Soft Tissue SarcomaPhase 2ESTIM-LBHNCT01136499
Efficacy and Safety Assessment of Oral LBH589 in Adult Patients With Advanced Soft TIssue Sarcoma After Pre-treatment Failure
A Phase 2 study testing LBH589 (Panobinostat®) in people with Soft Tissue Sarcoma, run by Centre Leon Berard at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to assess efficacy and safety of LBH589 - Panobinostat®, a potent HDACi, in patients with advanced STS who experiment disease progression after or during first-line chemotherapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Soft Tissue Sarcoma
- What is being tested?
- LBH589 (Panobinostat®)
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 53 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Jan 2010to Jan 2013
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- Histologically proven advanced metastatic or unresectable soft tissue sarcoma, excluding osteosarcoma.
- Prior treatment with a doxorubicin containing regimen whether in the adjuvant setting or for metastatic/advanced disease. If doxorubicin was given as adjuvant therapy patient may be included if relapse occurs within a year of adjuvant therapy. If relapse occurs more than one year after the completion of adjuvant therapy, the patient must have received one prior regimen for metastatic disease. Patient may have received one or more previous line of therapy. Patients with sex cord tumors may be included after prior treatment with a platinum containing regimen (pretreatment with a doxorubicin containing regimen is not required for this patients subgroup).
- Patient has at least one site of measurable nodal disease at baseline ≥ 2.0 cm in the longest transverse diameter and clearly measurable in at least two perpendicular dimensions, as determined by CT scan (MRI is allowed only if CT scan can not be performed).
- ECOG performance status (PS) ≤ 2.
- Adequate haematological, liver and renal function:
Show all 22Show fewer
- Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) ≥ 1.5 G/L,
- Hemoglobin ≥ 9 g/dL,
- Platelets ≥ 100 G/L,
- Total calcium (corrected for serum albumin) ≥ lower limit of normal (LLN) or correctable with supplements,
- Magnesium ≥ LLN or correctable with supplements,
- Potassium ≥ LLN or correctable with supplements,
- Phosphorus ≥ LLN or correctable with supplements,
- Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) and Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) ≤ 2.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) (or ≤ 5.0 x ULN if liver metastasis are present),
- Serum bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN,
- Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x ULN,
- If the serum creatinine is ≥ 1.5 x ULN, then a 24-hour creatinine clearance must be conducted and the result must be ≥ 50 mL/min.
- Clinical euthyroidy (patients are permitted to receive thyroid hormone supplements to treat underlying hypothyroidism).
- Ability to swallow capsules or tablets.
- Life expectancy ≥ 12 weeks.
- Mandatory affiliation with health security insurance.
- Signed written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Prior treatment with any HDAC or HSP90 inhibitor drug.
- Unresolved toxicities (≥ Grade 1) from prior therapy that would, in the opinion of the investigator, compromise patient safety.
- Any of the following concurrent severe and/or uncontrolled medical conditions which could compromise participation in the study:
- Impaired cardiac function or clinically significant cardiac diseases, including any one of the following:
- Left ventricular systolic function (LVEF) determined by MUGA scan or echocardiogram < center normal value,
- Complete left bundle branch block,
Show all 30Show fewer
- Obligate use of a cardiac pacemaker,
- Congenital long QT syndrome,
- History or presence of ventricular tachyarrhythmia,
- Presence of unstable atrial fibrillation (ventricular response > 100bpm),
- Clinically significant resting bradycardia (< 50 bpm),
- Mean corrected QT interval (QTcF - n ≥ 3) ≥ 450 msec on screening ECG,
- Right bundle branch block + left anterior hemiblock (bifasicular block),
- Angina pectoris ≤ 3 months prior to starting study drug,
- Acute myocardial infarction (MI) ≤ 3 months prior to starting study drug,
- History or presence of acute coronary syndrome,
- Other clinically significant heart disease (e.g.: Congestive heart failure (CHF), uncontrolled hypertension, history of labile hypertension, or history of poor compliance with an antihypertensive regimen),
- Impaired gastrointestinal (GI) function or GI disease that may significantly alter the absorption of LBH589 (e.g.: ulcerative diseases, uncontrolled nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, malabsorption syndrome, or extensive small bowel resection),
- Other concurrent severe and/or uncontrolled medical conditions (e.g.: uncontrolled diabetes, active or uncontrolled infection, chronic obstructive or chronic restrictive pulmonary disease) that could cause unacceptable safety risks or compromise compliance with the protocol.
