Head and Neck CancerNCT01184027
Impact of Nutrition and Swallowing Function of Head and Neck Cancer Patients During the Course of Treatment
An observational study of Head and Neck Cancer and Surgery, run by University of Alberta at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Weight loss resulting from poor food intake is common in head and neck cancer patients. Currently, feeding tubes are placed before starting treatment to provide nutrition and prevent weight loss. However, studies have not always shown that feeding tubes prevent weight loss. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Head and Neck Cancer, Surgery, Nutrition
- What is being tested?
- nutrition /swallowing counseling, G-tube/swallowing intervention and nutrition /swallowing intervention
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Oct 2010to Oct 2011
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Patients
Who may be able to join
- ≥ 18 years of age;
- diagnosed with HN cancer to sites of the oral cavity, pharynx, and larynx;
- all histologic types of cancer;
- advanced tumour stages;
- all forms of RT including standard or investigational for HNC;
- all forms of CT including standard or investigational for HNC;
- alert and mentally competent;
- English-speaking.
Who cannot join
- unable to have safe swallow following surgery;
- allergy or intolerance to any enteral nutritional supplements in current use;
- renal insufficiency
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
University of Alberta Hospital (Otolaryngology)
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7
About this study
Official title: Impact of Nutrition and Swallowing Function in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Head and Neck Cancer Patients During the Course of Treatment
Weight loss resulting from poor food intake is common in head and neck cancer patients. Currently, feeding tubes are placed before starting treatment to provide nutrition and prevent weight loss. However, studies have not always shown that feeding tubes prevent weight loss. Also, limiting food intake by mouth may lead to swallowing problems. The aim of this study is to compare the effect of diet and swallowing therapy with feeding tube placement. In this study, your weight, food intake, swallowing ability, and side-effects of treatment will be monitored before, during, and 3 and 6 months after treatment to see if there is any difference between the therapy groups. The investigators hope that with the addition of diet and swallowing therapy during treatment that we can improve food intake and swallowing ability while still maintaining weight.
Read the detailed description
Background: Multimodal treatment for advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) is associated with acute toxicities including mucositis, xerostomia, and dysphagia and a high prevalence of weight loss, requiring nutritional intervention. Currently, there is ongoing debate about the best way to provide nutrition support while undergoing chemoradiation (CRT) therapy after surgery for advanced head and neck cancer (HNC). Randomized controlled trials comparing the nutritional benefits of feeding tubes over dietary counseling and/or supplementation have not conclusively demonstrated a reduction in weight loss, unplanned hospitalizations, treatment toxicities, or tumour control. Additionally, the relative benefits of feeding tubes are controversial. Studies evaluating the efficacy of feeding tubes report that patients with feeding tubes have increased risk of aspiration, feeding tube dependence, a small but finite risk of tumour seeding, but more importantly long term functional swallowing impairment. However, emerging data are reporting that swallowing exercise programs that are designed to strengthen musculature throughout the course of treatment may lead to improved return of functional swallowing. Thus, preservation of functional swallowing may potentially improve return to oral nutrition.
Purpose: Our purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of nutritional and swallowing intervention with/out a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube to that of ad lib nutrition and swallowing counseling with/out a PEG tube in advanced HNC patients. Weight, caloric intake, instrumental swallowing function, xerostomia, mucositis, pain, unplanned treatment interruptions, unplanned hospital admissions, complications, duration of feeding tube, tumour control, performance status, and quality of life (QOL) will be assessed before, during, 3 and 6 months after CRT therapy to determine if there is any differences between the intervention groups.
Study Design: A randomized controlled longitudinal design during the entire course of treatment including surgery and CRT therapy will be conducted to investigate the efficacy of nutritional and swallowing interventions in HNC patients at baseline, after each course of consecutive course treatment and 3 and 6 month follow-up. Patients demonstrating a safe functional swallow following surgery will be randomly assigned to one of four groups: Group 1 - patients will receive PEG tube/in-depth nutrition and swallowing intervention; Group 2 - patients will receive PEG tube/ad lib nutrition and swallowing counseling; Group 3 - patients will receive in-depth nutrition and swallowing intervention; or Group 4 - patients will receive ad lib nutrition/Kaofeed tube nutrition and swallowing counseling.
Study Sample: Patients with diagnosis of HNC to the oral cavity, pharynx, and larynx undergoing surgery and CRT therapy at the University of Alberta Hospital (UAH) and Cross Cancer Institute (CCI) will be eligible for participation in the study.
