Pulmonary TuberculosisPhase 3NCT01154959
Latency in Pulmonary Tuberculosis
A Phase 3 study testing Moxifloxacin, Isoniazid, Rifampicin Pyrazinamide, Ethambutol in people with Pulmonary Tuberculosis, run by Tuberculosis Research Centre, India at 1 site in India.
Trial summary
The immune responses in latent tuberculosis are poorly understood. While it is difficult to define the onset of latency during natural infection, patients undergoing treatment for tuberculosis are driven into a state of latency or cure. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pulmonary Tuberculosis
- What is being tested?
- Moxifloxacin, Isoniazid, Rifampicin Pyrazinamide, Ethambutol
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIndia
- Study dates
- Feb 2010to Jul 2016
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18 years and above
- Residing in or around Chennai or Madurai
- No anti-TB treatment in the past or should have had less than one month of treatment (but less than one week in the preceding one month before enrollment in the study)
- At least two sputum smears should be positive for tubercle bacilli by fluorescent microscopy
- Express willingness to attend the treatment centre for supervised treatment
- Express willingness for home visits by the staff of the centre
- Express willingness to give written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Body weight less than 30 kg
- Hepatic or renal disease as evidenced by clinical or biochemical abnormalities
- Diabetes mellitus
- A history of seizure or loss of consciousness
- Psychiatric illness
- An abnormal electrocardiogram or anti-arrhythmic medication
Show all 10Show fewer
- Those in a moribund state
- Sero-positive for HIV antibodies
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Visual disorders other than refractory error
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Characterization of Immune Responses in Treatment-induced Latency in Pulmonary Tuberculosis
The immune responses in latent tuberculosis are poorly understood. While it is difficult to define the onset of latency during natural infection, patients undergoing treatment for tuberculosis are driven into a state of latency or cure. The present study on the effect of 3 and 4 month regimens containing moxifloxacin in sputum smear and culture positive pulmonary tuberculosis (TRC Study number 24) offers us the opportunity to study definitive immune responses pre and post treatment. We will evaluate a variety of innate and adaptive immune responses in patients before and after treatment and our study will compare the differences in immuno-phenotype (eg. Markers of T, B and NK cell activation, proliferation and regulatory phenotype) and function (eg. Production of cytokines, proliferative responses to TB antigens) at different time points following treatment. In addition, since a small percentage of patients will undergo relapse following treatment, the kinetics of immune responses in these patients will used to assess immunological predictors of relapse in tuberculosis.
Read the detailed description
Although Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infects approximately 2 billion people worldwide, 90% of Mtb infected individuals are able to resist overt disease (active tuberculosis) development and manifest only latent infection. Latent tuberculosis (TB) is defined as the persistent presence of live Mtb within an infected host without causing disease. It is characterized by a delayed type hypersensitivity response to purified protein derivative (PPD) mediated by mycobacteria specific T cells. During latency, Mtb is contained in localized granulomas where the mycobacteria reside in macrophages and in which growth and replication appears to be constrained. Maintenance of the granulomatous lesion is mediated by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Based on murine models, immunity to Mtb requires Th1 responses and (to a lesser extent) Th17 responses. Thus, IL 12, IFN gamma, and TNF alpha (and IL 17 and IL 23) all play important roles in induction and maintenance of protective immune responses against tuberculous disease. Although CD4+ T lymphocytes of Th1 type are critical for protective immunity, evidence exists that CD8+ T cells as well as unconventional T cells (gamma-delta T cells and CD 1 restricted T cells) contribute to optimum protection in susceptible animal models. Aside from producing cytokines that activate macrophages and initiate granuloma formation, T cells also have direct mycobactericidal activities through the concerted actions of perforins and granulysins.
