AzTrials
AzTrials

FibromyalgiaPhase 4NCT01173055

A Study to Evaluate the Effects of Milnacipran on Pain Processing and Functional MRI in Patients With Fibromyalgia

A Phase 4 study testing milnacipran in people with Fibromyalgia, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Fibromyalgia is a condition that includes pain, tenderness, stiff muscle, and fatigue. Researchers want to find out if "a drug" called milnacipran can help people with fibromyalgia. milnacipran (Savella) is approved by the FDA for the management of fibromyalgia. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Fibromyalgia
What is being tested?
milnacipran
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
22 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jun 2010to Jun 2012
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • You may be eligible to take part in this study if the following are true:
  • You are between the age of 18 and 70 years
  • If you are female
  • If you are right handed
  • You have a diagnosis of fibromyalgia for at least 3 months, as defined by the American College of Rheumatology 1990 Criteria
  • You are willing to stop taking certain medicines that you may be taking on a regular basis. The researchers will discuss these medications with you in detail

Who cannot join

  • You may not be eligible take part in this study if any of the following are true for you:
  • You have problems with your heart or cardiovascular system
  • You have problems with your liver or kidneys
  • You have an autoimmune disease, or a whole-body infection like HIV or hepatitis
  • You have cancer
  • You are pregnant or breastfeeding
Show all 11Show fewer
  • You abuse drugs or alcohol
  • You have suicidal thoughts or wishes
  • You have taken milnacipran or another study drug within the last 30 days
  • You have a medical problem not listed here that would make it unsafe for you to take part in the study
  • The research team feels that you will be unable to complete all phases of the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Michigan, Chronic Pain and Fatigue Research Center

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double-blind,Placebo-controlled, Two-way Crossover Study to Evaluate the Effect of Milnacipran on Pain Processing and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Activation Patterns in Patients With Fibromyalgia

Fibromyalgia is a condition that includes pain, tenderness, stiff muscle, and fatigue. Researchers want to find out if "a drug" called milnacipran can help people with fibromyalgia. milnacipran (Savella) is approved by the FDA for the management of fibromyalgia. In this study, milnacipran will be given to find out more about how it affects pain and thinking in people with fibromyalgia.

Read the detailed description

The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of milnacipran on pain processing in patients with fibromyalgia and to assess the correlation between this effect and neural activation patterns during functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI).

NOTE regarding Changes in Outcome Measures

In this Crossover Study, participants were involved for approximately 16 weeks in this sequence: a week of preparing for the initial assessments, baseline measurements (Week 0), 6 weeks on placebo or study drug followed by measurements for effect of drug or placebo (Week 6); a week of titration off of drug, if appropriate (or continued placebo, if on placebo), two weeks of washout, a new baseline assessment (Week 9), six weeks of study drug (or placebo), another set of measurements for effect of drug or placebo (Week 15), and a final titration period to maintain masking of assignment to drug or placebo. Of 17 participants who completed both sequences, data was analyzed for the 15 whose values for all measurement variables were usable.

When Outcome measure data was originally and accurately posted for baseline and change after treatment, the time frames listed were 0 and 15 weeks, because the last assessment was gathered at approximately week 15 for each person whose data is in the data set. However, given the crossover design, it seems more accurate and understandable, to show the time frame for the outcome measure as 6 because the participants were each administered drug or placebo for six weeks total. (Of course for the Placebo then Study Drug arm, the placebo data was collected at week 6, and for the Study Drug then Placebo arm, the drug data was collected at week 6, and similarly for the first group the drug data was collected at week 15 (first assignment, plus 1 week titration, 2 weeks washout, new baseline at week 9, and final collection at week 15), and for the second group the placebo data was collected at week 15.