Inclusion criteria are: ≥ 18 years of age; diagnosed with HNC to sites of the oral cavity, oropharynx, and larynx; all histologic types of cancer; advanced tumour stages; all forms of radiation therapy (RT) including standard or investigational for HNC; all forms of chemotherapy (CT) including standard or investigational for HNC; alert and mentally competent; English-speaking. Exclusion criteria are: unable to have safe swallow following surgical intervention; allergy or intolerance to any enteral nutritional supplements in current use; renal insufficiency. There are approximately 3-4 HNC patients scheduled for surgery, and CRT therapy per week at UAH/CCI. With a significance level of 0.01 between groups and a power of 0.85 (an effect size of 0.9) a minimum sample size of 41 patients is required for this study. As a pilot study with 20 degrees of freedom, an adequate and reasonable sample size would require 24 patients to be recruited to participate.
Data Collection: Patients will be informed of the study and consent obtained. Demographic and clinical data will be collected at the time of recruitment. Patient's height and weight will be recorded. Patients will be asked to complete the Patient Generated Subjective Global Assessment, Head and Neck Symptom Checklist, Edmonton Symptom Assessment Score and University of Washington Quality of Life Revised Questionnaire. Patients will be given instructions on how to complete the 24h dietary recall, will have assessments for mucositis and xerostomia and an appointment for modified barium swallow. After surgery, patient's who have a verified safe swallow by a speech-language pathologist (SLP) and MBS will be randomized into 1 of 4 groups. Patient randomized to Group 1 or 2 will have percutaneous gastrostomy (PEG) tubes inserted as per gastroenterology PEG tube insertion protocol. Patients randomized to Group 1 or 3 will have additional nutrition and swallowing intervention. Patients randomized to Group 3 or 4 who have symptoms that prevent them from swallowing or have a >5% weight loss during treatment will be offered a Kaofeed tube for nutrition supplementation. Nutritional intervention as outlined in studies by Ravasco et al. (2005) and Goncalves Dias et al (2005) will include individualized nutrition orientation to therapeutic diet that will aid the patient in achieving a caloric and protein intake which promotes approximately 40 kcal/kg/day. The nurse practitioner together with the patient will meet on a daily basis to review their therapeutic diet and resolve issues of symptom management that prevent dietary intake. Swallowing intervention will include evaluation of functional swallowing by a SLP. The SLP together with the patient will meet on a daily basis to review functional swallowing and will teach/aid the patient to adjust their swallowing to meet their changing safe swallowing needs. All parameters and study measurement are outlined in Table 1.
Data Analysis: Descriptive statistics will be used to generate a profile of the nutrition status, caloric intake, nutrition impact symptoms, swallowing function, quality of life, unplanned treatment interruptions, unplanned hospital admissions, and complications of HNC patients at baseline, after each course of consecutive course treatment and 3 month follow-up. Changes, as well as differences in nutrition status, caloric intake, nutrition impact symptoms, quality of life and swallowing function before and after each course of treatment, and 3 month follow-up will be examined using t-tests and analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Significance of the Study: The high prevalence and negative consequences of weight loss, primarily stemming from dysphagia in advanced HNC patients using the current multimodal treatment regime supports the need to determine the most effective nutritional management of this patient group. Additionally, this pilot study may establish the foundation for future protocols and guidelines for nutritional care of HNC patients.
- Conditions
- Head and Neck Cancer, Surgery, Nutrition, Swallowing
- Being tested
- nutrition /swallowing counseling, G-tube/swallowing intervention, nutrition /swallowing intervention
- Keywords
- head and neck cancer, surgery, nutrition
- Medical subject headings
- Head and Neck Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
nutrition /swallowing counselingBehavioural
Also called Group 4
general nutrition and swalling information
G-tube/swallowing interventionBehavioural
Also called Group 1
Patient will have active swallowing intervention with an SLP
nutrition /swallowing interventionBehavioural
Also called Group 3
Patient will have active (daily) nutrition and swallowing intervention based on patients individual needs.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| G-tube/swallowing intervention | patients will receive G-tube/nutritional and swallowing intervention. As per patient needs Receives: Behavioral: G-tube/swallowing intervention | |
| G-tube/swallowing counseling | G-tube/ad lib dietary and swallowing counseling. Current standard of care. | |
| nutrition/swallowing intervention | Patients will receive active nutrition and swallowing intervention based on patients caloric and swallowing needs. Receives: Behavioral: nutrition /swallowing intervention | |
| nutrition/swallowing counseling | Patients will have ad lib dietary intake with general nutrition and swallowing counseling. Receives: Behavioral: nutrition /swallowing counseling |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
nutrition status
evaluation of caloric intake
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
swallowing function
maintenance of swallowing function
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Aug 2010 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2010
- Primary completionOct 2011
- Study completionOct 2011
Why it stopped: The study did not receive funding.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Head and Neck CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of AlbertaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Alberta
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Catherine Kubrak, University of Alberta
- Investigators
- Catherine A Kubrak, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Alberta
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01184027
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HN 11226
- Status last verified
- May 2016
- First submitted
- 17 Aug 2010
- Last updated
- 23 May 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 May 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Impact of Nutrition and Swallowing Function in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Head and Neck Cancer Patients During the Course of Treatment
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01184027
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HN 11226
- Conditions
- Head and Neck Cancer, Surgery, Nutrition, Swallowing
- Keywords
- head and neck cancer, surgery, nutrition
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: The study did not receive funding.