T cell differentiation into Th1 and Th2 lineages based on their cytokine profile and transcription factor expression has served as the basis of our understanding the pathogenesis of a variety of infectious and allergic diseases. With the advent of newer techniques, T cell differentiation has expanded into several subsets, including Tregs, Th17 cells, and polyfunctional T cells, among others. Th1 cells are absolutely essential for resistance to TB both in mice and humans. Deficiencies in the IL 12 IFN gamma Stat1 pathway leads to disseminated mycobacterial infection in humans and to abrogation of resistance in mice. In addition, TNF alpha, another Th1 cytokine, is of almost equal importance, as treatment with biologics (e.g., anti TNF alpha antibodies) for inflammatory disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis has caused reactivation of TB in some individuals.
Latent TB can be maintained for the lifetime of the individual unless the immunological balance between the host and the pathogen is perturbed, resulting in reactivation of Mtb and active disease. The host and environmental factors involved in compromising the ability to contain latent infection are human immunodeficiency virus co infection, malnutrition, aging, stress, Type 2 diabetes, use of immunosuppressive agents, and other genetic factors. On the pathogen side, latency is thought to reflect a transition from replicating to nonreplicating dormant bacilli, with this transition being influenced by a variety of factors including oxygen deprivation and nitric oxide. The use of in vitro and in vivo models of latency combined with genome wide transcriptome profiling has led to the identification of Mtb genes highly expressed during latency called dosR or devR (dormancy) genes; however, each of the host and pathogen related factors controlling resistance and/or susceptibility to TB awaits complete elucidation.
The subsets of CD4+ T cells constitute an ever expanding repertoire, classified by their discrete cytokine profiles and often by expression of prototypical transcription factors and/or cell surface molecules. Two relatively newly emerging CD4+ T cell subsets of importance are Th17 cells, characterized by production of IL 17 family of cytokines, and regulatory T cells (Tregs), characterized by surface expression of CD25 and the transcription factor FoxP3. Little is known about the role of these two subsets in latent TB. The mechanism by which Mtb subverts immune responses to establish chronic, latent infection is also not well understood. Recently, a number of regulatory factors, including Tregs, IL 10, TGF-beta, CTLA 4, and PD 1, have been implicated in the establishment of chronic viral, bacterial, and parasitic infections.
The role of T, B and NK cells in the evolution of the immune response following therapy in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection has to be elucidated. The development of cellular immune responses in TB-infected patients post-chemotherapy to delineate the cellular arms of immunity in response to crude and defined TB antigens in treated patients needs to be studied.
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Tuberculosis
- Being tested
- Moxifloxacin, Isoniazid, Rifampicin Pyrazinamide, Ethambutol
- Keywords
- Pulmonary TB, Immune response, ATT, Immune responses in pulmonary tuberculosis, Predictors for relapse
- Medical subject headings
- Tuberculosis, Pulmonary
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Moxifloxacin, Isoniazid, Rifampicin Pyrazinamide, EthambutolDrug
Moxifloxacin (400mg), Isoniazid (300mg daily, 600mg thrice weekly), Rifampicin (450mg, and 600mg for patients weighing 60kg or more), Pyrazinamide (1500mg), Ethambutol (800mg)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Regimen 1 | Experimental | Rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, ethambutol and moxifloxacin daily for 3 months (3RHZEM) Receives: Drug: Moxifloxacin, Isoniazid, Rifampicin Pyrazinamide, Ethambutol |
| Regimen 2 | Experimental | Rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, ethambutol and moxifloxacin daily for 2 months followed by rifampicin, isoniazid, and moxifloxacin daily for 2 months (2 RHZEM daily / 2 RHM daily) Receives: Drug: Moxifloxacin, Isoniazid, Rifampicin Pyrazinamide, Ethambutol |
| Regimen 3 | Experimental | Rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, ethambutol and moxifloxacin daily for 2 months followed by rifampicin, isoniazid, and moxifloxacin thrice weekly for 2 months (2 RHZEM daily / 2RHM thrice weekly) Receives: Drug: Moxifloxacin, Isoniazid, Rifampicin Pyrazinamide, Ethambutol |
| Regimen 4 | Experimental | Rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, ethambutol and moxifloxacin daily for 2 months followed by rifampicin, isoniazid, ethambutol and moxifloxacin thrice weekly for 2 months (2 RHZEM daily / 2 RHEM thrice weekly) Receives: Drug: Moxifloxacin, Isoniazid, Rifampicin Pyrazinamide, Ethambutol |
| Control Regimen | Active comparator | Rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide and ethambutol thrice weekly for 2 months followed by rifampicin and isoniazid thrice weekly for 4 months (2 RHZE thrice weekly / 4 RH thrice weekly) Receives: Drug: Moxifloxacin, Isoniazid, Rifampicin Pyrazinamide, Ethambutol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The immune response to crude antigens - PPD and CFA and defined antigens - ESAT-6 and CFP-10 as well as positive controls- SEB and anti-CD3.