- Current treatment with any of the medications listed in appendix 04, if the treatment cannot be discontinued or switched to a different medication prior to starting study drug. The medications listed in appendix 04 have a relative risk of prolonging the QT interval, or inducing Torsades de Pointes, or inhibit CYP3A4/5.
- Major surgery ≤ 2 weeks prior starting study drug or who have not recovered from side effects of such therapy.
- History of brain metastases.
- Absence of at least one metastatic lesion greater than or equal to 2cm on pretreatment CT scan or other radiographic imaging as defined in RECIST criteria (appendix 02).
- Systemic treatment with any anti-cancer drug, including any investigational drug that is administered on an intermittent schedule if the last dose has not been administered ≥ 4 weeks ago, or if the patient has not recovered from any ongoing toxicity prior to study enrolment.
- Systemic treatment with any anti-cancer drug, including investigational drug that is administered on a chronic dosing schedule (e.g.: daily dosing, every-other-day dosing, MWF weekly) if ≤ 5 half-lives elapsed since the last dose, or if the patient has not recovered from any ongoing toxicity prior to study enrolment.
- Women who are pregnant or breast feeding.
- Women of childbearing potential (WCBP) are excluded unless they have a negative serum pregnancy test ≤ 48 hours prior starting study treatment. All sexually active WCBP and male patients are excluded unless they agree to use adequate contraceptive methods (injectable or implantable hormonal contraceptive, tubal ligation, intra-uterine device, barrier contraceptive with spermacide, or vasectomized partner) throughout the study. Since the potential of LBH589 to induce CYP3A4 is unknown, patients who are using oral contraceptives should use another effective method of contraception.
- Current immunosuppressive syndrome.
- History of another malignancy that is currently clinically significant or currently requires active intervention.
- Refusal or inability to comply with the protocol or follow the instructions given to them by the clinic staff.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Efficacy and Safety Assessment of Oral LBH589 in Adult Patients With Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma After Pre-treatment Failure: an Open-label, Multicenter Phase II Study
The purpose of this study is to assess efficacy and safety of LBH589 - Panobinostat®, a potent HDACi, in patients with advanced STS who experiment disease progression after or during first-line chemotherapy. The rational is based on the observation of activity of deacetylase inhibitor (DACi) in several pre-clinical models of STS including Synovial sarcoma and Ewing sarcoma.
Read the detailed description
Despite surgical excision and radiation therapy, approximately 50% of patients treated for localised STS will experience local or distant relapse.
Recurrent STS : current therapeutic strategies Although some patients may be salvaged with surgery, chemotherapy using doxorubicin-based regimens is in most cases indicated for patients with recurrent STS. Progression-free survival (PFS) is in most cases less than or equal to 6 months. Most patients die of their disease within 12-15 months following the diagnosis of advanced disease. Doxorubicin is considered as the standard of care in the first line setting for patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic STS. However, only 15-25% of these patients exhibit objective response following this chemotherapy while 30-35% experiment rapid disease progression. Doxorubicin-based combinations have resulted in an inconsistent increase in response rate but no survival advantage versus single-agent doxorubicin. After doxorubicin-based regimens failure, most agents, including other agents approved for the treatment of STS such as dacarbazine, ifosfamide and trabectedin, have shown very low response rates and short PFS. The only approved agent in this setting is trabectedin, which has shown prolonged stabilization in approximately 20% of patients at 6 months in several phase II trials. Gemcitabine-docetaxel combination, although not approved for the treatment of STS has shown interesting response rates in leiomyosarcomas, as well as other STS subtypes . Mechanisms of chemoresistance are poorly understood.
