AzTrials
AzTrials

Colonoscopy PreparationPhase 4NCT01140295

Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy in Children

A Phase 4 study testing polyethylene glycol, senna in people with Colonoscopy Preparation, run by Children's Hospital of Philadelphia at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of this study is to determine whether Miralax results in a more efficacious preparation as compared to senna for pediatric colonoscopy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 to 21 years
Conditions the study is for
Colonoscopy Preparation
What is being tested?
polyethylene glycol, senna
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
33 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Sep 2010to May 2011
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 to 21 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects age 6-21 yrs for senna, PEG-P groups
  • Subjects age 13-21 yrs for NaP group
  • First time colonoscopy
  • Patient weight <70 kg for PEG-P group (to not exceed 51 grams/dose)

Who cannot join

  • Chronic renal, liver, or heart failure
  • Chronic constipation
  • Patients on the GI inpatient or consult service.
  • Subjects taking senna or PEG on a regular basis for laxative reasons.
  • Pregnant or lactating females

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Polyethylene Glycol Powder Solution vs Senna for Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy in Children: A Prospective, Randomized, Investigator-Blinded Trial.

The primary objective of this study is to determine whether Miralax results in a more efficacious preparation as compared to senna for pediatric colonoscopy.

Read the detailed description

Study subjects will be randomized in two groups: Group one will receive 1.5 g/kg of Miralax orally the day before procedure and one day of clear liquid diet, while subjects in Group 2 will receive two doses of senna the day before procedure with two days of liquid diet (one day full liquid and one day clear liquid diet). On the day of the procedure parents/subjects will complete a questionnaire regarding prep compliance and adverse events. Electrolytes will be obtained prior to colonoscopy to monitor for electrolyte imbalance. Endoscopists will assess preparation for colonoscopy using validated cleanliness scale (Aronchick scale).

Being tested
polyethylene glycol, senna
Keywords
Preparation, Pediatric, Colonoscopy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • polyethylene glycol, sennaDrug

    Also called Miralax, Senna

    Senna dosage: Age 6-12 years: 3 teaspoons or 3 tablets by mouth 2 nights before endoscopy and 1 night before endoscopy. Age >12 years: 6 teaspoons or 6 tablets by mouth 2 nights before endoscopy and 1 night before endoscopy. A Fleet's rectal enema is administered on the morning of the procedure.

    Miralax at a dose of 1.5 grams/kg divided twice a day for two days; maximum of 51 grams per dose. Dissolve each 17 grams (1 capful) PEG-P in 240 mL water or other beverage according to the manufacturer's direction and to give the appropriate amount of PEG solution twice a day for two days.

Study groups in NCT01140295
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1, MiralaxActive comparatorMiralax colonoscopy preparation
Receives: Drug: polyethylene glycol, senna
2, sennaActive comparatorSenna colonoscopy preparation
Receives: Drug: polyethylene glycol, senna

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Efficacy of Colon Preparation

    Percentage of patients with excellent or good colonoscopy preparation. The efficacy of preparation is measured by using a validated colon cleanliness scale which has 5 different levels (Aronchik scale). Levels 1 and 2, which encompass excellent and good colonoscopy preparation, are routinely recognized as adequate preparation allowing for successful completion of colonoscopy. Levels 3-5 describe incomplete or poor preparation. These levels are associated with significant residual stool encountered at the time of colonoscopy.

    Measured: The outcome measure will be assessed once one day after the completion of colonoscopy preparation

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Proportion of Patients With Abnormal Electrolyte Levels

    The outcome measure was comparison of the proportions of patients who had abnormal electrolyte levels between two groups of patients, Miralax and senna.

    Sodium, potassium, chloride, and carbon dioxide levels were measured in mmol/L while urea nitrogen, creatinine, glucose, calcium, magnesium, and phosphorus were measured in mg/dL. Each of these values has a reference range which varies with patients' age and sex. Minimal change of one point above or below normal reference range was dismissed as clinically insignificant. Abnormal creatinine levels were rechecked through glomerular filtration rate calculation to determine if there was any compromise in renal function since abnormal creatinine level does not mean there is renal dysfunction nor that the level is clinically significant.

    Measured: The outcome measure will be assessed once one day after the completion of colonoscopy preparation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Jun 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2010
  3. Primary completionMay 2011
  4. Study completionMay 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
33 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01140295
Sponsor's protocol ID
2006-10-5004
Status last verified
Apr 2013
First submitted
1 Jun 2010
Last updated
12 Apr 2013
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Terry NA, Chen-Lim ML, Ely E, Jatla M, Ciavardone D, Esch S, Farace L, Jannelli F, Puma A, Carlow D, Mamula P. Polyethylene glycol powder solution versus senna for bowel preparation for colonoscopy in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013 Feb;56(2):215-9. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3182633d0a.

    PubMed 22699838

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing polyethylene glycol, senna in people with Colonoscopy Preparation, run by Children's Hospital of Philadelphia at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Apr 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 Apr 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Efficacy of Colon Preparation (time frame: The outcome measure will be assessed once one day after the completion of colonoscopy preparation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01140295, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Apr 2013.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in