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
Determining the correlation of increase in regulatory factors with the development of relapse in treated TB patients.
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Jul 2010 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2010
- Primary completionDec 2015
- Study completionJul 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (20)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pulmonary TuberculosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Tuberculosis Research Centre, India
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Collaborators
- National Institutes of Health (NIH)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr. S. Subash Babu, Tuberculosis Research Centre, India
- Investigators
- Subash Babu, MBBS, PhD, Principal investigator, Tuberculosis Research Centre, India
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01154959
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LTB01
- Status last verified
- Apr 2021
- First submitted
- 30 Jun 2010
- Last updated
- 19 Apr 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Comstock GW, Livesay VT, Woolpert SF. The prognosis of a positive tuberculin reaction in childhood and adolescence. Am J Epidemiol. 1974 Feb;99(2):131-8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a121593. No abstract available.
PubMed 4810628Lillebaek T, Dirksen A, Baess I, Strunge B, Thomsen VO, Andersen AB. Molecular evidence of endogenous reactivation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis after 33 years of latent infection. J Infect Dis. 2002 Feb 1;185(3):401-4. doi: 10.1086/338342. Epub 2002 Jan 17.
PubMed 11807725Wayne LG, Sohaskey CD. Nonreplicating persistence of mycobacterium tuberculosis. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2001;55:139-63. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.139.
PubMed 11544352EDWARDS PQ, EDWADS LB. Story of the tuberculin test from an epidemiologic viewpoint. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1960 Jan;81(1)Pt 2:1-47. No abstract available.
PubMed 13819440Kaufmann SH. How can immunology contribute to the control of tuberculosis? Nat Rev Immunol. 2001 Oct;1(1):20-30. doi: 10.1038/35095558.
PubMed 11905811Lin MY, Ottenhoff TH. Not to wake a sleeping giant: new insights into host-pathogen interactions identify new targets for vaccination against latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Biol Chem. 2008 May;389(5):497-511. doi: 10.1515/bc.2008.057.
PubMed 18953716Ulrichs T, Kaufmann SH. New insights into the function of granulomas in human tuberculosis. J Pathol. 2006 Jan;208(2):261-9. doi: 10.1002/path.1906.
PubMed 16362982Khader SA, Cooper AM. IL-23 and IL-17 in tuberculosis. Cytokine. 2008 Feb;41(2):79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2007.11.022. Epub 2008 Jan 22.
PubMed 18218322North RJ, Jung YJ. Immunity to tuberculosis. Annu Rev Immunol. 2004;22:599-623. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.22.012703.104635.
PubMed 15032590Locht C, Rouanet C, Hougardy JM, Mascart F. How a different look at latency can help to develop novel diagnostics and vaccines against tuberculosis. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2007 Nov;7(11):1665-77. doi: 10.1517/14712598.7.11.1665.
PubMed 17961090Murphy KM, Reiner SL. The lineage decisions of helper T cells. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002 Dec;2(12):933-44. doi: 10.1038/nri954.
PubMed 12461566Dong C. TH17 cells in development: an updated view of their molecular identity and genetic programming. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008 May;8(5):337-48. doi: 10.1038/nri2295.
PubMed 18408735McGeachy MJ, Cua DJ. Th17 cell differentiation: the long and winding road. Immunity. 2008 Apr;28(4):445-53. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.03.001.