Place of LBH589:
LBH589 is postulated to have activity in sarcomas by being able to arrest gene transcription through the inhibition of HDAC, to cause the misfolding of important proteins for sarcoma biology such as fusion proteins or overexpressed genes (HDM2, cdk4, AKT…) via the disruption of HSP90 functioning . Some mechanisms similar to leukemia-associated fusion proteins, which have been shown to recruit HDAC to repress hematopoietic differentiation, might be involved by some translocation-associated sarcomas. The SYT portion of the synovial sarcoma oncoprotein SYT-SSX interacts with trithorax-group proteins and binds directly to the mSin3A HDAC component. SSX associates with polycomb-group proteins, which involve HDAC activity to mediate transcriptional repression; thus, aberrant epigenetic changes in gene expression seem to be a central effect of the fusion oncoprotein in this disease. HDAC inhibitors have been effective against both synovial sarcoma and Ewing sarcoma in preclinical studies . Evidence has also been presented for growth inhibition and induction of differentiation in clear cell sarcoma (Nielsen TO, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada, unpublished data) and chondrosarcoma by HDACi.
Data from the phase I study involving patients with advanced solid tumors indicate that the MWF every week schedule of LBH589 is pharmacodynamically and clinically active. Histone acetylation was detected in peripheral blood cells for up to 72 hours (the maximum duration between doses on the MWF every week schedule) in 50% of patients at the 20 mg and 30 mg doses and CR and PR were observed in two and three patients respectively, with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Grade 3 fatigue was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in 2 patients treated at the 40 mg level and 1 patient treated at the 60 mg level. The 40 mg level seem to be tolerable and is felt to be the most likely to have activity in solid tumors.
After first-line chemotherapy failure, efficacy of therapeutic alternatives is limited. The purpose of this trial is therefore to investigate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of 40 mg of LBH589 given orally on a twice a week.
- Conditions
- Soft Tissue Sarcoma
- Being tested
- LBH589 (Panobinostat®)
- Keywords
- Sarcoma, Safety, Efficacy, PANOBINOSTAT
- Medical subject headings
- Sarcoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LBH589 (Panobinostat®)Drug
Also called panobinostat
40 mg MWF.
40 mg of LBH589, orally administered on Monday, Wednesday and Friday (MWF) on a weekly schedule, until tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| LBH PANOBINOSTAT | Experimental | 40 mg 3 days per week Receives: Drug: LBH589 (Panobinostat®) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
3 months non progression rate
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
Progression-free survival (PFS)
Measured: 6 months after the end of treatment (18 months after the start of treatment)
Time to progression (TTP)
Measured: 6 months after the end of treatment (18 months after the start of treatment)
best objective response rate
Measured: 6 months after the end of treatment (18 months after the start of treatment)
Safety profile based on incidence, intensity and type of adverse events
clinically significant changes in patients physical examination findings; vital sign measuremments; and clinical laboratory results will be recorded and monitored.
Measured: 6 months after the end of treatment (18 months after the start of treatment)
Plasmatic rate of LBH589
assess steady-state pharmacokinetics of the new formulation of LBH589 versus that one used in phase one studies.
Measured: 6 months after the end of treatment (18 months after the start of treatment)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Jun 2010 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2010
- Primary completionJan 2012
- Study completionJan 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (60)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Soft Tissue SarcomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Centre Leon BerardThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 53 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Leon Berard
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- BLAY PR Jean-Yves, Principal investigator, Centre Léon Berard
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01136499
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ESTIM-LBH
- Other IDs
- 2009-011280-37, 2009
- Acronym
- ESTIM-LBH
- Status last verified
- Feb 2013
- First submitted
- 19 Mar 2010
- Last updated
- 6 Mar 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Herman JG, Latif F, Weng Y, Lerman MI, Zbar B, Liu S, Samid D, Duan DS, Gnarra JR, Linehan WM, et al. Silencing of the VHL tumor-suppressor gene by DNA methylation in renal carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Oct 11;91(21):9700-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.21.9700.
