AzTrials
AzTrials

Heart FailureNCT01166360

The Usefulness of Growth Differentiation Factor 15 (GDF-15) for Risk Stratification in Cardiac Surgery

An observational study of Heart Failure and Coronary Artery Disease, run by University of Luebeck at 1 site in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Growth determination factor 15 (GDF-15) and high sensitive troponin-t (hsTnT) are emerging humoral markers for risk stratification in clinically stable heart failure patients and in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease
How many people
2,000 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
Jan 2008to Dec 2010
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Consecutive patients undergoing primary cardiac surgery at a University hospital.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients scheduled for cardiac surgery

Who cannot join

  • Withdrawal of informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Germany1 site
  • Department of Anesthesiology, University of Luebeck

    Lübeck, 23568

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: The Prognostic Relevance of Cerebral Oxygen Saturation, NTproBNP and Preoperative Creatinine Clearance in Cardiac Surgical Patients; Amendment 4: the Prognostic Relevance of Growth Differentiation Factor 15 (GDF-15) and High Sensitive Troponin-t (hsTnT)

Growth determination factor 15 (GDF-15) and high sensitive troponin-t (hsTnT) are emerging humoral markers for risk stratification in clinically stable heart failure patients and in patients with stable coronary artery disease. No data are available about the prognostic value of these peptides in relation to mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Primary objective of the present study is to test the hypothesis, that GDF-15 is superior to a standard preoperative risk score, the additive Euroscore for the prediction of 30 day mortality and postoperative morbidity in patients scheduled for cardiac surgery.

Secondary objectives are to test the predictive value of hsTNT, either alone, or in combination with GDF-15 and if GDF-15 adds additional information to NTproBNP levels and preoperative cerebral oxygen saturation (ScO2) levels.

Read the detailed description

The study will be based on 2 patient cohorts, a group of patients studied during an observation period (2009) and a validation cohort of patients studied in 2008. The 2009 cohort (about 800 patients) will be analyzed to determine the predictive value of GDF-15 for predicting mortality and morbidity. The 2008 cohort (about 1200 patients) will be used to validate these findings.

Besides conventional morbidity markers, new sensitive markers of organ dysfunction (FABP, NGAL, sFLT-1, PIGF) will also be tested in the 2009 group.

Keywords
Risk prediction, Euroscore, GDF-15, hsTnT, cardiac surgery
Medical subject headings
Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01166360
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patients 2009Patients undergoing cardiac surgery in 2009
Patients 2008Patients undergoing cardiac surgery in 2008

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. 30 day mortality

    The predictive accuracy of GDF-15 will be compared with the Euroscore. Since the Euroscore has been calibrated for 30 day mortality, this time frame will be used as primary outcome parameter.

    Measured: 30 days

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. 1 year mortality

    1 year mortality is a more relevant outcome variable than 30 day mortality

    Measured: 365 days

  2. Renal dysfunction defined according to AKI-criteria

    Renal dysfunction is an important outcome variable in cardiac surgery.

    Measured: 30 days

  3. MaC score as combined measure of postoperative morbidity

    The MACS is a combined score for postoperative complications: low cardiac output syndrome, need for renal replacement therapy, stroke, reintubation.

    Measured: 30 days

  4. Sensitive markers of organ dysfunction

    Fatty acid binding protein, neutrophyil gelatinase associated lipocalin are sensitive markers of organ dysfunction and shall be used to give more precise information on organ dysfunction.

    Measured: 4 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Jul 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2008
  3. Primary completionDec 2010
  4. Study completionDec 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
2,000 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01166360
Sponsor's protocol ID
CS_RS_2008-2009 - GDF_TNT
Status last verified
Mar 2011
First submitted
20 Jul 2010
Last updated
15 Mar 2011
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Heringlake M, Charitos EI, Erber K, Berggreen AE, Heinze H, Paarmann H. Preoperative plasma growth-differentiation factor-15 for prediction of acute kidney injury in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Crit Care. 2016 Oct 8;20(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1482-3.

    PubMed 27717384
  • Heringlake M, Charitos EI, Gatz N, Kabler JH, Beilharz A, Holz D, Schon J, Paarmann H, Petersen M, Hanke T. Growth differentiation factor 15: a novel risk marker adjunct to the EuroSCORE for risk stratification in cardiac surgery patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Feb 12;61(6):672-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.09.059.

    PubMed 23391200

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Heart Failure and Coronary Artery Disease, run by University of Luebeck at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Mar 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

30 day mortality (time frame: 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01166360, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Mar 2011.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in