HepatectomyDPONCT01194843
Placebo-controlled Evaluation of Ropivacaine Efficacy by Local Infiltrations
A study testing Ropivacaine and Physiological serum in people with Hepatectomy and Pain, run by Centre Leon Berard at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and impact on morphine consumption of ropivacaine administered by local per and post hepatic surgery infiltration. Patients will be randomized to either ropivacaine or physiological serum, with equivalent administration modalities in both arms. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hepatectomy, Pain, Metastasis
- What is being tested?
- Ropivacaine and Physiological serum
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 85 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Mar 2009to Apr 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female patients aged ≥ 18 years
- Patients with histologically confirmed cancer
- Patients treated at the Centre Léon Bérard
- Patients requiring a surgery for hepatic metastases
- ASA <= 3
- At least 3 weeks between surgery and chemotherapy
Show all 13Show fewer
- Total bilirubin < 1.5 x upper limit of normal range
- ASAT and ALAT < 5 times x upper limit of normal range
- Creatinine clearance > 60 ml per hour
- Serum creatinine < 115 µmol/l
- Mandatory affiliation with a health insurance system
- Patients able to understand French
- Signed, written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Patients with a hepatocellular carcinoma or an initial liver cancer
- Patients treated chronically by morphine
- Patients that already have abdominal pain
- Patients who are allergic either to morphinics, local anesthesics, paracetamol, NSAID or cortisone
- Patients suffering from heart, kidney or liver insufficiency
- Documented history of cognitive or psychiatric disorders
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Difficult follow-up
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Double-blind Placebo-controlled Evaluation of Ropivacaine Efficacy by Local Per and Post Hepatectomy Infiltrations for Adult Pain Management
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and impact on morphine consumption of ropivacaine administered by local per and post hepatic surgery infiltration.
Patients will be randomized to either ropivacaine or physiological serum, with equivalent administration modalities in both arms.
Patients will be followed during 4 days after the surgery. They will also come back for a follow-up visit one month later.
It is necessary to enrol 100 patients. The estimated period of inclusion is 24 months.
This is a prospective, comparative, monocentric, double-blind randomized study.
- Conditions
- Hepatectomy, Pain, Metastasis
- Being tested
- Ropivacaine, Physiological serum
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Neoplasm Metastasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RopivacaineDrug
40 ml infiltration at the end of the hepatectomy and then continuous local infiltration of 8 ml per hour over the 4 days after the hepatectomy
Physiological serumDrug
40 ml infiltration at the end of the hepatectomy and then continuous local infiltration of 8 ml per hour over the 4 days after the hepatectomy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ropivacaine | Experimental | Ropivacaine administration by local per and post surgery infiltration Receives: Drug: Ropivacaine |
| Physiological serum | Active comparator | Administration of physiological serum by local per and post surgery infiltration Receives: Drug: Physiological serum |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Efficacy of ropivacaine versus physiological serum administered by local infiltration and impact on morphine consumption
Measured: In the 4 days following the hepatectomy
Secondary outcomes (5)
Efficacy of ropivacaine versus physiological serum administered by local infiltration and impact on daily morphine consumption
Measured: In the 4 days following the hepatectomy
Evaluation of patients' perception of post-surgery pain
Measured: In the 4 days following the hepatectomy
Immediate and late complications related to the perfusion, the medical device and other predictable side effects
Measured: In the 4 days following the hepatectomy and one month later
Patients' post-surgery rehabilitation
Measured: Between surgery and follow-up visit, one month later
Patients' satisfaction with the pain care
Measured: Four days after the hepatectomy
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Sep 2010 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2009
- Primary completionFeb 2014
- Study completionApr 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (16)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HepatectomyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Centre Leon BerardThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 85 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Leon Berard
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- AstraZeneca, Fondation Apicil
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Véronique Peres-Bachelot, MD, Principal investigator, Centre Leon Berard
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01194843
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DPO-Hepatectomy
- Other IDs
- ET2007-073, 2007-007968-19
- Acronym
- DPO
- Status last verified
- Jan 2014
- First submitted
- 2 Sep 2010
- Last updated
- 21 Apr 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Beaussier M, El'Ayoubi H, Schiffer E, Rollin M, Parc Y, Mazoit JX, Azizi L, Gervaz P, Rohr S, Biermann C, Lienhart A, Eledjam JJ. Continuous preperitoneal infusion of ropivacaine provides effective analgesia and accelerates recovery after colorectal surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Anesthesiology. 2007 Sep;107(3):461-8. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000278903.91986.19.
PubMed 17721249Bianconi M, Ferraro L, Ricci R, Zanoli G, Antonelli T, Giulia B, Guberti A, Massari L. The pharmacokinetics and efficacy of ropivacaine continuous wound instillation after spine fusion surgery. Anesth Analg. 2004 Jan;98(1):166-172. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000093310.47375.44.
