GastroenteritisPhase 2NCT01185054
Is Electrolyte Maintenance Solution Required in Low-Risk Children With Gastroenteritis?
A Phase 2 study testing ½ strength apple juice and Pediatric Electrolyte in people with Gastroenteritis, run by The Hospital for Sick Children at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
The objective of this study is to clarify the current standard of care by determining if Electrolyte Maintenance Solution (EMS) is truly the optimal fluid to be used in low-risk children who present to an Emergency Department (ED) with < 72 hours of vomiting or diarrhea. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 to 60 months
- Conditions the study is for
- Gastroenteritis
- What is being tested?
- ½ strength apple juice and Pediatric Electrolyte
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 624 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Nov 2010to May 2015
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 to 60 months
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- ≥3 episodes of vomiting or diarrhea in preceding 24 hours
- Duration of illness less than 96 hours
- Age 6 - 60 months
- Clinical suspicion of acute intestinal infectious process
- Weight ≥ 8 kg
- Clinical dehydration score < 5
Show all 14Show fewer
- Capillary refill < 2 seconds
- Absence of bulging fontanelle
- Absence of bilious vomiting
- Absence of blood in diarrhea/emesis
- Absence of abdominal pain (if present reported as periumbilical in location)
- Absence of abdominal distention
- Absence of acute disease currently requiring treatment
- Absence of co-existing diseases (prematurity, cardiac, renal, neurological, metabolic, endocrine, immunodeficiency, trauma or history of ingestion)
Who cannot join
- Known gastrointestinal diseases (ie. inflammatory bowel disease, celiac) or any other underlying disease process that might place the child at an increased risk of treatment failure.
- Age < 6 months
- Weight < 8 kg
- If premature, corrected gestational age < 30 weeks
- Presence of hematochezia
- Responsible physician judges the child requires immediate intravenous rehydration
- English language is so limited that consent and/or follow-up is not possible.
- Non-Ontario resident [Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) follow-up data will not be available]
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The objective of this study is to clarify the current standard of care by determining if Electrolyte Maintenance Solution (EMS) is truly the optimal fluid to be used in low-risk children who present to an Emergency Department (ED) with < 72 hours of vomiting or diarrhea.
Read the detailed description
Gastroenteritis remains a major cause of morbidity amongst Canadian children. The primary treatment focus revolves around the use of Oral Rehydration Therapy (ORT) to treat dehydration and replace intravascular volume. Since diarrheal disease in Canadian children usually results in mild dehydration and minimal sodium losses, the use of low sodium Electrolyte Maintenance Solutions (EMS) has become the standard of care. However, given that North American children infrequently develop severe dehydration, it is unclear if the routine use of EMS is justified. When pediatricians directly dispense EMS, 16 children need to be treated to prevent 1 unscheduled office visit, however the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval is an astounding 508 patients. In addition, EMS is considered by some to be prohibitively expensive, with 15% of pediatricians believing it to be too expensive for their patients to purchase. An additional 40% report that taste is a major barrier to consumption. As a result, oral fluid replenishment is often underutilized and IV rehydration employed instead. Our goal is to provide evidence to guide the selection of the optimal ORT fluids in low-risk children, thus increasing its use, enhancing its success, and reducing the reliance on intravenous rehydration. We hypothesize that the strict adherence to EMS use in low-risk children may actually be counterproductive by resulting in reduced fluid intake and potentially increasing the use of intravenous rehydration.
- Conditions
- Gastroenteritis
- Being tested
- ½ strength apple juice, Pediatric Electrolyte
- Keywords
- Pediatrics, Gastroenteritis, Oral Rehydration, Electrolyte Maintenance Solution
- Medical subject headings
- Gastroenteritis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
½ strength apple juiceOther
For each episode of diarrhea 10 ml/kg of fluid will be given and for each episode of vomiting 2 ml/kg will be given. If the child does not like the solution another fluid can be used.