PubMed 7937876Szyf M. DNA methylation properties: consequences for pharmacology. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1994 Jul;15(7):233-8. doi: 10.1016/0165-6147(94)90317-4.
PubMed 7940985Herman JG, Merlo A, Mao L, Lapidus RG, Issa JP, Davidson NE, Sidransky D, Baylin SB. Inactivation of the CDKN2/p16/MTS1 gene is frequently associated with aberrant DNA methylation in all common human cancers. Cancer Res. 1995 Oct 15;55(20):4525-30.
PubMed 7553621Merlo A, Herman JG, Mao L, Lee DJ, Gabrielson E, Burger PC, Baylin SB, Sidransky D. 5' CpG island methylation is associated with transcriptional silencing of the tumour suppressor p16/CDKN2/MTS1 in human cancers. Nat Med. 1995 Jul;1(7):686-92. doi: 10.1038/nm0795-686.
PubMed 7585152Herman JG, Jen J, Merlo A, Baylin SB. Hypermethylation-associated inactivation indicates a tumor suppressor role for p15INK4B. Cancer Res. 1996 Feb 15;56(4):722-7.
PubMed 8631003Herman JG, Umar A, Polyak K, Graff JR, Ahuja N, Issa JP, Markowitz S, Willson JK, Hamilton SR, Kinzler KW, Kane MF, Kolodner RD, Vogelstein B, Kunkel TA, Baylin SB. Incidence and functional consequences of hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation in colorectal carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Jun 9;95(12):6870-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.12.6870.
PubMed 9618505Cameron EE, Baylin SB, Herman JG. p15(INK4B) CpG island methylation in primary acute leukemia is heterogeneous and suggests density as a critical factor for transcriptional silencing. Blood. 1999 Oct 1;94(7):2445-51.
PubMed 10498617Gelmetti V, Zhang J, Fanelli M, Minucci S, Pelicci PG, Lazar MA. Aberrant recruitment of the nuclear receptor corepressor-histone deacetylase complex by the acute myeloid leukemia fusion partner ETO. Mol Cell Biol. 1998 Dec;18(12):7185-91. doi: 10.1128/MCB.18.12.7185.
PubMed 9819405Grignani F, De Matteis S, Nervi C, Tomassoni L, Gelmetti V, Cioce M, Fanelli M, Ruthardt M, Ferrara FF, Zamir I, Seiser C, Grignani F, Lazar MA, Minucci S, Pelicci PG. Fusion proteins of the retinoic acid receptor-alpha recruit histone deacetylase in promyelocytic leukaemia. Nature. 1998 Feb 19;391(6669):815-8. doi: 10.1038/35901.
PubMed 9486655Lin RJ, Nagy L, Inoue S, Shao W, Miller WH Jr, Evans RM. Role of the histone deacetylase complex in acute promyelocytic leukaemia. Nature. 1998 Feb 19;391(6669):811-4. doi: 10.1038/35895.
PubMed 9486654Redner RL, Wang J, Liu JM. Chromatin remodeling and leukemia: new therapeutic paradigms. Blood. 1999 Jul 15;94(2):417-28. No abstract available.
PubMed 10397708Yoshida M, Nomura S, Beppu T. Effects of trichostatins on differentiation of murine erythroleukemia cells. Cancer Res. 1987 Jul 15;47(14):3688-91.
PubMed 2439196Yoshida M, Beppu T. Reversible arrest of proliferation of rat 3Y1 fibroblasts in both the G1 and G2 phases by trichostatin A. Exp Cell Res. 1988 Jul;177(1):122-31. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(88)90030-4.
