Age Related Macular DegenerationPhase 3GEFALNCT01170767
French Evaluation Group Avastin Versus Lucentis
A Phase 3 study testing Avastin and Lucentis in people with Age Related Macular Degeneration, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Age Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) is the first cause of visual impairment in elderly patients in industrialized countries. Neovascular or "wet" AMD, characterized by the presence of choroïdal neovessels, represents the most aggressive form of the disease. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Age Related Macular Degeneration
- What is being tested?
- Avastin and Lucentis
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 501 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Jun 2009to Dec 2012
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 50 years old
- Affected by neovascular retrofoveal AMD whatever the subtype, unilateral or bilateral (the eye included will be chosen by the investigator and the patient);
- Best corrected VA for the studied eye ranging between 20/32 (6.3/10) and 20/320 (0.6/10) with ETDRS scale
- Size of lesion < 12 disk area
- In case of occult neovessels, proof required of recent development of the lesion: loss of VA of at least 5 letters ETDRS (equivalent one line) in the last 3 months OR appearance of a subretinal heamorrhage OR increase in the size of the lesion (> 10%) using fluoresceinic angiography during the last month by comparison with the last 3 months OR appearance of OCT criteria of macular oedema type, serous separation of neuro-epithelium, separation of the pigmented epithelial during the last month
- Effective birth control for sexually active female
- Signed informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Previous or actual treatment with intravitreal injection of an anti-VEGF drug (ranibizumab, bevacizumab or pegaptanib) in the studied eye
- Other healing treatment in the studied eye during the last 3 months before the first injection
- Medical history of photocoagulation in the studied eye
- Involvement in another clinical study (studied eye and/or the other eye)
- Subretinal haemorrhage reaching the fovea centre, with a size > 50% of the lesion area
- Fibrosis or retrofoveal retinal atrophy in the studied eye
Show all 22Show fewer
- Retinal pigment epithelial tear reaching the macula in the studied eye
- Choroidal neovascularisation not related to a DMLA in the studied eye
- Medical history of intravitreal medical device in the studied eye
- Active or suspected ocular or peri-ocular infection
- Serious active intra-ocular inflammation in the studied eye
- Medical history of auto-immune or idiopathic uveitis
- Proved diabetic retinopathy
- Intra-ocular pressure ≥ 25 mmHg despite two topical hypotonic treatments
- Medical history of intra-ocular surgery within 2 months before the first injection in the studied eye
- Aphakia or lack of lens capsule (not removed by YAG laser) in the studied eye
- Any illness or ocular condition that would require an intra-ocular surgery in the studied eye within 12 months after the inclusion
- Known hypersensitivity to ranibizumab, bevacizumab, or another drug composite of the medicinal products used; allergy to fluorescein, indocyanin green, anaesthetic eye drops
- Arterial hypertension that is not controlled by an appropriate treatment
- Previous or actual treatment with systemic administration of bevacizumab
- Follow up not possible during 12 months
- No affiliation to the French national health insurance program.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Age Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) is the first cause of visual impairment in elderly patients in industrialized countries. Neovascular or "wet" AMD, characterized by the presence of choroïdal neovessels, represents the most aggressive form of the disease. Its prevalence is 3.3% among patients older than 65 years in Europe, and increases with age.
Intraocular injections of anti-angiogenic monoclonal antibodies (ranibizumab) to treat AMD have appeared recently. It is derived from a larger sized molecule, bevacizumab, which do not have the market authorization for this indication. However, numerous publications of case series seem to show the effectiveness and a satisfactory safety profile of bevacizumab.
These conclusions have to be confirmed with a high level of evidence study. The aim of the GEFAL study is to demonstrate non-inferiority of effectiveness in clinical terms after 12 months of treatment with bevacizumab compared to ranibizumab on the visual acuity of patients affected by neovascular AMD.
- Conditions
- Age Related Macular Degeneration
- Being tested
- Avastin, Lucentis
- Keywords
- Age-related Macular Degeneration, Bevacizumab, Ranibizumab
- Medical subject headings
- Macular Degeneration
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AvastinDrug
Intravitreal injection of bevacizumab at a concentration of 1.25 mg per injection. One injection per month at the maximum and between 3 and 12 injection in the whole study.
LucentisDrug
Intravitreal injection of ranibizumab at a concentration of 0.50 mg per injection. One injection per month at the maximum and between 3 and 12 injection in the whole study.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Avastin | Experimental | intravitreal injection of bevacizumab Receives: Drug: Avastin |
| Lucentis | Active comparator | intravitreal injection of ranibizumab Receives: Drug: Lucentis |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Evaluation of the mean change from inclusion to 12 months post initiation of treatment in VA score, measured on the "Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study" (ETDRS) scale at an initial distance of 4 meters.
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
Evaluate and compare the efficacy of treatments by bevacizumab and ranibizumab
Measured: 12 months
Evaluate and compare the proportion of adverse events occurring at the local and systemic level in the two groups.
Measured: 12 months
Describe and compare the dosage regimen (average number of injections and time before re-injection) in the two groups
Measured: 12 months
Describe the pharmacokinetic profile of the drugs in blood and aqueous humor in a sub-group of 20 patients, during the induction stage.
Measured: 3 months
Create a medico-economic model of the impact related to the two strategies.