Pediatric ElectrolyteOther
Also called Oral Electrolyte Maintenance Solution
For each episode of diarrhea 10 ml/kg of fluid will be given and for each episode of vomiting 2 ml/kg will be given. If the child does not like the solution another electrolyte maintenance fluid can be used. Fluids containing non-physiological concentrations of glucose and electrolytes (carbonated drinks, sweetened fruit juices, water) will be discouraged.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Fluids as Tolerated (FAT) Group | Experimental | The FAT group will receive ½ strength apple juice and will form the experimental group in this study. Receives: Other: ½ strength apple juice |
| Electrolyte Maintenance Solution (EMS) | Active comparator | The EMS group will form the control group as solutions such as Pediatric Electrolyte® are routinely recommended for use in children with gastroenteritis. Receives: Other: Pediatric Electrolyte |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of children experiencing a treatment failure
This outcome will be deemed to have occurred if any of the following occur:
- Requires an unscheduled visit after the initial encounter
- Requires physician evaluation during a follow-up assessment.
- Hospitalization or Intravenous Rehydration
- Extended Symptomatology
- Failure to consume sufficient study fluid during the initial ED visit
Measured: Within 7 days of enrolment
Secondary outcomes (4)
Percent Weight Change
Measured: 72-84 hours after enrolment
Proportion of Subjects Receiving Intravenous Rehydration
Measured: 7 days
Proportion of Subjects Requiring Hospitalization
Measured: 7 days
Frequency of diarrhea and vomiting episodes
Measured: 7 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Aug 2010 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2010
- Primary completionMay 2015
- Study completionMay 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for GastroenteritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The Hospital for Sick ChildrenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 624 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Hospital for Sick Children
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Stephen Freedman, The Hospital for Sick Children
- Investigators
- Stephen Freedman, MD, Principal investigator, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto Canada
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01185054
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1000017642
- Status last verified
- Apr 2018
- First submitted
- 18 Aug 2010
- Last updated
- 17 Apr 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Freedman SB, Willan AR, Boutis K, Schuh S. Effect of Dilute Apple Juice and Preferred Fluids vs Electrolyte Maintenance Solution on Treatment Failure Among Children With Mild Gastroenteritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 May 10;315(18):1966-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5352.
PubMed 27131100
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Apr 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Is Electrolyte Maintenance Solution Required in Low-Risk Children With Gastroenteritis?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01185054
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1000017642
- Conditions
- Gastroenteritis
- Keywords
- Pediatrics, Gastroenteritis, Oral Rehydration, Electrolyte Maintenance Solution
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 624 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The Hospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2010
- Primary completion
- May 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Aug 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this study is to clarify the current standard of care by determining if Electrolyte Maintenance Solution (EMS) is truly the optimal fluid to be used in low-risk children who present to an Emergency Department (ED) with < 72 hours of vomiting or diarrhea.