PubMed 3134246Itazaki H, Nagashima K, Sugita K, Yoshida H, Kawamura Y, Yasuda Y, Matsumoto K, Ishii K, Uotani N, Nakai H, et al. Isolation and structural elucidation of new cyclotetrapeptides, trapoxins A and B, having detransformation activities as antitumor agents. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1990 Dec;43(12):1524-32. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.43.1524.
PubMed 2276972Sugita K, Koizumi K, Yoshida H. Morphological reversion of sis-transformed NIH3T3 cells by trichostatin A. Cancer Res. 1992 Jan 1;52(1):168-72.
PubMed 1727377
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Mar 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy and Safety Assessment of Oral LBH589 in Adult Patients With Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma After Pre-treatment Failure: an Open-label, Multicenter Phase II Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01136499
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ESTIM-LBH / ESTIM-LBH
- Conditions
- Soft Tissue Sarcoma
- Keywords
- Sarcoma, Safety, Efficacy, PANOBINOSTAT
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 53 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Leon BerardUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2010
- Primary completion
- Jan 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Jun 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to assess efficacy and safety of LBH589 - Panobinostat®, a potent HDACi, in patients with advanced STS who experiment disease progression after or during first-line chemotherapy. The rational is based on the observation of activity of deacetylase inhibitor (DACi) in several pre-clinical models of STS including Synovial sarcoma and Ewing sarcoma.
Detailed description
Despite surgical excision and radiation therapy, approximately 50% of patients treated for localised STS will experience local or distant relapse.
Recurrent STS : current therapeutic strategies Although some patients may be salvaged with surgery, chemotherapy using doxorubicin-based regimens is in most cases indicated for patients with recurrent STS. Progression-free survival (PFS) is in most cases less than or equal to 6 months. Most patients die of their disease within 12-15 months following the diagnosis of advanced disease. Doxorubicin is considered as the standard of care in the first line setting for patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic STS. However, only 15-25% of these patients exhibit objective response following this chemotherapy while 30-35% experiment rapid disease progression. Doxorubicin-based combinations have resulted in an inconsistent increase in response rate but no survival advantage versus single-agent doxorubicin. After doxorubicin-based regimens failure, most agents, including other agents approved for the treatment of STS such as dacarbazine, ifosfamide and trabectedin, have shown very low response rates and short PFS. The only approved agent in this setting is trabectedin, which has shown prolonged stabilization in approximately 20% of patients at 6 months in several phase II trials. Gemcitabine-docetaxel combination, although not approved for the treatment of STS has shown interesting response rates in leiomyosarcomas, as well as other STS subtypes . Mechanisms of chemoresistance are poorly understood.
Place of LBH589:
LBH589 is postulated to have activity in sarcomas by being able to arrest gene transcription through the inhibition of HDAC, to cause the misfolding of important proteins for sarcoma biology such as fusion proteins or overexpressed genes (HDM2, cdk4, AKT…) via the disruption of HSP90 functioning . Some mechanisms similar to leukemia-associated fusion proteins, which have been shown to recruit HDAC to repress hematopoietic differentiation, might be involved by some translocation-associated sarcomas. The SYT portion of the synovial sarcoma oncoprotein SYT-SSX interacts with trithorax-group proteins and binds directly to the mSin3A HDAC component. SSX associates with polycomb-group proteins, which involve HDAC activity to mediate transcriptional repression; thus, aberrant epigenetic changes in gene expression seem to be a central effect of the fusion oncoprotein in this disease. HDAC inhibitors have been effective against both synovial sarcoma and Ewing sarcoma in preclinical studies . Evidence has also been presented for growth inhibition and induction of differentiation in clear cell sarcoma (Nielsen TO, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada, unpublished data) and chondrosarcoma by HDACi.
Data from the phase I study involving patients with advanced solid tumors indicate that the MWF every week schedule of LBH589 is pharmacodynamically and clinically active. Histone acetylation was detected in peripheral blood cells for up to 72 hours (the maximum duration between doses on the MWF every week schedule) in 50% of patients at the 20 mg and 30 mg doses and CR and PR were observed in two and three patients respectively, with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Grade 3 fatigue was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in 2 patients treated at the 40 mg level and 1 patient treated at the 60 mg level. The 40 mg level seem to be tolerable and is felt to be the most likely to have activity in solid tumors.