PubMed 14693613Borromeo CJ, Stix MS, Lally A, Pomfret EA. Epidural catheter and increased prothrombin time after right lobe hepatectomy for living donor transplantation. Anesth Analg. 2000 Nov;91(5):1139-41. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200011000-00018.
PubMed 11049898Godier A, Babinet A, el Metaoua S, Fulgencio JP, Bonnet F. [A new cause of postoperative confusion syndrome: nefopam]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2002 Jun;21(6):538-9. doi: 10.1016/s0750-7658(02)00650-0. French.
PubMed 12134601Ho AM, Lee A, Karmakar MK, Samy W, Lai PB, Ho OA, Cho A. Hemostatic parameters after hepatectomy for cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2007 Jul-Aug;54(77):1494-8.
PubMed 17708283Jalan R, Williams R, Bernuau J. Paracetamol: are therapeutic doses entirely safe? Lancet. 2006 Dec 23;368(9554):2195-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69874-7. No abstract available.
PubMed 17189017Kwan AL. Epidural analgesia for patient undergoing hepatectomy. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2003 Apr;31(2):236-7. No abstract available.
PubMed 12712800Larson AM. Acetaminophen hepatotoxicity. Clin Liver Dis. 2007 Aug;11(3):525-48, vi. doi: 10.1016/j.cld.2007.06.006.
PubMed 17723918Liu SS, Richman JM, Thirlby RC, Wu CL. Efficacy of continuous wound catheters delivering local anesthetic for postoperative analgesia: a quantitative and qualitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Dec;203(6):914-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.08.007. Epub 2006 Oct 25. No abstract available.
PubMed 17116561Mazoit JX, Butscher K, Samii K. Morphine in postoperative patients: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of metabolites. Anesth Analg. 2007 Jul;105(1):70-8. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000265557.73688.32.
PubMed 17578959Murphy EJ. Acute pain management pharmacology for the patient with concurrent renal or hepatic disease. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2005 Jun;33(3):311-22. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0503300306.
PubMed 15973913Schumann R, Zabala L, Angelis M, Bonney I, Tighiouart H, Carr DB. Altered hematologic profiles following donor right hepatectomy and implications for perioperative analgesic management. Liver Transpl. 2004 Mar;10(3):363-8. doi: 10.1002/lt.20059.
PubMed 15004762Tsui SL, Yong BH, Ng KF, Yuen TS, Li CC, Chui KY. Delayed epidural catheter removal: the impact of postoperative coagulopathy. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2004 Oct;32(5):630-6. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0403200503.
PubMed 15535484Urwin SC, Smith HS. Fatal nefopam overdose. Br J Anaesth. 1999 Sep;83(3):501-2. doi: 10.1093/bja/83.3.501.
PubMed 10655934Villier C, Mallaret MP. Nefopam abuse. Ann Pharmacother. 2002 Oct;36(10):1564-6. doi: 10.1345/aph.1C017.
PubMed 12243607
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Apr 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Double-blind Placebo-controlled Evaluation of Ropivacaine Efficacy by Local Per and Post Hepatectomy Infiltrations for Adult Pain Management
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01194843
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DPO / DPO-Hepatectomy
- Conditions
- Hepatectomy, Pain, Metastasis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 85 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Leon BerardUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- AstraZeneca, Fondation Apicil
- Study start
- Mar 2009
- Primary completion
- Feb 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Sep 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and impact on morphine consumption of ropivacaine administered by local per and post hepatic surgery infiltration.
Patients will be randomized to either ropivacaine or physiological serum, with equivalent administration modalities in both arms.
Patients will be followed during 4 days after the surgery. They will also come back for a follow-up visit one month later.
It is necessary to enrol 100 patients. The estimated period of inclusion is 24 months.
This is a prospective, comparative, monocentric, double-blind randomized study.
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ropivacaine | Experimental | Drug: RopivacaineRopivacaine administration by local per and post surgery infiltration |
| Physiological serum | Active comparator | Drug: Physiological serumAdministration of physiological serum by local per and post surgery infiltration |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Male or female patients aged ≥ 18 years
- Patients with histologically confirmed cancer
- Patients treated at the Centre Léon Bérard
- Patients requiring a surgery for hepatic metastases
- ASA <= 3
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patients with a hepatocellular carcinoma or an initial liver cancer
- Patients treated chronically by morphine
- Patients that already have abdominal pain
- Patients who are allergic either to morphinics, local anesthesics, paracetamol, NSAID or cortisone
- Patients suffering from heart, kidney or liver insufficiency
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ropivacaine40 ml infiltration at the end of the hepatectomy and then continuous local infiltration of 8 ml per hour over the 4 days after the hepatectomy | Drug | Ropivacaine |
| Physiological serum40 ml infiltration at the end of the hepatectomy and then continuous local infiltration of 8 ml per hour over the 4 days after the hepatectomy | Drug | Physiological serum |
Primary outcome
Efficacy of ropivacaine versus physiological serum administered by local infiltration and impact on morphine consumption
Time frame: In the 4 days following the hepatectomy
5 secondary outcomes
Efficacy of ropivacaine versus physiological serum administered by local infiltration and impact on daily morphine consumption
Time frame: In the 4 days following the hepatectomy
Evaluation of patients' perception of post-surgery pain
Time frame: In the 4 days following the hepatectomy
Immediate and late complications related to the perfusion, the medical device and other predictable side effects
Time frame: In the 4 days following the hepatectomy and one month later
Patients' post-surgery rehabilitation
Time frame: Between surgery and follow-up visit, one month later
Patients' satisfaction with the pain care
Time frame: Four days after the hepatectomy
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Apr 2015.