PubMed 18400187Weaver CT, Hatton RD, Mangan PR, Harrington LE. IL-17 family cytokines and the expanding diversity of effector T cell lineages. Annu Rev Immunol. 2007;25:821-52. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141557.
PubMed 17201677Fontenot JD, Rudensky AY. Molecular aspects of regulatory T cell development. Semin Immunol. 2004 Apr;16(2):73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2003.12.002.
PubMed 15036230
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Apr 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Characterization of Immune Responses in Treatment-induced Latency in Pulmonary Tuberculosis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01154959
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LTB01
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Tuberculosis
- Keywords
- Pulmonary TB, Immune response, ATT, Immune responses in pulmonary tuberculosis, Predictors for relapse
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Tuberculosis Research Centre, IndiaOther government
- Collaborators
- National Institutes of Health (NIH)
- Study start
- Feb 2010
- Primary completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Jul 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The immune responses in latent tuberculosis are poorly understood. While it is difficult to define the onset of latency during natural infection, patients undergoing treatment for tuberculosis are driven into a state of latency or cure. The present study on the effect of 3 and 4 month regimens containing moxifloxacin in sputum smear and culture positive pulmonary tuberculosis (TRC Study number 24) offers us the opportunity to study definitive immune responses pre and post treatment. We will evaluate a variety of innate and adaptive immune responses in patients before and after treatment and our study will compare the differences in immuno-phenotype (eg. Markers of T, B and NK cell activation, proliferation and regulatory phenotype) and function (eg. Production of cytokines, proliferative responses to TB antigens) at different time points following treatment. In addition, since a small percentage of patients will undergo relapse following treatment, the kinetics of immune responses in these patients will used to assess immunological predictors of relapse in tuberculosis.
Detailed description
Although Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infects approximately 2 billion people worldwide, 90% of Mtb infected individuals are able to resist overt disease (active tuberculosis) development and manifest only latent infection. Latent tuberculosis (TB) is defined as the persistent presence of live Mtb within an infected host without causing disease. It is characterized by a delayed type hypersensitivity response to purified protein derivative (PPD) mediated by mycobacteria specific T cells. During latency, Mtb is contained in localized granulomas where the mycobacteria reside in macrophages and in which growth and replication appears to be constrained. Maintenance of the granulomatous lesion is mediated by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Based on murine models, immunity to Mtb requires Th1 responses and (to a lesser extent) Th17 responses. Thus, IL 12, IFN gamma, and TNF alpha (and IL 17 and IL 23) all play important roles in induction and maintenance of protective immune responses against tuberculous disease. Although CD4+ T lymphocytes of Th1 type are critical for protective immunity, evidence exists that CD8+ T cells as well as unconventional T cells (gamma-delta T cells and CD 1 restricted T cells) contribute to optimum protection in susceptible animal models. Aside from producing cytokines that activate macrophages and initiate granuloma formation, T cells also have direct mycobactericidal activities through the concerted actions of perforins and granulysins.
T cell differentiation into Th1 and Th2 lineages based on their cytokine profile and transcription factor expression has served as the basis of our understanding the pathogenesis of a variety of infectious and allergic diseases. With the advent of newer techniques, T cell differentiation has expanded into several subsets, including Tregs, Th17 cells, and polyfunctional T cells, among others. Th1 cells are absolutely essential for resistance to TB both in mice and humans. Deficiencies in the IL 12 IFN gamma Stat1 pathway leads to disseminated mycobacterial infection in humans and to abrogation of resistance in mice. In addition, TNF alpha, another Th1 cytokine, is of almost equal importance, as treatment with biologics (e.g., anti TNF alpha antibodies) for inflammatory disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis has caused reactivation of TB in some individuals.
Latent TB can be maintained for the lifetime of the individual unless the immunological balance between the host and the pathogen is perturbed, resulting in reactivation of Mtb and active disease. The host and environmental factors involved in compromising the ability to contain latent infection are human immunodeficiency virus co infection, malnutrition, aging, stress, Type 2 diabetes, use of immunosuppressive agents, and other genetic factors. On the pathogen side, latency is thought to reflect a transition from replicating to nonreplicating dormant bacilli, with this transition being influenced by a variety of factors including oxygen deprivation and nitric oxide. The use of in vitro and in vivo models of latency combined with genome wide transcriptome profiling has led to the identification of Mtb genes highly expressed during latency called dosR or devR (dormancy) genes; however, each of the host and pathogen related factors controlling resistance and/or susceptibility to TB awaits complete elucidation.