After first-line chemotherapy failure, efficacy of therapeutic alternatives is limited. The purpose of this trial is therefore to investigate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of 40 mg of LBH589 given orally on a twice a week.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| LBH PANOBINOSTAT | Experimental | Drug: LBH589 (Panobinostat®)40 mg 3 days per week |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (22 listed)
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- Histologically proven advanced metastatic or unresectable soft tissue sarcoma, excluding osteosarcoma.
- Prior treatment with a doxorubicin containing regimen whether in the adjuvant setting or for metastatic/advanced disease. If doxorubicin was given as adjuvant therapy patient may be included if relapse occurs within a year of adjuvant therapy. If relapse occurs more than one year after the completion of adjuvant therapy, the patient must have received one prior regimen for metastatic disease. Patient may have received one or more previous line of therapy. Patients with sex cord tumors may be included after prior treatment with a platinum containing regimen (pretreatment with a doxorubicin containing regimen is not required for this patients subgroup).
- Patient has at least one site of measurable nodal disease at baseline ≥ 2.0 cm in the longest transverse diameter and clearly measurable in at least two perpendicular dimensions, as determined by CT scan (MRI is allowed only if CT scan can not be performed).
- ECOG performance status (PS) ≤ 2.
Key exclusion criteria (30 listed)
- Prior treatment with any HDAC or HSP90 inhibitor drug.
- Unresolved toxicities (≥ Grade 1) from prior therapy that would, in the opinion of the investigator, compromise patient safety.
- Any of the following concurrent severe and/or uncontrolled medical conditions which could compromise participation in the study:
- Current treatment with any of the medications listed in appendix 04, if the treatment cannot be discontinued or switched to a different medication prior to starting study drug. The medications listed in appendix 04 have a relative risk of prolonging the QT interval, or inducing Torsades de Pointes, or inhibit CYP3A4/5.
- Major surgery ≤ 2 weeks prior starting study drug or who have not recovered from side effects of such therapy.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LBH589 (Panobinostat®)Also: panobinostat40 mg MWF. 40 mg of LBH589, orally administered on Monday, Wednesday and Friday (MWF) on a weekly schedule, until tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity. | Drug | LBH PANOBINOSTAT |
Primary outcome
3 months non progression rate
Time frame: 3 months
5 secondary outcomes
Progression-free survival (PFS)
Time frame: 6 months after the end of treatment (18 months after the start of treatment)
Time to progression (TTP)
Time frame: 6 months after the end of treatment (18 months after the start of treatment)
best objective response rate
Time frame: 6 months after the end of treatment (18 months after the start of treatment)
Safety profile based on incidence, intensity and type of adverse events
Time frame: 6 months after the end of treatment (18 months after the start of treatment)
Plasmatic rate of LBH589
Time frame: 6 months after the end of treatment (18 months after the start of treatment)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Mar 2013.
- Background: PubMed 7937876Herman JG, Latif F, Weng Y, Lerman MI, Zbar B, Liu S, Samid D, Duan DS, Gnarra JR, Linehan WM, et al. Silencing of the VHL tumor-suppressor gene by DNA methylation in renal carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Oct 11;91(21):9700-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.21.9700.
- Background: PubMed 7940985Szyf M. DNA methylation properties: consequences for pharmacology. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1994 Jul;15(7):233-8. doi: 10.1016/0165-6147(94)90317-4.
- Background: PubMed 7553621Herman JG, Merlo A, Mao L, Lapidus RG, Issa JP, Davidson NE, Sidransky D, Baylin SB. Inactivation of the CDKN2/p16/MTS1 gene is frequently associated with aberrant DNA methylation in all common human cancers. Cancer Res. 1995 Oct 15;55(20):4525-30.
