AzTrials
AzTrials

Physical FunctionEarly Phase 1NCT01179503

Vitamin D Supplementation and Physical Function in Older Adults

A Early Phase 1 study testing calcium and Vitamin D plus calcium in people with Physical Function and Vitamin D Insufficiency, run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A growing body of evidence suggests that vitamin D status is important in biologic processes involved in the maintenance of physical function. To advance the investigators understanding of the role of vitamin D in physical function, the investigators will conduct a feasibility pilot study to collect key information to… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 70 to 89 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Physical Function, Vitamin D Insufficiency
What is being tested?
calcium and Vitamin D plus calcium
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
16 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jan 2010to May 2011
Phase
Early Phase 1
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 70 to 89 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score of ≥ 4 to < 10
  • Vitamin D insufficient (serum 25(OH)D ≥ 10 to < 25 ng/mL)

Who cannot join

  • Serious or uncontrolled chronic disease including: insulin-dependent or uncontrolled diabetes; cancer requiring treatment in past year, except non-melanoma skin cancers; past or current ischemic heart disease, uncontrolled angina, heart failure, peripheral artery disease (PAD), or stroke; chronic respiratory disease; uncontrolled endocrine/metabolic disease; neurological or hematological disease; liver or renal dysfunction; and severe musculoskeletal impairment
  • Impaired cognitive function (MMSE ≤ 24)
  • Dependent on a cane or walker
  • Use of anti-coagulants
  • Unwillingness to undergo a muscle biopsy
  • Taking prescription vitamin D2 or OCT vitamin D3 supplements of > 1000 IU/d
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Inability or contraindications to consume daily vitamin D and calcium supplements
  • Weight loss of ≥ 5% or more in the past 6 months
  • Involved in any other intervention

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Wake Forest University

    Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Vitamin D Supplementation, Skeletal Muscle Gene Expression, and Physical Performance in Older Adults

A growing body of evidence suggests that vitamin D status is important in biologic processes involved in the maintenance of physical function. To advance the investigators understanding of the role of vitamin D in physical function, the investigators will conduct a feasibility pilot study to collect key information to help design a full-scale randomized trial to determine whether vitamin D supplementation will delay declines in physical function. The primary goals of the pilot study are to determine cost-effective strategies for identifying persons at high risk for functional decline with insufficient vitamin D levels, determine the serum vitamin D response to a vitamin D supplementation regimen designed to attain sufficient vitamin D levels, and provide preliminary data of key functional measures (balance, physical performance and muscle power) for the future larger study design. A secondary goal is to begin to examine potential mechanisms by which vitamin D supplementation may enhance physical performance by exploring the effects of vitamin D supplementation on changes in skeletal muscle gene expression.

Read the detailed description

A growing body of evidence suggests that vitamin D status is important in biologic processes involved in the maintenance of physical function. However, whether remediation of vitamin D insufficiency will improve physical function and the potential mechanisms involved are unclear. Previous vitamin D supplementation trials have produced mixed results with respect to physical function; however, most trials did not specifically recruit individuals who were vitamin D insufficient nor is the potential mechanism of action understood well enough to appropriately select those individuals most likely to benefit. To advance our understanding of the role of vitamin D in physical function, the investigators will conduct a feasibility pilot study to collect key information to help design a full-scale randomized trial to determine whether vitamin D supplementation will delay declines in physical function. The primary goals of the pilot study are to determine cost-effective strategies for identifying persons at high risk for functional decline with insufficient vitamin D levels, determine the serum vitamin D response to a vitamin D supplementation regimen designed to attain sufficient vitamin D levels, and provide preliminary data of key functional measures (balance, short physical performance battery (SBBP) and muscle power) for the future larger study design. A secondary goal is to begin to examine potential mechanisms by which vitamin D supplementation may enhance physical performance and muscle contractility by exploring the effects of vitamin D supplementation on changes in skeletal muscle gene expression using microarrays.

Being tested
calcium, Vitamin D plus calcium
Keywords
vitamin D, physical performance

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • calciumDietary supplement

    600 mg calcium carbonate twice daily (total of 1200 mg/day) for 4 months

  • Vitamin D plus calciumDietary supplement

    1000 IU of vitamin D3 twice daily (for a total of 2000 IU/day) plus 600 mg calcium carbonate twice daily (for a total of 1200 mg/day)

Study groups in NCT01179503
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Calcium onlyActive comparator1200 mg Calcium per day
Receives: Dietary Supplement: calcium
Vitamin D plus calciumExperimental2000 IU vitamin D plus 1200 mg calcium per day
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D plus calcium

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Physical performance

    Change in the expanded Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score (composite score including the following: timed 4m walk; time to stand from a chair 5 times without the use of arms; and time to hold side-by-side, semi-tandem, tandem, and one legged stands for the testing of balance)

    Measured: 4 months

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Skeletal muscle gene expression

    Muscle will be obtained from the vastus lateralis using the percutaneous needle biopsy technique. Five µg of RNA will be supplied for each experimental condition to be analyzed. The WFUHS MicroArray Core Facility further purifies the provided RNA over an RNAeasy column and performs all subsequent steps of the GeneChip protocol (cDNA generation, generation of biotinylated cRNA, chip hybridization, and generation of .CEL files).

    Measured: 4 months

  2. Change in expanded SPPB balance task time

    Change in expanded SPPB balance task time (time to hold side-by-side, semi-tandem, tandem, and one legged stands; max of 30 sec)

    Measured: 4 months

  3. Change in narrow 4m walk test of balance time

    Change in time to complete narrow 4m walk test of balance (usual pace over 4m while staying between lines of colored tape placed 20cm apart)

    Measured: 4 months

  4. Change in 400m walk test time

    Change in 400m walk test time (usual pace)

    Measured: 4 months

  5. Change in knee extensor power

    Change in knee extensor power measured by the Nottingham Power Rig

    Measured: 4 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Aug 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2010
  3. Primary completionMay 2011
  4. Study completionMay 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Early Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
16 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01179503
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB00011371
Other IDs
R01AG029364-03S1
Status last verified
Aug 2018
First submitted
10 Aug 2010
Last updated
17 Aug 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Early Phase 1 study testing calcium and Vitamin D plus calcium in people with Physical Function and Vitamin D Insufficiency, run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Physical performance (time frame: 4 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Aug 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in