The subsets of CD4+ T cells constitute an ever expanding repertoire, classified by their discrete cytokine profiles and often by expression of prototypical transcription factors and/or cell surface molecules. Two relatively newly emerging CD4+ T cell subsets of importance are Th17 cells, characterized by production of IL 17 family of cytokines, and regulatory T cells (Tregs), characterized by surface expression of CD25 and the transcription factor FoxP3. Little is known about the role of these two subsets in latent TB. The mechanism by which Mtb subverts immune responses to establish chronic, latent infection is also not well understood. Recently, a number of regulatory factors, including Tregs, IL 10, TGF-beta, CTLA 4, and PD 1, have been implicated in the establishment of chronic viral, bacterial, and parasitic infections.
The role of T, B and NK cells in the evolution of the immune response following therapy in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection has to be elucidated. The development of cellular immune responses in TB-infected patients post-chemotherapy to delineate the cellular arms of immunity in response to crude and defined TB antigens in treated patients needs to be studied.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 5
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Regimen 1 | Experimental | Drug: Moxifloxacin, Isoniazid, Rifampicin Pyrazinamide, EthambutolRifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, ethambutol and moxifloxacin daily for 3 months (3RHZEM) |
| Regimen 2 | Experimental | Drug: Moxifloxacin, Isoniazid, Rifampicin Pyrazinamide, EthambutolRifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, ethambutol and moxifloxacin daily for 2 months followed by rifampicin, isoniazid, and moxifloxacin daily for 2 months (2 RHZEM daily / 2 RHM daily) |
| Regimen 3 | Experimental | Drug: Moxifloxacin, Isoniazid, Rifampicin Pyrazinamide, EthambutolRifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, ethambutol and moxifloxacin daily for 2 months followed by rifampicin, isoniazid, and moxifloxacin thrice weekly for 2 months (2 RHZEM daily / 2RHM thrice weekly) |
| Regimen 4 | Experimental | Drug: Moxifloxacin, Isoniazid, Rifampicin Pyrazinamide, EthambutolRifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, ethambutol and moxifloxacin daily for 2 months followed by rifampicin, isoniazid, ethambutol and moxifloxacin thrice weekly for 2 months (2 RHZEM daily / 2 RHEM thrice weekly) |
| Control Regimen | Active comparator | Drug: Moxifloxacin, Isoniazid, Rifampicin Pyrazinamide, EthambutolRifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide and ethambutol thrice weekly for 2 months followed by rifampicin and isoniazid thrice weekly for 4 months (2 RHZE thrice weekly / 4 RH thrice weekly) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Age 18 years and above
- Residing in or around Chennai or Madurai
- No anti-TB treatment in the past or should have had less than one month of treatment (but less than one week in the preceding one month before enrollment in the study)
- At least two sputum smears should be positive for tubercle bacilli by fluorescent microscopy
- Express willingness to attend the treatment centre for supervised treatment
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Body weight less than 30 kg
- Hepatic or renal disease as evidenced by clinical or biochemical abnormalities
- Diabetes mellitus
- A history of seizure or loss of consciousness
- Psychiatric illness
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Moxifloxacin, Isoniazid, Rifampicin Pyrazinamide, EthambutolMoxifloxacin (400mg), Isoniazid (300mg daily, 600mg thrice weekly), Rifampicin (450mg, and 600mg for patients weighing 60kg or more), Pyrazinamide (1500mg), Ethambutol (800mg) | Drug | Control Regimen, Regimen 1, Regimen 2, Regimen 3, Regimen 4 |
Primary outcome
The immune response to crude antigens - PPD and CFA and defined antigens - ESAT-6 and CFP-10 as well as positive controls- SEB and anti-CD3.
