olympus DoubleLayer stentDoubleLayer plastic stent will be inserted for malignant hilar obstruction. | Device | DLS |
Primary outcome
Stent patency
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Interval time (d) from stent insertion to occlusion
4 secondary outcomes
All cause complications
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Cost-effectiveness
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Mortality
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Technical success
Time frame: within 24 hr after stent insertion
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Mar 2011.
- Background: PubMed 14648409Tringali A, Mutignani M, Perri V, Zuccala G, Cipolletta L, Bianco MA, Rotondano G, Philipper M, Schumacher B, Neuhaus H, Schmit A, Deviere J, Costamagna G. A prospective, randomized multicenter trial comparing DoubleLayer and polyethylene stents for malignant distal common bile duct strictures. Endoscopy. 2003 Dec;35(12):992-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-44601.
- Background: PubMed 7686100Wagner HJ, Knyrim K, Vakil N, Klose KJ. Plastic endoprostheses versus metal stents in the palliative treatment of malignant hilar biliary obstruction. A prospective and randomized trial. Endoscopy. 1993 Mar;25(3):213-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1010295.
- Background: PubMed 10536130de Groen PC, Gores GJ, LaRusso NF, Gunderson LL, Nagorney DM. Biliary tract cancers. N Engl J Med. 1999 Oct 28;341(18):1368-78. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199910283411807. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 10202060Yeoh KG, Zimmerman MJ, Cunningham JT, Cotton PB. Comparative costs of metal versus plastic biliary stent strategies for malignant obstructive jaundice by decision analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999 Apr;49(4 Pt 1):466-71. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(99)70044-1.
- Background: PubMed 9609426Chang WH, Kortan P, Haber GB. Outcome in patients with bifurcation tumors who undergo unilateral versus bilateral hepatic duct drainage. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998 May;47(5):354-62. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70218-4.
- Background: PubMed 1281903Davids PH, Groen AK, Rauws EA, Tytgat GN, Huibregtse K. Randomised trial of self-expanding metal stents versus polyethylene stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction. Lancet. 1992 Dec 19-26;340(8834-8835):1488-92. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92752-2.
- Background: PubMed 9468416Prat F, Chapat O, Ducot B, Ponchon T, Pelletier G, Fritsch J, Choury AD, Buffet C. A randomized trial of endoscopic drainage methods for inoperable malignant strictures of the common bile duct. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998 Jan;47(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70291-3.
- Background: PubMed 12085032Cheng JL, Bruno MJ, Bergman JJ, Rauws EA, Tytgat GN, Huibregtse K. Endoscopic palliation of patients with biliary obstruction caused by nonresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma: efficacy of self-expandable metallic Wallstents. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Jul;56(1):33-9. doi: 10.1067/mge.2002.125364.
Related trials for Bile Duct Obstruction
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of Seladelpar and Cilofexor in Participants With Primary Biliary Cholangitis
Primary Biliary Cholangitis
RecruitingObservational study
Determine the Prevalence of Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency (EPI) in Pediatric and Adult Participants With Alagille Syndrome After Liver Transplantation
Exocrine Pancreatic Insuficiency
RecruitingObservational study
A Study of the Effectiveness, Safety and the Long-term Outcomes of Participants With Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis (PFIC) Who Take Odevixibat (Bylvay) in China
Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Odevixibat in Patients With Alagille Syndrome
Alagille Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing SEMS insertion and DLS insertion in people with Bile Duct Obstruction and Klatskin's Tumor, run by Soon Chun Hyang University at 4 sites in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Mar 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Do Hyun Park, MD (+82-2-3010-3180, dhpark@amc.seoul.kr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Stent patency (time frame: Up to 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01125865, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Mar 2011.