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of AlbertaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2010
- Primary completion
- Oct 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Aug 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Weight loss resulting from poor food intake is common in head and neck cancer patients. Currently, feeding tubes are placed before starting treatment to provide nutrition and prevent weight loss. However, studies have not always shown that feeding tubes prevent weight loss. Also, limiting food intake by mouth may lead to swallowing problems. The aim of this study is to compare the effect of diet and swallowing therapy with feeding tube placement. In this study, your weight, food intake, swallowing ability, and side-effects of treatment will be monitored before, during, and 3 and 6 months after treatment to see if there is any difference between the therapy groups. The investigators hope that with the addition of diet and swallowing therapy during treatment that we can improve food intake and swallowing ability while still maintaining weight.
Detailed description
Background: Multimodal treatment for advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) is associated with acute toxicities including mucositis, xerostomia, and dysphagia and a high prevalence of weight loss, requiring nutritional intervention. Currently, there is ongoing debate about the best way to provide nutrition support while undergoing chemoradiation (CRT) therapy after surgery for advanced head and neck cancer (HNC). Randomized controlled trials comparing the nutritional benefits of feeding tubes over dietary counseling and/or supplementation have not conclusively demonstrated a reduction in weight loss, unplanned hospitalizations, treatment toxicities, or tumour control. Additionally, the relative benefits of feeding tubes are controversial. Studies evaluating the efficacy of feeding tubes report that patients with feeding tubes have increased risk of aspiration, feeding tube dependence, a small but finite risk of tumour seeding, but more importantly long term functional swallowing impairment. However, emerging data are reporting that swallowing exercise programs that are designed to strengthen musculature throughout the course of treatment may lead to improved return of functional swallowing. Thus, preservation of functional swallowing may potentially improve return to oral nutrition.
Purpose: Our purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of nutritional and swallowing intervention with/out a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube to that of ad lib nutrition and swallowing counseling with/out a PEG tube in advanced HNC patients. Weight, caloric intake, instrumental swallowing function, xerostomia, mucositis, pain, unplanned treatment interruptions, unplanned hospital admissions, complications, duration of feeding tube, tumour control, performance status, and quality of life (QOL) will be assessed before, during, 3 and 6 months after CRT therapy to determine if there is any differences between the intervention groups.
Study Design: A randomized controlled longitudinal design during the entire course of treatment including surgery and CRT therapy will be conducted to investigate the efficacy of nutritional and swallowing interventions in HNC patients at baseline, after each course of consecutive course treatment and 3 and 6 month follow-up. Patients demonstrating a safe functional swallow following surgery will be randomly assigned to one of four groups: Group 1 - patients will receive PEG tube/in-depth nutrition and swallowing intervention; Group 2 - patients will receive PEG tube/ad lib nutrition and swallowing counseling; Group 3 - patients will receive in-depth nutrition and swallowing intervention; or Group 4 - patients will receive ad lib nutrition/Kaofeed tube nutrition and swallowing counseling.
Study Sample: Patients with diagnosis of HNC to the oral cavity, pharynx, and larynx undergoing surgery and CRT therapy at the University of Alberta Hospital (UAH) and Cross Cancer Institute (CCI) will be eligible for participation in the study.
Inclusion criteria are: ≥ 18 years of age; diagnosed with HNC to sites of the oral cavity, oropharynx, and larynx; all histologic types of cancer; advanced tumour stages; all forms of radiation therapy (RT) including standard or investigational for HNC; all forms of chemotherapy (CT) including standard or investigational for HNC; alert and mentally competent; English-speaking. Exclusion criteria are: unable to have safe swallow following surgical intervention; allergy or intolerance to any enteral nutritional supplements in current use; renal insufficiency. There are approximately 3-4 HNC patients scheduled for surgery, and CRT therapy per week at UAH/CCI. With a significance level of 0.01 between groups and a power of 0.85 (an effect size of 0.9) a minimum sample size of 41 patients is required for this study. As a pilot study with 20 degrees of freedom, an adequate and reasonable sample size would require 24 patients to be recruited to participate.