Detailed description
Gastroenteritis remains a major cause of morbidity amongst Canadian children. The primary treatment focus revolves around the use of Oral Rehydration Therapy (ORT) to treat dehydration and replace intravascular volume. Since diarrheal disease in Canadian children usually results in mild dehydration and minimal sodium losses, the use of low sodium Electrolyte Maintenance Solutions (EMS) has become the standard of care. However, given that North American children infrequently develop severe dehydration, it is unclear if the routine use of EMS is justified. When pediatricians directly dispense EMS, 16 children need to be treated to prevent 1 unscheduled office visit, however the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval is an astounding 508 patients. In addition, EMS is considered by some to be prohibitively expensive, with 15% of pediatricians believing it to be too expensive for their patients to purchase. An additional 40% report that taste is a major barrier to consumption. As a result, oral fluid replenishment is often underutilized and IV rehydration employed instead. Our goal is to provide evidence to guide the selection of the optimal ORT fluids in low-risk children, thus increasing its use, enhancing its success, and reducing the reliance on intravenous rehydration. We hypothesize that the strict adherence to EMS use in low-risk children may actually be counterproductive by resulting in reduced fluid intake and potentially increasing the use of intravenous rehydration.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Fluids as Tolerated (FAT) Group | Experimental | Other: ½ strength apple juiceThe FAT group will receive ½ strength apple juice and will form the experimental group in this study. |
| Electrolyte Maintenance Solution (EMS) | Active comparator | Other: Pediatric ElectrolyteThe EMS group will form the control group as solutions such as Pediatric Electrolyte® are routinely recommended for use in children with gastroenteritis. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 to 60 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (14 listed)
- ≥3 episodes of vomiting or diarrhea in preceding 24 hours
- Duration of illness less than 96 hours
- Age 6 - 60 months
- Clinical suspicion of acute intestinal infectious process
- Weight ≥ 8 kg
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Known gastrointestinal diseases (ie. inflammatory bowel disease, celiac) or any other underlying disease process that might place the child at an increased risk of treatment failure.
- Age < 6 months
- Weight < 8 kg
- If premature, corrected gestational age < 30 weeks
- Presence of hematochezia
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ½ strength apple juiceFor each episode of diarrhea 10 ml/kg of fluid will be given and for each episode of vomiting 2 ml/kg will be given. If the child does not like the solution another fluid can be used. | Other | Fluids as Tolerated (FAT) Group |
| Pediatric ElectrolyteAlso: Oral Electrolyte Maintenance SolutionFor each episode of diarrhea 10 ml/kg of fluid will be given and for each episode of vomiting 2 ml/kg will be given. If the child does not like the solution another electrolyte maintenance fluid can be used. Fluids containing non-physiological concentrations of glucose and electrolytes (carbonated drinks, sweetened fruit juices, water) will be discouraged. | Other | Electrolyte Maintenance Solution (EMS) |
Primary outcome
Proportion of children experiencing a treatment failure
Time frame: Within 7 days of enrolment
This outcome will be deemed to have occurred if any of the following occur: * Requires an unscheduled visit after the initial encounter * Requires physician evaluation during a follow-up assessment. * Hospitalization or Intravenous Rehydration * Extended Symptomatology * Failure to consume sufficient study fluid during the initial ED visit
4 secondary outcomes
Percent Weight Change
Time frame: 72-84 hours after enrolment
Proportion of Subjects Receiving Intravenous Rehydration
Time frame: 7 days
Proportion of Subjects Requiring Hospitalization
Time frame: 7 days
Frequency of diarrhea and vomiting episodes
Time frame: 7 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Apr 2018.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27131100Freedman SB, Willan AR, Boutis K, Schuh S. Effect of Dilute Apple Juice and Preferred Fluids vs Electrolyte Maintenance Solution on Treatment Failure Among Children With Mild Gastroenteritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 May 10;315(18):1966-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5352.
Related trials for Gastroenteritis
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Investigate Efficacy and Safety of Brivekimig in Participants With Crohn's Disease
Crohn's Disease
RecruitingPhase 2
Aquamin® for Prevention of Ulcerative Colitis J-Pouch-associate Intestinal Inflammation
Ulcerative Colitis, Ileal Pouch
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Vedolizumab in Adult Participants With Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease
Crohn's Disease
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study on the Safety of TAK-279 and Whether it Can Reduce Inflammation in the Bowel of Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease
Crohn's Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
VE303 for Prevention of Recurrent Clostridioides Difficile Infection
Clostridium Difficile, Clostridium Difficile Infections
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Stephen Freedman, MD principal investigator
The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto Canada
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing ½ strength apple juice and Pediatric Electrolyte in people with Gastroenteritis, run by The Hospital for Sick Children at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 14 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Apr 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of children experiencing a treatment failure (time frame: Within 7 days of enrolment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01185054, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Apr 2018.