- Background: PubMed 7585152Merlo A, Herman JG, Mao L, Lee DJ, Gabrielson E, Burger PC, Baylin SB, Sidransky D. 5' CpG island methylation is associated with transcriptional silencing of the tumour suppressor p16/CDKN2/MTS1 in human cancers. Nat Med. 1995 Jul;1(7):686-92. doi: 10.1038/nm0795-686.
- Background: PubMed 8631003Herman JG, Jen J, Merlo A, Baylin SB. Hypermethylation-associated inactivation indicates a tumor suppressor role for p15INK4B. Cancer Res. 1996 Feb 15;56(4):722-7.
- Background: PubMed 9618505Herman JG, Umar A, Polyak K, Graff JR, Ahuja N, Issa JP, Markowitz S, Willson JK, Hamilton SR, Kinzler KW, Kane MF, Kolodner RD, Vogelstein B, Kunkel TA, Baylin SB. Incidence and functional consequences of hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation in colorectal carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Jun 9;95(12):6870-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.12.6870.
- Background: PubMed 10498617Cameron EE, Baylin SB, Herman JG. p15(INK4B) CpG island methylation in primary acute leukemia is heterogeneous and suggests density as a critical factor for transcriptional silencing. Blood. 1999 Oct 1;94(7):2445-51.
- Background: PubMed 9819405Gelmetti V, Zhang J, Fanelli M, Minucci S, Pelicci PG, Lazar MA. Aberrant recruitment of the nuclear receptor corepressor-histone deacetylase complex by the acute myeloid leukemia fusion partner ETO. Mol Cell Biol. 1998 Dec;18(12):7185-91. doi: 10.1128/MCB.18.12.7185.
- Background: PubMed 9486655Grignani F, De Matteis S, Nervi C, Tomassoni L, Gelmetti V, Cioce M, Fanelli M, Ruthardt M, Ferrara FF, Zamir I, Seiser C, Grignani F, Lazar MA, Minucci S, Pelicci PG. Fusion proteins of the retinoic acid receptor-alpha recruit histone deacetylase in promyelocytic leukaemia. Nature. 1998 Feb 19;391(6669):815-8. doi: 10.1038/35901.
- Background: PubMed 9486654Lin RJ, Nagy L, Inoue S, Shao W, Miller WH Jr, Evans RM. Role of the histone deacetylase complex in acute promyelocytic leukaemia. Nature. 1998 Feb 19;391(6669):811-4. doi: 10.1038/35895.
- Background: PubMed 10397708Redner RL, Wang J, Liu JM. Chromatin remodeling and leukemia: new therapeutic paradigms. Blood. 1999 Jul 15;94(2):417-28. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 2439196Yoshida M, Nomura S, Beppu T. Effects of trichostatins on differentiation of murine erythroleukemia cells. Cancer Res. 1987 Jul 15;47(14):3688-91.
Related trials for Soft Tissue Sarcoma
RecruitingPhase 2
A Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial Evaluating 68Ga-HX01 Injection for PET/CT Imaging
Soft Tissue Sarcoma
RecruitingPhase 3
Measuring if Immunotherapy Plus Chemotherapy is Better Than Chemotherapy Alone for Patients With Aggressive Poorly Differentiated Sarcomas
Metastatic Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma, Metastatic Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Dose Escalation and Dose Expansion Study of MDX2003 in Patients With Different Types of Lymphoma
Lymphoma, Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM)
Enrolling by invitationPhase 1
Evaluation of the I-phase Clinical Trial of 177Lu-HX02 Injection in Patients With Advanced Malignant Solid Tumors
Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
BLAY PR Jean-Yves principal investigator
Centre Léon Berard
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing LBH589 (Panobinostat®) in people with Soft Tissue Sarcoma, run by Centre Leon Berard at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 22 inclusion and 30 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Mar 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
3 months non progression rate (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01136499, which also lists 60 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Mar 2013.