Time frame: 2 years
1 secondary outcome
Determining the correlation of increase in regulatory factors with the development of relapse in treated TB patients.
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Apr 2021.
- Background: PubMed 4810628Comstock GW, Livesay VT, Woolpert SF. The prognosis of a positive tuberculin reaction in childhood and adolescence. Am J Epidemiol. 1974 Feb;99(2):131-8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a121593. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 11807725Lillebaek T, Dirksen A, Baess I, Strunge B, Thomsen VO, Andersen AB. Molecular evidence of endogenous reactivation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis after 33 years of latent infection. J Infect Dis. 2002 Feb 1;185(3):401-4. doi: 10.1086/338342. Epub 2002 Jan 17.
- Background: PubMed 11544352Wayne LG, Sohaskey CD. Nonreplicating persistence of mycobacterium tuberculosis. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2001;55:139-63. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.139.
- Background: PubMed 13819440EDWARDS PQ, EDWADS LB. Story of the tuberculin test from an epidemiologic viewpoint. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1960 Jan;81(1)Pt 2:1-47. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 11905811Kaufmann SH. How can immunology contribute to the control of tuberculosis? Nat Rev Immunol. 2001 Oct;1(1):20-30. doi: 10.1038/35095558.
- Background: PubMed 18953716Lin MY, Ottenhoff TH. Not to wake a sleeping giant: new insights into host-pathogen interactions identify new targets for vaccination against latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Biol Chem. 2008 May;389(5):497-511. doi: 10.1515/bc.2008.057.
- Background: PubMed 16362982Ulrichs T, Kaufmann SH. New insights into the function of granulomas in human tuberculosis. J Pathol. 2006 Jan;208(2):261-9. doi: 10.1002/path.1906.
- Background: PubMed 18218322Khader SA, Cooper AM. IL-23 and IL-17 in tuberculosis. Cytokine. 2008 Feb;41(2):79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2007.11.022. Epub 2008 Jan 22.
- Background: PubMed 15032590North RJ, Jung YJ. Immunity to tuberculosis. Annu Rev Immunol. 2004;22:599-623. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.22.012703.104635.
- Background: PubMed 17961090Locht C, Rouanet C, Hougardy JM, Mascart F. How a different look at latency can help to develop novel diagnostics and vaccines against tuberculosis. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2007 Nov;7(11):1665-77. doi: 10.1517/14712598.7.11.1665.
- Background: PubMed 12461566Murphy KM, Reiner SL. The lineage decisions of helper T cells. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002 Dec;2(12):933-44. doi: 10.1038/nri954.
- Background: PubMed 18408735Dong C. TH17 cells in development: an updated view of their molecular identity and genetic programming. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008 May;8(5):337-48. doi: 10.1038/nri2295.
Related trials for Pulmonary Tuberculosis
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Quabodepistat-containing Regimens for the Treatment of Drug-resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis
Rifampicin-Resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis
RecruitingPhase 2
BRIGHT-Child TB: Short-Course Treatment for Non-Severe Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Children
Tuberculosis
Recruiting
Channa Striata and Curcuma Domestica Supplementation in Patients With Active Pulmonary Tuberculosis
Pulmonary Tuberculosis
RecruitingPhase 2
Trial of Novel Regimens for the Treatment of Pulmonary Tuberculosis
Pulmonary Tuberculosis
RecruitingPhase 2
Platform Assessing Regimens and Durations In a Global Multisite Consortium for TB
Pulmonary Tuberculosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Subash Babu, MBBS, PhD principal investigator
Tuberculosis Research Centre, India
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Moxifloxacin, Isoniazid, Rifampicin Pyrazinamide, Ethambutol in people with Pulmonary Tuberculosis, run by Tuberculosis Research Centre, India at 1 site in India.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The immune response to crude antigens - PPD and CFA and defined antigens - ESAT-6 and CFP-10 as well as positive controls- SEB and anti-CD3. (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01154959, which also lists 20 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Apr 2021; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 2 Nov 2026.