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jul 2010 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2009
- Primary completionDec 2012
- Study completionDec 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Age Related Macular DegenerationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hospices Civils de LyonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 501 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospices Civils de Lyon
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Laurent KODJIKIAN, Principal investigator, Hospices Civils de Lyon - Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01170767
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2007.467/10
- Acronym
- GEFAL
- Status last verified
- Feb 2013
- First submitted
- 26 Jul 2010
- Last updated
- 28 May 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Kodjikian L, Souied EH, Mimoun G, Mauget-Faysse M, Behar-Cohen F, Decullier E, Huot L, Aulagner G; GEFAL Study Group. Ranibizumab versus Bevacizumab for Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration: Results from the GEFAL Noninferiority Randomized Trial. Ophthalmology. 2013 Nov;120(11):2300-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.06.020. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
PubMed 23916488
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 May 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- French Evaluation Group Avastin Versus Lucentis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01170767
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GEFAL / 2007.467/10
- Conditions
- Age Related Macular Degeneration
- Keywords
- Age-related Macular Degeneration, Bevacizumab, Ranibizumab
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 501 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospices Civils de LyonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2009
- Primary completion
- Dec 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jul 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Age Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) is the first cause of visual impairment in elderly patients in industrialized countries. Neovascular or "wet" AMD, characterized by the presence of choroïdal neovessels, represents the most aggressive form of the disease. Its prevalence is 3.3% among patients older than 65 years in Europe, and increases with age.
Intraocular injections of anti-angiogenic monoclonal antibodies (ranibizumab) to treat AMD have appeared recently. It is derived from a larger sized molecule, bevacizumab, which do not have the market authorization for this indication. However, numerous publications of case series seem to show the effectiveness and a satisfactory safety profile of bevacizumab.
These conclusions have to be confirmed with a high level of evidence study. The aim of the GEFAL study is to demonstrate non-inferiority of effectiveness in clinical terms after 12 months of treatment with bevacizumab compared to ranibizumab on the visual acuity of patients affected by neovascular AMD.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Avastin | Experimental | Drug: Avastinintravitreal injection of bevacizumab |
| Lucentis | Active comparator | Drug: Lucentisintravitreal injection of ranibizumab |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Age ≥ 50 years old
- Affected by neovascular retrofoveal AMD whatever the subtype, unilateral or bilateral (the eye included will be chosen by the investigator and the patient);
- Best corrected VA for the studied eye ranging between 20/32 (6.3/10) and 20/320 (0.6/10) with ETDRS scale
- Size of lesion < 12 disk area
- In case of occult neovessels, proof required of recent development of the lesion: loss of VA of at least 5 letters ETDRS (equivalent one line) in the last 3 months OR appearance of a subretinal heamorrhage OR increase in the size of the lesion (> 10%) using fluoresceinic angiography during the last month by comparison with the last 3 months OR appearance of OCT criteria of macular oedema type, serous separation of neuro-epithelium, separation of the pigmented epithelial during the last month
Key exclusion criteria (22 listed)
- Previous or actual treatment with intravitreal injection of an anti-VEGF drug (ranibizumab, bevacizumab or pegaptanib) in the studied eye
- Other healing treatment in the studied eye during the last 3 months before the first injection
- Medical history of photocoagulation in the studied eye
- Involvement in another clinical study (studied eye and/or the other eye)
- Subretinal haemorrhage reaching the fovea centre, with a size > 50% of the lesion area
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AvastinIntravitreal injection of bevacizumab at a concentration of 1.25 mg per injection. One injection per month at the maximum and between 3 and 12 injection in the whole study. | Drug | Avastin |
| LucentisIntravitreal injection of ranibizumab at a concentration of 0.50 mg per injection. One injection per month at the maximum and between 3 and 12 injection in the whole study. | Drug | Lucentis |
Primary outcome
Evaluation of the mean change from inclusion to 12 months post initiation of treatment in VA score, measured on the "Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study" (ETDRS) scale at an initial distance of 4 meters.
Time frame: 12 months
5 secondary outcomes
Evaluate and compare the efficacy of treatments by bevacizumab and ranibizumab
Time frame: 12 months
Evaluate and compare the proportion of adverse events occurring at the local and systemic level in the two groups.
Time frame: 12 months
Describe and compare the dosage regimen (average number of injections and time before re-injection) in the two groups
Time frame: 12 months
Describe the pharmacokinetic profile of the drugs in blood and aqueous humor in a sub-group of 20 patients, during the induction stage.
Time frame: 3 months
Create a medico-economic model of the impact related to the two strategies.
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 May 2019.
- Results publication: PubMed 23916488Kodjikian L, Souied EH, Mimoun G, Mauget-Faysse M, Behar-Cohen F, Decullier E, Huot L, Aulagner G; GEFAL Study Group. Ranibizumab versus Bevacizumab for Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration: Results from the GEFAL Noninferiority Randomized Trial. Ophthalmology. 2013 Nov;120(11):2300-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.06.020. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
Related trials for Age Related Macular Degeneration
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Safety and Efficacy of Oral HX9428 Tablets in Subjects With Wet Age-related Macular Degeneration (wAMD)
Wet Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
RecruitingPhase 3
Extension Study for the Port Delivery System With Ranibizumab (Portal)
Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Safety and Efficacy of ADVM-022 in Treatment-Experienced Patients With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration [LUNA]
Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
A Study to Determine the Efficacy, Safety, and Durability of Faricimab in Participants With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (nAMD)
RecruitingPhase 3
Study to Assess the Injection Burden, Adverse Events, Change in Disease Activity, and Long-Term Preservation of Visual Acuity of Surabgene Lomparvovec in Adult Participants With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (nAMD)
Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Laurent KODJIKIAN principal investigator
Hospices Civils de Lyon - Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Avastin and Lucentis in people with Age Related Macular Degeneration, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 22 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Evaluation of the mean change from inclusion to 12 months post initiation of treatment in VA score, measured on the "Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study" (ETDRS) scale at an initial distance of 4 meters. (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01170767, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 May 2019; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 29 Oct 2026.