Data Collection: Patients will be informed of the study and consent obtained. Demographic and clinical data will be collected at the time of recruitment. Patient's height and weight will be recorded. Patients will be asked to complete the Patient Generated Subjective Global Assessment, Head and Neck Symptom Checklist, Edmonton Symptom Assessment Score and University of Washington Quality of Life Revised Questionnaire. Patients will be given instructions on how to complete the 24h dietary recall, will have assessments for mucositis and xerostomia and an appointment for modified barium swallow. After surgery, patient's who have a verified safe swallow by a speech-language pathologist (SLP) and MBS will be randomized into 1 of 4 groups. Patient randomized to Group 1 or 2 will have percutaneous gastrostomy (PEG) tubes inserted as per gastroenterology PEG tube insertion protocol. Patients randomized to Group 1 or 3 will have additional nutrition and swallowing intervention. Patients randomized to Group 3 or 4 who have symptoms that prevent them from swallowing or have a >5% weight loss during treatment will be offered a Kaofeed tube for nutrition supplementation. Nutritional intervention as outlined in studies by Ravasco et al. (2005) and Goncalves Dias et al (2005) will include individualized nutrition orientation to therapeutic diet that will aid the patient in achieving a caloric and protein intake which promotes approximately 40 kcal/kg/day. The nurse practitioner together with the patient will meet on a daily basis to review their therapeutic diet and resolve issues of symptom management that prevent dietary intake. Swallowing intervention will include evaluation of functional swallowing by a SLP. The SLP together with the patient will meet on a daily basis to review functional swallowing and will teach/aid the patient to adjust their swallowing to meet their changing safe swallowing needs. All parameters and study measurement are outlined in Table 1.
Data Analysis: Descriptive statistics will be used to generate a profile of the nutrition status, caloric intake, nutrition impact symptoms, swallowing function, quality of life, unplanned treatment interruptions, unplanned hospital admissions, and complications of HNC patients at baseline, after each course of consecutive course treatment and 3 month follow-up. Changes, as well as differences in nutrition status, caloric intake, nutrition impact symptoms, quality of life and swallowing function before and after each course of treatment, and 3 month follow-up will be examined using t-tests and analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Significance of the Study: The high prevalence and negative consequences of weight loss, primarily stemming from dysphagia in advanced HNC patients using the current multimodal treatment regime supports the need to determine the most effective nutritional management of this patient group. Additionally, this pilot study may establish the foundation for future protocols and guidelines for nutritional care of HNC patients.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| G-tube/swallowing intervention | – | Behavioral: G-tube/swallowing interventionpatients will receive G-tube/nutritional and swallowing intervention. As per patient needs |
| G-tube/swallowing counseling | – | –G-tube/ad lib dietary and swallowing counseling. Current standard of care. |
| nutrition/swallowing intervention | – | Behavioral: nutrition /swallowing interventionPatients will receive active nutrition and swallowing intervention based on patients caloric and swallowing needs. |
| nutrition/swallowing counseling | – | Behavioral: nutrition /swallowing counselingPatients will have ad lib dietary intake with general nutrition and swallowing counseling. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Patients
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- unable to have safe swallow following surgery;
- allergy or intolerance to any enteral nutritional supplements in current use;
- renal insufficiency
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| nutrition /swallowing counselingAlso: Group 4general nutrition and swalling information | Behavioural | nutrition/swallowing counseling |
| G-tube/swallowing interventionAlso: Group 1Patient will have active swallowing intervention with an SLP | Behavioural | G-tube/swallowing intervention |
| nutrition /swallowing interventionAlso: Group 3Patient will have active (daily) nutrition and swallowing intervention based on patients individual needs. | Behavioural | nutrition/swallowing intervention |
Primary outcome
nutrition status
Time frame: 6 months
evaluation of caloric intake
1 secondary outcome
swallowing function
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 May 2016.
Related trials for Head and Neck Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Proton Re-irradiation in Patients With Recurrent or Second Primary Head and Neck Cancer , a Multicentre Phase II Single Arm Trial
Head & Neck Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Proton Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy or Photon Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Combination With Pembrolizumab Before Surgery for the Treatment of Locally Advanced and Radiation-Naive Locoregionally Recurrent Oral Cavity Cancer, OSPRI Trial
Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Locally Recurrent Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 4
Lidocaine Infiltration and Neuroimmunomodulation in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery
Head and Neck Cancer (H&N)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Catherine A Kubrak, PhD principal investigator
University of Alberta
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Head and Neck Cancer and Surgery, run by University of Alberta at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 May 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
nutrition status (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 May 2016; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.