- Background: PubMed 17721249Beaussier M, El'Ayoubi H, Schiffer E, Rollin M, Parc Y, Mazoit JX, Azizi L, Gervaz P, Rohr S, Biermann C, Lienhart A, Eledjam JJ. Continuous preperitoneal infusion of ropivacaine provides effective analgesia and accelerates recovery after colorectal surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Anesthesiology. 2007 Sep;107(3):461-8. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000278903.91986.19.
- Background: PubMed 14693613Bianconi M, Ferraro L, Ricci R, Zanoli G, Antonelli T, Giulia B, Guberti A, Massari L. The pharmacokinetics and efficacy of ropivacaine continuous wound instillation after spine fusion surgery. Anesth Analg. 2004 Jan;98(1):166-172. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000093310.47375.44.
- Background: PubMed 11049898Borromeo CJ, Stix MS, Lally A, Pomfret EA. Epidural catheter and increased prothrombin time after right lobe hepatectomy for living donor transplantation. Anesth Analg. 2000 Nov;91(5):1139-41. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200011000-00018.
- Background: PubMed 12134601Godier A, Babinet A, el Metaoua S, Fulgencio JP, Bonnet F. [A new cause of postoperative confusion syndrome: nefopam]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2002 Jun;21(6):538-9. doi: 10.1016/s0750-7658(02)00650-0. French.
- Background: PubMed 17708283Ho AM, Lee A, Karmakar MK, Samy W, Lai PB, Ho OA, Cho A. Hemostatic parameters after hepatectomy for cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2007 Jul-Aug;54(77):1494-8.
- Background: PubMed 17189017Jalan R, Williams R, Bernuau J. Paracetamol: are therapeutic doses entirely safe? Lancet. 2006 Dec 23;368(9554):2195-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69874-7. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 12712800Kwan AL. Epidural analgesia for patient undergoing hepatectomy. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2003 Apr;31(2):236-7. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 17723918Larson AM. Acetaminophen hepatotoxicity. Clin Liver Dis. 2007 Aug;11(3):525-48, vi. doi: 10.1016/j.cld.2007.06.006.
- Background: PubMed 17116561Liu SS, Richman JM, Thirlby RC, Wu CL. Efficacy of continuous wound catheters delivering local anesthetic for postoperative analgesia: a quantitative and qualitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Dec;203(6):914-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.08.007. Epub 2006 Oct 25. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 17578959Mazoit JX, Butscher K, Samii K. Morphine in postoperative patients: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of metabolites. Anesth Analg. 2007 Jul;105(1):70-8. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000265557.73688.32.
- Background: PubMed 15973913Murphy EJ. Acute pain management pharmacology for the patient with concurrent renal or hepatic disease. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2005 Jun;33(3):311-22. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0503300306.
- Background: PubMed 15004762Schumann R, Zabala L, Angelis M, Bonney I, Tighiouart H, Carr DB. Altered hematologic profiles following donor right hepatectomy and implications for perioperative analgesic management. Liver Transpl. 2004 Mar;10(3):363-8. doi: 10.1002/lt.20059.
Related trials for Hepatectomy
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
NIVO+IPI Neoadjuvant Therapy for Recurrent Resectable HCC
Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC), Recurrent Hepatocellular Cancer
Not yet recruiting
RAPID for Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases
Colorectal Liver Metastases (CRCLM), Colorectal Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 4
Remimazolam Versus Propofol for Maintenance of Anaesthesia During Major Hepatectomy Under Low Central Venous Pressure
Intraoperative Hypotension, Hepatectomy
Recruiting
Implementation of a Pain Management Plan in Major Open Abdominal Surgeries.
Abdomen Cancer, Pancreas Adenocarcinoma (MSI-H)
Recruiting
Novel Method to Assess Hepatic Regeneration and Predict Hepatic Related Morbidity After Partial Hepatectomy
Liver Cancer Adult, Liver Regeneration
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Véronique Peres-Bachelot, MD principal investigator
Centre Leon Berard
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Ropivacaine and Physiological serum in people with Hepatectomy and Pain, run by Centre Leon Berard at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Efficacy of ropivacaine versus physiological serum administered by local infiltration and impact on morphine consumption (time frame: In the 4 days following the hepatectomy). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01194843, which also lists 16 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Apr 2015.