Thus, outcome measures originally listed for 6 and 9 weeks, which were previously shown as "Data Not Reported" were effectively already included within the data presented for change from baseline shown in Week 15 in this fashion: 9 week data for the second assignment is part of the "week 0 data" for the first assignment, to get pre-treatment baseline for each treatment shown. Week 6 data is the post-treatment data which was shown as week 15, but is now recategorized as 6 week data. There is no, and never was, any data that could represent assignment to drug or placebo for 9 or 15 weeks.

Additionally, several outcome measures based on fMRI values were always listed in the protocol as other outcomes (not secondary outcomes), but had been incorrectly posted in the earlier listings on ClinicalTrials.gov. They have been accurately reclassified in the 2017 resubmission.

Conditions
Fibromyalgia
Being tested
milnacipran, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Fibromyalgia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • milnacipranDrug

    Also called Savella

    Milnacipran will be given orally twice daily in tablet form at different times during the course of the study. The highest dose of milnacipran to be used in the study is 200mg/day.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Also called placebo/sugar pill

    Placebo will be given orally twice daily in tablet form at different times during the course of the study.

Study groups in NCT01173055
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
MilnacipranExperimentalMilnacipran will be given orally twice daily in tablet form at different times during the course of the study. The highest dose of milnacipran to be used in the study is 200mg/day.
Receives: Drug: milnacipran
PlaceboExperimentalPlacebo will be given orally twice daily in tablet form at different times during the course of the study.
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain Threshold at Baseline

    The primary outcome parameter is the medium pressure pain threshold at pre-treatment baseline (pressure that evokes a perceived pain intensity of 40-50 out of 100 on a numerical rating scale). Measured in kg/cm^2.

    Measured: Baselines measured at week 0 and week 9 after washout from first assignment to treatment

  2. Change in Pain Threshold From Baseline to End of Treatment.

    The primary outcome parameter is the change in medium pressure pain threshold (pressure that evokes a perceived pain intensity of 40-50 out of 100 on a numerical rating scale) from baseline to end of treatment. Measured in kg/cm^2. Lower values represent a worse outcome.

    Measured: baseline compared with 6 weeks of treatment

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Control (DNIC) Effect at Baseline.

    0-100 numerical rating scale. 0 on the numerical scale represents a better outcome. 100 represents a worse outcome.

    Measured: Baselines measured at week 0 and week 9 after washout from first assignment to treatment

  2. Change in Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Control (DNIC) Effect From Baseline to End of Treatment.

    0-100 numerical rating scale. 0 on the numerical scale represents a better outcome. 100 represents a worse outcome.

    Measured: baseline compared with 6 weeks of treatment

  3. Pain Tolerance at Baseline

    The primary outcome parameter is the pressure pain tolerance (maximum tolerated pressure) at pre-treatment baseline.

    Measured: Baselines measured at week 0 and week 9 after washout from first assignment to treatment

  4. Change in Pain Tolerance From Baseline to End of Treatment

    The primary outcome parameter is the change in pressure pain tolerance (maximum tolerated pressure) from baseline to end of treatment. Measured in kg/cm^2. Lower values represent a worse outcome.

    Measured: baseline compared wtih 6 weeks of treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Jul 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2010
  3. Primary completionJun 2012
  4. Study completionJun 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
22 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01173055
Sponsor's protocol ID
MD-SAV-09
Status last verified
Oct 2017
First submitted
29 Jul 2010
Last updated
8 Nov 2017
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Ichesco E, Peltier SJ, Mawla I, Harper DE, Pauer L, Harte SE, Clauw DJ, Harris RE. Prediction of Differential Pharmacologic Response in Chronic Pain Using Functional Neuroimaging Biomarkers and a Support Vector Machine Algorithm: An Exploratory Study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021 Nov;73(11):2127-2137. doi: 10.1002/art.41781. Epub 2021 Sep 22.

    PubMed 33982890

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing milnacipran in people with Fibromyalgia, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Nov 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Feb 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain Threshold at Baseline (time frame: Baselines measured at week 0 and week 9 after washout from first assignment to treatment). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01173055, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Nov 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in